Monday, February 29, 2016

Is Ted Cruz an advocate of a North American Union?

by Dr. Eowyn
Ted Cruz at Liberty U., March 23, 2015Ted Cruz, joined by wife Heidi and daughters, announces his presidential campaign at Liberty U., March 23, 2015
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) met his wife, Heidi (née Nelson), while working on the George W. Bush presidential campaign of 2000. Heidi Cruz is currently head of the Southwest Region in the Investment Management Division of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and previously worked in the White House for Condoleezza Rice and in New York as an investment banker for J.P. Morgan. Wikipedia lists Heidi Nelson Cruz as an  “investment banker” and a “historical member” of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
Heidi Cruz was a member of the CFR-sponsored Independent Task Force on the Future of North America, which was launched in October 2004. The Task Force advocates a greater economic and social integration between Canada, Mexico, and the United States as a North American region.
Comprised of a group of prominent business, political and academic leaders from the U.S., Canada and Mexico, the Task Force was organized and sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations (U.S.), the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, and the Mexican Council on Foreign Relations. It was co-chaired by former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, John Manley, former Finance Minister of Mexico, Pedro Aspe, and former Governor of Massachusetts and Assistant U.S. Attorney General William F. Weld.
Its main publication is the 70-page Task Force Report #53 entitled, Building a North American Community (May 2005). Heidi Cruz is listed as a member of the Task Force (page 9 of the report in PDF) and described as “an energy investment banker with Merrill Lynch in Houston, Texas” who “served in the Bush White House under Dr. Condoleezza Rice as the Economic Director for the Western Hemisphere at the National Security Council, as the Director of the Latin America Office at the U.S. Treasury Department, and as Special Assistant to Ambassador Robert B. Zoellick, U.S. Trade Representative.”
Task Force on North America Union members
The Report’s recommendations include (see pp. 7-32 of the Report; pp. 29-54 of the PDF):


“The governments of Canada, Mexico, and the United States should articulate as their long-term goal a common security perimeter for North America. In particular, the three governments should strive toward a situation in which a terrorist trying to penetrate our borders will have an equally hard time doing so, no matter which country he elects to enter first.”


“The three countries should develop a secure North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers. This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout the region.”


Specific recommendations under this plan include:
  • “Harmonize visa and asylum regulations, including convergence of the list of “visa waiver’’ countries;
  • Harmonize entry screening and tracking procedures for people, goods, and vessels (including integration of name-based and biometric watch lists);
  • By 2010, “Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be . . . the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.


“Security cooperation among the three countries should also extend to cooperation on counterterrorism and law enforcement, which would include the establishment of a trinational threat intelligence center, the development of trinational ballistics and explosives registration, and joint training for law enforcement officials.”
Note: Now I’m beginning to “get” why U.S. police departments are hiring non-US citizens as officers!


“NAFTA has transformed Mexico, but it has also deepened and made much more visible the divisions that exist in the country…. The gap in wages has led many Mexicans to travel north in search of higher incomes and better opportunities. For the past three decades, Mexico has been the largest source of legal immigrants to the United States, and Mexican-Americans make increasingly valued and growing contributions to the life of the United States and, through remittances, to their families at home. Mexico is also the leading source of unauthorized migration, with attendant economic and security problems in both countries and untold hardships for Mexican migrants. Over time, the best way to diminish these problems is by promoting better economic opportunities in Mexico.”
Note: In other words, more socialist “spread the wealth”!


“With tariff barriers virtually eliminated, and the outlines of a North American economy visible, the time has come to take a more comprehensive approach to strengthening the economic prospects for citizens in all three countries. The first step is to encourage convergence in the most-favored-nation tariff rates each partner charges on imports from outside North America. Next, the governments should reduce the remaining nontariff barriers to the flow of goods and services, and address problems arising from charges of price discrimination and subsidization by competitors in North America. Finally, they should coordinate their approach to unfair trade practices by foreign suppliers to the North American market. The ultimate goal should be to create a seamless market for suppliers and consumers throughout North America.


“To make the most of the impressive pool of skill and talent within North America, the three countries should look beyond the NAFTA visa system. The large volume of undocumented migrants from Mexico within the United States is an urgent matter for those two countries to address. A long-term goal should be to create a ‘North American preference’—new rules thatwould make it much easier for employees to move and for employers to recruit across national boundaries within the continent…. Canada and the United States should consider eliminating restrictions on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico as well.”
Specifics on how to create a North American free flow of labor include:
  • By 2010, streamline immigration and labor mobility rules to “enable citizens of all three countries to work elsewhere in North America with far fewer restrictions than immigrants from other countries.”
  • “Special immigration status should be given to teachers, faculty, and students in the region.”
  • “Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the United States” by “eliminating all remaining barriers to the ability of their citizens to live and work in the other country.”


The Task Force recommends the following North American regional political institutions be established:
  1. An annual North American summit meeting.
  2. North American Advisory Council.
  3. North American Inter-Parliamentary Group to meet every other year.
In the last part of the Task Force’s report, “Additional and Dissenting Views,” Heidi S. Cruz wrote (pp. 33-34):
“I support the Task Force report and its recommendations aimed at building a safer and more prosperous North America. Economic prosperity and a world safe from terrorism and other security threats are no doubt inextricably linked. While governments play an invaluable role in both regards, we must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us—truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants.”
Now you know why, despite his blustering against Obama’s executive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens in this country, on March 27, 2015, Ted Cruz indicated he “remains open to a path to legal status for undocumented workers.” 
Born in Canada of an American citizen mother and a Cuban father, Ted Cruz held dual Canadian-U.S. citizenship. But it was only when the Dallas Morning News in August 2013 pointed out his dual citizenship that Cruz finally applied to renounce his Canadian citizenship — which meant that in 2012 when Cruz had run for and was elected a U.S. senator, he was a Canadian citizen. On May 14, 2014, Cruz finally ceased being a citizen of Canada. See “Republican Sen. Ted Cruz announces presidential campaign, but is he eligible?




by Sharon Rondeau
Radio host Mark Levin has said that he believes Sen. Ted Cruz is a “natural born Citizen’ because of his birth to a U.S.-citizen mother
(Feb. 29, 2016) — On Monday, constitutional eligibility activist Gary Wilmott reported that attorney, author and radio host Mark Levinstated on January 8, 2016 in regard to Cruz’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president:
I’m prepared to debate any so-called legal scholar, professor, serious commentator or candidate on this particular issue on the air. More than happy to do it. You see it’s not just the matter of just an opinion. You have to understand the Constitution, have to understand the nature of construction, you have to understand a little bit of American history. So that makes things complicated for liberals and knee-jerkers.  But I’m more than happy to debate this issue with anybody who says that an American citizen born of an American citizen mother wherever that citizen is born is not eligible as a natural citizen as a naturalized citizen to run for POTUS.
There is absolutely no authority for that.
I’m putting out a challenge right now on this program.
At issue is whether Cruz, who was born in Canada to a Cuban father, is a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution for the presidency.
On January 7, Breitbart News reproduced a statement released on Levin’s Facebook page in response to an article written by Breitbart’s John Nolte in which Nolte asked, “As “stupid” as this issue may be for Levin, do we want to litigate it in front of the American people today or three weeks before the general election, when Cruz is either our presidential or vice-presidential nominee? Because you have to be wearing blinders to believe that will not happen.”


Camels with their nose in the tent
Yes, it is true....Who will care?

What a wonderful country. Freedom for everyone. But watch your

That's why there is such an alarm within US government, since Trump's
statement about temporally suspending the migration of Muslims to and from US
till US authorities make sure there is a proper concept of safe penetration
of US territory.

People are stunned to learn that the head of the U.S. CIA is a Muslim!

Do hope this wakes up some! You mean until it hits you
like a ton of bricks read it again, until you understand!

We now have a Muslim government.

John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in
Saudi Arabia .

Obama's top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her
parents still live.

Hillary Clinton's top adviser, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother
are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt .

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is
a Muslim.

Homeland Security Adviser, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.

Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam
al-Marayati, is a Muslim.

Obama's Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America
is a Muslim.

Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a

Nancy Pelosi announced she will appoint Rep Andre Carson, D-Ind, as the first Muslim lawmaker in the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. It would make Carson the first Muslim to serve on the committee that receives intelligence on the threat of Islamic militants in the Middle East ! He has suggested that U.S. schools should be modeled after Islamic madrassas, where education is based on the Quran!!!

And last but not least, our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama. 

It's questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he
was sworn in. He didn't repeat the oath properly to defend our nation
and our Constitution. Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath
again in private.

CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a

Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur'an

Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and verbally tarred and feathered by
Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our

Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are
systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East.

The more damage Obama does, the more arrogant he's become! Our nation and our government has been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us. It can only get worse!

What is Rubio popping into his mouth?...


Ted Cruz is a lawyer.
Barack Obama was a lawyer.
Ted Cruz has sealed his records.
Barack Obama has sealed his records.
Ted Cruz is considered a Constitutional Scholar.
Barack Obama touted himself  a Constitutional Scholar.
Ted Cruz has been a US Senator for about 3 years.
Barack Obama pretended to be a US Senator for about 3 years.
Ted Cruz has a problem with his birthright.
Barack Obama has a problem with his birthright.
Ted Cruz does nothing but shoot off his mouth.
Barack Obama does nothing but shoot off his mouth.
Ted Cruz is half-Hispanic.
Barack Obama is half-black.
Ted Cruz's father has ties to Communism. (Castro)
Barack Obama's father has ties to Communism. (Communist Party USA)
Ted Cruz does not use his real name. (Rafael Edward Cruz)
Barack Obama does not use his real name. (Barry Soetoro)
Ted Cruz may not be Christian. (Dominionism)
Barack Obama is not a Christian. (Islam)
Ted Cruz's wife is a member of CFR.
Barack Obama's wife is a member of CFR.

Sunday, February 28, 2016

Chris Wallace ruffles Ted Cruz's feathers...

Open Letter to Ted Cruz, Candidate for United States President


February 27, 2016
Presidential “candidate” Ted Cruz was born in Canada to a Cuban national who at some point became a Canadian citizen. Many have questioned both Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s eligibility to serve as president under the “natural born Citizen” clause of the U.S. Constitution. Still unanswered is whether or not the current occupant of the position, Barack Hussein Obama, is eligible given his claimed British-citizen father and fraudulent government documents.
Dear Sir,
I am concerned that you want to be the next President of the United States when we all know you were born in Canada and your father was a Cuban National and possibly became a Canadian citizen at the time of your birth.  It is moot that your mother was previously an American citizen when it may have been she had become a Canadian citizen as well.  Her citizenship is not the deciding factor when you take into consideration the Framers’ intent of the term “natural born Citizen.”  That fact alone does not qualify you to be eligible under Article 2, Section 1, and Clause 5 of the United States Constitution for President or Vice President of my country.

Ted Cruz: “This is My Country”


by Sharon Rondeau

Sen. Ted Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada in December 1970 and was granted Canadian citizenship at birth. Thus far, Cruz has not released any documentation showing that he holds U.S. citizenship, although the Canadian government asks whether one renouncing that citizenship possesses citizenship from another country.
(Feb. 27 , 2016) — While campaigning in Georgia on Saturday in the runup to the “Super Tuesday” primaries, presidential candidate Ted Cruz exclaimed to his audience, “This is my country, da** it!   Stand up and fight for it together.”
But is the U.S. Cruz’s “country?”
Born in Canada to a U.S.-citizen mother and Cuban-citizen father who became a Canadian in 1973, Cruz immigrated to the U.S. at age four with his parents.  It is unknown whether or not Cruz wasregistered as a U.S. citizen at birth or at a later date, and he has refused to release any documentation on himself other than his birth certificate to The Dallas Morning News in August 2013.
While Cruz and fellow candidate Marco Rubio take turns attacking Republican frontrunner Donald Trump over the non-release of his tax returns and his business dealings, Rubio and Cruz are questionably qualified for the office they seek as “natural born Citizens” as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
report from political strategist and author Roger Stone on Friday said that Rubio and Cruz have attempted to make deals with each other and with Trump, respectively which would affect the outcome of the presidential primary season.
Rubio was born in the U.S. to parents who had not yet naturalized as U.S. citizens.
Over the last ten months, The Post & Email has unsuccessfully sought government documentation indicating Cruz’s citizenship status.  The U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. State Department have all declined to release any documents they might have out of “privacy” concerns.