Retired Marine Officer Steve Klein Says: Benghazi Cover-Up Began At the Top
Well, isn't that just nice? The People's Purse is bankrupt.
Every penny for those helicopters comes from borrowed DEBT slapped on
our backs. $690 MILLION to GIVE to the Afghanistan Air Force. I want to
puke. Our children, grand children and great grand children have no
future except as financial slaves to the criminal syndicate out in
Washington, DC.
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Obama is fully behind the attack, and shouldn’t just be impeached — he should be prosecuted for criminal attacks on American liberties.
6 Reasons the IRS Scandal Leads to Obama
At this point, essentially all evidence points to the fact that Obama knew of and likely ordered the IRS attack on the Tea Party. He joked about it, talked about it, met with the people who initiated it, and met 100+ times with the IRS chief while it was occurring.
Since the scandal broke, everyone seems to be falling on their swords and protecting the White House. Meanwhile, some officials are coming forward saying it “comes from the top”.
Some people are so blindly in love with Barack Obama — for reasons I will probably never understand — that they believe it’s all fabricated and just a stunt by Republicans. So let’s look at the evidence.
1. Orders Came “From the Top”
Even though the official story is that it was just a question of “low level” workers acting on their own, we now know that is a lie for a variety of reasons. Some IRS officials have even come forward, with one saying that it came “from the top”:
“We people on the local level are doing what we are supposed to do. . . . That’s why there are so many people here who are flustered. Everything comes from the top. We don’t have any authority to make those decisions without someone signing off on them. There has to be a directive.”Considering the Obama administration immediately began claiming this was a low-level issue, it should be clear how far up this goes, especially in light of everything else we know about Obama’s involvement.
2. Obama Talked About It Beforehand
Obama joked about using the IRS as a weapon in 2009, just a year before the Tea Party attack began. While clearly it was only a joke, it’s pretty clear that using the IRS in a political context wasn’t something he’d never considered.
If this was the only evidence, there wouldn’t be a link to Obama. But mixed with the reasons listed below, it’s simply more damning of what should be obvious at this point.
READ MORE...
Uncle Sam Wants You...Under His Thumb!
It's scandal season in the Obama administration. Let's just summarize the more egregious behavior of our Beloved Leader and his Apostles. More
Hillary's - and now Obama's - Vast Left-Wing Cover-Up
Are not Barack and Hillary joined at the hip in their Saul Alinsky ideologies, their Rules for Radicals tactics, and their current tar baby of the Benghazi cover-up? More
It's scandal season in the Obama administration. Let's just summarize the more egregious behavior of our Beloved Leader and his Apostles. More
Hillary's - and now Obama's - Vast Left-Wing Cover-Up
Are not Barack and Hillary joined at the hip in their Saul Alinsky ideologies, their Rules for Radicals tactics, and their current tar baby of the Benghazi cover-up? More
Friday, May 24, 2013
ALAN KEYES: The leadership of both wings (Democrat and Republican) of the elitist faction are working to overturn constitutional self-government in the United States. Neither of these parties cares to practice government of, by and for the people.
HIGH CRIMES & MISDEMEANORS
Impeachment: Rush is wrong this time
Exclusive: Alan Keyes uses Hamilton quote to challenge 'waste of effort' argument
In this respect, Barack Obama’s rise to, and abuse of, political power has proven to be a litmus test. It has exposed the GOP’s protestations of allegiance to the Constitution for what they are: a hollow ploy, used to get votes from gullible conservatives loyal to the Constitution and its principles. Meanwhile, by action or inaction, many of the people they vote into office end up helping the would-be tyrants of the Obama faction cultivate the seeds of its destruction.
READ MORE...
(AP)
FreedomWorks President Matt Kibbe tells Newsmax that
Thursday’s decision by the embattled IRS to replace Lois Lerner over the
agency’s targeting scandal is “clearly the tip of the iceberg” along
with other administrative casualties that have been offered up thus far
by the Obama administration.
[Full Story]
Thursday, May 23, 2013
| ||||
MORE Q & A WITH MIKE ZULLO...
In the 27 minute interview below with host of PPSIMMONS Radio - Carl
Gallups, Zullo answers several more important and pressing questions
that YOU have been asking and then gives a surprise sneak peek into an
upcoming event, scheduled to happen in the near future, that could shape
this investigation in a monumental way. Zullo stresses that this event
is just ONE of several of ever progressing importance that will be
coming down the pike over the next couple of months.
Lois Lerner’s a 3-time loser
By Judi McLeod Full Story
Even
with Obama administration-sanctioned IRS suppression—or with all odds
stacked against them—the might of the Tea Party remains inspirationally
epic.
The IRS already had its hobnailed big boot down on the tail of hundreds of Tea Party groups at mid-term elections on November 2, 2010, the IRS raid against the Tea Party having kick-started in March of the same year.
With the IRS boot at their throats, the Tea Parties stuck it to the high-riding Obama Democrats, virtually shellacking them in Nov. 2, 2010 mid-term elections.
By Judi McLeod Full Story
Even
with Obama administration-sanctioned IRS suppression—or with all odds
stacked against them—the might of the Tea Party remains inspirationally
epic.The IRS already had its hobnailed big boot down on the tail of hundreds of Tea Party groups at mid-term elections on November 2, 2010, the IRS raid against the Tea Party having kick-started in March of the same year.
With the IRS boot at their throats, the Tea Parties stuck it to the high-riding Obama Democrats, virtually shellacking them in Nov. 2, 2010 mid-term elections.
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Now Fact: All aspects ObamaGov Completely Corrupt/Criminal
By Sher Zieve
Obama syndicate most corrupt, criminal and openly tyrannical
By Sher Zieve
Obama syndicate most corrupt, criminal and openly tyrannical
Team Arpaio: No Hawaii Statute Compels HDOH To List Birthplace On Hawaii Birth Certificates
Sheriff Joe's Lead Obama Investigator Mike Zullo: No Hawaii Statute
Compels HDOH To List Birthplace On Hawaiian Birth Certificates
AUDIO HERE:
( Clip via Carl Gallups @...
Obama’s ‘Iron Curtain’ descends on America
By Judi McLeod Full Story
Under the Marxist rule of President Barack Hussein Obama, Uncle Sam
morphs day by day into ‘Uncle Satan’. Ironic when contemplating that
Iran has long called America “the great Satan”.
By Judi McLeod Full Story
What did Obama do on 9/11/2012?
What did Obama do on 9/11/2012? Jack Cashill asks if BHO pulled a Clinton a la '96 during Benghazi attack
By Jack Cashill
On this past Sunday
morning, Chris Wallace of Fox News grilled the administration’s newly
anointed flak catcher, White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer.
One critical question was how Obama spent that long night of Sept. 11, 2012, while his charges were busy dying in Benghazi.
“With all due respect,”
asked Wallace, “you didn’t answer my question. What did the president do
that night?” This was a good question and one that prompts a careful
look at the time line.
At 3:40 p.m.
Washington time on Sept. 11, 2012, U.S. ambassador to Libya Chris
Stevens in Benghazi called his No. 2 man, Greg Hicks, and told him,
“We’re under attack.”
(All times cited will be EDT, six hours earlier than Libyan time).
At 4:05 p.m.
the State Department Operations Center issued an alert to all relevant
agencies, “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack.”
At 4:25 p.m. a six-member CIA team headed by Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods arrived at Stevens’ compound from the nearby annex.
Under heavy fire, Woods’
team recovered the body of Foreign Service IT specialist Sean Smith but
could not find Stevens’ body in the burning building.
At 5 p.m.
President Barack Obama had a pre-scheduled meeting with Defense
Secretary Leon Panetta, who briefed him on the Benghazi situation.
At 6 p.m.
Woods and his CIA team arrived back at the annex, which they would
defend Alamo-style for the next six hours. They would kill an estimated
60 Libyans before the night was through.
At 6:07 p.m.
the State Department Operations Center shared a report from the U.S.
Embassy in Tripoli that Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility for
the Benghazi attack. The terror group also called for an attack on the
Embassy in Tripoli.
At 7:30 p.m.
or thereabouts Obama engaged in an hour-long phone call with Israeli
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Obama hoped to mend fences with
Netanyahu to help secure the Jewish vote in the upcoming election.
After roughly 8:30 p.m., there is no known accounting of Obama’s time or whereabouts.
At 11:15 p.m.
Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, another former SEAL, were killed in a
mortar assault at the annex. Doherty had just arrived as part of a
six-man team from Tripoli.
At 1:40 a.m.,
having evacuated the annex, the first group of Americans flew out of
Benghazi bound for Tripoli. They saw Stevens’ body at the airport and
confirmed his death.
Said Pfeiffer to Wallace
when asked about Obama’s evening, “He was in constant touch with his
national security team and kept up to date with the events as they were
happening.”
Wallace then listed all the
critical people with whom Obama had little or no conversation – the
secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the chairman of the joint
chiefs.
Pfeiffer clarified, “He was
talking to his national security staff, his National Security Council –
people who would keep him up to date as these things were happening.”
“Was he in the situation room?” Wallace asked.
“I don’t remember what room
he was in that night,” said Pfeiffer. “That’s a largely irrelevant
fact.” No, it is not irrelevant at all.
I cannot say for sure where
Obama was that evening, but if the night of July 17, 1996, set a
precedent, Obama was likely in the White House family quarters.
For the record, at 8:35 p.m.
on that turbulent night in the election year of 1996, President Bill
Clinton and wife Hillary left a Washington fundraiser and headed back to
the White House by motorcade.
At 8:31 p.m.,
two FAA veterans at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center
observed a target arching and intersecting with Paris-bound TWA Flight
800 as it headed east off Long Island’s south shore.
A manager from that center
rushed the radar data to the FAA technical center in Atlantic City, and
from there it was faxed to FAA headquarters in Washington and rushed
“immediately” to the White House situation room.
It was in this room, “in the
aftermath of the TWA Flight 800 bombing,” as Clinton aide George
Stephanopoulos unwittingly told Peter Jennings on Sept. 11, 2001, that
all key parties converged.
“This looks bad,” said Ron
Schleede of the National Transportation Safety Board upon first seeing
the data that “suggested something fast made the turn and took the
airplane.”
Anti-terror czar Richard Clarke got the message too. By 9 p.m., he was driving in to the White House to convene a meeting of his security group, not at all the norm for a plane crash.
“I dreaded what I thought
was about to happen,” Clarke wrote in his best-seller “Against All
Enemies.” Clarke called it “The Eisenhower option,” a retaliatory strike
against Iran.
When President Clinton met
with friendly historian Taylor Branch on Aug. 2, 1996, he also traced
the TWA 800 disaster to Iran. “They want war,” Branch quoted Clinton as
saying.
On the night of July 17, however, the president chose not to join Clarke and the other agency representatives in the situation room.
Clinton remained holed up in
the family quarters with Hillary. Retired Air Force Lt. Col. Robert
“Buzz” Patterson and others have confirmed the president’s location that
evening.
Patterson was in a position
to know. He carried the nuclear football for the president, and he too
was in the White House that night, though purposefully kept out of the
loop.
The one person Patterson has
tentatively cited as being in the family quarters with the Clintons is
Sandy Berger, the deputy director of the NSA and the Clintons’ politicalconsigliere.
As it happened, National
Security Adviser Tony Lake, Sandy Berger’ boss, was not invited to the
family quarters. Lake was known to excuse himself from meetings when
they turned political.
That night Berger and the
Clintons gathered information from the FAA radar, from the satellite
data and from the eyewitness accounts and translated the data into
electoral strategy.
By 3 a.m. Clinton had apparently gathered enough information to call Lake with the following message: “Dust off the contingency plans.”
Dust them off, yes, but
let’s not get too serious about them. In late summer 1996, with the
election comfortably in the bag, war was the last thing the Clintons
wanted or needed.
On Sept. 11, 2012, war was
the last thing Obama wanted or needed as well. He had already bagged
Osama bin Laden, pacified al-Qaida and liberated Libya.
Or so he repeated endlessly.
Foreign policy was alleged to be his electoral strong suit. Given the
political dynamics, Obama likely retreated, just as the Clintons had, to
the family quarters.
As Pfeiffer said, Obama probably did talk to “people who would keep him up to date as these things were happening.”
Obama and certain of these
people, the political insiders, would have spent the night translating
national security data into electoral strategy.
After all, Obama had a big
fundraiser the next day in Vegas. That did not allow much time to
establish an alibi that would preserve his carefully crafted bin
Laden-slayer narrative.
It was a close call, but
with a little help from the media – a special shout-out to CNN’s Candy
Crowley! – the alibi worked just well enough to get the man re-elected.
History does repeat itself.
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
GOT THAT RIGHT...MORE LIKE HITLER AND PINNOCHIO WRAPPED UP IN ONE...
The Blog
He’s No Nixon
8:00 AM, May 21, 2013
• By WILLIAM KRISTOL
The thoughtful Carl Cannon has written a piece, "Richard Milhous Obama,"
concluding that our current president has more in common with our 37th
than President Obama's partisans would like to acknowledge. The
estimable Victor Davis Hanson has weighed in, defending against liberal
dissents the proposition that "Nixon Is a Fair Comparison" with Obama.
I
protest. Will no one stand up for Richard Nixon? Richard Nixon was a
combat veteran, a staunch and brave anti-Communist, a man who took on
the liberal establishment and at times his own party's as well, a leader
who often thought for himself and had the courage of his convictions, a
president who assembled a first-rate Cabinet and one who—while flawed
both in character and in policy judgment—usually tried to confront the
real problems and deal with challenges of his times. Richard Nixon led
neither the country nor his own administration from behind.
I worked for Richard Nixon (well, I worked for two
months in the Nixon White House in 1970 as a summer intern). I voted for
Richard Nixon (in 1972, my first vote, against George McGovern—and one
about which I have no regrets). I knew Richard Nixon (very slightly—I
met him on a few occasions in groups in the late 1970s and the 1980s,
and then a couple of times when I worked for Vice President Quayle). And
so I feel obliged to rise to Richard Nixon's defense, and to say, with
all due respect, to our current president: Barack Obama, you're no
Richard Nixon.
The serial lies by a serial liar have covered up the ugly truth that American lives were sacrificed on the altar of appeasement. Four men are dead and a fifth has been locked up to keep the lie alive.
Obama: Serial Liar
May 21, 2013 By Comments (27)
Will
Rogers, the great humorist, once said, “If you ever injected truth into
politics, you would have no politics.” If you injected truth into the
teleprompter during one of Obama’s speeches, there would be nothing left
but an empty chair.Fourteen days after the September 11, 2012 attacks, Obama appeared at the United Nations to deliver a eulogy for the man he had not troubled to save and to declare that the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.
Obama denounced the “crude and disgusting video” that had “sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world” and explained that it couldn’t be banned only because of the pesky Constitution. Two days later, the man behind the video, a Coptic Christian protesting the Muslim persecution of Christians in Egypt, had been arrested. The actual perpetrators of the attack still walk the streets of Benghazi.
That lopsided injustice appeared to have been the plan all along. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had told Charles Woods, the father of murdered Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods, that the administration was going to arrest and prosecute the man who made the video.
It was the only promise that Obama and Clinton made about Benghazi which they faithfully kept. Everything else was a lie. Doubletalk had become an administration habit. Obama would say one thing and do another. Or he would loudly tell a lie and quietly speak some version of the truth in order to hedge his bets.
On May 13, 2013, standing alongside British Prime Minister David Cameron, Obama said, “The day after it happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism.” The phrasing suggested an admission, rather than an assertion. A thing that had to be dragged out of him. But even that much was not true.
At the United Nations, Obama had not used the word, terrorism. On 60 Minutes, he carefully avoided calling it a terrorist attack. There and on The View, he took refuge in delaying tactics about a developing investigation that was doomed from the start because the FBI had no power to take any action in a city run by the same terrorist militias that had carried out the attacks.
In campaign speeches, Obama mentioned acts of terror, plural and unspecified, while administration proxies like Susan Rice blamed a YouTube movie trailer for the carnage and Obama and Clinton spent $70,000 on an apology commercial denouncing the video in Pakistan.
There was no question that the dominant message coming out of the White House after the attacks was that the trailer for The Innocence of Muslims was to blame. The infamous talking points trimmed away any mention of terrorism and reduced a heavily armed attack to a spontaneous protest over an online movie trailer.
This Sunday, Obama adviser Dan Pfeiffer was sent to do a tour of the morning shows where he declared that Obama’s whereabouts during the attack were irrelevant and that the process by which the talking points were altered was likewise irrelevant.
At his joint press conference with Cameron, Obama had taken the same line, declaring the investigation a “sideshow” and insisting that there was nothing there and that no one had known what was going on. Gregory Hicks, the lead diplomatic figure in Libya, however had testified that everyone there knew that it was a terrorist attack and that it had nothing to do with the video.
At 2 AM, local time, Hicks had briefed Clinton. Despite everything the one man in the position to know what was happening was saying, the administration chose a disastrous and dishonest narrative instead.
The dishonesty isn’t ending any time soon.
At a joint press conference with Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, a known supporter of terrorism, Obama once again shifted the blame to Congress for a lack of security and the failure to intervene.
The myth that the State Department lacked the funds to provide security in Benghazi was the defense against accusations of administration malfeasance. But it’s a myth that fell apart when Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, testified in Congress that budget issues had not prevented the hiring of more security personnel.
The Washington Post had pointed out that Congress would have provided supplemental security funding if it had been requested. Despite pleas from diplomats on the ground, it was not. Instead the State Department’s bureaucrats and donor diplomats were busy squandering money on all sorts of wasteful vanity projects.
The State Department had plenty of money. It just chose to use it in the wrong ways. It had millions to spend on embassy art, ridiculously overpriced Kindles and even on an Afghan YouTube channel.
At the press conference, Obama went so far as say, “We’re going to need Congress’s help in terms of increasing the number of our Marine Corps Guard who protect our embassies” when under him, not only were 20,000 Marines being fired, but at the presidential debate, Obama had mocked Romney’s objections to his drastic naval cuts by saying that we no longer needed outdated horses and bayonets.
The real reason that the Marines had not been there protecting Benghazi was the same reason that no military forces came to the rescue once the attack began. It was the same reason that Obama blamed the video and used the United Nations as a forum for denouncing that video, instead of denouncing terrorism.
The issue was never the budget. It was appeasement.
The United States was not incapable of using armed force over Benghazi. Obama’s first Libya lie, the one that led to the war, was the claim that Gaddafi forces were about to carry out a massacre in Benghazi. No such massacre had occurred anywhere or was going to occur, but it was enough for Obama to go to war, without ever admitting that he was at war.
Was the military power that was leveraged to defend Benghazi incapable of being leveraged to defend the mission in Benghazi? Was overthrowing Gaddafi really easier than protecting American diplomats and security personnel under siege?
Benghazi was, from beginning to end, a story of appeasement gone bad. The serial lies by a serial liar have covered up the ugly truth that American lives were sacrificed on the altar of appeasement. Four men are dead and a fifth has been locked up to keep the lie alive.
MUST READ ARTICLE FROM DR. LAURIE ROTH...WAKE-UP AMERICA!...
Congress and ‘the people’ can do nothing to Obama UNLESS THEY DECIDE TO
By Dr. Laurie Roth
May 21st, 2013
Obama’s tentacles have spread throughout the country sucking the life out of everything they grab onto. America is dying.
Freedom – Dying
Energy industry – Dying
Reputation – Dying
National security – Dying
Sovereignty, state and federal – Dying
Health and privacy – Dying
Law and U.S. Constitution – Dying
Military – Dying
Morals and Judeo-Christian speech and traditions – Dying
The squeeze is on and the deathly blue is flowing in the water all around us. We are a nation, which has been boldly attacked in plain sight as Hitler did with Germany. More and more of us can feel it and know we are dying as Obama and his goons light another cigarette and roll out more tentacles of death and lies.
What is alive and living amidst the dying
* Agenda 21 and Sustainability – Alive
* U.N. agenda and its attempts to crush U.S. sovereignty – Alive
* Bold attacks on 1st amendment, 2nd amendment and 10th amendment rights – Alive
*End run by the Feds to control all school curriculums through bribes and deceit – Alive
*Establishment and growth of Islam and Shariah law in America and worldwide – Alive
*Using the IRS, EPA and DOJ to attack Obama’s enemies – all conservatives – Alive
Common Core curriculum –“Obama must have the minds, bodies and futures of your children” – Alive
The Push for ‘Common Core’ IS a national emergency that will not only rape and violate the minds, freedoms and privacy rights of our children and families but bankrupt most states. As with Obama care, it is completely littered with Government controls, lies and is unaffordable.
Each week I interview Common Core warrior and expert Christina Michas and last week she had on with her Henry Burke, a Civil engineer who had added up what each state had been financially offered by the Feds to join up and bypass their state curriculum. I asked them both, “how is it that States would give up their own curriculums and sovereignty to join a new and untested ‘Common Core’ handed down by Obama and the Feds? What they said made my skin crawl. The Feds offered a national contest, ‘Race to the top’ for all the states. The carrot would be desperately needed money given up front for each state, if they committed to only doing Common Core curriculum instead of their own version. Most states bit and bit hard. You know, as Pelosi said, “sign the bill before you read it” the same was in play with most states.
States had no clue that the front money was a pittance compared to the massive state costs that would practically bankrupt the states and make common core a state ‘death ray’. Just like with Obama care, Common core is entirely unaffordable and will require massive tax increases on the citizens.
Just two examples given by my guests involved Washington and California. In Washington, (my liberal and compromised state) they received 34 million from the Feds as their carrot. However, the total additional cost for Common core will total 365 million. Minus the carrot of 34 million from the 365 million, Washington has to find an additional 331 million. This will mean much more debt and a no doubt a huge tax increase.
In California, their carrot was close to 104 million. The total Common Core cost above and beyond what is normally spent on education will be 2.1 billion. Even taking off the 104 million, California will have to come up with an additional 2 billion. This is a state nearly bankrupt already and swirling down the financial toilet bowl.
As states have started seeing this unfold and started looking at the obscene cost of and what Common Core really teaches, they are rising up and starting to work on opting out. So far 23 states are trying to get out now and go back to their own programs. Just this week I got the call that Texas had bowed out of Common Core and Utah just won a resolution against it and that battle is going in the right direction.
You might be saying, what is the big deal with Common Core?
Where do I begin to uncover the evil and danger of Common Core to our States and children?
As Hitler went after the health care system and public schools so is Obama. Each week Christina Michas and her guests have been educating my audience to just what Common Core teaches and does.
First of all, Common Core completely rewrites our real U.S. history and instills shame in our kids for being American. The Boston Tea Party is likened to that of a 9/11 terrorist attack, not our heroes and patriots pursuing freedom.
It pushes Islam as a Religion of peace and lies about its real agenda and history. Christianity and Americans are the bad ones.
Common Core pushes Sustainability and Agenda 21 as the norm. – Sovereignty is a thing of the past.
It crushes exeptionalism and achievement and offers no special incentives and help for the disabled or gifted students.
It violates privacy rights for kids and families by doing ‘data mining’ on kids, dictating training and career focus. They are punched down and pushed into a sustainable, amoral and new world order cookie cut out. Then you put the kiddies in the Common Core – Obama oven and you now have obedient little ‘Step ford Wives’ cookies that will work and do what Obama and the progressives say.
No more teacher conferences – the school controls, manipulates, indoctrinates everything during school. Parents are not invited and are in the way.
Sexually pervert the kids from the youngest ages and raise them up to be completely amoral. National Sexuality education standards – k-12 – no right or wrong taught anymore. Starting in Kindergarten, kids will learn about Lesbians, gays, transgender, bestiality, pedophilia, abortions, and all kinds of sexual acting out. Kids will not hear of moral constraints, traditions, Judeo Christian norms and history of sex.
So many reasons to impeach and try Obama for treason
How many investigations can there be before our Congress and House will wake up and get this evil criminal, Obama out of our White House? They cannot afford to get stuck on treasonous stupid anymore, hiding behind race and other issues.
Evil comes in all colors and we have an evil man in the White House attacking health care, our Freedoms, attacking all Obama’s enemies using the DOJ, IRS, EPA and other Government agencies. We have murders and lying cover-ups all over the Benghazi nightmare and the illegal IRS running our health care system as well.
Congress needs to start building the support of public opinion by doing weekly press conferences and carrying forth the reason and steps of either Treason charges or impeachment charges. If they don’t have the Senate behind them…yet… get the American people behind them with endless and building pressure of press conferences. This will put much needed media pressure on the Senate and more panic in the White House causing Obama to slip up more and more.
Rush and others are great and have served our country wonderfully over the years, but yesterday, when I heard Rush say on his program “we won’t impeach Obama and we can’t win that battle”, pushing the audience to go after the ideology of progressivism/liberalism I nearly died. I understand how hard it is and will be. I understand Obama attacks nonstop and is black. I get it that our Senate is Democrat. So what!
I also understand that when your house is burning to the ground you don’t call a meeting in the community to try and avoid future arson and fires. YOU RUN IN THE HOUSE WITH AXES AND HOSES SHOOTING WATER AND SAVING THE LIVES AND PROPERTY YOU CAN. Firefighters do the best to promote safety and they will risk their lives to save another and put a fire under control. I know, my Grandfather was a Fire Chief for 30 years, then the state of Oregon Fire Marshall after that until he died.
This is no time to quit for America. This is war without the guns (for now). Benghazi is stuffed with lies, cover-ups, murders and crimes all linking back to Obama and his staff. The IRS scandal and attack on Obama’s enemy list is stuffed with crimes and linked back to Obama again. Whose enemies have been targeted and nearly ruined? Not George Bushes, not Pee Wee Herman’s, but Obama’s enemies.
Lies, cover-ups, criminal actions and evil are ALL Obama knows how to do as President. I urge Congress to build the momentum and power of an impeachment and/or Treason action by doing vocal, organized and REAL press conferences each week for the public, covering the issues and plans, thus putting pressure on the Senate, especially with the 2014 elections coming up. Obama will attack and react to you. YOU ATTACK BACK – STRONGER AND LOUDER!!!
Now is the time to lead, conquer, destroy and clean up for America. We can talk about taking on the cancer of progressivism another time. Our house is burning down now.
Join me each day on my national radio show from 7-10pm PAC or listen to an archive later at at: www.therothshow.com
“This junket wasted tax dollars and the resources of our overextended military. No wonder we had to sue to pry loose this information.”
Judicial Watch Obtains Documents Detailing the Cost to Taxpayers for Michelle Obama’s Family Trip to Africa
October 04, 2011 | 40 Comments
Charges for the Aircraft and Crew Alone Amount to $424,142
Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it has obtained mission expense records and passenger manifests from the United States Air Force related
to the June 21-27, 2011, trip taken by First Lady Michelle Obama, her
family and her staff to South Africa and Botswana. Judicial Watch
obtained the documents pursuant to an August 19, 2011, Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Air Force (No.
11-1496)). Judicial Watch is investigating the purpose and itinerary of
the trip as well as a breakdown of the costs to taxpayers.
On June 28, 2011, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request seeking
the mission taskings, transportation records, and passenger manifests
for Michelle Obama’s Africa trip. Documents were only provided after
Judicial Watch filed suit:
- According to U.S. Department of Defense’s published hourly rates for the C-32A aircraft used for the trip, Judicial Watch calculated the total cost to American taxpayers was $424,142 for use of the aircraft (34.8 flight hours x $12,188 per hour). (The C-32 is a specially configured military version of the Boeing 757.) Other expenses – meals (off the plane), transportation, security, various services, etc. – have yet to be disclosed.
SENIOR STAFFERS
- The passenger manifests confirm the presence of Obama’s daughter’s, Malia and Sasha on the trip. The two girls are listed as “Senior Staff.” The manifests also list Mrs. Obama’s mother, Marian Robinson, and niece and nephew, Leslie and Avery Robinson, as well Mrs. Obama’s makeup and hairstylist (Carl Ray and Johnny Wright).
- The expense records also show $928.44 was spent for “bulk food” purchases on flight. Overall, during the trip, 192 meals were served for the 21 passengers on board.
Read more about Africa, Michelle Obama
Developing: Sheriff Arpaio Lead Investigator Mike Zullo Taking Questions; Prosecution?
EXCLUSIVE! Have a question for Mike Zullo? ASK IT HERE!
Mike Zullo to give exclusive interviews through PPSIMMONS RADIO for YOUR questions!
PPSIMMONS News Exclusive
PPSIMMONS News has received confirmation from Mike Zullo, lead investigator, of the Cold Case Posse of the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Obama Fraud Investigation, that he will answer any and all legitimate questions concerning the case through PPSIMMONS Radio.
Zullo affirmed that he would do his best to appear at least once a week (when possible) with Carl Gallups (Host) and answer the tough questions that citizens and patriots are asking.
Zullo said, "I will have to be careful to not give away legal strategy and specifics to the criminal side of the investigation, but I will be more than glad to answer any and all questions regarding this investigation, my qualifications, the history of the Cold Case Posse, fund raising policies and efforts, information release methods, general ideas of where the case is headed, and the latest updates on what is getting ready to happen next. I have nothing to hide in these matters and other matters like them."
Zullo went on to say, "This is a professional, duly sworn and authorized, law enforcement investigation. Our goal is to now move the investigation to federal and/or state prosecution levels. Those plans are coming together nicely now and we are garnering promises and laying plans with very important people of standing and influence who can make this thing happen. I think the public will seem some important movement towards these ends in the very near future."
Below (here) is an example of a Zullo Update for PPSIMMONS RADIO (Please Note - this particular broadcast suffered an anomaly upon upload to YouTube. It was recorded in stereo but came out in mono when uploaded. We figure it must be a YouTube "thing.")
Rules for questions:
All legitimate questions pertinent to the case will be considered.
Questions concerning personal attacks on any personality will be deleted and not considered
Questions asking for detailed specifics about the case cannot be answered - but they will be answered as much as is legally possible. - PPSIMMONS. - Questions can be submitted here.
RELATED: Audio: Sheriff Joe Obama ID Fraud Investigator: New Obama Revelations In Two Weeks - AUDIO HERE.
Obama 'In the Morehouse'
How to give a rousing commencement speech if you're Barack Obama: lie about everything. More
How to give a rousing commencement speech if you're Barack Obama: lie about everything. More
Benghazi Exclusive: State Department Denies Libya Weapons Buyback program Exists
By Marinka Peschmann Full Story
Danger.
Danger. Al Qaeda’s Syrian wing also known as “rebels” bent on
overthrowing Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad (mirroring the Saudi, the
Obama administration and Republican Senator John McCain’s position),
have taken over the oilfields that once belonged to Assad.
By Marinka Peschmann Full Story
Monday, May 20, 2013
GLENN BECK
We Love Man
But........
We Love Man
But........
Commentary BY:
Dwight Kehoe
Dwight Kehoe
May 20, 2013 TPATH- Everyone who watches Glenn Beck on his internet show knows, he begins each broadcast by announcing, "Welcome to the Glenn Beck Show, the network you are building. Glenn may have been correct in that statement since TPATH and many others have not only linked to his TV Show, his radio show and his many publications and events, but also, thousands of us have called cable and satellite companies in an effort to get them to take Glenn Beck TV.
This past week, Mr. Beck, who has been called the "Conspiracy King", and his two fawning boot lickers on the radio, decided to alienate 75% of those "building his network". Beck, for some reason, only known to him, felt it necessary, once again, to take on the so called Birthers. The condescending, flippant sarcasm, the bunching together of those who have spent years reading and understanding the facts about Obama's ineligibility and then relegating them into a gaggle of fools and idiots, would have made Saul Alinsky and Kieth Obermann proud. (by the way, where is Kiethy Boy theses days?)
It is important to point out that Beck does some good work, in fact some great work. Most of which has been ridiculed by the very same people he now appears to be aligning himself with. The big question here is...Why?
Its quite interesting that Glenn would choose this time, when Comrade Obama and his cadre of leftist crooks, fabricators and liars are being exposed for not only what they are, but for what they have been, to attack those who are concerned that we have an illegal President. Also, relating to this, Beck has been bedside himself when the mainstream media either ignored or labeled him a conspiracy nut as he was putting together evidence concerning the Saudi terrorist the State Department secreted out of the country after the Marathon bombing.
Hey Glenn, welcome to the club, Buddy.
Over the years Glenn's prognostications have been, while not always spot on, very close to what we are seeing today, throughout the world. For that work he needs to be complimented and praised. But at the same time, all of these many "theories" that he has investigated, organized into cute little charts on the blackboard, can't hold a candle to the reams of information, proven facts, hidden and forged documents relating the mystery man occupying our White House. Again, the question screams.....Why?
Before I speculate on what could be behind Glenn's seemingly intentional ignorance, purposeful antagonism and frankly, completely flabbergasting position he has taken on the eligibility and forgeries of Obama, the following list of Obama Issues, most of which have been thoroughly investigated by some very capable people and ignored by Beck, should make one wonder why someone so into conspiracies would chose to not only evade and disdain but belittle those who are most likely to support him.
- Obama's father was never an American citizen.
- Article II of our Constitution requires the President to be "Natural born". Obama is not.
- Obama stated many times and wrote about his being Kenyan.
- Anyone who can dial a phone could put a birth announcement in the paper in Hawaii.
- No one, except a progressive Obama minion in Hawaii, has seen Obama's original birth certificate. Not one person!
- Obama's passport has been hidden because it may show he was listed as Kenyan during his trips to Pakistan during a time that American citizens were forbidden to travel there.
- Federal records, in the form of microfiche, which track every person coming into or leaving the country have been altered and the two week period that would show if Obama's mother left the country with an infant are the only records missing over a forty year period.
- The visitor's log book from the hospital where Obama was supposed to be born, has been concealed and removed from public view because it probably shows no visitors to Obama's momma before, during or after the supposed birth. That would be pretty much impossible unless, she wasn't there.
- Not any of the two Hawaiian hospitals where Obama claims he was born in will go on record as saying he was in fact, born there.
- Obama's mother's passport has been found for the period of her trips to Kenya around the time Obama was supposed to be born. If a guardian (parent) takes an infant out of the country, that infant's picture and information would have to be, by Federal Law, added to the guardian's passport. His mother's passport did not have that information on it. Clearly, this indicates she left before Obama was born.
- The birth certificate the Divider N Chief posted on the internet is a forgery. There is no doubt about that. Even if one would overlook a President lying to the American people, forging legal documents is a crime.
- Obama has used several Social Security numbers including one issued in a state where he never lived.
- There is no evidence that Obama ever legally changed his name, but everyone knows he was called by several names and enrolled in schools both in Africa and America under names not "Obama".
- Obama filled out election documents and stated that he was never known by or did he ever use another name except Obama. This is a crime.
- The Selective Service required "citizens" to sign up with them at the age of 18. Obama clearly never did that. Most likely he didn't have to, since he was not a citizen. When a political career became apparent, a Selective Service card for Obama was fabricated. This is also a crime.
Of course, if like some others, Glenn has decided not to pursue any of this because he believes the politicians, the judicial system and the country have become so corrupt, these issues will never go anywhere and there are other more viable things that need attention, he could be forgiven for that. But he has spent hours trashing those who believe every aspect of our Constitution should be protected. This does not make sense.
Some of us who watch the information highway closely, have seen bitter rivalries arise between between radio talk show hosts and internet hosts. One of the most unpleasant of these engagements has been festering between Beck and Alex Jones of Info Wars. Alex Jones, an aggressive and ever vigilant watchdog of our runaway government has long accused Beck of purloining data and research from his website and not giving credit to him.
Without being specific, I have noticed that Info Wars was in front on issues that later Glenn did talk about. Whether that constitutes theft of services or not, I make no contention here. But..... Since Alex Jones is and has been on the issue of Obama's forgeries, crimes and ineligibility, the impetus for Beck's attitude towards "Birthers" could very well stem from this, even to the point where Glenn is willing to disparage his own viewers and supporters.
There are a few more suppositions that can be made here. I'll list them. You decide.
- Glenn does not want to go against his pal at FOX, Billy O'reilly.
- Glenn is looking to expand his network to cable outlets owned and controlled by the left.
- Glenn is stubborn and won't admit that early on he was too hasty in attacking Birthers.
- Glenn may not want to see or be a part of removing the first black President.
- And last, but not least, aliens have invaded Glenn's brain and are about to take over the world.
May 20, 2013 TPATH
America’s cry for help lost in the White Noise
By Judi McLeod Full Story
Back
in the salad days of President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, the
first sign of the coming soft tyranny against We the People should have
been the roughly 2000 car dealerships forced out of business by the anti-free enterprise cabal squatting on the White House.
By Judi McLeod Full Story
Benghazi is about derelictions of duty by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton before and during the massacre of our ambassador and three other American officials, as well as Obama and Clinton’s fraud on the public afterward.
NATIONAL REVIEW
ONLINE, May 18,
2013
Clinton and Obama discussed Benghazi. What did they say?
By Andrew C. McCarthy
‘What would you be focusing on in the
Benghazi investigation?” I spent many years in the investigation biz, so it’s
only natural that I’ve been asked that question a lot lately.
I had the good fortune to be trained in
Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Rudy famously made his mark
by making law enforcement reflect what common sense knew: Enterprises take their
cues from the top. Criminal enterprises are no different: The capos do not carry
out the policy of the button-men — it’s the other way around.
So if I were investigating Benghazi, I’d
be homing in on that 10 p.m. phone call. That’s the one between President Obama
and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — the one that’s gotten close to zero
attention.
Benghazi is not a scandal because of
Ambassador Susan Rice, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland, and
“talking points.” The scandal is about Rice and Nuland’s principals, and about
what the talking points were intended to accomplish. Benghazi is about
derelictions of duty by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton before
and during the massacre of our ambassador and three other American officials, as
well as Obama and Clinton’s fraud on the public afterward.
A good deal of media attention has quite
appropriately been lavished on e-mail traffic between mid-level administration
officials in the days leading up to Sunday, September 16. That is the day when
Ms. Rice, a close Obama confidant, made her appalling appearances on the
Sunday-morning political shows. Those performances were transparently designed
to mislead the American people, during the presidential campaign stretch run,
into believing that an anti-Islamic Internet video — rather than a coordinated
terrorist attack orchestrated by al-Qaeda affiliates, coupled with the Obama
administration’s gross failure to secure and defend American personnel in
Benghazi — was responsible for the killings.
Fraud flows from the top down, not the
mid-level up. Mid-level officials in the White House and the State Department do
not call the shots — they carry out orders. They also were not running for
reelection in 2012 or positioning themselves for a campaign in 2016. The people
doing that were, respectively, President Obama and Secretary of State
Clinton.
Obama and Clinton had been the architects
of American foreign policy. As Election Day 2012 loomed, each of them had a
powerful motive to promote the impressions (a) that al-Qaeda had been decimated;
(b) that the administration’s deft handling of the Arab Spring — by empowering
Islamists — had been a boon for democracy, regional stability, and American
national security; and (c) that our real security problem was “Islamophobia” and
the “violent extremism” it allegedly causes — which was why Obama and Clinton
had worked for years with Islamists, both overseas and at home, to promote
international resolutions that would make it illegal to incite hostility to
Islam, the First Amendment be damned.
All of that being the case, I am puzzled
why so little attention has been paid to the Obama-Clinton phone call at 10 p.m.
on the night of September 11.
Even in the conservative press, it has
become received wisdom that President Obama was AWOL on the night of September
11, after first being informed by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, in the late
afternoon, that the State Department facility in Benghazi was under attack. You
hear it again and again: While Americans were under attack, the
commander-in-chief checked out, leaving subordinates to deal with the crisis
while he got his beauty sleep in preparation for a fundraising campaign trip to
Vegas.
That is not true . . . and the truth, as
we’ve come to expect with Obama, is almost surely worse. There is good reason to
believe that while Americans were still fighting for their lives in Benghazi,
while no military efforts were being made to rescue them, and while those
desperately trying to rescue them were being told to stand down, the president
was busy shaping the “blame the video” narrative to which his administration
clung in the aftermath.
We have heard almost nothing about what
Obama was doing that night. Back in February, though, CNS News did manage to pry one grudging disclosure out of White
House mendacity mogul Jay Carney: “At about 10 p.m., the president called
Secretary Clinton to get an update on the situation.”
Obviously, it is not a detail Carney was
anxious to share. Indeed, it contradicted an earlier White House account that claimed the president had not spoken with
Clinton or other top administration officials that night.
The earlier story better fit Obama’s modus
operandi, which is to disappear in times of crisis. His brief legislative career
was about voting “present” because he prefers to be absent when accountability
knocks. The idea is to be the Obama of Evan Thomas lore: “standing above the
country, above — above the world, he’s sort of God.” He reemerges only after the
shooting stops and the smoke clears: gnosis personified, here to diagnose our
failings. He is not a commander-in-chief for the battle but the armchair general
of the post mortem.
In this instance, though, Carney’s hand
was forced by then-secretary Clinton. Testifying before the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee in January, she recounted first learning at about 4 p.m. on
September 11 that the State Department facility in Benghazi was under attack.
That was very shortly after the siege started. Over the hours that followed,
Clinton stated, “we were in continuous meetings and conversations, both within
the department, with our team in Tripoli, with the interagency and
internationally.” It was in the course of this “constant ongoing discussion and
sets of meetings” that Clinton then recalled: “I spoke with President Obama
later in the evening to, you know, bring him up to date, to hear his
perspective.”
Yes, the 10 p.m. phone call.
In contrast to President Obama’s
preference for absence, Mrs. Clinton has always projected the image of the
tireless hands-on leader. But the aim of this energetic ubiquity is not all that
different from that of Obama’s disappearing act: If you’re dazzled by how hard
she works, she may not need to account for what it is she’s been working
on.
In the case of Benghazi, however, we now
have context for Clinton’s frenetic activity. Thanks to the whistleblower
testimony at a House hearing by Gregory Hicks, the State Department’s No. 2
official in Libya at the time of the Benghazi siege, we know what Clinton
learned in her “continuous meetings and conversations” that night.
When Clinton began monitoring events after
4 p.m., State’s No. 1 official in Libya, Ambassador Christopher Stevens, had
just urgently called his deputy, Hicks, to alert the State Department that the
Benghazi facility and Stevens himself were “under attack.” Hicks, who was in
Tripoli at the time, made clear that everyone on the ground in Libya knew what
was happening in Benghazi was a terrorist attack — the anti-Islamic video “was a
non-event,” he explained. He also made clear that he was the leader of what
Clinton had called “our team in Tripoli.” As such, he kept the State Department
in Washington up to speed on developments.
We also know that at 8 p.m. Washington
time, Hicks spoke directly with Clinton and some of her top advisers by
telephone. Not only was it apparent that a terrorist attack involving
al-Qaeda-affiliated Ansar al-Sharia was underway, but Hicks’s two most profound
fears at the time he briefed Clinton centered on those terrorists: First, there
were reports that Ambassador Stevens might be in the clutches of the terrorists
at a hospital they controlled; second, there were rumblings that a similar
attack on the embassy in Tripoli could be imminent, convincing Hicks that State
Department personnel should evacuate. He naturally conveyed these developments
to his boss, the secretary of state. Clinton, he recalled, agreed that
evacuation was the right course.
At about 9 p.m. Washington time, Hicks
learned from the Libyan prime minister that Stevens was dead. Hicks said he
relayed all significant developments on to Washington as the evening progressed
— although he did not speak directly to Secretary Clinton again after the 8 p.m.
briefing.
That is the context of the 10 p.m. phone
call between the president and the secretary of state.
We do not have a recording of this call,
and neither Clinton nor the White House has described it beyond noting that it
happened. But we do know that, just a few minutes after Obama called Clinton,
the Washington press began reporting that the State Department had issued a
statement by Clinton regarding the Benghazi attack. In it, she
asserted:
Some have sought to justify this vicious
behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The
United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs
of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning
of our nation.
Gee, what do you suppose Obama and Clinton
talked about in that 10 p.m. call?
Interestingly, CNS News asked Carney
whether, in that 10 p.m. phone call, the president and Secretary Clinton
discussed the statement that Clinton was about to issue, and, specifically,
whether they discussed “the issue of inflammatory material posted on the
Internet.”
Carney declined to answer.
We now know from the e-mails and TV clips
that, by Sunday morning, the White House staff, State Department minions, and
Susan Rice were all in agreement that the video fairy tale, peppered with
indignant rebukes of Islamophobia, was the way to go.
How do you suppose they got that
idea?
— Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at
the National Review
Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom
Center. He is the author, most recently, of Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic
Democracy.
The story that the Obamas willingly gave up their right to practice law stinks to high heaven. You don’t have to scratch very deep to smell this load of garbage. - By Linda Jordan.
Scratch & Sniff Test: Obama's Court Ordered Inactive Law License Status Under Scrutiny
The Scratch & Sniff Test
By Linda Jordan | Birther Report
- May 20, 2013 -
Excuses offered by obots, the main stream media and Barack and Michelle Obama as to why they “voluntarily” gave up...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
