Give Us Liberty

2012-02-01T18:09:00.001-08:00

Could A Contempt of Court in Georgia Lead to an Obama Impeachment?

Hard to believe that as American Citizens, we would see the day that our Commander-in-Chief would deliberately disregard the law.

One has to wonder if there are reasons beyond a simple disregard for the law.

More to the point, could there be reasons to not appear in a court case that is essentially, mute - meaning that plans might be underway and in progress that will cause the legal system to be, in effect - null and void.

Yes - We're talking about Martial Law.

Read Entire Article

2012-02-01T14:55:00.001-08:00

PLAINTIFF WELDEN’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BREAKING! JUST RECEIVED!!!

PLAINTIFF WELDEN’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT

AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Click here for a PDF of what Attorney Van Irion filed

with the OSAH February 1, 2012

Reminder: These are only PROPOSED findings of fact

and conclusions of law.

This has not yet been signed by the judge.

Please do not manufacture deceptive headlines

from this document!

ENHANCED AUDIO OF GEORGIA BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING JAN. 26, 2012

2012-02-01T13:54:00.001-08:00

YOU WILL BE PLEASED WITH THIS IMPROVED, ENHANCED AUDIO OF THE OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING IN ATLANTA, GA ON JANUARY 26, 2012. PLEASE TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND ALSO ANY OBOTS YOU MAY KNOW. HELP SPREAD THE WORD ABOUT THE FRAUD IN THE WHITE HOUSE. THIS EVENT WAS HISTORY IN THE MAKING!

PLEASE CONSIDER DONATING TO THE Article II Super PAC which made the Live Stream possible. The PAC spent in excess of $3,000 to make this happen and has other important projects pending intended to help spread the word about what it means to be a constitutional president.

You may donate at:

Article II Super Pac

You also can mail your payment made payable to Article II Super PAC to:

Article II Super PAC
PO BOX 940661
Simi Valley, CA. 93094

Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions such as the Georgia Ballot Challenge to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.

Please visit the site at www.Article2LegalDefenseFund.com and consider making a secure online donation.
Disclaimer: Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund are two separate legal entities with separate missions, separate banking accounts and separate mailing addresses. Neither entity assumes any legal liability for any litigation or consequences thereof, as we are not a Party to such actions.

Article II Super PAC does not make contributions to candidates.Art2SuperPAC may accept unlimited corporate contributions and unlimited individual contributions. Funds raised by Art2SuperPAC will only be used for independent expenditures. Contributions to Art2SuperPAC are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Contributions from foreign nationals and federal-government contractors are prohibited.

2012-02-01T13:23:00.001-08:00

WHY ARE WE STILL SUCH GULLIBLE FOOLS?

Posted by: Dean C. Haskins
dean@birthersummit.org
202.241.3648
Posted: February 1, 2012
© 2012 The Birther Summit
Download a PDF

He is a fool who rejects the facts simply because he does not like them.

Where the law concerning birth certificates from the State of Hawaii are concerned, it is certainly disheartening to see so many people within our movement play the part of utter dunderheads. Because we so want to believe that there is some legal maneuver that will grant an attorney license to walk into the Department of Health in Honolulu and inspect whatever may or may not exist pertaining to Barack Obama, we are easy prey for the deceptive legal claptrap of a narcissistic attorney, and the online sources that echo those snake-oil sales pitches.

The facts are really not all that hard to understand, but first, one must be willing to set aside his preconceived notions about what those facts are (the notions that have been used as an insidious ploy to raise money), and approach those facts honestly. Having previously tried to relay those facts, only for them to be ignored by some, please allow me to present them in a different way that might make them a bit easier for those who appear to be willfully ignorant.

1. Barack Obama has no legal authority to give access to any original documents possessed by the Department of Health in Hawaii.

The State of Hawaii is the owner of all Hawaiian records of vital statistics. The Hawaiian Department of Health is the keeper of those records. Barack Obama has no authority over that which he does not own. Once issued a “certified copy” of any such record, the recipient is free to do whatever he would like with THAT document, but that has no bearing upon any original document the certified copy represents, as that is owned by the state, and not by the person named on the document.

Furthermore, a photocopy of the certified copy being sent to a judge in Georgia does not produce a legally valid reason for inspection of an original possessed by Hawaii. At most, the Georgia judge could request to see the certified copy from which the photocopy was made. Legally, that would be the extent of the judge's authority.

2. State courts have no legal authority to give access to any original documents possessed by the Department of Health in Hawaii.

Hawaii law (H.R.S. 338-18) prohibits access to, or inspection of, any birth certificate to anyone who doesn't have a direct and tangible interest (generally, immediate family members). No subpoena or Motion to Produce from any other state regarding original documents possessed by Hawaii will ever be enforceable, as providing such would be against Hawaii law. No state court has the power or jurisdiction to force a Hawaiian court to do something that would be against Hawaii law.

3. A certified copy of a birth certificate is legally considered an original.

Article IV of the Constitution (the Full Faith & Credit Clause) requires every state to consider documents certified as valid from every other state to be valid. In regards to birth certificates, a certified copy (with raised seal) must be viewed as equal in authority and validity as the original.

So, what will you do with your newly acquired knowledge? Will you continue to allow yourself to be whipped into a mouth-breathing frenzy because some internet headline states that a judge has given a lawyer a “green light” to obtain legally protected documents in Hawaii? Or, will you stop and think about the validity of those headlines in light of the law?

Here's the equivalent of the so-called “green light” that Judge Malihi gave: imagine that you walk across the street from your house, and you ask that neighbor for permission to request that your next-door neighbor defy the law of gravity and levitate. Knowing that he has no authority to stop you from requesting something of your next-door neighbor (regardless of your next-door neighbor's ability to honor your request), I'm thinking his response would probably be, “Sure, go ahead.”

That's the extent of Judge Malihi's “green light.” He doesn't possess the legal authority to stop any such request from being made to the Superior Court. But, here's yet another accurate prediction: the Superior Court won't even try to “levitate,” as it will understand that there are laws that prevent such an action.

If everyone in our movement could at least act like he comprehends these very simple laws, we might actually make some progress toward resolution. As long as we continue to behave like moths drawn to a counterfeit light of deceptive lunacy, we will all be viewed as nutwhacks by association—and that's what the media continues to do by focusing on the “grifter element” of our cause. As much as we really want for those baseless headlines to be true, they are not; so, if you continue to fall for them, not only is it your fault (because you've now been shown the truth), you are ultimately helping to destroy the very movement you claim to support.

As much as we all might wish that someone could walk into the Department of Health and be given access to inspect whatever documents may exist there, it would plainly be against the law for the DOH to allow such access. How can we be a movement that proclaims to embrace the law, and demands that the law be upheld, and yet at the same time, support nonsensical efforts to thwart the law? Something is very wrong with that picture.

Not until we have a brilliant attorney who can construct an argument against the Department of Health in Hawaii that, somehow, would allow that access within the law, will that ever happen. So far, such an argument has not even remotely been made. And, it could be, there is possibly no such argument that could ever be made. For that answer, you'll have to ask someone other than an “unemployed musician” (LOL!). If I were a lawyer, and there were an “unemployed musician” who knew these laws better than I, I certainly wouldn't publicly call him an “unemployed musician.” But, that's just me. Whether we're called “bloggers” or “unemployed musicians” does not change who better understands these laws. You can take that to the bank!

The good news is, there ARE some legitimate actions underway—actions that are being cultivated within the constraints of the law. If you truly want to see us move forward in these eligibility issues, I strongly recommend that you focus on http://riseupforamerica.com/ and http://libertylegalfoundation.org/.

And, as always, Article2SuperPAC remains a resource committed to furthering our cause through education and underwriting. Visit them regularly at http://www.art2superpac.com/.

As you can probably imagine, my inbox continues to be slammed because of my recent articles. While the vast majority of what I receive is wholly supportive, there is still the occasional “not-so-supportive” message. Please be aware that, as I have previously stated, emails that simply attack me or praise incompetence, but do not address the actual facts, will not only be ignored, they will demonstrate the sender's unwillingness to learn the truth, and a lack of moral integrity by a support of, and association with, something that is ethically indefensible.

I will continue to share the truth the best I can. Just remember this: while the truth will inevitably set you free, it will likely piss you off first. Just do me a favor, get over your pissed-offedness and engage of few synapses to understand what the law really says, and how that law doesn't actually square with the seemingly endless deceptive tripe, before sending me any more emails.

###

If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at www.birthersummit.org or contact Dean Haskins at dean@birthersummit.org.

2012-02-01T13:19:00.003-08:00

Who Else Will Challenge Obama’s Eligibility,If Not Us?

Stand up and fight or we can lose this fight.
A grassroots internet effort is happening this week to blast fax each state’s Secretary of State with thousands of requests to take Barack Obama’s name off of their state’s presidential election ballot because he is not Constitutionally eligible to serve as our president.
Coming on the heels of the explosive eligibility hearing in the courtroom of Judge Michael Malihi,this citizens’ effort is being led by RightMarch.com.
RightMarch recognizes we have to take up our own cause to see that only eligible candidates get on our 2012 election ballots because clearly,an omerta or code of silence is preventing our Congress state legislators or our Supreme Court from looking into this matter.
Long ago we realized we could no longer depend on our country’s media to provide us with the information we need in this matter. Even a blackout of news on Obama’s eligibility exists on talk radio. Have you heard much about the Georgia case on your favorite show?
With a decision expected this week from Judge Maliki,inside information is hinting on a default judgment due to the fact that both Barack Obama and his attorney Michael Jablonski simply ignored a direct court order to appear and testify in front of citizen plaintiffs.
The sample fax which you can copy or pay a small amount to have sent for you says to your elected Secretary of State: “Jurisdiction falls squarely on your shoulders as head of the State’s office that conducts elections,and it is your sworn duty as a person of honor and a public servant to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution.”
The primary obstacle to Obama’s eligibility is the “natural born citizen” requirement in Article II,Section 1,Clause 5 which states both parents must be born in our country. This removes all of the drama surrounding the authenticity questions of Obama’s birth certificate,because he has stated in his own words that his father was born in Kenya,a protectorate of Great Britain at the time of his birth.
Another troubling sidebar is surfacing as evidence which was reportedly admitted in the Georgia hearing concerned the TWO DIFFERING Democrat National Committee Certificates of Candidate Eligibility (CCE) statements which were signed and sent up to the Congress by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.
If Pelosi’s CCE saying,“certified to be eligible per the constitutional requirements” was only sent up to the state of Hawaii and not to all of our other 49 states,then this is just another legal nail in the coffin of Barack Obama’s presidential candidacy eligibility!
A strong grassroots citizens’ effort will impress our state officials that we only are governed by the U.S. Constitution,and not by their political correctness!

2012-02-01T13:04:00.001-08:00

2012-02-01T11:50:00.000-08:00

Gallup state numbers predict huge Obama loss

byConn Carroll Senior Editorial Writer

Gallup released their annual state-by-state presidential approval numbers yesterday, and the results should have 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue very worried. If President Obama carries only those states where he had a net positive approval rating in 2011 (e.g. Michigan where he is up 48 percent to 44 percent), Obama would lose the 2012 election to the Republican nominee 323 electoral votes to 215.
Gallup adds:

Overall, Obama averaged 44% job approval in his third year in office, down from 47% in his second year. His approval rating declined from 2010 to 2011 in most states, with Wyoming, Connecticut, and Maine showing a marginal increase, and Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Minnesota, New Jersey, Arizona, West Virginia, Michigan, and Georgia showing declines of less than a full percentage point. The greatest declines were in Hawaii, South Dakota, Nebraska, and New Mexico.

PART 1 of 3

2012-02-01T10:13:00.001-08:00

Obama: The Illegitimate President with Dr. Jerome Corsi

Prisonplanet.com
Wednesday, February 1, 2012
Alex talks with best selling author Jerome Corsi about a summon issued by a Georgia judge ordering Obama to appear before the court in a lawsuit challenging his eligibility and presence on the March presidential ballot. Obama did not appear and his lawyers said he would ignore the subpoena and not participate in the legal proceedings. Corsi and Alex also talk about the rapidly escalating situation in Iran and the Persian Gulf. Jerome Corsi is the author of The Obama Nation and Unfit for Command.

PART 2 of 3

2012-02-01T10:12:00.001-08:00

PART 3 of 3

2012-02-01T10:11:00.001-08:00

From the Blogosphere...

2012-02-01T08:58:00.001-08:00

How much longer does Obama think he can get away with his fraud? Simply amazing what one judge with a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, can do.

Obama, the screws are tightening around you. Your dictatorial reign of usurped power will be coming to an end. What's more, is the fact that you could not have possibly done this alone. This is tantamount to a conspiracy to exercise a willingness on your part and those who've aided and abetted you to defraud the American public as to your eligibility to be POTUS. Therefore, many others were in on it. They would be the DNC, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, the MSM, members of your cabinet, Joe Biden, and I suspect if it were ever to be presented in a court of law, quite a few members of the Democrat Party and some in the Republican Party.

We also will be looking forward to Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse report due out soon. When all is said and done, I believe this will represent the biggest fraud and conspiracy ever to be perpetrated on the American people. This will constitute a Constitutional crises of mega proportions. If this crises goes all the way to the courts, the numbers of co-conspirators is legion. The way this is turning out, it looks like it could take many, many months or even years to fully adjudicate. Might even have to build a new prison (wait a minute, those FEMA Detention Centers would work just fine for all you co-conspirators to be jailed in).

The progressives in our country have been working for a long, long time to realize their dream of a Socialistic America. It seems to me that Senator Joe McCarthy (House Committee on Un-American Activities fame) was right! There were and are many Communists, Socialists, progressives and Fascists here in our country who have managed to infiltrate our govt. They have managed to implement policies detrimental to an effective, Constitutional Republic. They have been working overtime in their efforts to undermine our Republic. The biggest mistake they made was in the election of one Barack Hussein Obama. They've overplayed their hand. They became all worked up with their perceived power and rule over us, the little people. They've in fact, become so enamored with their strategy of total usurpation of power and fraud over America, that they are now basically flaunting it in our faces now. What with all the cameras and spying going on by our own govt on us, the people, our own govt's dereliction of duty to their oath of office to NOT defend our borders, the implementation of a police state, and the most egregious of all, the passing and signing into law be an unqualified POTUS, the NDAA!

You've basically come out of the closet, given your middle finger to America and have treated the American people as the enemy. You've dishonor your oath of office, you've already proven to the American people the many lies you've committed. You and Pelosi we're supposed to have the most 'transparent administration ever' remember, Obama?

People everywhere should be signing the praises of Judge Malihi's and Sheriff Arpaio's efforts to right America's ship and get it sailing again on the right course. Thank you judge and sheriff for upholding and honoring your oaths of office. God Bless You and thank you for helping to get our Republic back.

2012-02-01T08:09:00.001-08:00

2012-02-01T06:48:00.001-08:00

Obama Primary Ballot Access Challenge Hearing in Illinois Scheduled for February 2nd, 2012

Illinois Board of Elections to hear Obama Eligibility Cases Feb. 2Obama Ballot Challenge PUBLIC NOTICESTATE BOARD OF ELECTIONSandSTATE OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD MEETING The Illinois State Board of Elections...

Disingenuous HANNITY: I don’t believe that. I don’t think that’s going to work.

2012-02-01T05:15:00.000-08:00

WorldNetDaily’s Farah: Rubio ineligible for VP slot, not a ‘natural-born citizen’ [VIDEO]

Tonight on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Joseph Farah alleged that Florida senator Marco Rubio is ineligible to serve as vice president, saying he’s “not a natural-born citizen. We’ve been through this with Obama now for four years.”
Farah, the editor of WorldNetDaily.com, drove much of the controversy over President Barack Obama‘s birth certificate, claiming the president also was ineligible to serve because of where he was born.
He speculated that former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum hasn’t been more aggressive in taking on Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney because he is angling to be Romney’s running mate.
“I think Santorum is doing one of two things,” Farah said. “He is either trying to position himself as, ‘Hey, there is no mud on me and I’m a bona fide conservative’ and that is going to propel him in the race. Or, the other thing that crossed my mind — he was really talking about Newt criticizing Romney — the thought occurred to me, is he trying to position for a vice presidential candidacy there?”
Host Sean Hannity said Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is more likely to share the ticket if Romney wins the GOP nomination. But Farah declared that Rubio would not be eligible.

HANNITY: I think that’s taken. It’s got to be Rubio. That’s my guess.
BOB BECKEL: If it’s not, somebody’s lost their mind.
FARAH: Rubio is not eligible.
HANNITY: Whoa, what do you mean, ‘Rubio’s not –
FARAH: He’ll lose 10 percent of the Republican vote because he is not a natural-born citizen. We’ve been through this with Obama now for four years.
HANNITY: I don’t believe that. I don’t think that’s going to work.

2012-02-01T05:12:00.001-08:00

Is “Fast and Furious” Beginning to Crack Wide Open? »

ERIC HOLDER TO TESTIFY ON FEB. 2 by Sharon Rondeau (Feb. 1, 2012) — Putative Attorney General Eric Holder is scheduled to present testimony...

Feb 1 2012 Read More »

2012-01-31T19:48:00.000-08:00

Democratic Congressional Candidate Removed from Ballot for Being Constitutionally Ineligible

House candidate not eligible to serve, records show

Russell Lissau @ Daily Herald

A suburban Democratic candidate for Congress is ineligible to hold that office because he hasn't been a U.S. citizen long enough, records show.

Aloys Rutagwibira, 53, of Hainesville, is a native of Rwanda who became a naturalized American citizen on July 6, 2006, according to voter registration records acquired by the Daily Herald.

Congressional service requires seven years of citizenship. Rutagwibira won't be eligible until July 2013.

Rutagwibira is one of five candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for the 10th District seat now held by Republican Bob Dold.

Rutagwibira has not returned multiple telephone calls requesting interviews. He also failed to attend a scheduled candidate interview session Tuesday at the Daily Herald office in Libertyville.

When asked via email about his citizenship, Rutagwibira refused to confirm the date he took the citizenship oath.

He also expressed offense that the Daily Herald discovered the discrepancy during a search of public records rather than by first asking him. MORE HERE: http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120131/news/701319649

U.S. House of Reps candidate removed from ballot.

He is not constitutionally eligible to serve, records show

Commander Charles Kerchner(Ret.)

Read the full report here: http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120131/news/701319649

Well, they are enforcing Article I Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution as to who can serve as a U.S. Representative, when are they going to start enforcing Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution as to who can serve as the President and Commander in Chief instead of giving the current usurper resident of the White House a pass. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father was a foreign national who was never a U.S. citizen and thus Obama is clearly not eligible to be the President. MORE HERE: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/u-s-house-of-reps-candidate-removed-from-ballot

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

2012-01-31T16:01:00.001-08:00

The Lights are on…But for How Long?

SITE STILL ON SHARED HOSTING ACCOUNT SHUT DOWN TWICE IN ONE WEEK…FOR MORE THAN FIVE DAYS

by Sharon Rondeau
(Jan. 31, 2012) — 4:32 p.m. ET – It’s been a long five, almost six days.

As Arlen Williams generously posted here and here during The Post & Email’s inadvertent downtime, on January 20, our host, GoDaddy LLC, claimed that our site created a problem for other websites by utilizing too much space and shut it down after we hired someone to troubleshoot it. We were not advised of the problem until the following morning. On Thursday, January 26, just after publishing our account of the hearings in Atlanta on Obama’s eligibility, the site was shut down again without warning, purportedly for generating a “query” which caused a “runaway code” resulting in the same risk to other sites. GoDaddy had informed us that its policy is that the site owner is not given advance warning of an impending shutdown.

We are not convinced that the overloads were not caused by hackers or other ill-wishers to the dissemination of the truth.

When we purchased the hosting plan in late September 2010, we were given unlimited bandwidth and assured that the server was adequate to our needs. We know our readership has grown exponentially since that time and certainly wished no harm to come to other sites on the server.

Our second website developer called today to inform us that he was able to bring up the site, but it is still on the shared server rather than the dedicated server which we purchased in good faith to avoid over-capacity problems in the future. For the last five days, we have paid for two hosting packages and been unable to utilize either one.

The website professional still had unanswered questions which were expressed to an executive assistant earlier today in a conference call, and within the last five minutes, it appears that GoDaddy responded to them as requested. However, the message concluded with the following:

I noticed that your website is producing an error at this time. Please let us know if you need further assistance from us regarding this migration or getting your setup completed.. We are happy to assist you.

Please contact us if you have any further issues.

Regards,

Who knows what that means? Are they referring to the old hosting account, where The Post & Email currently resides and is an apparent risk to other websites, or the new hosting account, where The Post & Email was supposed to go and for which we paid almost $800?

The website developer has told us that we are “OK for now,” but that the site will go down again after a technical change takes effect.

The Post & Email wishes to formally thank Arlen Williams of Gulag Bound for his gracious posting of our work during our absence from the web. Last evening, Sharon Meroni of Patriots Heart Network also posted our update, and ObamaBallotChallenge wrote an article in response to our latest update which was published this morning. If we have neglected to thank anyone else who posted our work, it is because we are unaware of it.

We would also like to thank everyone who has donated to our emergency fundraiser to cover the unexpected expenses of the “move.” We have learned that maintaining a prominent place on the web is not an inexpensive business and have raised just over $700 of our $1,500 goal.

My office is in a state of chaos from the last five days, so it’s back to work on the breaking news of the day…for as long as it lasts this time around.

2012-01-31T15:57:00.001-08:00

Obama’s Contempt for the Rule of Law

By Gina Miller On 31 Jan, 2012

Listen to the author read this article

The so-called “mainstream” media are despicable. The government propaganda news reporters of the past in places like Soviet Russia and their modern contemporaries do not hold a candle to the current communist Democrat mouthpiece news “reporters” here in America in their ability to lie to the people. Those of us who have watched the sickeningly fawning, fiercely biased reporting on Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) since before the 2008 presidential election know exactly what I mean. Reporters for the media establishment would not report the truth about Obama even on pain of death.

So it comes as no surprise that the most spiked (unreported) story of the past several weeks is that of three legal complaints against Obama in the State of Georgia that demand he prove his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President, and thus, his ability to legally be on the ballot in Georgia. This story has not been covered by the mainstream media, except in rare isolated instances of vitriolic presentation. Have you seen it on your local evening news? Have you read it in your local bird cage liner newspaper? Nope and nope.

This story is huge, yet the Obot media, in lockstep with the sinister character in the White House, refuse to report on it. In the event you are unaware of this story, the bottom line is that finally after more than three years’ worth of legal challenges, one judge has been willing to allow the case against Obama to proceed on its merits. At last, we find a judge who appears to respect the Constitution. That judge is Michael M. Malihi of the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings.

Judge Malihi rejected the Obama team’s demand that he dismiss a subpoena requiring Obama to appear in court in Altanta to prove his eligibility. The judge refused. Then, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, tried to go around Judge Malihi’s court and sent a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp demanding that he abolish the court case and announcing that neither Obama nor his counsel would attend (“contempt of court” anyone?). To his credit Secretary Kemp basically told team Obama to put it in their pipe and smoke it.

So the hearings were held last Thursday sans Team Obama. Arguments were heard which include that Obama is not a natural born citizen—as required by the Constitution—because his supposed father was not a U.S. citizen and that Obama possibly possesses a fraudulent Social Security number. The judge has yet to issue a ruling.

He could have issued a default ruling against Obama, but as WND’s Bob Unruh reported last Friday,

“Attorneys who argued in a Georgia court this week that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president say Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi considered granting a default judgment before they even argued the case.
That presumably could have recommended that Obama failed to prove his eligibility and therefore should not be on the 2012 ballot, since he and his lawyer snubbed the hearing, for which Obama was subpoenaed.
But the attorneys argued against such an easy victory on the point of the single hearing, expressing instead their desire to get the evidence concerning Obama’s eligibility or lack of it in the record, so that it would be there should the case elevate to an appellate level.
The attorneys also said the strategy decision by Obama to simply ignore the subpoena and the hearing may ultimately backfire, because judges typically aren’t pleased to listen to arguments from someone who wants to introduce evidence during an appeal.”

The fact that Obama did not show when subpoenaed further illustrates his complete contempt for the rule of law in America. He has repeatedly violated the United States Constitution with non-recess recess appointments, taking over private sector car companies, signing the takeover of the health care industry and mandating that all Americans buy health insurance, running guns into the hands of enemies of America in the Mexican drug cartels, bypassing Congress to enact his will, etc.

As I have said before, Obama is behaving as a dictator, and someone needs to hold him accountable. I am not holding my breath for anyone to arrest him for contempt of court, but someone most certainly should. Despite what he seems to believe, he is not above the law; however, if no one is willing to hold him accountable to the law, by default he is above it. This is a terrible place in which we find our nation—with an utterly lawless man in the office of President.

Besides Orly Taitz and Mark Hatfield, another attorney who argued against Obama before Judge Malihi last Thursday was Van Irion, co-founder of the Liberty Legal Foundation. He had some serious observations about Obama’s disregard for the authority of the court, and in part, he wrote,

“One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: ‘Nixon Resigns!’ President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.
Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.
The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.”

Yes, indeed.

There is most certainly contempt in every aspect of Obama’s being. He displays contempt for our nation, our military, our freedoms, our Constitution and rule of law, all while insulting our intelligence with his interminable lying. We will have to wait to see what Judge Malihi decides. I have no word on when he may issue his ruling, but it is said to be soon. I pray—and patriots throughout our nation pray—that he makes the right decision.

It is far past time for someone to hold this lawless criminal in the White House accountable. Yes, I said criminal! If you consider that to be too strong of a word to describe the behavior of Barack Obama, then you are simply uninformed or of like mind with him. The time for mincing words and playing polite with this communist Democrat regime is over—actually, the time for it never was. Now, more than ever, we must tell it like it is with this administration and shout it from the rooftops.

When you consider polling (if you believe any of the polls) that indicates about fifty percent of Americans support Obama for reelection, then you know how much trouble we are in. If after three years of Obama’s outrageous behavior in office, we see that many Americans are still truly so clueless, it is only a matter of a very short time before the commie zombies will completely rule over us. We must fight to educate and inform the voter zombies where we find them, and hope they will listen. Otherwise, it may soon be too late.

Attorney Van Irion Interview 1/26/12 Atlanta, Georgia

2012-01-31T14:18:00.000-08:00

Please consider making a secure online donation to Article2SuperPAC by credit card or check by clicking here.

2012-01-31T11:01:00.001-08:00

MORE FROM obamaballotchallenge

You may not have heard much about:

Attorney Mark Hatfield (Representing Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_kAnzbxbbFQ
http://riseupforamerica.com/attymarkhatfieldtalks.html

Attorney Van Irion (representing David Welden) was a guest of David Oxley on Radio Sandy Springs
The response to yesterday’s show on the Georgia Eligibility Case was very good.

Here is the direct link to our podcast for you or to pass on if you’d like: http://radiosandysprings.com/podcasts/TLAFJan30.2012.mp3

This is so important and in my opinion Brian Kemp the Sec of State has no choice but to omit or disallow Obama’s name on the ballots.

Thanks,

David Oxley

Van Irion’s organization: http://libertyleaglfoundation.org

Both of these attorneys are pushing the natural born Citizenship aspect. Orly Taitz is more on the identity fraud/document forgery side, emphasizing that not only is he not NBC, but may not be any kind of a citizen and might not even be “Barack Obama. She also brings up NBC. Both approaches are useful.

2012-01-31T09:12:00.001-08:00

How Obama’s Eligibility Fiasco Poses Trouble For Dems

If Georgia’s Secretary of State says Obama is off the ballot,it will set in motion a scary domino effect that will devastate down ballot Democrats.
It’s doubtful that the media will explain what is likely to happen if there is a blank space at the top of the Democrat slate in Georgia next November,but here’s a likely scenario.
The results the latest IBD/TIPP survey hold nothing but bad news for Obama and his Democrats. Almost 2 /3 of the respondents agreed that we are preparing for the most important election since 1860. Even in the absence of hard evidence,can there be any doubt that those who are disinterested and feel no sense of urgency about this election probably have very little connection to our America except as a place to demand from to pay for their America?
“Voter Interest” in this election can rightly be used interchangeably with “voter intensity”,which in turn translates to “voter enthusiasm” to vote.
Last March,Republican enthusiasm was 5 points higher than Democrat enthusiasm,but that difference had grown to a 21 point edge in an October CNN survey.
CNN found that 64% of Republicans are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting in November which was up 3 points from June. Democrats by contrast had just a 43% enthusiasm level as they looked forward to voting in November.
These kinds of numbers are the stuff of titanic defeats for Democrats.
A 2010 enthusiasm edge of 19 points at 63/44 for Republicans gave them pickups of 680 state level legislative seats and 64 Congressional seats.
Today’s IBD/TIPP survey shows that Republicans are 26 points more enthusiastic than Democrats with no telling how far the gap will grow. Clearly getting rank and file Democrats out to vote for Barack Obama or anyone other Democrat will be an uphill battle.
Very dangerous territory for Democrats
A December Gallup mega survey of 5000 voters in 12 swing states revealed non-white enthusiasm was 32%. Compared to 2008 when 65% of blacks voted 97% for Obama,this is a stunning number.
If black enthusiasm to vote is already less than half 2008 levels, one has to wonder how many blacks will turn out to vote for ANY Democrat without Obama at the top of their ticket.
If the Obama Citizenship cases in other states are successful,it will be a disaster for down ballot Democrats like never before.

Improved sound...

2012-01-31T04:27:00.000-08:00

MEDIA BLACK-OUT ON OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY HEARING... Deliberately Hiding That Obama Isn't Really President... Georgia Ineligibility Hearing Videos: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4

2012-01-31T04:20:00.001-08:00

Web host shuts down site twice, promises to migrate,
then leaves customer in the lurch

By Sharon Rondeau
The Post & Email (site is under maintenance at time of publishing)
(Jan. 30, 2012) – Due to high traffic on both January 20 and 26 after Atty. Orly Taitz announced breaking news regarding the Georgia ballot challenges, The Post & Email’s web host, GoDaddy LLC, shut the site down without warning.
We worked quickly to hire a website developer to optimize the site and restore the twice-daily news alerts which had stopped working. He began work almost right away and was about to start the optimization process when GoDaddy shut the site down for the second time.
Although both the website developer and I contacted GoDaddy immediately and explained the steps we were taking to correct any overages, GoDaddy refused to turn the site back on. It made no difference that tens of thousands of readers were depending on the newspaper to report accurately, quickly, and in detail the breaking news of the day, which is vital in these days of the Obama regime.
On January 26, we prepaid $800 for a new hosting plan on a dedicated server to resolve the issue. We had already paid the website developer more than $200 to do his work. In a three-way conference call, GoDaddy told us that it would take up to 72 hours to prepare the server and that they would migrate the site content from the old server to the new. However, on the third day, they changed their story and said it was the website developer’s job to migrate the content.
He attempted to do so and after three hours stated that he was unfamiliar with their server, deferring to GoDaddy to do it. GoDaddy then put The Post & Email at the end of another 72-hour queue. I asked to speak with a supervisor and did so, but nothing changed. Later on January 29, the word from GoDaddy was that the migration had not even been started yet.
I am spending the last of The Post & Email’s funds to attempt to get the site up and running again. I may have to hire a specialist after the migration is done, as I had to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that problems with connections might be encountered. Having to pay another professional will most likely deplete the small amount of cash we have left.
Your editor has been working without pay for many months to bring you the news, complete with personal interviews, court documents, inside investigations, and detailed follow-up. However, even though we have tens of thousands of readers each month, only a relatively few actually support the paper. If we cannot get past this hurdle, The Post & Email will close, which is exactly what our enemies want.
GoDaddy can be reached at 480-505-8877, and the corporate office phone number is 480-505-8800. A detailed letter has been mailed to Bob Parsons, CEO, and a message left with one of his corporate staff this morning. I have pledged to withhold the contents of the letter from publication until after Parsons has had a chance to respond and act upon it.
If you wish to see The Post & Email return and grow, please send money via Paypal to payments@thepostemail.com.
Or send checks to:
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076
We need approximately $1,500 to overcome this obstacle. Can that be raised from a monthly readership of possibly 200,000?
Thank you for your support.
Sharon Rondeau, Editor

Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

2012-01-30T20:13:00.001-08:00

Obama Attorney Knows Eligibility Hearing Was Disaster For The President

Though we’ll not know the outcome of the Georgia hearing regarding ballot eligibility for the nation’s number 1 undocumented worker until the first part of February,Barack Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid,shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.
One day prior to the scheduled hearing before Administrative Judge Michael Malihi,Obama attorney Michael Jablonski addressed both a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp AND an email,directed to the Secretary via one of the court’s hearing officers,asking Kemp to cancel the hearing.
Georgia law allows “any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” to file an objection to that candidate’s inclusion on the State ballot. (1)

Such objection filings go to the Secretary of State who makes a determination to either overrule or pass them along to the State Administrative Court for disposition. Michael Malihi was the Administrative Judge to whom a number of these objections were directed by the Secretary and he found them worthy of pursuing in court.

The dozens of similar suits questioning Obama’s eligibility,filed in other venues around the nation were dismissed because the plaintiffs “lacked standing”—that is,were unable to prove direct,personal damage if Obama were to be permitted to remain in or run again for the office he holds.
But Georgia law trumped that defense,throwing Obama and Jablonski into uncharted waters. And forced to follow the new tack of actually having to lawfully and properly PROVE Obama’s eligibility,in the weeks since the original filing,Jablonski had pretty much emptied his quiver on behalf of the acting president.
On January 3^rd his motion for an outright dismissal of the lawsuits was denied by Judge Malihi. And on Friday the 20^th,his motion to quash subpoenas demanding the presence of Obama in the courtroom along with original copies of his Hawaii birth certificate and all Social Security information was denied as well.
But what degree of audacity,arrogance,hutzpah and perhaps downright panic does it require to demand that the Georgia Secretary of State cancel arguably the most anticipated hearing in state history less than 24 hours before its scheduled start? Never mind that it was Secretary Kemp who believed the suits had enough merit to be explored in the first place!
Jablonski’s letter alternately reads like a threat,a whine and a prayer as he misstates Georgia statute,belittles Judge Malihi,refers to irrelevant previous findings and ultimately states that because he and his revered client are not receiving the absolute acquiescence they so richly deserve at the hands of these minor Georgia officials,they will take their marbles and go home.
Indeed,so much in a dither was the mighty mouthpiece,he actually winds up his petulant epistle by telling Secretary Kemp that he doesn’t have the legal right to inconvenience the president in the first place! “…No law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot,” writes Jablonski. “…The attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.” (2)
It is not difficult to imagine Jablonski writing these words as he wags a finger in Kemp’s face while threatening to hold his breath until he turns blue!
In his written reply to Jablonski,Kemp briefly corrects the attorney’s incorrect reading of Georgia statute while issuing a friendly though unmistakably direct warning:“…if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.” (3)
Obama supporters and other useful idiots around the country are laughing at what they consider the efforts of a backward,Southern state to capture the national spotlight for its 15 minute allowance of fame.
But rest assured that Michael Jablonski does NOT see the humor! And Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

To read more use these links:
(1)     http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
(2)     https://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/jablonski-letter-to-secretary-of-state-kemp/
(3)     http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4122

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

2012-01-30T20:12:00.000-08:00

What Witnesses Testified To At Obama’s Georgia Citizenship Hearing

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” Private Investigator Susan Daniels told Judge Michael Malihi under oath,as she reviewed her research into Barack Obama’s social security numbers investigation!
Her analysis centered on a Connecticut resident “born in 1890″ whose official registration somehow is mixed in with the Obama social security investigation. Testimony at the court hearing of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot for reelection in 2012 revealed stunning sworn facts that clearly places into question the sitting president’s authenticity.
In an interview after the administrative hearing,Daniels said,“I discovered immediately. . .( that social security number) was fraudulent. . .was.. no way it was accurate.” The live internet video stream suddenly went black when she said,“He’s using a . . . “ While I was able to glean some startling testimony,other witness responses to Attorney Orly Taitz’s questioning seemed garbled and had certain interruptions at key moments of the proceedings.
A remarkable source determined to bring the truth to the American people,namely htt://art2superpac.com,should allow you to view the hearing if it somehow can still stay up.
Attorney Taitz’s first witness keyed in on the non-natural born citizen status of Barack Obama senior,a fact clearly stated by his son’s own words admitting his father was born in Kenya,a protectorate of Great Britain at the time of our sitting President’s birth. Another forensic witness stated under oath that “1-the serial number is out of sequence 2-the (Nordyke) twins born after (Obama). . .their serial numbers are lower. . (you) would expect them to be higher. . .a certifying paragraph is different. . .the name of the registrar is different. . .(you) would expect the same (name) since they (twins and Obama) were born within 24 hours” of one another! The forensic expert said,“There is credible evidence to warrant further investigation!” Another computer scanner expert went through lengthy analysis of a soft wear creation of the birth certificate released last April as compared to a document simply scanned from the original.
African American Pastor James David Manning is calling out officialdom for keeping the American people in the dark about this never before hearing of a sitting U.S. president’s eligibility challenge. “This is a big story,” he says on his web video. Pastor Manning says our media outlets,our Republican candidates,the Supreme Court,all members of Congress are involved in a “Conspiracy” (his words) to hide from us what is really going on.
Dr. Jerome R. Corsi,author of several Barack Obama books,says Judge Malihi’s witnesses show “Barack Obama is slam-dunk-disqualified” to appear on the Georgia official 2012 ballot. For him and his attorneys to not attend this official hearing was stunning.
Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.” One commenter said,“I demand to know if my president is legal or not,no fooling around.” Perhaps the biggest news story of our country’s recent history is under blackout in an omerta or code of silence unprecedented in journalism.

To read more use these links:
http://art2superpac.com
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified
http://atlah.org/2012/01/24/judge-orders-obama-to-court-media-conspiracy

2012-01-30T20:07:00.000-08:00

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

by Bob Unruh

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.

But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.

The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.

READ MORE:

OBOTS AT WORK...

2012-01-30T16:50:00.001-08:00

Arpaio's Phoenix offices temporarily evacuated

PHOENIX (AP) — The downtown Phoenix offices of Sheriff Joe Arpaio were temporarily evacuated Monday morning because of a suspicious envelope addressed to the sheriff containing a white, powdery substance.

A spokesman refused to release details to the The Associated Press until an afternoon news conference.

The Arizona Republic (http://bit.ly/yp8VBf ) reports the envelope was opened on the 19th floor of the Wells Fargo building where the sheriff's office has its headquarters. The unknown substance was found inside the envelope.

A Phoenix Fire Department hazardous materials crew responded.

The crew removed the envelope, and people working in the area were allowed to return.

Officials were still investigating. No injuries were reported.

___

Information from: The Arizona Republic, http://www.azcentral.com

2012-01-30T16:08:00.001-08:00

Attorney Leo Donofrio: The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed

The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed

Attorney Leo Donofrio

I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.

Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:

Clause A = “Only a natural born Citizen may be President.”

Clause B = “Anyone born in the United States is a Citizen.”

(While these two clauses reflect Article 2, Section 1, and the 14th Amendment, I shall refer to them as “Clause A” and “Clause B” for now.)

The code of statutory construction is learned by every student in law school, and every practicing attorney has confronted it. Every judge is required to apply the rule equally to all statutes, and the Constitution. There is no wiggle room at all. The rule states that when a court examines two clauses, unless Congress has made it clear that one clause repeals the other, the court must observe a separate legal effect for each. More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific.

Clause B is a general rule of citizenship, which states that all persons born in the country are members of the nation.

Clause A is a specific clause that says only those members of the nation who are “natural born” may be President.

According to the rule of statutory construction, the court must determine that Clause A requires something more than Clause B.
READ MORE...

2012-01-30T14:06:00.001-08:00

How's that Hopey Changey doin' for ya'?...

2012-01-30T11:17:00.000-08:00

Here’s recap of Hope and Change since President Obama took office in Jan 2009. Comparing economic indicators starting in Jan 2009 to present day:
1. Federal debt has increased by 43% from $10.6 trillion to $15 trillion.
2. Americans living in poverty have increased by 16% from 39.8 million to 46.2 million.
3. Total unemployment (U6) has increased by 68% from 13.7 million to 23 million.
4. Price of gasoline has increased by 80% from $1.86/gal to $3.35/gal.
5. Americans on food stamps have increased 42% from 31.8 million to 45.2 million.
6. Home foreclosures per year have increased by 34% from 850,000 to 1,140,000.
7. Total bankruptcy filings per year have increased by 42% from 1,117,641 to 1,593,081.
8. Median Household incomes have declined by 4%.
9. Average selling price of new homes has declined by 10%.
10. US dollar compared to foreign currencies has declined by 8.7%. [US dollar index of 85.9 in Jan 2009 to 78.5 in Dec 2011.]
11. US dollar compared to gold has declined 105%. [ $855/ounce to $1750/ounce

ANOTHER LOOK AT THE GEORGIA ELIGIBILITY HEARING...

2012-01-30T10:27:00.001-08:00

He (OBAMA) is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.

2012-01-30T10:09:00.000-08:00

Obama the Chicken is Being Plucked

30.01.2012

Pages: 12 3

By Mark McGrew

AP photo

January 29 through the 31^st, 5% of the sheriffs in America are in Las Vegas Nevada, learning how to tell the Federal government agents to pack sand and get out of town. 20% of the 50 United States of America have been presented with lawsuits and or legal filings challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to be on the ballot for the 2012 election.

Congressional representative Allen West summed up the American people's feelings for the Obama administration today when he told Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to, "Get the hell out of The United States of America!". His talk can be seen here.

Ten people will be murdered today in Mexico with guns provided to drug cartels by Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General. Politicians are calling for him to resign. Resign??

There is enough evidence presented to Congress to arrest him and prosecute him for an Act of War against the nation of Mexico, accessory to murder of thousands of innocent citizens in Mexico and America as well as the murder of United States Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. Resign?? Besides sending illegal guns to Mexico, Holder and his associates sold guns to criminal street gangs inside the United States where the guns will be used inside the United States. It will take years to find the thousands of guns these criminals sold to killers.

Eric Holder and his criminal operatives in his office and the Department of Justice need to be dragged out in handcuffs, jailed with no bail and put on trial with a jury of American citizens who are not federal government employees.

Like a dead chicken being plucked, Obama has lost his power and his support. Six months or so ago, French President Sarkozy called Obama, "Insane". Other world leaders have publicly called him incompetent and other derogatory names.

Since then, major news in America has been slowly, quietly, as if testing the waters, pointing out Obama's faults and crimes. Little by little they are feeding America, and the World, the truth about the man they fought so hard to cover up for these past four years. Feather by feather, the chicken known as Obama, is being plucked. The most hated psychopath on Earth and his administration are going to be thoroughly plucked, gutted, tossed in an oven, cooked and devoured. And like any dead carcass with no use, Obama and his faithful supporters will be thrown onto a garbage heap until they rot to nothing.

The thing known as Obama is committing one large theft after another of the American people's money, work and trust. He is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.

Like all stupid people, he thinks everyone else is stupider than he is. There is, however, one thing he has done well. Every facet of American life and business has gone down considerably, except for foreclosures, unemployment, bankruptcies and business closures.

The mistake he made was to think that We the People, would just sit back and take his arrogant insulting crap.

Pamela Barnett was a plaintiff in a case brought by Orly Taiz demanding proof that Obama was eligible to be President. That court arrogantly and illegally refused to hear their complaint. Pamela Barnett's character reflects that of most Americans: When you treat her like a dog, she'll jump up and bite you. So she formed an organization to teach and help people how to have Obama taken off of all 50 State ballots. And it is working very well. Her site is here: http://obamaballotchallenge.com

And it is working. Obama has been denied to be on the primary ballot in Alabama until he proves he is eligible. Georgia has a ruling pending in 3 weeks to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible.

The amazingly tenacious, Carl Swensson, fighting to get Obama out of the office of the President, by knocking on every official's door he could find for four years, finally found two government employees who were not traitors and took their Oath of Office seriously: The Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp and Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia Office of Administrative Hearings. Meet Carl Swensson at this site: www.RiseUpForAmerica.com

And quit being a jerk. Send him 5 or 10 bucks for his legal bills. His wife wants him home to spend more time with the cat. Carl Swensson credits his wife for his stamina in being able to run his business and being able to expend the energy and the capital in fighting the treasonous federal elected employees.

Only a Natural Born Citizen can be President. There are at least three US Supreme Court cases defining Natural Born Citizen. The Us Constitution refers to "The Law of Nations", which defines Natural Born Citizen. There are dozens of letters of correspondence from the signers of the Declaration of Independence and creators of the US Constitution defining Natural Born Citizen. The United States Congress, in the past nine years has made eight unsuccessful attempts to change the wording of the US Constitution to say that foreign born or children of foreign born parents can be the President of the United States of America. These elected employees have repeatedly proven that they know damn well what a Natural Born Citizen is. The record is clearly established, through

READ MORE...

2012-01-30T08:20:00.001-08:00

2012-01-30T04:48:00.001-08:00

Entire Georgia Obama Ballot Access Challenge Hearing Video Now Available in One Video

Entire Georgia Eligibility Challenge Hearing, Atlanta Georgia, January 26th 2012Article II Super PAC Email The archived video of the complete January 26, 2012 Georgia State Administrative Hearing on...

2012-01-30T04:47:00.001-08:00

2012-01-29T18:48:00.000-08:00

Georgia on My Mind: Full Faith and Credit

Published January 27, 2012 96 Comments

Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to cheat his way back into the pResidency.

The stunning victory of the Constitutionalists over Barack Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah in Georgia on January 26 was also a victory for the judicial system and the rule of law. No doubt the pressure on Georgia officials is significant so it is important to remind them of the support that exists for their courage.

Scofflaw

Defiant Obama–nothing new, of course–blows it by not showing up, but when has he ever showed up even through his lawyers? He has dismissed all of us as just so much toilet paper, and his attack on the judiciary, the people, and the states will not stop with this positive ruling.
The Obama ballot challenge and the Article II SuperPac have had a considerable impact in beginning the process of outright removal of his name from the ballot and has the additional very important impact of raising awareness and doubt about Obama in the electorate. Rather demoralizing for the Obots, Congress, and the media to have spent their wad, ‘credibility‘, and resources defending a fake, fraud, liar, and criminal, don’t you agree? They will stay home, not vote, and ‘blame it on Bush’.
Its time now to go on the offense and cripple Obama in the states he needs to “win” the election. Some 130 electoral college votes are needed in the states of Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Ohio, and New York in order for Obama to ~~give the appearance of~~ have(ing) a chance of winning the 2012 election. Given the Georgia ruling, our next step is…get prepared…use the Constitution: (h/t slcraignbc)

U.S. Constitution Article IV Section 1.
Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.
JUDGMENTS: EFFECT TO BE GIVEN IN FORUM STATE
In General
Article IV, Sec. 1, has had its principal operation in relation to judgments. Embraced within the relevant discussions are two principal classes of judgments. First, those in which the judgment involved was offered as a basis of proceedings for its own enforcement outside the State where rendered, as for example, when an action for debt is brought in the courts of State B on a judgment for money damages rendered in State A; second, those in which the judgment involved was offered, in conformance with the principle of res judicata, in defense in a new or collateral proceeding growing out of the same facts as the original suit, as for example, when a decree of divorce granted in State A is offered as barring a suit for divorce by the other party to the marriage in the courts of State B.
The English courts and the different state courts in the United States, while recognizing “foreign judgments in personam” which were reducible to money terms as affording a basis for actions in debt, originally accorded them generally only the status of prima facie evidence in support thereof, so that the merits of the original controversy could always be opened. When offered in defense, on the other hand, “foreign judgments in personam” were regarded as conclusive upon everybody on the theory that, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall, “it is a proceeding in rem, to which all the world are parties.”

The Obama ballot challenge must move now to these states as a new State Challenge Campaign, and those readers here in those states I would hope would immediately contact the Obama Ballot Challenge and the Article II SuperPac to initiate proceedings:

A State District Court filing of a Show Cause Order asking why the State of (x) should not honor the State of Georgia’s determination under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, addressed to the State Gov., Atty Gen., SoS , and State Election Commission/Board/Agency as Respondents is a logical next step. (h/t slcraignbc).

Already ballot challenges in Illinois and Alabama are underway, for 30 more electoral votes. If we raise enough awareness and enough challenges to make our state officials pay attention, Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to win the election.

The knowing liar

And don’t forget Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and the report due out in February. The justice department and individuals have threatened the Sheriff with removal and death, and are finally being held accountable. I doubt that Arizona will have an easy time of putting him back on the ballot, notwithstanding Governor Brewer’s lack of courage and membership in the usurper’s’ ‘council of governors‘.
We will not forget that everything Obama has signed as an illegal occupant of the White House has no effect in law. Think of the tens of thousands of people, including our soldiers, that have died under this illegality.
Section 2 of Article 4 states, in part:

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

How correct it would be to have the charges against Obama in any state lead to the arrest and detainment of Obama? Would it stop his endless campaigning?
No Enthusiasm for the Usurper
Obama has already lost the youth vote to Ron Paul. There is no enthusiasm for the Obutt or Moose-hell anymore. Oh, and they’ll have to arrest the OWS people first before they declare martial law, as the Patriots will be at home keeping our power dry. And there is nothing more ugly than the left scorned. We told you Obots, you’re the first ones to be detained under martial law.

2012-01-29T18:45:00.001-08:00

Conservative Powerhouse:If Obama Raises Taxes,GOP Will Impeach Him

Ben Johnson,The White House Watch

The move to impeach Barack Obama is moving forward —either in this term or,Heaven forfend,in the next. This week,one of the most influential conservative heavyweights raised the prospect of ignobly kicking the president out of office between elections. Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform is the author of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge,a promise signed by hundreds of office-seekers that under no circumstances will they raise taxes. On Thursday,Norquist told the National Journal:

NJ: At the end of 2012,a number of major tax provisions,including the Bush-era cuts,are set to expire. Do you have any predictions?
NORQUIST:We’re focused on the fact that there is this Damocles sword hanging over people’s head. What you don’t know is who will be in charge when all of this will happen. I think when we get through this election cycle,we’ll have a Republican majority,[though] not necessarily a strong majority in the Senate,and a majority in the House. The majority in the House will continue to be a Reagan majority,a conservative majority. Boehner never has to talk his delegation going further to the right.
If the Republicans have the House,Senate,and the presidency,I’m told that they could do an early budget vote—a reconciliation vote where you extend the Bush tax cuts out for a decade or five years. You take all of those issues off the table,and then say,“What do you want to do for tax reform?”
Then,the question is:“OK,what do we do about repatriation and all of the interesting stuff?” And,if you have a Republican president to go with a Republican House and Senate,then they pass the [Paul] Ryan plan [on Medicare].
NJ: What if the Democrats still have control? What’s your scenario then?
NORQUIST: Obama can sit there and let all the tax [cuts] lapse,and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach. The last year,he’s gone into this huddle where he does everything by executive order. He’s made no effort to work with Congress. (Emphasis added.)

Grover is no fly-by-night gadfly. He is one of the most powerful figures on the right-flank of the Republican Party. As his profile on Wikipedia states:

Norquist was listed as one of the five primary leaders of the post-Goldwater conservative movement by Nina Easton in her 2000 book,“Gang of Five”. Working with eventual Speaker Newt Gingrich,Norquist was one of the co-authors of the 1994 Contract with America,and helped to rally grassroots efforts,which Norquist later chronicled in his book Rock the House. Norquist also served as a campaign staff member on the 1988,1992 and 1996 Republican Platform Committees.

Simply put,when Grover speaks,D.C. Republicans listen.
Norquist is a single-issue conservative. Although he has been associated with other intellectual undercurrents and movements —for instance,his support for anti-Communists in the 1980s and his more recent service in the National Rifle Association —he eats,sleeps,and breathes tax policy. In this week’s comments,he has laid down a potent marker for the president:If Obama goes forward with his plan for “job-killing tax increases”in 2013,Norquist will see that he is consigned to an early retirement.
It’s enough to make me wish momentarily that Obama had already raised taxes.
Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign. Click here to sign the Impeach Obama petition.

FAST APPROACHING THE ONE MILLIONTH VISITOR TO GIVE US LIBERTY THIS MORNING!...

2012-01-29T09:44:00.001-08:00

WHAT SHE REALLY SAID...

2012-01-29T07:50:00.000-08:00

2012-01-29T07:31:00.001-08:00

2012-01-29T07:24:00.000-08:00

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

From CitizenWeIIs

FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement

On July 5, 2011, Abdul Hassan, an attorney from NY, submitted a request for an advisory opinion from the FEC. Hassan acknowledged that he was a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen. Abdul Hassan posed the following questions:
“1. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am included in the meaning of
“candidate” or “person” or “individual” running for President as used in the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”)?
2. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am prohibited from receiving matching funds under the FECA?
3. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I would be in violation of 2 USC §
441h(b) ifi solicit and/or receive presidential campaign contributions?
4. Whether, in light of the steps I have taken in my presidential run as outlined above, I am subject to the expenditure, contribution and record-keeping requirements of FECA and the regulations thereunder? (Note: I have not yet crossed the $5,000 threshold that triggers the registration and reporting requirements – it is therefore important that I receive an answer before
these requirements are triggered.).”
http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/63383043?extension=pdf
The FEC responded with an Advisory Opinion on September 2, 2011.
Here are some interesting exerpts:
“We are responding to your advisory opinion request concerning the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, and Commission regulations to your campaign for President of the United States, given your status as a naturalized citizen.
The Commission concludes that the Act does not prohibit Mr. Hassan, a
naturalized citizen, from becoming a “candidate” as that term is defined under the Act. However, Mr. Hassan will not be eligible to receive Federal matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act.”
“Mr. Hassan indicates that he satisfies all of the constitutional requirements for
serving as President, except the natural born citizen requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. 1″
“2. As a naturalized American citizen, is Mr. Hassan eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act?”
“No, as a naturalized American citizen, Mr. Hassan is not eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“Matching Payment Act”).
The United States Constitution provides that “[n]o Person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .” U.S. Const. art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.”
“2 The Act does not contain separate definitions for candidates for different Federal offices. The Constitution’s “natural born Citizen” provision only pertains to “the Office of President.” U.S. Const., art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.
3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”
“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″
“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”
http://saos.nictusa.com/aodocs/AO%202011-15.pdf
Observations
The FEC refers to the US Constitition requirement for the presidency, natural born citizen.
The FEC notes the distinction between a natural born citizen and naturalized citizen.
The Fec states that a naturalized citizen is not eligible for the presidency.
The FEC states that only a natural born citizen may receive presidential matching funds.
The FEC acknowledges that although they do not have the authority to keep ineligible candidates off of ballots, some of the states do.
“3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”
Hence the GA and other state ballot challenges to Obama.
Conclusions
The FEC still acknowledges the US Constitution.
However, in 2007 when Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie submitted an advisory opinion request on behalf of Barack Obama to keep open the option for presidential matching funds, Bauer knew that Obama was not a natural born citizen. Ellen Weintraub, on the FEC committee that responded with an advisory opinion in the affirmative for Obama, was a former Perkins Coie staff member. Fraud was committed by Obama and Bauer and one has to question the ethics of Weintraub’s involvement.
The FEC acknowledges with these statements:
“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″
“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”
that there are eligibility requirements for receiving presidential matching funds and that the FEC is charged with administering these funds. It is clear
that the FEC should always require proof of eligibility. It should have done so in 2007. We know there was inherent bias in 2007 (see part 4 of this series).
Court cases also clarify the powers given to the FEC. The FEC has more power than they have alluded to.
See Doug Teper, et al V. Zell Miller, et al, April 24, 1996.
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/82/82.F3d.989.96-8147.html

2012-01-29T07:17:00.001-08:00

WILL THEY BECOME AMERICA'S
GREATEST HEROS?

Deputy Chief Judge
Michael Malihi

Georgia Sec. of State
Brian Kemp

2012-01-29T07:15:00.001-08:00

The target is Obama!
Henry Lamb Full Story
To listen click here
Many people are convinced that this President has done more to destroy the United States in three years than all the other presidents combined. The only hope of preventing another four years of even more drastic destructive policies is the election of one of the four remaining Republican candidates. The two frontrunners are using their time and resources, even on national television where they can be seen by the public, arguing over whether Newt’s consulting contract with Freddie Mac is “lobbying,” or whether Mitt is a moderate. Wake up gentlemen; the target is Obama!

2012-01-28T19:39:00.001-08:00

2012-01-28T16:49:00.001-08:00

2012-01-28T11:42:00.000-08:00

The Most Polarizing President Ever

Peter Wehner 01.27.2012

It’s official now. Barack Obama’s ratings are “historically polarized,” according to a new Gallup survey.
Jeffrey Jones of the Gallup organization writes, “The historically high gap between partisans’ job approval ratings of Barack Obama continued during Obama’s third year in office, with an average of 80 percent of Democrats and 12 percent of Republicans approving of the job he was doing… The 68-point gap between partisans’ approval ratings of Obama last year is nine points higher than that for any other president’s third year.” Obama, by the way, holds the record for the most polarized first and second years in office, too. Which means Obama has set a record for polarization every year he’s been in office.

READ MORE...

2012-01-28T07:36:00.001-08:00

2012-01-28T07:34:00.003-08:00

Beyond the Constitution’s Tipping Point

by Michael Oberndorf

We have reached a tipping point in this country The fraud in the White House threw all pretense of adherence to the Constitution to the wind and made several blatantly illegal “recess” appointments of extreme leftists to positions of power within the government. Clearly,this was a move to avoid letting the Senate exercise its advise-and-consent authority over appointments. The thing is,Congress was not in recess,so the move was illegal.
It would seem,however,that we conservatives are not the only ones who have noticed how spinelessly co-operative Congress has become in foisting totalitarian socialism on America in the past few years. The Marxist/neo-fascists who run the Democrat Party and write the speeches and policy for the Sock Puppet in the White House,appear to be keenly aware of the compliance of this worthless body. Confronted with the reality of a massive defeat at the polls in November – assuming,of course that an honest election could actually take place (entiende “fat chance,” amigos?) – they have pulled out all the stops and are imposing their agenda on the country,the Constitution and federal laws be damned. The Reichstag has been burned.
Strategically,from the point of view of the radical left,this makes total sense. If they can continue to get away with over-the-top lawlessness,as they have with their cover-up of the Fast and Furious debacle that resulted in the deaths of over 200 Mexican citizens,and two American federal agents;numerous obvious,but unprosecuted cases of Democrat voter fraud;the looting of the Treasury,disguised as “stimulus;” collusion with Big Unions and “green” corporations in return for huge bribes euphemistically called “campaign donations;” their refusal to close the border and their actual facilitation of the invasion of illegals by refusing to build the fence mandated by law,their refusal to enforce immigration laws,their refusal to deport apprehended illegals,and their withdrawal of National Guard personnel from the border,et cetera,et cetera,ad nauseam,then it is likely that they will get away with what amounts to a coup d’etat. And so far,they are succeeding.
I find this especially disheartening since it was only a couple of weeks ago that Obama- Soetoro’s hero and role model,Marxist dictator Hugo Chavez,publicly called him a clown and accused him of wrecking the country. Why is it that a ham-fisted communist dictator can speak the truth,but our self-proclaimed conservative “leaders” in Congress are as silent as the grave they appear to be digging for American freedom and liberty?
I can’t help but think that one of the events that encouraged the Marxist Democrats to go on the offensive – and folks,their actions have been offensive,in every sense of the word – is the fact that all but a small handful of members of both the House and the Senate voted for the Constitution-crushing National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA),including some whom I had previously considered genuine conservatives. Continue reading Beyond the Constitution’s Tipping Point

FROM WND...

2012-01-27T23:19:00.000-08:00

Both attorneys, J. Mark Hatfield and Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation told WND they felt comfortable discussing the situation as the judge had imposed no ban on communicating what happened.
“The judge … was considering just entering a default judgment against Obama,” Hatfield said today. “The plaintiffs’ attorneys uniformly did not want the judge to do that because there wouldn’t be any evidence in the record at all.”
In Georgia, state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
That’s exactly what several groups of individuals did. Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.
Hatfield and Irion told WND the expected process is that Malihi will make a decision over the course of the next week whether Obama, without appearing or being represented at the hearing, documented his eligibility to the court’s satisfaction.
That recommendation then goes to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, to whom Obama’s lawyer, Michael Jablonski, earlier had complained that Malihi was letting the attorneys “run amok” since the issue of Obama’s “citizenship” had been resolved.
But in fact the U.S. Constitution demands a different status for presidents, that of a “natural born citizen,” which Founders likely considered to be the offspring of two citizen parents. If that is the case, Obama could not be eligible as his father was a Kenyan national subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom.
At the time Jablonski complained to Kemp and told him he should simply cancel the hearing, Kemp warned Jablonski that he ultimately would be reviewing the hearing result, and to not participate would be at Obama’s “peril.”
Both lawyers, whose cases in fact are separate from each other as well as from the Taitz’ case, said it was important for them to be able to introduce evidence and build a court record.
Hatfield said the goal ultimately is to have a court rule on the substance of the controversy: Is it necessary to have citizen parents to be a “natural born citizen” or will that definition evolve as America ages?
Hatfield told WND that he specifically asked the judge at the end of the hearing to close the record, and he did that. Hatfield said that should make it clear that as the decision is made, and any challenges progress, no new information can be added to the evidence already submitted.
He said it’s very clear that the court had jurisdiction to take the case and accept evidence, since the ballot at issue is a ballot with which the state election in 2012 will be conducted.
And Hatfield noted that although Obama’s lawyer at least made a motion to quash the subpoena from Taitz for his testimony and records, Obama’s attorneys never even bothered to respond to his own motion to produce records.
Obama’s campaign declined to respond to WND emails and messages inquiring about a comment on the situation.
Irion told WND the default is a typical result when one side fails to appear for a dispute that’s being adjudicated in court, but in this case, that would have left it wide open for arguments on appeal that had nothing to do with the issue.
He said he explained to the judge that awarding a default judgment actually would have been rewarding Obama for failing to respond to the subpoena.
The attorneys said they would be watching for Obama’s next move in the contest. And they said they believe there is a possibility that because of the dispute, Obama may end up not being on the Georgia ballot in the fall.
Obama lost the state in the 2008 election to John McCain.
Earlier, several attorneys who previously took cases challenging Obama’s eligibility as high as the U.S. Supreme Court said Obama’s refusal to participate in the hearing was a travesty.
“That President Obama’s attorneys didn’t show respect for the court, the citizens, the secretary of state, and the statutes of Georgia reveals the true character of the administration as being completely and utterly against state’s rights,” said attorney Leo Donofrio. “The federal government is growing out of control with every administration and this action today is a loud announcement that this administration is going to do what it likes, and you can imagine that their response to this judiciary would be exactly the same if this had been the U.S. Supreme Court.”
He said if Georgia does decide to keep Obama off its state election ballots, he won’t appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, “because if he were to lose there, his entire administration would be void, including his appointments to the Supreme Court.”
“If Obama were to appeal in Georgia, only this election is in play, and only as to Georgia’s ballots, but if he loses in Georgia, appealing to the SCOTUS brings in his entire eligibility, and the legitimacy of his current administration,” Donofrio warned.
“My personal belief is that if the U.S. Supreme Court held that he was ineligible, he might simply ignore the ruling, and test the will of the nation, just as he is testing the will of the state of Georgia,” he said.
“If the judge’s recommendation – and I’ve been told that it’s going to be to disqualify Mr. Obama as a candidate – is followed by the secretary of state, Mr. Obama has got a real problem,” said Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation.
His organization pursued several of the lawsuits over Obama’s occupancy of the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has not accepted any eligibility cases.
“He’s thumbed his nose at the court. He’s thumbed his nose at the secretary of state in Georgia. He’s thumbed his nose at the people and said, ‘I’m above it all. I’m above the law,’” Kreep said.
Mario Apuzzo, who also shepherded a case to the Supreme Court, said Obama, by not showing, “actually failed to meet his burden of proof, to show that he is eligible and should be placed on the ballot.”
“For him to just ignore due process here is really telling a lot,” he said, noting, “This decision will have a ripple effect.”
“He’s not above the law. That’s a very important thing here. He’s a private person running for office, so he had no business not showing up. So the court can enter the judgment, and then the secretary of state does what he wants with it. And this will have a ripple effect for other secretaries of state, for other states, for the public. Also for any case that could be pending in the Supreme Court, where the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility is implicated,” he said.

Important update! Judge Malihi expedites the date for post trial motions. Moves it from February 5th to February 1st, will issue his ruling shortly thereafter

2012-01-27T23:14:00.001-08:00

Judge Malihi shortened the time to file any post trial trial pleadings. He moved the date from February 5th to February 1. He will issue his ruling shortly thereafter. I believe, he will issue his ruling by the end of the day on February 1 or on February 2 at the latest. I believe Brian Kemp, the Secretary of State of GA, will announce on February 2 or 3rd whether Barack Hussein Obama’s name will be allowed on the ballot in the state of GA as an eligible Presidential candidate.

2012-01-27T21:28:00.001-08:00

CNN Tries To Whitewash Obama's Radical Past

IBD Editorials.com

As the president launches his re-election bid by striking a more centrist tone, the partisan press is helping him whitewash his radical past. Teamwork or not, it'll be hard to bleach. Exhibit A is CNN's Soledad O'Brien. Earlier this week, she hosted a segment that tried to de-link Obama from Chicago socialist Saul Alinsky. The late Alinsky is the father of community organizing and the author of the far-left bible "Rules for Radicals."
O'Brien opened her piece by scolding GOP front-runner Newt Gingrich for warning Obama "will represent Saul Alinsky (and) European socialism" in a second term. "President Obama has never said that he was influenced by Alinsky," O'Brien insisted.
Of course he hasn't. He's not stupid enough to publicly link himself to a socialist. But the record is clear that he was in fact influenced by Alinsky, if only CNN's "journalists" would do their homework. Allow us to do it for them:
• Obama first learned Alinsky's rules in the 1980s, when Alinskyite radicals with the Chicago-based Alinsky group Gamaliel Foundation recruited, hired, trained and paid him as a community organizer in South Side Chicago. (Gamaliel's website expressly states it grew out of the Alinsky movement.)
• In 1988, Obama even wrote a chapter for the book "After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois," in which he lamented organizers' "lack of power" in implementing change.
• Gamaliel board member John McKnight, a hard-core student of Alinsky, penned a letter for Obama to help him get into Harvard Law School.
• Obama took a break from his Harvard studies to travel to Los Angeles for eight days of intense training at Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation, a station of the cross for acolytes.
• In turn, he trained other community organizers in Alinsky agitation tactics.
• Obama also taught Alinsky's "Power Analysis" methods at the University of Chicago.
• During the presidential campaign, Obama hired one of his Gamaliel mentors, Mike Kruglik, to train young campaign workers in Alinsky tactics at "Camp Obama," a school set up at Obama headquarters in Chicago. The tactics helped Obama capture the youth vote like no other president before him.
• Power would no longer be an issue, as Obama infiltrated the highest echelon of the political establishment — the White House — fulfilling Alinsky's vision of a new "vanguard" of coat-and-tie radicals who "work inside the system" to change the system.
• After the election, his other Gamaliel mentor, Jerry Kellman (who hired him and whose identity Obama disguised in his memoir), helped the Obama administration establish Organizing for America, which mobilizes young supporters to agitate for Obama's legislative agenda using "Rules for Radicals."
• Obama's favorite rule is No. 13: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it." You see that in his attacks on "fat cat bankers," "greedy health insurers" and "millionaires and billionaires." He also readily applies Alinsky's fifth rule of "ridiculing" the opposition.
"Obama learned his lesson well," said David Alinsky, son of the late socialist. "I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing."
Bizarrely, O'Brien was more than willing to connect Alinsky with the Tea Party, without citing a shred of real evidence to back up the silly claim. The CNN anchor closed her segment by saying she would pin Gingrich down on his supposedly misleading claims. "We will be sure to ask the former speaker the next time we get a chance to talk to him about that," she said.
Wouldn't it make more sense to just ask Obama? You know, "Mr. President, have you ever read Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals'"? Or "Have your ever trained at organizations founded by Alinsky?"
Is she really this clueless? Or is she covering for Obama? Either way, it does not reflect well on a journalist of her stature and influence.
It's plain CNN plans to gloss over the president's radical past in this campaign, just like it did in 2008.

From Orly Taitz...

2012-01-27T13:42:00.000-08:00

Carl Swensson, I accept your apology

Posted on | January 27, 2012

Orly Taitz: This was posted by Carl Swenssen, chair of the Republican party of Clayton County GA and one of the plaintiffs for another attorney. I accept his apology:

I must now make a Public apology for words I used, in a deragatory fashion, concerning Patriot Orly Taitz. We all make mistakes and that one was a real boner on my part. I do hope Orly will accept my apology as we are ALL in this fight together.

2012-01-27T13:39:00.001-08:00

Judge Malihi Denied Taitz's Request for Obama's Hawaii Records: Court Lacks Jurisdiction

Farrar|Welden|Swensson|Powell v. Obama - Order Denying Orly Taitz's Letters Rogatory for Hawaii Documents Related to Obama Order: The parties may file any post hearing pleadings by Wednesday, February...

2012-01-27T07:09:00.001-08:00

Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born

The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-BornAttorney Leo Donofrio I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware...

2012-01-27T06:39:00.000-08:00

Video:Woman Says “Avowed Muslim”Obama Not Prez;Santorum Doesn’t Correct Her

At a town hall meeting in Lady Lake,Florida,a woman said Barack Obama is a Muslim,ineligible to be president,violates the Constitution,and should be kicked out of office —and Rick Santorum did not correct her. The woman began:

I never refer to Obama as President Obama because legally he is not. He constantly says that our Constitution is passé,and he ignores it as you know and does what he darn well pleases. He is an avowed Muslim and my question is,why isn’t something being done to get him out of government? He has no legal right to be calling himself president

Santorum responded that Obama’s “recess”appointments would cause him to “draw the line.”He said he may name that woman his first czar.
That’s much different than John McCain,who called Obama “a family man”on the campaign trail in 2008. For some reason,the compliment did not get McCain elected president.

2012-01-27T06:38:00.003-08:00

Obama Disrespects Court,State,America,Constitution by Skipping Eligibility Hearing

Dave Tombers,WND.com

One of the attorneys who fought a court case over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court says he fears that even if the U.S. Supreme Court declared Obama unqualified,he’d simply ignore the ruling and continue issuing orders.

But those who observed a court hearing today in Atlanta say it could be the beginning of the end for the Obama campaign,because of the doubt that could surge like a tidal wave across the nation.

The comments came today from Leo Donofrio, who led the pack in filing lawsuits over Obama’s 2008 election and his subsequent occupancy of the White House.
He was commenting on today’s hearing before a Georgia administrative law judge on complaints raised by several state residents that Obama is not eligible to run for the office in 2012. That hearing went on after Obama and his lawyer decided to snub the court system and refuse to participate.
A decision from the judge,Michael Malihi,is expected soon.
The Georgia residents delivered sworn testimony to a court that,among other things,Obama is forever disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state because his father never was a U.S. citizen. Because the Constitution’s requirement presidents be a “natural born citizen,” which is the offspring of two citizen parents,he is prevented from qualifying,they say.
The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office,and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated,while his supporters say he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.
In Georgia,the law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications,the judge determined.
Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar,Leah Lax,Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth,represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell,represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.
Donofrio’s case – like all the others that have reached the Supreme Court – simply was refused recognition….
Read more.

2012-01-27T04:24:00.000-08:00

Add caption

OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27^th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14^th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2^nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2^nd witness. Mr. Strunk.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that the true owner of the number was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Vogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Vogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Vogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.

2012-01-26T13:37:00.000-08:00

YES!!!!!!!

JUDGE TO MAKE RULING ON. FEB. 5...NOTE: REPORTER GETS HER FACTS WRONG...ATTORNEY'S WERE NOT ARGUING THAT OBAMA WAS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN...UNBELIEVABLE!...

2012-01-26T13:31:00.001-08:00

BY THE WAY...WHAT'S A BIRTHER HEARING?

Message from Orly Taitz...

2012-01-26T12:04:00.000-08:00

I presented my case and gave interviews to all the major networks: CBS, NBC, ABC and so on. 6 witnesses testified to Obama’s use of a forged BS and a stolen SSN

A MESSAGE FROM CARL SWENSSON...

2012-01-26T11:56:00.001-08:00

To all my friends in battle,

The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case. Both Van Irion and My lawyer, Mark Hatfield made certain that our cases and evidence in those two cases would be closed so as not to be affiliated, in any way, with “Birther” Orly Taitz. As expected, she was an embarrassment.

Now we’re merely awaiting the publishing of this Judge’s ruling which, as previously stated, will be a Default Judgment.
In other words…we won. Now it’s time for the rest of the States to take my lead and duplicate this effort.

Carl

2012-01-26T10:15:00.000-08:00

CERTIFIGATE

Georgia warns Obama of 'peril' of ignoring eligibility hearing

Lawyer had urged secretary of state to simply cancel challenges

by Bob UnruhEmail | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after spending nearly three decades writing on a wide range of issues for several Upper Midwest newspapers and the Associated Press. Sports, tornadoes, homicidal survivalists, and legislative battles all fell within his bailiwick. His scenic photography has been used commercially, and he sometimes plays in a church worship band

The state of Georgia is warning Barack Obama of the “peril” of simply ignoring today’s hearing on his eligibility to be on the 2012 presidential election ballot in the state
The hearing before an administration law judge was streamed live today, but Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, yesterday told the state he and his client would not participate.
READ MORE...

2012-01-26T10:11:00.000-08:00

Georgia court told Obama slam-dunk disqualified

Sworn testimony reveals fake Social Security number, other gaps

by Jerome R. Corsi

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Along with serving as WND's senior staff reporter, Corsi is a senior managing director at Gilford Securities. Gilford Securities, founded in 1979, is a full-service boutique investment firm headquartered in NYC providing financial services to institutional and retail clients, from investment banking and equity research to retirement

Georgia residents today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state because his father never was a U.S. citizen, so he forever is prevented from qualifying as a “natural born citizen” as the U.S. Constitution demands for a president.
The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated, while his supporters say he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.
READ MORE...

EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...

2012-01-26T09:58:00.000-08:00

BREAKING!! GAME ON!!!!—Eligibility Alert!

OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

UPDATE FROM GEORGIA!...

2012-01-26T09:43:00.000-08:00

Doug Vogt just called and said that the judge offered Orly a summary judgement and the hearing would not be necessary ... but of course she wanted to present it anyway to get this evidence before the public.

Now lets see what the CIA allows the mainstream media to publish. In other words the good news is that the judge will recommend that Obama not be permitted on the Georgia primary ballot in March.

POST & EMAIL UPDATES AT 11:00 AM EST...

2012-01-26T08:11:00.000-08:00

SHARON RONDEAU PROVIDES THE LATEST FROM GEORGIA...

THE POST & EMAIL

Taitz asked Vogt if he examined the birth certificate which was posted online, and he said, “Yes, I did.” He stated that “sloping lines” would not be seen if the image had been made from a paper document.

Taitz asked, “Would you expect to see a clear embossed seal on the document?” and Vogt answered, “Yes, I would.” However, he stated that such was not present on Obama’s birth certificate. Regarding the number of Obama’s purported birth record, Vogt stated that “federal regs” require that “all birth certificate numbers have to be sequential, starting on January 1.”

At 10:49, witness John Sampson took the stand. He stated that he has a background in criminal justice, served as a police officer in New York City and worked as an immigration inspector. His background includes working for the INS in the area of “immigration fraud” and he was also a deportation officer. He stated that he has testified in front of “federal grand juries.” He stated that he started his own consulting firm in 2009 and has been self-employed since then.

Taitz asked Sampson about Obama’s social security number, and Sampson said that he “ran” the number 042-68-4425 and that it was assigned to Obama since 1977.

Taitz asked if Sampson had examined the birth certificate, and he said, “Yes.” He raised the issue of the Nordyke twins’ birth certificate, whose numbers were lower than Obama’s even though their birth occurred a day later. He stated that the registrar’s name was different than that on the Nordyke twins’ documents and that it was unlikely that the registrar would have been different in the “same hospital” regarding births one day apart.

Sampson recommended further investigation, including subpoenas and court orders, to obtain more information on the number “042-68-4425.”

Sampson mentioned that Obama has also been known as “Barry Soetoro.”

Taitz asked what Sampson thought needed to be done regarding the questions about Obama’s background, and he recommended asking for an official copy of the SS-5 for his social security number application and the Hawaii Department of Health to see “if he was born in Hawaii.” Sampson stated that an investigation would be “a criminal investigation” through a U.S. attorney’s office. He said that if a person has been found to be impersonating a U.S. citizen, he would be subject to “deportation.”

Shortly thereafter, Sampson’s testimony ended, and Taitz began discussing Obama’s alleged years in Indonesia from 1968-71, during which he was known as “Barry Soetoro.”

“We have another boy who from 1968-69 was in Hawaii,” she said. The judge then said, “Are you testifying? Do you know how?” which brought laughter from the assembly. The judge then said she could discuss the matter during closing arguments. Taitz responded, “I would like to testify,” after which she took the stand.

Taitz stated that “Mr. Obama has resigned from the bar.” The judge asked, “How is that relevant?” Taitz said that it was pertinent because Obama was “hiding his identity.”

LATEST UPDATES AT 10:45 AM EST FROM THE POST & EMAIL...

2012-01-26T07:51:00.000-08:00

THE POST & EMAIL LINK

“First I ran the social security number to check the address, and the same number came up for him in Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, DC. It showed a phone number, and it was always the same number…It would show intermittently ‘August 4, 1961′ and ’1890.’” Daniels stated that she obtained information “directly from the Social Security Administration.”

At 10:30 Mr. Chito Papa took the stand. He stated that he works in the field of Information Technology including Adobe® software.

Taitz asked Papa if the “birth certificate” which “Obama posted online” had flattened layers. ”Did you see one layer or multiple layers? Taitz asked. ”I saw multiple layers,” he answered.

Taitz asked Papa about Obama’s social security number which appeared on his tax return posted on the internet, and Papa stated that the layers had not been flattened. Taitz then thanked Papa for his testimony.

At 10:36 a.m. another witness, Linda Jordan, was called to the stand. Taitz adjusted her Powerpoint presentation by means of a laptop computer and began by asking a question about “E-Verify,” the U.S. government’s system for flagging potential illegal immigrants from working. Jordan stated that she ran Obama’s number through the E-Verify system and said, “When I read it, it was 2011, and it could not verify it. It came back.”

At 10:39 a.m., Douglas Vogt took the stand. Vogt stated that he owns a typesetting company and has been “in the business for 18 years now.”

Taitz asked Vogt if he examined the birth certificate which was posted online, and he said, “Yes, I did.”

10:44 AM EST...

2012-01-26T07:44:00.001-08:00

MORE THAN 15,000 CONCERNED AMERICANS ON ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WEBSITE RIGHT NOW!

UPDATE ON COURT HEARING FROM THE INCOMPARABLE SHARON RONDEAU AT THE POST & EMAIL...

2012-01-26T07:34:00.000-08:00

Georgia Ballot Hearing Under Way

POST & EMAIL LINK HERE

VAN IRION SPEAKING AT 9:44 A.M. ET

by Sharon Rondeau

Judge Michael Malihi is presiding over the Obama ballot challenges being heard today in Atlanta, GA

(Jan. 26, 2012) — The court convened at approximately 9:30 a.m. Judge Michael Malihi began by asking those present to stand and reading the last paragraph of Atty. Michael Jablonski’s letter to Brian Kemp, Georgia Secretary of State, “into the record,” commenting that Jablonski was not present at the hearing.

The judge called plaintiff David Welden to stand and asked where he resided and if he were a registered voter in the state of Georgia. Then his attorney, Van Irion, stood and stated that there were three types of citizenship in the United States. He then provided argument on the definition of “natural born Citizen,” referring to Minor v. Happersett.

“The court should recognize that the term ‘citizen” is not ‘natural born Citizen,’ Irion said. “The Minor court’s definition of ‘natural born Citizen’ says ‘parents.’

“In closing, this case is about the Constitution,” Irion said. We’ve shown that Barack Obama’s father was never a citizen…and that means he is not constitutionally qualified…Finally, the defendant was ordered to be here, and I wish to state on the record that that shows not just a contempt for this court…”

Then Irion was interrupted and stopped speaking.

9:54 a.m.: Atty. J. Mark Hatfield stood and stating that he represents Kevin Richard Powell and Carl Swensson. Hatfield mentioned the White House schedule as he saw that it related to Obama’s lack of attendance at the hearing.

Carl Swensson was sworn in at 9:56 a.m. and stated his residence and county. Then Kevin Powell was asked the same. Both were asked if they were able to vote for President of the United States.

Swensson and Powell explained their challenges filed with the Secretary of State’s office to the judge.

Hatfield held up the Certification of Nomination which Nancy Pelosi signed in 2008 to place Obama’s name on the ballot. The judge asked if it was a “certified copy,” and Hatfield answered that it was. He then read from it, stating that it did not affirm that the candidates met constitutional requirements to serve, while the wording from the Republican National Committee for its candidates did contain that wording.

The judge asked if the documents were from a “United States government source,” and Hatfield answered “Yes, sir, they were.”

Hatfield cited Jablonski’s January 25 letter “indicating that they did not want the proceedings to go forward and did not want to participate.” Hatfield also entered into evidence Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father.

Ken Allen, a resident of Arizona, stood to present the documentation he had received from the State Department after submitting a FOIA request early in 2009, which The Post & Email reported on here. He stated that “Barack Obama Sr.” was “never a citizen.”

At 10:09 a.m. someone said, “Let’s take a short break,” and people stood up and began moving around and talking with one another.

At 10:17 a.m., the court was called back in to order.

Atty. Orly Taitz was called upon to speak. The Georgia registered voter whom she represents, David Farrar, stood and identified himself.

Taitz utilized a projector on the wall to the right of the judge as an aid in her presentation. She then stated that evidence existed that Obama possessed Indonesian citizenship, to which the judge was heard by this writer to say, “That’s not relevant.” Taitz then discussed the court’s decision in Minor v. Happersett and was interrupted by the judge, who said, “Counselor, can you save your argument for the closing?” She then stopped speaking.

Mr. Christopher Strunk of New York then went up to the front of the courtroom to testify, and Taitz began to ask him questions about the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, one of which contains the name “Soebarkah.” Strunk stated, “She wanted that expunged from her record, but we never got that.”

Susan Daniels, Private Investigator from Ohio, then took the stand, and spoke about her investigation which revealed that Obama had reportedly been using a social security number which she contended had not been assigned to him.

Taitz asked Daniels, “What was the social security number attached to your request?” and Daniels read off “042-68-4425.” Daniels said, “In all my years, I’ve never seen anything like this.” She stated that the person who had originally owned the number had been born in 1890.

LIVE FROM GEORGIA...

2012-01-26T04:13:00.000-08:00

FOR THE LATEST INFORMATION AND EXCLUSIVE UPDATES, CHECK BACK WITH GIVE US LIBERTY THROUGHOUT THE DAY.

WE WILL HAVE CONTINUOUS CONTACT INSIDE THE COURTROOM WITH ARTICLE II SUPER PAC REPRESENTATIVES VIA INSTANT MESSAGING DURING THE PROCEEDINGS. WE WILL ALSO HAVE EXCLUSIVE CONTACT VIA CELL PHONE DURING BREAKS.

LOOK FORWARD TO UPCOMING EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEWS, VIDEOS AND INSIDE INFORMATION IN THE UPCOMING DAYS HERE AT GUL.

ENJOY THE LIVESTREAM!

ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET

http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXCLUSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2012-01-25T17:29:00.000-08:00

Georgia Ballot Challenge News
January 25th, 2012

Georgia Secretary of State Response to Obama's Request to Cancel Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

BREAKING!! GAME ON!!!!—Eligibility Alert!

GEORGIA SOS TELLS OBAMA AND HIS ATTORNEY YOU MISS THE HEARING AT YOUR PERIL!!!!!!
Obama's Attorney Jaberwoki Slapped Down By Georgia SOS - 1/25/2012

2012-01-25T17:23:00.000-08:00

Obama eligibility hearing to be broadcast live

'Complicit media ignoring all calls for honest reporting on the issue'

A political action committee which believes Barack Obama is not legally qualified for U.S. president plans a live broadcast of tomorrow’s hotly anticipated court hearing in Atlanta regarding Obama’s eligibility.
The Article II Super PAC says it will provide uncensored, gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the event beginning at 9 a.m. Eastern at this online address.

Based in Simi Valley, Calif., the PAC says it decided to act out of a sense of frustration, since most national news outlets have been ignoring the constitutional mandate that presidents be a “natural-born citizen,” which the PAC maintains is a person who is a child of two U.S. citizen parents.
READ MORE...

SCAREDY CAT!...LOL

2012-01-25T15:21:00.001-08:00

OK AMERICA...THIS IS A RED FLAG TO ANYONE WITH AN OUNCE OF COMMON SENSE...IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS WE HAVE A USURPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE...ALSO LOOKS LIKE THE OBAMA CAMP DIDN'T WANT A LIVESTEAM OF THEIR LIES SENT AROUND THE COUNTRY!...

2012-01-25T15:09:00.000-08:00

BREAKING!!!!! OBAMA BLINKS!!!!—Eligibility Alert!

OBAMA ATTORNEY
BITCHES, MOANS,
WHINES AND LIES!

Obama's Attorney Refusing To Show Up At Obama's Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearings

Obama's Private Attorney Refusing To Show Up At

Obama's Georgia Ballot Access Challenge Hearings

January 25, 2012

Hon. Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
214 State Capitol
Atlanta, Georgia 30334

via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.
(vrusso@sos.ga.gov)

Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Secretary Kemp:

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.

For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.

It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.

Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.

In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….

As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.

All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).

The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

Very truly yours,

MICHAEL JABLONSKI
Georgia State Bar Number 385850
Attorney for President Barack Obama

cc:

Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal (kbeal@osah.ga.gov))
Van Irion, Esq. (van@libertylegalfoundation.org)
Orly Taitz, Esq. (orly.taitz@gmail.com)
Mark Hatfield, Esq. (mhatfield@wayxcable.com)
Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. (vrusso@sos.ga.gov)
Stefan Ritter, Esq. (sritter@law.ga.gov)
Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. (abrumbaugh@law.ga.gov)
Darcy Coty, Esq. (darcy.coty@usdoj.gov)
Andrew B. Flake, Esq. (andrew.flake@agg.com)
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30746

REMINDER:

Article II Super PAC Providing Live Internet Video Stream
From Inside Obama's 3 Georgia Ballot Hearings

MORE LIVE STREAM DETAILS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Flier/Handout - Obama Not a Natural Born Citizen with Venn Diagram - Support Art2SuperPAC

2012-01-25T11:37:00.001-08:00

LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE—Eligibility Alert!

Big news is the upcoming Georgia hearings on three Obama ballot challenges. Subpoenas have been upheld, so far, in spite of “Obama’s” best efforts to quash. Hearings will be on January 26th, starting at 9 A.M. These are public, so you can attend: courtroom 3E at 185 Central Avenue, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 , ground floor. Stay tuned to this site!

Major Announcement:

ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET

http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html

CLICK VIEW IN FULLSCREEN BELOW TO READ
PRESS RELEASE

ART2SUPERPACANNOUNCEMENTREGARDINGLIVEGAHEARINGBROADCASTv2

“The PAC saw the need to do this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by MainStream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said Director Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.
The PAC describes this upcoming event as “The hearing of the century, for the (alleged) political crime of the century,” referring to the breathtaking implications of an illegal “President” in the White House or on the presidential ballot.
These proceedings could lead to the removal of the incumbent from the Georgia ballot, which would raise questions nationwide. This would be the first time that these issues and related evidence are deliberated in open court.
Numerous ballot challenges have been filed in dozens of states, contesting “Obama’s” questionable eligibility, based upon natural born citizenship requirements, in Article II of the U.S. Constitution and laws in multiple states.
Georgia will be one of the first states heard. This is due to the timing of challenge filings and its unique state administrative court set up to handle such matters, in a jurisdiction potentially receptive to such cases.
Three cases are being heard on one momentous day, in this order:

1. Plaintiffs David Welden (represented by Van Irion);
2. Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell (represented by Mark Hatfield);
3. David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren, Laurie Roth (represented by Dr. Orly Taitz).

#####

Let’s pony up for the Article II PAC We the People! If you intend to watch the cases live, even if you aren’t, they can use our support and donations! This will be the best movie you will attend all year! We expect some real action, drama, and ? What stars will be there? What stars won’t?
Call in some friends, have breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and keep the champagne on ice! Pull out your party hats! Start the popcorn! Let the lawsuits begin! Send a special invitation to your Representatives and Senators to join the party!
We will keep this post open for cheering and thoughts throughout the day!
Yes, please add your comments when you read this too! I know you are as excited as we are. We are thrilled that we won’t be missing out on this DAY IN HISTORY! In fact, we HOPE that someone GOES DOWN in History! That would be the CHANGE we’ve been waiting for!
Question for Obama on Thursday.
“Are you wearing your Depends today?”

2012-01-25T11:36:00.001-08:00

Judge Rules Obama Must Prove Presidential Eligibility In Georgia Courtroom

Doug Book,CoachIsRight.com

For those who have waited 3 years for a judge to finally rule that Barack Hussein Obama must prove that he is legally and Constitutionally qualified to run for or serve as President of the United States,the day may have come at last.
For on Friday,Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi ruled that subpoenas demanding the presence of Barack Obama in his Georgia courtroom on January 26^th along with the original form of his Hawaii birth certificate and information on his myriad Social Security numbers will remain in force.
Obama ‘s attorney Michael Jablonski had filed a motion to quash those subpoenas,arguing if Obama were made to answer questions before the court it would “…[require] him to interrupt duties as President of the United States…” (1)
It was also Obama’s claim that “presidential electors and Congress,not the State of Georgia,hold the Constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates.” (1)
Well Judge Malihi did not agree with Obama’s arguments that the laws of the State of Georgia were somehow irrelevant to the process,or that
Read more.

2012-01-25T07:01:00.000-08:00

THE BIG LIST of eligibility 'proofers'

See those who have raised questions about legitimacy of Obama presidency

by Bob Unruh

Here is a compilation of the statements, questions, and videos of the many high-profile personalities and leaders who have raised questions about Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
WND has reported on multiple legal challenges to Obama over his status as a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

Some of the lawsuits question whether Obama actually was born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama’s American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.
Other challenges have focused on Obama’s citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.
Further, others question his citizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools during his childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistan three decades ago.
In April, Obama released an image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” from the state of Hawaii, but since then, a multitude of experts in imaging, documents and computers have concluded it isn’t real.
Here are the comments:
Minuteman PAC
An influential Minuteman PAC is weighing in on the argument over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, with a call for concerned citizens across the country to flood their state secretaries of state offices with requests that Obama be removed from the 2012 ballot.
In a new statement released by the Minuteman Pac, officials there said, “Obama needs every vote he can get in 2012 – if we can get just one state to remove his name from its ballot, he does not stand a chance.
“To do this, though, we need tens of thousands of messages overwhelming the offices of every single secretary of state, since they are the ones who are ultimately responsible for determining who qualifies to be on the ballot – and, of course, who doesn’t,” the organization’s statement said.
“As our Founding Fathers intended, it is the states which protect us from all out tyranny. The federal election in 2012 and the constitutional eligibility of the candidates is no different. In the end, our states are responsible for ensuring the eligibility of candidates and our states will protect us from the tyranny of a presidential usurper.”
The organization noted the defense strategy that Obama’s lawyers outlined in a pending case in Georgia, where this week there are to be three hearings on different challenges to Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
The law in that state allows residents to raise a challenge, and several groups already have.
Obama’s lawyer told the judge the president should be excused from a subpoena for his testimony and birth evidence, but the judge refused.
It was Obama’s lawyer who argued because Obama was chosen by the presidential electors and confirmed by Congress, the testimony he’s being told to provide is “irrelevant.”
“You read that right, folks,” the Minuteman PAC said. “Obama’s dream-team of lawyers are arguing that, because of the electoral system, Barack Hussein Obama is not accountable to the American people.”
Specifically, Obama’s lawyers wrote, “Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates. … The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant.”
The PAC was set up to serve as the political arm of the Minuteman Movement, the initiative that seeks to secure America’s territory against incursion, invasion and terrorism.
Matt Romney
Matt Romney, whose father, Mitt, is vying for commitments from Iowa GOP caucus voters this weekend, said his dad would release his financial records when “President Obama releases his grades and birth certificate,” confirming a short time later it was a joke.
But Barack Obama, in Hawaii now on a vacation estimated to set the taxpayers back some $4 million, saw it as an opportunity to cash in, and his 2012 campaign machine immediately posted online: “The Birth Certificate Thing Again?”
“Matt Romney says his dad Mitt will release his tax returns “as soon as” President Obama releases his birth certificate the campaign fundraising pitch by “Grant,” said today. “This is how the Romney campaign thinks it’s going to win the Republican primary: by pandering to the dead-ender fringe of extremists who still question where the president was born.”
The Obama campaign continued, “We can’t rewrite the other side’s talking points for them, but we can drive up the cost of this kind of politics. So we’re re-releasing our coffee mugs with the president’s birth certificate smack-dab on the side. Get yours today and remind the GOP what we all know is true – our president is made in the USA.”
According to a Talking Points Memo report, Matt Romney was talking with a reporter Thursday on the topic of documnts and candidates’ information.
“He’s certainly not afraid of anything, he’s not hiding anything,” he said of his father in a video recorded by a Patch reporter in New Hampshire, recorded TPM.
“But I heard someone suggest the other day that as soon as President Obama releases his grades and birth certificate and sort of a long list of things, that maybe he’d do that.”
Matt immediately noted “that’s a suggestion from someone else.”
Later yet, TPM said, Matt Romney tweeted “I repeated a dumb joke. My bad.”
The ‘PolitiChicks’:
Four politically active women including former Saturday Night Live star Victoria Jackson, pro-life speaker and activist Jannique Stewart, editor and activist Jennie Jones and columnist Ann-Marie Murrell say the Obama birth certificate likely is a fake and they are alarmed that Americans are more disturbed by that possibility.
Members of PolitiChicks have joined celebrities and leaders including Donald Trump, Michael Savage and Pat Boone who have expressed concern about the possibility that Obama isn’t qualified under the Constitution’s requirements for a president – and wonder what could happen to the U.S. should that be recognized generally.
Their short program on the issue has been posted on YouTube, and gives then an open door to express their concerns.
Jackson, the SNL veteran, put her worries to a tune, “Yes, I’m a birther, and I’m really, really proud. Yes. I’m a birther, why aren’t I allowed – to ask intelligent questions and find out what is true? Yes, I’m a birther. Don’t you want to be one too?”
Stewart wondered openly why the issue is important, and the others explained that without a legitimacy to the presidency, there would be a question about whether any of his actions as “president” would be valid.
Or would it be treason, they wondered.
Jackson, a popular speaker for tea party rallies all across the country, said the bottom line is that there is an appearance of lying and false identities on the part of Obama.
“He’s not an American. I don’t care about a piece of paper. He’s not an American because he doesn’t’ have American values,” she said.
Donald Trump

Donald Trump

Mega-millionaire Donald Trump makes a return trip to the list of doubters.
He was asked by CNN’s Piers Morgan this week whether he accepts what Obama has released as valid.
He was referring to the image of a Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth” that was released by the White House in April, a document that imaging experts have stated on the record they doubt is real.
Trump, who in April claimed credit for creating the circumstances that prompted Obama to release the “Certificate” image, was blunt.
“No, I don’t necessarily accept it,” he said.
“Do you believe he was probably born in America?” Morgan pressed.
“He might have been,” Trump said.
“What does your gut tell you, because you are a smart guy,” Morgan continued.
“My gut tells me couple things. No. 1, you know, it took a long time to produce this certificate, and when it came out, as you know, check out the Internet, many people say it is not real, you know, that it’s a forgery,” Trump said. “They go over it, and lots of different things and lots of different reasons.”
He continued, “The other thing is, nobody has been able to see, you know, the day of his birth, they had twins born, they had another one born. Nobody has been able to find any records that he was born in that hospital.”
Just days earlier, Trump had been hit by Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren on the same issue:
“I don’t know just how it miraculous appeared … all of a sudden after years and years it was produced out of nowhere,” he said. “If in fact it’s not 100 percent, he’s not supposed to be president of the country.”
He pointed out it was Van Susteren’s first question to him.
“People have real questions about the validity,” he said.
Michael Savage

Michael Savage (San Francisco Chronicle)

Talk radio icon Michael Savage has labeled Barack Obama a “lifetime naked Marxist” and says he is troubled by the president’s refusal “to show a valid birth certificate.”
The comments came this week as Savage was blasting the advance toward socialist that is being pursued by the Obama administration in Washington.
Obama is “a man who refuses to show a valid birth certificate. A man who applies for college aid as a foreign student and then denies he’s foreign. A man who has a Social Security Number from a state he’s never even lived in,” Savage said, citing three of the major disputes over Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, command U.S. troops and set foreign policy.
His comments, with the references to Obama’s deceptions regarding his eligibility, come at about the 8-minute mark:
Savage was citing evidences of Obama’s socialist agenda:
“A man who orchestrates the sale of murder weapons to Mexican drug cartels. A man who can be held in contempt of court, in fact, was for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. A man who requires Americans to purchase a product from a third party (Obamacare), which is unconstitutional. A man who spent a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and then admitted there was no such thing,” he said.
Savage said Obama also “bypassed” Congress to implement the failed illegal alien amnesty by “executive fiat.”
Obama is “a man who demanded an oil company hand over $20 billion to a political appointee, terminated America’s ability to put a man in to space, and encouraged racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places and refused to let the Justice Department investigate the New Black Panther Party.”
Pat Boone
Longtime song and movie star and WND columnist Pat Boone is unconvinced by President Obama’s release in April of an image of a Hawaii “Certificate of Life Birth” in support of his claim to be eligible under the U.S. Constitution to be president.
“I was in Kenya about a year and a half ago, and everyone there says, you know, your president was born here,” he told an interview for the San Francisco Chronicle.
He described the image released on April 27 by the White House – an image that a multitude of experts in documents, computers and imaging have described as a fake – as a “photo-shopped fraud.”
The publication confronted Boone at a GOP event in California recently.
He said he had heard the tape recording of Obama’s grandmother claiming to have been present in Mombasa when Obama was born.
“Some say she didn’t understand the question. One thing for sure,” Boone said, “She understood to say I was there. Where it was, it wasn’t Hawaii.”
Franklin Graham
In an interview with HotAirPundit, Franklin Graham, heir apparent to the ministry legacy of his father, Rev. Billy Graham, said Barack Obama readily could resolve the questions over his birth certificate:
“I think he’s a very nice man … but I think our country is in big trouble,” Graham said.
Asked specifically about Donald Trump’s repeated questions about Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility, Graham said, “The president I know has some issues to deal with here. He can solve this whole birth certificate issue pretty quickly.
“I was born in a hospital in Ashville, N.C., and I know that my records are there … I don’t know why he can’t produce that.
“It’s an issue that looks like he could answer pretty quickly,” he said.
Pat Buchanan
Two-time GOP presidential candidate and longtime political analyst Pat Buchanan says Barack Obama should just show his birth certificate to put an end to questions over his eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
His comments came in an interview on MSNBC, where he serves as a political analyst:
Buchanan said he agrees with Mitt Romney in that he believes Obama was born in Hawaii, and the newspapers probably were accurate in reporting his birth there in 1961.
However, he said, “I do agree with Donald Trump when he said, ‘Why is Barack Obama toying with the American people? Why doesn’t he just produce this and end this controversy.’”
Said Buchanan, a founder and editor of The American Conservative and columnist for WND, “I think it shows a real arrogance of power.”
He also challenged the White House press corps to simply demand the answers, to which Bill Press, another WND columnist, responded that Obama’s eligibility “is a total non-issue.”
Press also claimed that “in 2007 the president produced his birth certificate. They put it online. … End of story.”
However, what was posted online by the Obama campaign was a computer-generated image of a “Certification of Live Birth,” a short-form document any Hawaii resident could have obtained at the time simply by declaring the birth had taken place in the state.
Melania Trump
Melania Trump told CNN’s Joy Behar that the dispute could be resolved easily if Obama would just “show it.”
“I have a birth certificate from Slovenia,” she said. “Do you want to see President Obama’s birth certificate or not?”
Behar responded. “I’ve seen it. I’ve seen it,” referring to the online image posted by the Obama campaign.
“It’s not a birth certificate,” Melania Trump pointed out.
“It’s a ‘certificate of live birth,’” Behar said.
Actually, at the time, it was a “Certification of Live Birth” that does not, in fact, prove a Hawaiian birth place.
The Drudge Report
“Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to Be President,” by two-time No. 1 New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi, was headlined on the Drudge Report, which declared, “The street date is a LONG month away, and author Jerome Corsi, the man who torpedoed John Kerry’s presidential dreams with SWIFT BOAT, has gone underground and is holding his new findings thisclose.”
“‘It’s utterly devastating,’ reveals a source close to the publisher. ‘Obama may learn things he didn’t even know about himself!’” Drudge said.
Drudge wondered whether the president’s attorneys will “attempt to interfere with the book’s distribution?” and whether the book will “finally – once and for all – put an end to the growing controversy?”

The image of the book also was seen on Rush Limbaugh’s personal computer today as he broadcast his top-rated radio program from his Florida studio.

Jerome Corsi’s “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” book can be partially seen featured on the Drudge Report on Rush Limbaugh’s computer as he broadcast his radio show from South Florida Wednesday, April 20, 2011.

“The book results from three years of continuing research,” Corsi said. “I traveled to Kenya and to Hawaii – I have hired private investigators and had the help of inside sources in Kenya, Indonesia and Hawaii. The book will contain startling new information, and the release of the book will be orchestrated through WND with documents the public has never seen before.”
Interest in the controversy has accelerated in recent months. There was Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie’s famous pledge to find Barack Obama’s birth certificate and make it public to shut up the so-called “birthers.”
The governor’s quest raised national interest in the issue – especially when he failed to produce the promised documentation. Members of Congress have raised similar questions about Obama’s eligibility, and state lawmakers are considering plans to require documentation from presidential candidates.
Then came Donald Trump out of the blue, asking questions WND’s newsroom team has been asking for the last two and a half years, raising the national debate to furious new heights.
At Alexa, the Internet information company, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” was rated before its release as the hottest product.
“Products that people are coveting right now … 1. Where’s the Birth Certificate?” the site said.

The site also listed at No. 2 among “Hot Pages,” the Drudge reference to “Book to Reveal Obama’s True Identity?”
The book was listed at the No. 2 position among all books at Amazon.com at the time, leading the nonfiction and professional and technical categories completely.

Bill O’Reilly

Bill O’Reilly

Fox News host Bill O’Reilly brought attention to the issue after some comments he made about the arguments apparently were scrubbed from an audio of his program, a file posted online.
O’Reilly had erroneously claimed President Obama’s
Connecticut-issued Social Security number was likely the result of his father having “lived in Connecticut for several years.” In his viewer email segment last week, O’Reilly was asked by viewer John Knox of Arlington, Va.: “What about Obama having a Connecticut Social Security number? He never lived there.”
“His father lived in Connecticut for several years,” O’Reilly answered, adding that “babies sometimes get numbers based on addresses provided by their parents.”
Another letter from Fox viewer Ken McFadden of LaGrange, Ga., asked: “O’Reilly, will you stake your professional reputation that Mr. Obama is constitutionally eligible to be president?”
“I will, Ken,” answered O’Reilly.

A screenshot from BillOReilly.com shows no mention of the viewer’s letter asking O’Reilly why Obama is using a Connecticut-based Social Security number when he never lived there.

But those questions and answers did not appear on a Fox News website podcast of the episode purchased, downloaded and audited by WND. In addition, a printed version of the question-and-answer exchange, above, on BillOReilly.com, a separate site, also left out the key question about Connecticut.
The Fox audio podcast had O’Reilly doing the “Factor Mail” segment, starting with a question from Marion Rauch, Ocala., Fla.: “O’Reilly, well I am so glad you cleared up the myths surrounding President Obama. Come on, Bill, give us the facts, not opinion.”
He responded, “Gave you the facts, Marion. Stand by all of ‘em. If you have evidence to the contrary, please pass it along. You got the facts.”
Following a “bump” in the audio, he then moves immediately into “Pinheads and Patriots.”
O’Reilly’s full explanation of the “truth” of Obama “myths” is here:
Donald Trump
Billionaire Donald Trump called for the president to just show the birth certificate, because without proof, Obama’s presidency actually could be “illegal.”
Trump told Bill O’Reilly that when he started suggesting that Obama should be answering some questions and providing some information, he thought that “probably” Obama was eligible to be president. He said his opinion changed to that being only “possible.”
He told Laura Ingraham that the circumstances of Obama’s eligibility story – his birth location and timeline – just don’t add up.
“There’s something fishy about the whole thing,” he said.
He noted that even Obama’s own family members have been unable to agree at which hospital he was born.
“If you are going to be the president of the United States you have to be born in the United States – and there is doubt [about Obama],” he said. “If he wasn’t born in this country, it’s one of the great scams.”
Michele Bachmann

U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann

Comments from Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., indicate her concern is less about Obama’s eligibility than removing any question from her own candidacy should she pursue the GOP nomination for 2012.
“I’ll tell you one thing, if I was ever to run for president of the United States, I think the first thing I would do in the first debate is offer my birth certificate so we can get that off the table,” she told radio personality Jeff Katz on Boston’s Talk 1200 Radio Station.
Bachman’s comment came up as Katz was interviewing her about several significant issues developing in Washington, including Rep. Peter King’s hearings on radical Islam in the U.S. and the trillion-dollar expenditures the country will face because of Obama’s health-care reform law.
Bachmann said at the time of the interview she hadn’t made a decision on a 2012 bid for the White House. She later joined the race.
She said the hearings scheduled by King address the obvious “common thread” in terror cases targeting the U.S. and its residents recently.
“We know there’s a common thread. Why not look into it?” she said.
Denver Post publisher Dean Singleton

Dean Singleton (Minnesota Public Radio)

Dean Singleton, publisher of the Denver Post, has confirmed that the questions about Obama’s eligibility are “valid.”
However, he told radio talk show host Peter Boyles on his KHOW AM 630 program that it’s not something he wants to argue about.
Singleton’s comments were posted on YouTube by an organization monitoring the criticism of Obama:
“Asking the question is certainly fine to do,” Singleton said during the discussion with Boyles about Obama’s records and eligibility. “To me it’s not the big issue. I know to you it is.”
He continued, “The American people elected Barack Obama president. He’s got two more years to go on his term. Probably four more after that. He was elected by the people, says he’s a citizen, produced a certificate of live birth (sic). There’s no proof he’s not a citizen.”
Singleton said he can criticize Obama’s policies and actions “all day long,” but the eligibility controversy is “just not something I want to argue about.”
“There are questions,” he admitted. “Why hasn’t the president released his college transcripts. … Those are valid questions, and probably should be asked until he does [answer].
“There’s nothing wrong with asking the question over and over.”
Notre Dame Law School professor emeritus Charles E. Rice

A professor emeritus at the Law School of Notre Dame says he doesn’t know whether Barack Obama “achieved election by misrepresenting, innocently or by fraud, his eligibility for that office.”
But Charles E. Rice, who has authored “What Happened to Notre Dame?” said the U.S .House of Representatives should be the leaders stepping forward to resolve the question.
“The House of Representatives is an appropriate body to inquire into the facts and legal implications of a president’s disputed eligibility for office,” he wrote on a blog, called The Steady Drip,” today.
“The House itself has a contingent but potentially decisive role in the election of a president,” he wrote.
“The lawsuits have presented a bewildering array of claims,” wrote Rice. “There is no reason to analyze those lawsuits here in detail.”
But he added, “It is fair to say that the Obama controversy involves significant issues of fact and law that deserve some sort of official resolution.”
“I suggest no conclusion as to whether Obama is eligible or not. But the citizens whom the media and political pundits dismiss as ‘birthers’ have raised legitimate questions,” he said.
“This is potentially serious business. If it turns out that Obama knew he was ineligible when he campaigned and when he took the oath as president, it could be the biggest political fraud in the history of the world,” he said.
“As long as Obama refuses to disclose the records, speculation will grow and grow … the first step toward resolving the issue is full discovery and disclosure of the facts,” he said.
Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh recently opened his top-rated program asking why Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie appears to have no support from the White House in his publicized quest to resolve the growing doubt about Barack Obama’s eligibility for the Oval Office.
“Where’s Obama? Where’s the White House? Is this guy flying alone? Neil Abercrombie on his own on this? So much of this is difficult to fathom, to believe,” the king of talk radio said.
Limbaugh noted WND’s story that has led to established media such as the Daily Mail of London declaring in a headline: “Hawaii governor claims record of Obama’s birth ‘exists in archives’ but cannot produce the vital document.”
“The story originated at WorldNetDaily in this country earlier, and of course if it originates anywhere outside the mainstream press, the mainstream press will not acknowledge it,” Limbaugh told his listeners.
Abercrombie said in a Honolulu Star-Advertiser interview that he wanted to resolve the issue because he feared it would jeopardize Obama’s re-election in 2012.
“But he’s done the exact opposite now,” Limbaugh said. “How many of us could get away with saying, ‘Yeah there’s a little notation somewhere there in the archives, but we can’t find the birth certificate.’”
ABC News also ran a story on its website leading with, “Officials in Hawaii say they have located President Obama’s birth certificate indicating that he was born in the state, but have yet to produce the document at the heart of a long-simmering conspiracy theory.”
Hear part of Limbaugh’s opening segment:
Puzzling over Abercrombie’s investigation, Limbaugh began by pointing out the governor’s knowledge of the “ins and outs of electoral politics” as a veteran of 20 years in the U.S. House of Representatives.
But Abercrombie made a mistake, Limbaugh said, in announcing his investigation in December before he was sure that he could produce the proof.
Abercrombie told the Honolulu paper that resolving the issue is “a matter of principle with me.” There are reports he later simply dropped his effort.
Sean Hannity
Radio show host Sean Hannity says today the biggest names demanding verification of Obama’s birth time and place are those on the left:
“If people want to ask the question, the birth certificate, I don’t have a problem with them asking the question. Turn over the birth certificate,” he said.
“The biggest birther is Chris Mathews,” he continued, citing that personality’s suggestions that Obama simply open up the documents necessary to provide the proof.
“He’s got liberals angry with him now,” he said.
MSNBC’S Chris Matthews
Chris Matthews, the anchor of MSNBC’s “Hardball” program, called for Barack Obama to release his original, long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate to put to rest any doubts about the president’s constitutional eligibility to hold office.
“I am not a birther. I am an enemy of the birthers,” he said.
But he wondered, “Why doesn’t the president just say, ‘Send me a copy right now?’ Why doesn’t Gibbs and Axelrod say, ‘Let’s just get this crappy story dead?’ Why not do it? … If it exists, why not put it out?”
Matthews was joined by Clarence Page of the Chicago Tribune and David Corn of Mother Jones, who both agreed with the call for Obama to publicly release the document, which to this point has remained under wraps.
Orioles slugger Luke Scott
“He was not born here,” Orioles slugger Luke Scott told David Brown of Yahoo sports in an interview posted online.
“That’s my belief. I was born here. If someone accuses me of not being born here, I can go – within 10 minutes – to my filing cabinet and I can pick up my real birth certificate and I can go, ‘See? Look! Here it is. Here it is.’ The man has dodged everything. He dodges questions, he doesn’t answer anything. And why? Because he’s hiding something.”
Scott continued, “You know what? People who have bad intentions, people that are deceivers or are not of honor and integrity – that’s how they act. I’ve seen it in every – it doesn’t matter what level. It can be in politics, it can be in business, it can be in sports, it can be in the construction field. Doesn’t matter. It’s all the same attitude. It’s the same thing.”
He said, “People who tell the truth, they’re very easy to … their actions prove it. Something as simple [as] providing a birth certificate. Come on. If you’re born here, there’s plenty of documents. But you know what? There’s no documentation of him. No legal documentation of him. There’s been lie after lie after lie exposed, but people put it under the carpet. Hence, the problem we have in this country.”
Wrote Brown, “Scott’s opinion about the president’s birthplace – while certainly not unique – was a stunning climax to a friendly and frank 20-minute Answer Man session that spanned his enthusiasm for baseball, hunting, firearms, personal responsibilities and smaller government. … Scott used to come to the ballpark packing heat. Now sporting an offseason beard but no noticeable firearm, Scott came out guns blazing, figuratively …”
Scott did not hesitate when interviewed by Brown.
“There needs to be accountability for the truth. I don’t care if you’re the president of the United States, you need to be held accountable. If you’re involved in treacherous acts, or you’re saying things that are against, or are selling out our country, you should be brought to trial,” he said.
“I mean, no one’s above the law. There’s a lot of people that fought for their country and that’s not something to be taken lightly. They gave their life, everything they had, they gave their lives, to give us what we have. That’s why I’m so passionate about my beliefs – because someone died. They gave their life, their blood was spilled, so I had an opportunity to chase a dream and play baseball for a living.”
Talk radio host Laura Ingraham
One of talk radio’s first ladies, Laura Ingraham, believes Barack Obama was born in the United States and is a legitimate president, but she suggests it wouldn’t hurt him to release his original long-form birth certificate.
That would be among the documents, she said, that should be available to the American public about their president, arguably the most powerful man in the world.
She specifically cited Obama’s college records as among the documents still concealed by him and wondered about his time at Occidental College.
“In the interest of full disclosure, sir, could we please have those records?” she asked.
A minute later, she added, “And of course, you know, all of you are thinking ‘Laura when are you going to say long-form birth certificate.’ Well, long-form …”
Her remarks are on YouTube, with the birth certificate reference about 5:20 into the recording:
The focal point of Ingraham’s commentary was Obama’s lack of transparency, an issue he boasted would be a hallmark of his administration.
A spokesman for Ingraham’s show said the commentary was describing the hypocrisy of the Obama administration, which has boasted of transparency while concealing a lot of information.
Michigan congressional candidate Tim Walberg

Tim Walberg in video by Mediaite

A candidate for Congress in Michigan is suggesting the easiest way to resolve questions over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be commander-in-chief would be a simple, just-a-few-close-friends, birth certificate party.
The idea from Tim Walberg is being reported by Tommy Christopher, a columnist at the website Mediaite, which has posted a video of Walberg’s comments online.
According to the video, Walberg, asked about Obama’s eligibility, responds:

I’m going to take him at his word that he’s an American citizen. I don’t know why it’s not resolved, other than the fact that the president hasn’t resolved it yet. …
If I had to do it, I’d just simply, of course I had to show my birth certificate in order to be on the ballot. If I were going to do it, I’d call Rush Limbaugh, Alan Colmes, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, and maybe one justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Call them into a room and lay out my birth certificate on the table. … and say, now all of you take a look at it. Tell me what you find. Now go and report it.”

Walberg noted the president “has an awful lot of power to keep from showing certain things unless the courts will stand up to him. Or unless Congress in majority will stand up, up to and including impeachment. And Republicans don’t have that majority.”
The Mediaite said, “Now, Alan Colmes is a great guy, a great liberal, but I’m sure even he would admit that he and Rush Limbaugh might not possess the gravitas to serve on a panel with a Supreme Court justice. Luckily for them, in Walberg’s plan, SCOTUS participation is optional.”
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich told a Spanish-language television Obama has an “obligation” to figure out why so many Americans doubt his life story.
“If I were the president, that would really concern me, not because of Fox News or talk radio or Rush Limbaugh, but what is there that he’s doing that would let that many people be confused?” Gingrich said on Univision’s “Al Punto,” according to a report from The Hill.
The former speaker insisted that Obama was “absolutely” born in the United States and is a Christian, but Gingrich also insisted the president needs to consider what he’s doing that may lead people to suspect him Muslim.
“I think some of this stuff is just a sign of how much fear and anxiety has built up,” Gingrich said, “but I think the president has an obligation to slow down and say, if you’re president of all the people, what is it the White House is doing that so frightens a third of the Republican Party that they don’t even believe something as simple and as obvious as his self-professed religious belief.”
New Mexico congressional candidate Steve Pearce
Steve Pearce, a candidate for Congress in New Mexico, says he wouldn’t mind being “in the fight” over the issue of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president.
The candidate made the comment in response to a question from a constituent at a public campaign stop, and it is being publicized by Heath Haussamen at the NMPolitics website.
Haussamen used the opportunity to warn that Obama is eligible, is president and a candidate that suggests there still could be unanswered questions would “empower those on the extreme, fringe right who may be willing to resort to violence.”
Haussamen said the comments came at a Sept. 30 meeting in Los Lunas.
A video that was posted on the Huffington Post website reveals a woman asking Pearce for his position on whether Obama is eligible, since an ineligible president would create all sorts of questions about the legitimacy of his actions in office.
Pearce said Obama raised the “most significant questions himself” by talking about his travels to Pakistan as a youth, at a time when travel there by U.S. residents was not easy.
He then tries to focus the discussion on the nation’s economy, noting that a member of Congress can only fight so many battles in a year, and he believes the economy is paramount.
But he also confirmed, according to the video, that should the issue arise formally, “I don’t mind being in the fight. … I don’t have a problem expressing my opinion or expressing a vote.”
Arizona state House candidate Cecil Ash
During a meeting for state House candidates with editors and others at the Arizona Republic, House District 18 Democrat candidate Michael Conway blasted GOP incumbent Cecil Ash for signing onto a plan that would require future presidential candidates to verify their eligibility.
The newspaper reported Conway questioned why Ash would support such a plan, and Ash responded that states don’t verify the eligibility of presidential candidates, and he thinks it should happen in the future.
He explained to the newspaper that it hasn’t been an issue before, because people know the parentage and heritage of Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and others.
“That’s not the case with President Obama,” he said.
He cited a New York Times poll revealing that 1 in 5 Americans believe Obama foreign-born and another nearly 1 in 4 have doubts.
Conway then pointed to the “Certification of Live Birth” that the Obama campaign posted online during his 2008 race, the newspaper said.
“And you don’t think you as a leader had the opportunity to let people know the truth? The electronic copy of the birth certificate had been released. It had been on the Internet. It had been on multiple news networks,” Conway claimed.
But Ash pointed out that the online document is not the same as a “birth certificate,” and the document posted by Obama could have been obtained under Hawaii law without proof of a birth in the state.
“That is the only copy there is, sir,” Conway said, according to the newspaper. “You know this.”
Then he accused Ash of being racist.
“The fact of the matter is, if he was white you wouldn’t have put the issue forward,” the newspaper reported he charged.
Ash said race has nothing to do with GOP opposition to Obama.
Michigan congressional candidate Andrew Raczkowksi

Rocky Raczkowski

Just one day after a poll by CNN included the startling revelation that 6 of 10 Americans doubt President Obama’s birth story, Andrew “Rocky” Raczkowski, who won a Michigan GOP primary for Congress over establishment candidate Paul Welday, said he had concerns, too.
According to a report in Politico, he is on tape telling a meeting of supporters in Novi, Mich., “You have a president that seems to be, um … well … I don’t know if he even has been born in the United States, but … until I see a birth certificate.”
Raczkowski doesn’t care that his words are on tape, reportedly being circulated by Democrats in an attempt to damage his campaign.
“They don’t need an HD recorder – they can call me. I’m very open, they can call me; we can have an open discussion, perhaps even a debate,” he told the publication.
Anthony Tolda
A candidate for Congress in New York’s Second District, a seat now held by Democrat Steve Israel, says there is a “usurper” in the Oval Office and impeachment isn’t the solution since “that would imply that he held the seat in a valid manner in the first place.”
The comments by Constitution Party candidate Anthony Tolda were reported on a blog calling on Obama to release his records.
“For our Constitution to continue to exist much longer Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro must be removed from office,” the candidate’s statement said. “I would not seek to impeach him, as that would imply that he held the seat in a valid manner in the first place.”
Tolda’s speech was captured in two segments on video:
In it, he references the “usurper” in the office of the president.
But the blog expands on that, noting that Tolda was asked specifically about Obama’s eligibility to be president.
The candidate responded, “There is a process to remove seat holders that are not able to legally hold a seat. Until now the highest seat that was removed from the holder in this manner is a seat(s) in the U.S. Senate.
“I will seek to begin this process as soon as I am sworn in. Although I do not intend to pursue an impeachment, I would assist in any efforts started by others in office to impeach. Only so long as I can verify that it would not nullify my plans for the annulment-type removal that has been used on senators unfit to legally hold office in the past,” he said.
Indiana congressional candidate Marvin Scott
Indiana congressional candidate Marvin Scott was responding to call-in questions from campaign supporters when he was confronted with a question about his position on the eligibility issue:
Scott, who is challenging Democrat incumbent Andre Carson, said, “Certainly, we have a right to know as citizens of this country. And that particular question has to be vetted over and over again to assure the public that the people who are representing us are fair and have ascended to that particular position because they have met all of the requirements, and therefore they are entitled to by a vote of the populace to be there.”
Scott has been a professor of sociology at Butler University for nearly 20 years and for nine years was president of a management-consulting firm.
He’s served as a consultant to public schools, colleges, universities and federal courts. His website explains he’s running for the House of Representatives because Republicans have a “long and rich history with basic principles: Individuals, not government, can make the best decisions; all people are entitled to equal rights; and decisions are best made close to home.”
Sen. David Vitter, R-La.
Louisiana’s Vitter says the dispute over Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president should be resolved in court.
“I support conservative legal organizations and others who would bring that to court,” Vitter said, according to an Associated Press report citing a video of the event.
It’s also significant that the AP reported on Vitter’s comments. The news wire has stated the president’s “birth certificate” has been made public even though the image of the document posted online actually is a “certification of live birth,” which was available to those not born in Hawaii.
Vitter was responding to a constituent at a town-hall meeting in Metairie, La., who asked about Obama’s “refusal to produce” a birth certificate.
The AP reported the crowd applauded the question.
Vitter said he didn’t have personal “standing” for litigation. But he said he supports the efforts to bring the question to court.
“I think that is the valid and most possibly effective grounds to do it,” he said.
He said “first and foremost” Americans need to “fight the Obama agenda at the ballot box starting this fall.”
Vitter said, according to the AP report, that the matters of the nation are too important to be diverted by distractions.
U.S. Rep. Steve King
U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, appears to have suggested he’s not entirely satisfied that all the questions about President Obama’s eligibility have been answered fully.
The issue came up as he talked about the national debt in a recent address in Congress, televised by C-SPAN and posted on YouTube:
The congressman referred to the estimated $44,000 that each child born in the United States owes at the moment of birth as his or her part of the federal debt.
“We worry about them carrying a student-loan debt … maybe $40,000 in student loans,” he said. “We’ll, I’d be happy to take that $40,000 loan and a guarantee of a college degree and think that child could pay that off.”
But for the $44,000 in federal debt obligations, all the individual gets is access to citizenship in the United States of America, he said.
“Little baby with ink on their foot, stamped right there on the birth certificate – there’s one in this country we haven’t seen,” he said. “But the footprints on those we have seen. Those little babies owe Uncle Sam $44,000.”
U.S. Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C.
Rep. Bob Inglis, R-S.C., said Obama was born “not in Hawaii.” He gave the answer during a tongue-in-cheek “interview” on the satirical Colbert Nation show.
Inglis was being grilled about whether he was a conservative.
“Are you conservative enough for the 4th District?” Stephen Colbert asked.
“I sure hope so,” Inglis responded.
Inglis noted he had been endorsed by the National Rifle Association and the Christian Coalition.
Then Colbert said, “Complete this sentence. ‘Barack Obama was born in …’”
“Oh,” said Inglis, “Not Hawaii.”
Champaign, Ill., mayor Gerald Schweighart
A few weeks earlier, the mayor of Champaign, Ill., Gerald Schweighart, said Obama should produce his birth certificate.
The mayor was asked about Obama and responded he doesn’t think he’s “American.”
“If you are not willing to produce an original birth certificate, then you’ve got something to hide,” he said. “If he doesn’t have something to hide, produce it.”
Others raising questions are Tennessee state Senate speaker Ron Ramsey, Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero, Oklahoma state Rep. Mike Ritze, U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., and many others with similar questions.
Ramsey said, “I don’t know whether President Obama is a citizen of the United States or not. I don’t know what the whole deal is there.”
But Ramsey also said he doesn’t believe citizens are concerned about Obama’s citizenship status.
“But I’m going to tell you something,” he said. “When you walk out on the street down here, people don’t really care about this issue.”
There also have been efforts to raise the question of Obama’s eligibility at the state and national levels. Several state legislatures are working on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. Among the states where election qualification or eligibility requirements were being considered or developed include Oklahoma, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Virginia and New York.
Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero
Hawaii state Sen. Will Espero, a Democrat, has suggested that legislation could be adopted to release Obama’s birth records and satisfy critics.
While Espero said he believes Obama was born in Hawaii, he explained, “My decision to file the legislation was primarily a result of the fuss over President Obama’s birth records and the lingering questions.”
Oklahoma state Rep. Mike Ritze
Oklahoma state Rep. Mike Ritze sponsored a proposal to demand eligibility documentation from candidates for political office, including the president. Ritze, who says he regularly gets questions from his constituents about Obama’s eligibility, said an “ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” on the issues of candidate qualifications and eligibility.
U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.
In March 2009, Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., proposed H.R. 1503, known as the Presidential Eligibility Act. It is still pending in a House committee and has nearly a dozen co-sponsors, including Reps. Dan Burton, R-Ind.; Ted Poe, R-Texas; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.; John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas; Trent Franks, R-Ariz.; Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; and Kenny Marchant, R-Texas.
The measure seeks to “amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee’s statement of organization a copy of the candidate’s birth certificate … to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution.”
Arizona state Sen. Sylvia Allen
Arizona state Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, said the controversy over Obama and his birth certificate has raised questions.
“It just makes sense and will stop any controversy in the future to just show you are a natural born citizen,” she told the Arizona Capitol Times.
Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges
Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges, R-Skull Valley, told WND she has been getting questions from other states about H. 2442, a proposal she sponsored to require future presidential candidates to show they are qualified under the U.S. Constitution’s demand for a “natural born citizen.” The bill was co-sponsored by some three dozen lawmakers who also want state officials to independently verify the accuracy of documentation.
U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal, R-Ga.
Rep. Nathan Deal, R-Ga., sent a Dec. 10 letter to the White House formally requesting that President Obama address questions about his place of birth – and thus, whether he is qualified to be president. Deal, who is running for governor, said several months ago he would ask Obama to prove his eligibility.
“I have looked at the documentation that is publicly available, and it leaves many things to be desired,” Deal said in November.
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
Even Sarah Palin, former vice-presidential candidate and best-selling author, affirmed that questions about Barack Obama’s eligibility for office are legitimate.
“I think it’s a fair question, just like I think past association and past voting records – all of that is fair game,” Palin said. “The McCain-Palin campaign didn’t do a good enough job in that area.”
Former House majority leader Tom DeLay
In October, former House majority leader Tom DeLay offered his views on Obama’s birth, saying, “Why wouldn’t the president of the United States show the American people his birth certificate? You have to show a birth certificate to play Little League baseball. It’s a question that should be answered. It’s in the Constitution that you have to be a natural born citizen of the United States to be president.”
U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.
Asked whether he believes Obama is eligible to be president, U.S. Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., said, “What I don’t know is why the president cannot produce a birth certificate. I don’t know anyone else who can’t produce one. I think that’s a legitimate question.”
U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.
U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said he believes Obama was born in the U.S., but he also said he thinks the president is trying to hide something:
“I believe he’s a natural born citizen of the United States. Therefore, even if he acts un-American and seems to go against American interests, he’s still an American-born citizen,” he said. “All that being said, probably Barack Obama could solve this problem and make the birthers back off by simply showing … his long-form birth certificate.”
Because that isn’t happening, “There’s some other issue there.”
“I don’t know what it is that he doesn’t want people to see the birth certificate. I don’t think it has to do with his natural-born citizenship,” Franks continued. “He’s spent an awful lot of money to keep people from seeing the birth certificate. … I think it has to do with something else.”
Feminist icon Camille Paglia
Even feminist icon Camille Paglia, a Salon.com columnist who earlier wrote about the ambiguities of President Barack Obama’s birth certificate, told a National Public Radio audience that those who have questions about his eligibility actually have a point. “Yes, there were ambiguities about Obama’s birth certificate that have never been satisfactorily resolved. And the embargo on Obama’s educational records remains troubling,” she wrote.
New Hampshire State Rep. Laurence Rappaport
In September, New Hampshire State Rep. Laurence Rappaport, R-Colebrook, said he was tired of telling his constituents that he’s not sure of Obama’s eligibility to serve as president. He met with New Hampshire’s secretary of state, William Gardner, who oversees the state’s elections, to demand answers.
“Regardless of where he was born, is he a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution? I don’t know the answer to that,” Rappaport said. “My understanding is that … a natural born citizen had to be someone with two American parents. If that’s true, his father was a Kenyan and therefore a British subject at the time. Then there’s the issue: If he was born out of the country, was his mother old enough at the time to confer citizenship?
“I expect somebody to come up with the legal answers to this,” Rappaport told WND, “and so far that hasn’t happened.”
Former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, R-Ariz.
In his Jan. 26 appearance on “Hardball,” former Rep. J.D. Hayworth was asked by Chris Matthews, “Are you as far right as the birthers? Are you one of those who believes that the president should have to prove that he’s a citizen of the United States and not an illegal immigrant? Are you that far right?”
Hayworth replied, “Well, gosh, we all had to bring our birth certificates to show we were who we said we were, and we were the age we said we were, to play football in youth sports. Shouldn’t we know exactly that anyone who wants to run for public office is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and is who they say they are?”
“Should the governor of Hawaii produce evidence that the president is one of us, an American?” Matthews asked. “Do you think that’s a worthy pastime for the governor of Hawaii right now?”
“No, I … Look, I’m just saying the president should come forward with the information, that’s all,” said Hayworth. “Why should we depend on the governor of Hawaii?”
A video of the interview follows:
Prominent commentators
A prominent array of commentators, including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Lou Dobbs, Peter Boyles and WND’s Chuck Norris and Pat Boone have all said unequivocally and publicly that the Obama eligibility issue is legitimate and worthy.
Longtime New York radio talker Lynn Samuels did the same. “We don’t even know where he was born,” she said. “I absolutely believe he was not born in this country.”
Also, Aaron Klein, best-selling author and WND reporter, dedicated several of his shows on New York’s WABC Radio to investigating the birth certificate issue. Klein also repeatedly called out the news media for their lack of curiosity on the subject.

2012-01-24T17:37:00.001-08:00

Georgia Democrat Party Says Republicans Carrying Out “Political Tricks” Against Obama »

BUT TWO DEMOCRATS ARE PLAINTIFFS! by Sharon Rondeau (Jan. 24, 2012) — The Georgia Democrat Party is asking for donations to mount an offensive...
Jan 24 2012 / Read More »

2012-01-24T10:05:00.001-08:00

LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE—Eligibility Alert!

Major Announcement:

ARTICLE II SUPER PAC WILL PROVIDE GAVEL TO GAVEL LIVE VIDEO COVERAGE FROM THE 3 BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARINGS ON JANUARY 26TH IN ATLANTA GEORGIA STARTING AT 9 AM ET

http://www.art2superpac.com/livevideo.html

CLICK VIEW IN FULLSCREEN BELOW TO READ
PRESS RELEASE

ART2SUPERPACANNOUNCEMENTREGARDINGLIVEGAHEARINGBROADCASTv2

2012-01-24T09:15:00.001-08:00

Video: Roger Hedgecock Tackles Obama's Eligibility And Georgia Court Hearing

Nationally Syndicated Radio Host Roger Hedgecock Tackles

Obama's Eligibility And Georgia Court Hearing

Neil B. Turner @ Citizens for the Constitution

2012-01-24T05:07:00.001-08:00

GINGRICH FACT: HOUSE VOTED 395 TO 28 GINGRICH GUILTY OF HOUSE ETHICS RULES VIOLATION --> FIRST TIME IN 208-YEAR HOUSE HISTORY. GINGRICH WAS FINED $300,000.

GINGRICH APOLOGIZED: "I brought down on the people's house a controversy which could weaken the faith people have in their government." THEN HE RESIGNED

WTF??
IS THIS THE BEST WE'VE GOT IN AMERICA?

BOTH...

2012-01-23T20:11:00.001-08:00

Is Obama Guilty of Identity Fraud Rather than Ineligibility? »

DO MISSING RECORDS, HAWAII’S STONEWALLING AND INCONSISTENCIES POINT TO A DIFFERENT LIFE STORY? by Sharon Rondeau (Jan. 22, 2012) — On January 26, 2012,...

Jan 22 2012 / 17 comments / Read More »

MUST READ!...

2012-01-23T18:00:00.001-08:00

Which Laws Could Have Been Broken? »

MISUSE OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY, CONSPIRACY, MISPRISION OF FELONY? by Sharon Rondeau (Jan. 23, 2012) — Numerous graphics, typesetting, Adobe® and scanning professionals have claimed...
Jan 23 2012 / 1 comment / Read More »

WAY TO GO TIMMY!...YOU ROCK!...

2012-01-23T17:49:00.000-08:00

Tim Thomas

on his Facebook site tonight:

I believe the Federal government has grown out of control, threatening the Rights, Liberties, and Property of the People.
This is being done at the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial level. This is in direct opposition to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers vision for the Federal government.
Because I believe this, today I exercised my right as a Free Citizen, and did not visit the White House. This was not about politics or party, as in my opinion both parties are responsible for the situation we are in as a country. This was about a choice I had to make as an INDIVIDUAL.
This is the only public statement I will be making on this topic. TT

Tim Thomas, Boston Bruins goalie, snubs President Obama

AP Photo

There was a notable absence during a White House reception this afternoon for the Stanley Cup champion Boston Bruins: star goalie Tim Thomas.

Thomas refused the invite for "political reasons," Sports Illustrated reports.

Nearly every other member of the Bruins was at the ceremony, where President Obama congratulated the team on its victory. Thomas is a staunch conservative and is expected to explain his snub of the president on his Facebook page this evening.

"Whatever he will say is not reflective of our organization's views or beliefs," Bruins General Manager Peter Chiarelli told SI.com.

2012-01-23T12:29:00.001-08:00

BIRTHER SUMMIT PARTNERING TO BRING LIVE GEORGIA VIDEO FEED

Posted by: Dean C. Haskins
dean@birthersummit.org
202.241.3648
Posted: January 23, 2012
© 2012 The Birther Summit

Download a PDF

Because of the considerable cost involved with providing a live video feed of the three Georgia hearings that will be taking place on Thursday, January 26, Vattelevision, LLC, the parent company of The Birther Summit, has agreed to partner financially with Article II Super PAC to be able to provide the finest coverage to the greatest number of national viewers.
Additionally, Dean Haskins will be on site to assist with the video feed arrangements, outside video interviews of notable attendees, and as an eyewitness to the proceedings. He will follow up with a report (including the video interviews), and states that he will do so with an eye for honesty, and not sensationalism.

###

If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at www.birthersummit.org or contact Dean Haskins at dean@birthersummit.org.

2012-01-23T12:18:00.001-08:00

2012-01-23T09:09:00.001-08:00

THE NOOSE IS TIGHTENING...THE USURPER RUNNING OFF TO LAS VEGAS ON THURSDAY INSTEAD OF FACING THE MUSIC IN GEORGIA...

2012-01-23T07:12:00.001-08:00

RE: An extraordinary set of circumstances
(Atty Leo Donofrio files amicus brief in
GA eligibility case)

Has anyone everr seen anything as bizarre as what's happening now regarding Obama/Soetoro.

Consider this:

The usurper is going to give the State of the Union Address tomorrow night, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. Mr. Cool will stand at the podium in front of the full Outlaw Congress, Supreme Court Justices and other "luminaries" knowing full well his game of fraud might just be on the cliff. But, as a very practiced, pathological liar, the serial vacationer will no doubt yuk it up while trying to look serious reading how many teleprompters?

Two days later, Barry is required to respond to a subpoena to bring all his records to court in Georgia to prove his eligibility to run for the office he has usurped.

Unless his attorney's can get an emergency stay of some sort between now and Thursday, Jan. 26, 2012 - the imposter president of these united States of America will be in a court room in Georgia or be held in contempt.

When you think about it, it really is an extraordinary set of circumstances.

Of course the "mainstream" media and cable network anchors and news desks have remained mute. They play the numbers game hoping the cattle will be content with the drivel they serve up. I know there was local coverage in Georgia, but other than WND and other independent news sites, the lock down on what's happening with that looming court date has been complete.

Leo Donofrio, for those who might not know, was the first individual to challenge the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro, McCain and a third candidate for ballot qualification in New Jersey in 2008.

Leo has filed an amicus brief with the court in that Georgia case; actually there are three sets of plaintiffs:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

"This morning, I filed an AMICUS BRIEF in the Georgia POTUS eligibility cases. The brief complies with all Rules and procedures of the Administrative Court. The brief is 54 pages, and the appendix is 155 pages.

The Rules of Court require attachment to the brief of all legal authorities, other than those issued by the federal government, or the State of Georgia. There's some very esoteric law attached thereto.

"I seriously urge everyone to familiarize themselves with Lord Coke's Report from Calvin's Case, as well as Chancellor Ellesmere's argument, also in Calvin's Case, for this is the true common law genesis of jus soli

subjection, which happens to be a uniquely Christian tenet of law that has been completely misunderstood in this country for too long now. Calvin's Case is universally recognized as the common law precedent relating to jus soli, but it is so much more fascinating than you can imagine. And it will forever revolutionize understanding of the words "natural-born".

"This book contains all of the relevant arguments and reports. But the original text of Lord Coke's Report is the proper starting point. (This document is also in the appendix to my brief.) And here's another source

with slightly modernized English and extras. You may download the AMICUS BRIEF here."

Below is the direct link to his brief . It is long, but well worth the time for anyone who wants to fully understand the 'natural' born issue and not the pap regurgitated by ignorant members of

Congress, federal judges and assorted employees who work in election divisions in the states.

You may download the AMICUS BRIEF here.

NOTE: Article II Political Action Committee (http://art2superpac.com) will be on site with uncut, uncensored, complete, live streamed gavel-to-gavel video coverage of the first ever “Obama” Constitutional Presidential eligibility hearings. “The PAC saw the need to do this last month, because of the often incomplete and biased coverage of this issue by MainStream news media and recently received permission from the court,” said Director Helen Tansey, who will personally manage on-site efforts.

FROM THE BLOGOSPHERE...

2012-01-23T06:57:00.001-08:00

It gets curiouser and curiouser.

Although Attorney Apuzzo believes Obama has a definite obligation to appear in court in Georgia on 1/26 to testify, there's a big probability that he won't show up. The worst that could then happen is a $5 fine and his name would not appear on the Presidential ballot for Georgia -- but only IF the Georgia Secretary of State decides to bar Barry from the ballot.

Now, here's a new development coming out of this mystery. It may be that Obama actually is eligible as a "Natural Born Citizen" and his only real crime is identity theft. How is that possible ? Well, without any genuine birth certificate, "Obama" could have been born anywhere -- even in Harlem in New York City, as one researcher proposes. His real father could be anyone -- even Malcolm X (aka "Shabazz"). That story by Martha Trowbridge is gaining some legs.

Of course, Obama could have been born in Kenya. That's why we need a genuine birth document -- to show where on earth he actually was born. Since his attempt to manufacture an Hawaiian birth certificate has been closely investigated by computer experts -- and shown to be a forgery -- it seems
very improbable that he was born in Hawaii. So which alternative story do you prefer to believe -- that he was born in Kenya to Barack Obama, Sr. or that he was born in Harlem to black radical Malcolm X ?

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, there is a posse led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio rounding up some facts to demonstrate the truth of WHO the man sitting in the White House actually is and WHERE his birth occurred. Sooner or later we may learn the TRUTH.

However, please vote to reelect Barry (" Obama/Soetoro"') or ("Shabazz"). He has a great record of performance in improving the economy, leading America out of the recession and preventing the environment from being polluted via dirty coal, filthy oil and ugly pipelines -- even if it comes at the price of higher gasoline and utility bills, destroying JOBS, and delaying our country's ever becoming independant of foreign energy sources. After all, he is very articulate and good looking -- and has boosted the popularity of the Teleprompter and the creative use of Czars and Executive Orders. He is an inspiring role model, rising from Community Organizer to become putative President of the U.S.

Only in exceptional America could something like this happen. Stay tuned for new developments in this ongoing soap opera. The rest of the world must surely be laughing at this comedy/tragedy.

Give Us Liberty

PLAINTIFF WELDEN’S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

ENHANCED AUDIO OF GEORGIA BALLOT CHALLENGE HEARING JAN. 26, 2012

WHY ARE WE STILL SUCH GULLIBLE FOOLS?

PART 1 of 3

PART 2 of 3

PART 3 of 3

From the Blogosphere...

Disingenuous HANNITY: I don’t believe that. I don’t think that’s going to work.

The Lights are on…But for How Long?

SITE STILL ON SHARED HOSTING ACCOUNT SHUT DOWN TWICE IN ONE WEEK…FOR MORE THAN FIVE DAYS

Attorney Van Irion Interview 1/26/12 Atlanta, Georgia

Improved sound...

Web host shuts down site twice, promises to migrate,then leaves customer in the lurch

Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

WND EXCLUSIVE

Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

OBOTS AT WORK...

Arpaio's Phoenix offices temporarily evacuated

How's that Hopey Changey doin' for ya'?...

ANOTHER LOOK AT THE GEORGIA ELIGIBILITY HEARING...

He (OBAMA) is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.

Obama the Chicken is Being Plucked

FAST APPROACHING THE ONE MILLIONTH VISITOR TO GIVE US LIBERTY THIS MORNING!...

WHAT SHE REALLY SAID...

WHY DID OBAMA REFUSE MATCHING FUNDS IN 2008?

From CitizenWeIIs

FROM WND...

Important update! Judge Malihi expedites the date for post trial motions. Moves it from February 5th to February 1st, will issue his ruling shortly thereafter

From Orly Taitz...

JUDGE TO MAKE RULING ON. FEB. 5...NOTE: REPORTER GETS HER FACTS WRONG...ATTORNEY'S WERE NOT ARGUING THAT OBAMA WAS NOT AN AMERICAN CITIZEN...UNBELIEVABLE!...

Message from Orly Taitz...

A MESSAGE FROM CARL SWENSSON...

CERTIFIGATE

Georgia warns Obama of 'peril' of ignoring eligibility hearing

Lawyer had urged secretary of state to simply cancel challenges

Georgia court told Obama slam-dunk disqualified

Sworn testimony reveals fake Social Security number, other gaps

EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...

UPDATE FROM GEORGIA!...

POST & EMAIL UPDATES AT 11:00 AM EST...

LATEST UPDATES AT 10:45 AM EST FROM THE POST & EMAIL...

10:44 AM EST...

UPDATE ON COURT HEARING FROM THE INCOMPARABLE SHARON RONDEAU AT THE POST & EMAIL...

Georgia Ballot Hearing Under Way

VAN IRION SPEAKING AT 9:44 A.M. ET

LIVE FROM GEORGIA...

BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXCLUSIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obama eligibility hearing to be broadcast live

'Complicit media ignoring all calls for honest reporting on the issue'

SCAREDY CAT!...LOL

OK AMERICA...THIS IS A RED FLAG TO ANYONE WITH AN OUNCE OF COMMON SENSE...IT'S PRETTY OBVIOUS WE HAVE A USURPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE...ALSO LOOKS LIKE THE OBAMA CAMP DIDN'T WANT A LIVESTEAM OF THEIR LIES SENT AROUND THE COUNTRY!...

THE BIG LIST of eligibility 'proofers'

See those who have raised questions about legitimacy of Obama presidency

BOTH...

MUST READ!...

WAY TO GO TIMMY!...YOU ROCK!...

Tim Thomas on his Facebook site tonight:

Tim Thomas, Boston Bruins goalie, snubs President Obama

AP Photo

BIRTHER SUMMIT PARTNERING TO BRING LIVE GEORGIA VIDEO FEED

THE NOOSE IS TIGHTENING...THE USURPER RUNNING OFF TO LAS VEGAS ON THURSDAY INSTEAD OF FACING THE MUSIC IN GEORGIA...

FROM THE BLOGOSPHERE...

Web host shuts down site twice, promises to migrate,
then leaves customer in the lurch

Tim Thomas

on his Facebook site tonight: