©2010 drkate
As reported here, the government’s own witness–Lt. Campbell, kicked open the eligibility door when she testified before the Military Panel that she knew that LTC Lakin’s reason for refusing to deploy was the question of Obama’s eligibility. While that could have opened the door to further questioning on this issue in a normal fair proceeding, recall that Judge Lind struck down any part of Lakin’s defense that would require proof of Obama’s eligibility. Further, during Judge Lind’s questioning of Lt. Col. Lakin on his previous guilty pleas, she reminded him that his conscience was not a reason to disobey an order.
The prosecution, upon that little ‘slip’, immediately shut down that part of her testimony and re-focused her attention on the ” Roberts-directed order” to Lt. Col. Lakin to get on a specific plane flight. Conveniently, Col. Roberts–the Medal of Honor winner–was recalled to “remember” that he had told Lt. Campbell to tell Lakin to get on ‘that’ plane.
How interesting that the defense did notpick up on, challenge or pursue that discrepancy in testimony. This was one of many small signals that a script was in play.
Continue reading ‘Courage and Betrayal’
As reported here, the government’s own witness–Lt. Campbell, kicked open the eligibility door when she testified before the Military Panel that she knew that LTC Lakin’s reason for refusing to deploy was the question of Obama’s eligibility. While that could have opened the door to further questioning on this issue in a The prosecution, upon that little ‘slip’, immediately shut down that part of her testimony and re-focused her attention on the ” Roberts-directed order” to Lt. Col. Lakin to get on a specific plane flight. Conveniently, Col. Roberts–the Medal of Honor winner–was recalled to “remember” that he had told Lt. Campbell to tell Lakin to get on ‘that’ plane.
How interesting that the defense did not
Continue reading ‘Courage and Betrayal’
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.