And They Accuse the Tea Party of Racism?

 By John Lillpop
Imagine a government that refuses to protect citizens because they happen to be white

MUST READ!...

BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily
Rush charges Obama
'foreigner' in loyalties
'We don't need birth
certificate to know'
--WND

BRILLIANT!...A MUST READ!...TAKE 30 mins TO PERUSE THE FINER POINTS...

Kerchner v Obama: Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the U.S. Supreme Court for Kerchner et al vs. Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al Lawsuit.

Kerchner et al v Obama/Congress/Pelosi et al now appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. Via Commander Kerchner; JAMESBURG, NJ – (Sept. 30, 2010) - Attorney Mario Apuzzo of Jamesburg, NJ,...

Just Sayin'

Gitmo Open  253 Days Past Oblah-blah-blah's  1st Year Closure Promise

Military Tribunals Maintain Jurisdiction


More Obama Failure= More American Success

2 More Out of 5 Then the Senate Gets Flipped

These are the critically key senate races 33 days from the general election- Washington, California, Nevada, Delaware, and Connecticut.

Based on the latest projections from not in the tank surveys, the count is looking like 46 Dems and 49 Repubs with the above 5 in play.

In order to take the majority 2 more seats have to veer right. Washington has Rossi in the lead, and Angle is neck and neck with Reid. Fiorina or McMahon look to be the next best hope if either Rossi or Angle lose. O'Donnell and the First Staters could surprise us all, but if you are looking for the senate race needing your help, these are the ones. If you can, send them some money. They all have election websites online for donations.

Steve

By JOHN CHRISTIAN RYTER

During the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama said that his favorite movie was "The Godfather" with Marlon Brando. He liked it so much he enjoys doing an imitation of "Don Corleone" for his friends. For his enemies, he's about as close to being the real thing as you can be without being a Sicilian. Like a Sicilian don, Obama—like those who preceded him (constitutionally) to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue—has become one of the three most powerful politicians in the world. I hesitate to refer to Obama as a "leader" since he has none of the characteristics that world leaders must possess for their nations to be economically and militarily secure. But, that's what happens when you put an inept, totally inexperienced community organizer in a job that requires an experienced leader. (His predecessors were all the single most powerful men in the world.) That may be why the Russians now refer to him as "the Godfather."
Obama, like the Chicago mobster he is at heart under the slick talking political veneer, believes he will succeed if he bullies and intimidates the American people enough to frighten them into abject submission. Or, at least, scares them to silence. Complaining about the Tea Partiers at a fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee at the Arsht Center for Performing Arts in Miami, Florida for protesting his political agenda, Obama noted that on April 15 thousands of Tea Partiers picketed 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to protest his tax policies—and his capricious spending of their money. Obama said: "In all, we passed 25 different tax cuts last year. And one thing we haven't done is raise income taxes on families making less than $250 thousand a year—another promise that we kept." (In reality, Obama dumped almost three trillion dollars in new taxes on the taxpayers since January, 2009. Congress simply hasn't designated which pockets of whose pants the Godfather and his thugs will take that money from. Congress, which now expects to lose from 30 to 50 House seats is trying to minimize its election losses by waiting until after the election to complete the task of raising taxes.) In his speech, Obama continued, mocking the Tea Party with the words of yet another movie character, this time Jack Nicholson's Col. Nathan Jessep, saying, "I've been a little amused over the last couple of days where people have been at these [Tea Party] rallies about taxes..." then throwing in his Jessep remark: "...I would rather they just said thank you!"
It's not just white Tea Partiers who have a vendetta against the Godfather. Pravda, which doesn't like Obama either, reported on Sept. 25 that a black woman, Valma Hart (who Pravda called "the voice of America") blindsided the Godfather at a rally in Washington, DC on Monday, Sept. 20. Pravda noted that the assembled media "...almost lost their lunch" when Hart asked her question. Given the floor by Obama, she said: "I am a chief financial officer for...AmVets here in Washington. I'm also a mother. I'm a wife. I'm an American veteran, and I'm one of your middle-class Americans. And, quite frankly, I'm exhausted. I'm exhausted of defending you, defending your administration, defending the mantle of change that I voted for—and deeply disappointed with where we are right now. I have been told that I voted for a man who said he was going to change things in a meaningful way for the middle class. I'm one of those people, and I'm waiting, sir. I'm waiting. I don't fee it yet. And, I thought, while it wouldn't be in great measure, I would feel it in some small measure. I have two children in private school. And the financial recession has taken an enormous toll on my family. My husband and I joked for years that we thought we were well beyond the hot dogs and beans era of our lives. But, quite frankly, it's started to knock on our door and ring true that it might be where we're headed again. And, quite frankly...I need you to answer this honestly—is this my new reality?" In one fell swoop, Valma Hart erased the racist card in the dialogue about the nature of Obama's agenda.
Obama was stunned, not expecting to be bushwhacked by a black woman in what was supposed to be a very friendly audience. His eyes darted around for someone else to defuse the awkward silence by firing off a new question, allowing him to ignore Hart. The TV producer whispered to him: "Psst—You're on TV! Please answer her!" Obama looked at the TelePrompTer and read the que: "We're moving in the right direction."
Of course he is. The Godfather and his Chicago thugs know exactly what they are doing. Their covert agenda is to deliberately destroy the US economy. That is precisely the "change" George Soros-backed Obama was paid to deliver by Soros' funding of his presidential campaign. While logic tells us the Soros-globalist express could be derailed with tariffs and other protectionism measures, the socialist elites in Congress in the pockets of Soros and others like him, are rigidly opposed to any form of protectionism, screaming that protectionism is anti-free enterprise. The media and the left has done a good job of selling the notion that protectionism repudiates the virtues of competitive free trade in which the free market determines who succeeds and who fails. In reality, every nation in the world except the United States uses tariffs to keep the US from gaining equal access to their consumer markets.
This has been going on since the end of World War II when our allies and defeated enemies cried for access to the best consumer market in the world. Feeling an obligation to help Europe rebuild their war torn economies, the United States embarked on a reckless plan in which they deliberately neglected to safeguard the American economy believing it could absorb the demands placed on it by predator economies—both friends and enemies—to sell their wares to US consumers without reciprocating to US manufacturers. As America went from being the world's largest lender nation to the world's worst debtor nation, the US government suddenly woke up to the fact that it needed foreign capital to prop up the US dollar. That opened the door for currency manipulators like Soros. Soros gambles on the rising or falling value of currencies. Today he's betting against all of them by investing his own assets in gold. Which, of course, is one of the reasons why gold is still holding at just under $1,300 an ounce. And why that is likely to continue in the short run.
Here are the 20 most vulnerable currencies in order of vulnerability: Iceland, Greece, Hungary, Portugal, Spain, Latvia, Ireland, Ukraine, Romania, Lithuania, Turkey, Bulgaria, Egypt, India, Italy, the United States, Estonia, Poland, Kazakhstan, and Indonesia. The determination was based on the lack of liquidity and esoteric nature of those currencies in the CDS spreads, based on those countries' potential for gross domestic product growth. It is interesting that the economy of Indonesia is ranked better than the economy of the United States. But then, since they have most of our jobs, that should not surprise anyone.
In an exclusive interview with Reuters on Sept. 15, Soros said that "...gold is the ultimate bubble [and that] this is a period of great uncertainty so nothing is very safe. In a deflationary environment he added, 'gold is the only...bull market. It just made a new high yesterday...'" ($1,274.75) "...In the present circumstances that may continue. It will be very interesting to see if there is a decline in the next few weeks because practically everything that makes a new high almost immediately afterwards reverses and disappoints. I called gold the ultimate bubble which means it may go higher, but it's certainly not safe, and it's not going to last forever." Yet, Soros is betting his chips against every fiat currency in the world. He may not have long to wait.
As the political Godfather of the United States, Soros' agent of change appears to be doing everything in his power to collapse the economy of the United States which, according to the domino theory, will topple the economies of every nation in the world. And, as Obama invests his sweat equity in purposely burdening the United States with debt that will almost certainly collapse its economy, Soros is stockpiling gold to protect his financial assets as he cautiously treads on uncharted ground.
Soros believes he has covered his butt by making sure that just in case there is no safe haven currency where he can park his wealth until the global financial crisis is over and one-world government exists, he will still be part of the ruling caste when the dust settles. Soros Fund Management LLC holds 5.24 million shares of SPDR Gold Trust, worth about $650 million. In addition, Soros holds about $250 million in gold mine shares. If the world's currencies collapse, Soros' gold holdings will be worth billions of dollars. And, of course, at that time, every government in the world will likely seize every smidgen of gold owned by private citizens—except those in the ruling caste. Which is precisely what Franklin D. Roosevelt did under Presidential Proclamation 2039 on March 6, 1933 when he seized all of the gold owned by working class Americans under the threat of ten years in prison and a fine of $10,000.00. Not seized were the gold coins possessed by recognized "collectors" (i.e., the wealthy). The seized gold was replaced with fiat scrip at face value, backed only by the government's "good intentions," and printed by the Fed under the cover of night on orders from Roosevelt before he ascended into the White House. That's one thing about the dons and capos in the federal government—unlike the fictitious Don Corleones or the real John Dillingers, they don't need a gun when they rob the American people. The law is their weapon. (Foreigners holding post-1933 US paper dollars were still allowed to redeem them for gold at any Fed bank until Aug. 15, 1971. President Richard M. Nixon permanently closed the gold window on that date, ending the practice of gold redemption for scrip.)
(Tip:—If I was buying gold coins, I would not be buying any US gold coins. Furthermore, if I owned any US gold coins purchased since the US government enacted the Annunzio-Wylie Money Laundering Deterrence Act of 1998, which gave rise to a Federal Reserve banking regulation, implemented on Mar. 4, 1999, known as "Know Your Customer." If I owned US gold coins purchased after January, 1999, I would very publicly sell them. Then I would replace them with Maple Leafs, Krugerrands, Kangaroos or whatever other foreign gold coins I could find, or perhaps even diamonds, rubies or emeralds. Portable wealth is portable wealth.)
Under Fed policy, gold brokers must report the sale of pre-1965 US coins on IRS Form 8300 ostensibly to safeguard them from seizure in a time of national emergency. In reality, this provision is a double-edged sword since tracking gold transactions is a prelude to confiscation. In addition to listing exempted coins on Form 8300, "Know Your Customer" initially required gold brokers to report gold sale transactions of $10,000 or more. The amount reported was reduced first to $5,000, then $4,000 and now, I believe, any gold sale of $600 or more. What cannot legally be confiscated by the US government are foreign gold coins. Which means, if you are buying Canadian Maple Leafs, Australian Kangaroos, Chinese Pandas or South African Krugerrands, they should be safe from seizure—unless Congress enacts a new law since Roosevelt's law dealt specifically with US coins. Bullion is legal to be confiscated in times of national emergencies. What is most interesting today is that in the event of another gold seizure, the US government has made it clear that it will "redeem" those coins at face value. In other words, the owner of say, ten 1927 $20.00 St. Gaudin double eagle gold coins would get $200.00 for his coins from the government at confiscation even though they are selling today for at least $1,500.00 each. At that price, ten 1927 St. Gaudins would bring $15,000.00 in the open market. Quite a discount. By the way: when Roosevelt seized all gold coins and gold certificates in 1933, it was reported that the government melted them down. They did not. Since gold coins were worth more than bullion, Roosevelt used the gold coins seized from the American people to pay off gold claims from Europe. In doing so, he saved about 25% of the value of the exchange of paper money for gold. In reality, he saved 100% since he replaced the seized gold with Federal Reserve Notes that were backed only by FDR's good will. Would it shock you to learn that many of the pre-1933 gold coins that were seized by FDR on March 9, 1933 are the same pre-1933 gold coins you are now buying?
On Tues., Jan. 30, 1934 FDR signed the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 into law. On Wed., Feb. 1, 1934 under Presidential Proclamation 2072—without consulting Congress—FDR arbitrarily reduced the weight of the gold dollar from 25 4/5 grains to 15 5/20 grains—a reduction of 59%. In a new form of taxation, FDR reduced the value of the fiat dollars in every American's pocket from 100¢ to 41¢, stealing almost 60% of the net worth of every working class American in the country. Commodities held their value, which meant in one day the price of every commodity in America doubled in price. Government calls it inflation. In reality its theft, plain and simple. When money manipulation occurs there is always one winner and one loser. The money barons always win and the human capital of the rich—the working class serfs—always lose. Which, of course, is why the money barons create the political Godfathers who are groomed to mastermind the theft and to push their Party's capodecinas (capo or mob lieutenant for short) in the House and Senate to ram through the legislation the overlords who funded his rise to power need enacted. How do you stop them? You criminalize campaign contributions and jail not only the K Street lobbyists who pay the bribes and the politicians who greedily take them, but also the barons of banking and the princes of industry on Wall and Broad Street in New York. A law must be enacted in which the CEOs, the corporate officers and every board member of every company that funds the bribing of public officials are construed to be as guilty as the lobbyist who acts as the mob bagman. The prison sentences for each must be the same, and equally mandatory, since each are equally guilty. A mandatory prison sentence of ten years and a million dollars per bribe per politician—with no chance for parole or pardon from any President or Governor—must be assessed to everyone involved from the corporate CEO to the bagman to the politician. Those convicted must serve every day of their sentence behind bars. The bribing of people placed in positions of trust (who write laws which allow malefactors to steal the wealth of the working class) is a form of economic genocide. Those who engage in it, or profit from it anywhere in the world, must be forced to pay the price—the whole price!

Soros, who has evolved into the scion of the far left, has been funneling money into the Democratic Party and into the coffers of almost every far left member of the House and Senate. For every dollar donated, there is a reciprocatory, although never talked about, quid pro quo demanded. Soros is a Hungarian-born Jew who, like most European Jews, is an extreme radical socialist. He has enough money to actually manipulate the national politics of any reasonably democratic parliamentarian nation. Through his Open Society Institute, Soros funds scores of anti-American socialist groups in the United States like ACORN, Center for American Progress, Human Rights Watch, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, MoveOn.org and the New American Foundation.
Obama and his capos in the Executive Branch are diligently following the joint agenda laid out by the socialist capitalists and the free enterprise money barons who, in their rush to create world government in the second decade of the 21st century, formally merged their efforts and backed the dark horse in 2008 instead of battling amongst themselves and risk losing the White House that year to a Romney-Tancredo or Romney-Hunter ticket that would have brought about a revival of the Reagan Years. The Soros agenda dovetails perfectly with Obama's own Cloward-Pivens agenda—collapsing the economy by overloading it with debt and, in the chaos, seizing absolute power and forming a dictatorship controlled solely by him. However, Cap & Trade was too much even for the environmentalist-friendly Rockefeller family—particularly when they know that thousands of foundries in China burn bituminous coal without any pollution controls. Those factories are churning tons of chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere. Chloroflurocarbons are banned in the United States. The Obama decision to use the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases was like adding insult to injury to Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV [D-WV]. Rockefeller introduced legislation that would prevent the Obama Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] from instituting rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants and other industrial sources for at least the next two years while Congress decided just what regulations were really needed, and implement them by law rather than one man's decree. Two other pieces of legislation to tie the hands of the EPA were also introduced. One by Rep. Nick Joe Rahall [D-WV] who introduced the companion legislation to Rockefeller's Senate bill; and another bill was offered by Senators Mary Landrieu [D-LA] and Blanche Lincoln [D-AR] (who is facing tough challenges in November), Sen. Ben Nelson [D-NE] and recently dumped Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R-AK] who proffered the bill and who plans to run as an Independent (but who will likely hand her Republican Senate seat to the Democratic challenger, Sitka mayor Scott McAdams).
Initially the Rockefeller and Morgan banks were backing Hillary Clinton in the age-old battle of free enterprise capitalists against socialist capitalists. But on the eve of the New Hampshire primary when the votes giving Hillary Clinton the victory were being tabulated, Hillary suddenly lost 100% of her financial support from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase. Once the major donors pulled their money, the small donor contributions dribbled to a halt, forcing Hillary to finance her own campaign from that point on. It was a losing battle because when you lose the money support of the money barons you also lose the political cover of the leftwing media as well. And then, the late night talk show hosts, swarming like baracuda, ridicule you. When Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert join the feeding frenzy, you will know that Obama is going to lose in 2012. Soros may control the radical leftwing blogsphere but Rockefeller and the princes of industry and the barons of banking and business controls the Fourth Estate.
Today, it appears that may be happening to Obama. The late night talk shows are now sniping at him—the first sign that you've fallen out of grace with the money barons. Will Obama take the hint and back off of his radical Cloward-Pivens strategy? Or will the Godfather and his capos in the Executive Branch and Congress push even harder to ram another Obama edict—Cap & Trade—through both Houses and put it on Obama's desk before they go back to their home States and face angry voters for three days before they are voted out of office on Nov. 2?

OBAMA AIN'T RUNNING IN 2012 BECAUSE HE WILL BE OUT OF OFFICE BEFORE THEN...AND IF HE ISN'T ... THE PEOPLE THIS TIME WILL DEMAND TO SEE HIS BC!...HE CAN'T DO IT...HE'S A FRAUD!...

Obama 52%, Clinton 37% for 2012 Democratic NominationClinton's support highest among conservative, less well-educated Democratsby Frank NewportPRINCETON, NJ -- If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were to challenge President Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2012, she would currently have the support of 37% of Democrats nationally, while 52% would support Obama.
NBC's "Meet the Press" host David Gregory on Sept. 5 raised the possibility that Clinton might renew her battle against Obama for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, asking outside White House adviser David Plouffe, "Do you envision a primary challenge from another Democrat in 2012 against this president?" Gregory then asked more specifically, "Do you -- can you rule out, based on actual information, that Secretary of State Clinton would not pursue the presidency again, would not challenge President Obama?"

Clinton was Obama's main challenger for the 2008 Democratic nomination in a long-fought and, at times, contentious battle. Once Obama clinched the nomination, Clinton and her husband Bill Clinton strongly supported Obama's nomination, and Hillary Clinton now serves in Obama's cabinet as secretary of state.
President Obama has yet to announce his intentions for 2012, although Harry Truman in 1952 and Lyndon Johnson in 1968 have been the only presidents since Calvin Coolidge to decline to seek re-election when they were eligible to do so.
Presidents with relatively low job approval ratings heading into a possible re-election bid are vulnerable to intra-party challenges. As two examples, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter were challenged for their respective parties' nomination as sitting presidents -- Ford by Ronald Reagan, and Carter by Edward Kennedy and Jerry Brown. Ford's job approval rating had reached as low as 37% in 1975, the year before he ran for re-election, and Carter's had reached 28% in 1979. Obama's current weekly job approval rating is 44%, albeit with more than two years until the next presidential election.

Obama's strengths among Democrats in the hypothetical matchup with Clinton lie with college graduates and liberals, the latter of whom make up about 36% of this sample of 859 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. Clinton does better among less well-educated Democrats and bests Obama among conservatives, who make up 22% of Democrats. Clinton does slightly better among women than among men.


Implications

As is the case for the 2012 Republican nomination, voter sentiments at this stage of the 2012 election cycle have low predictive validity. In late 2006, for example, Gallup polls showed that Clinton led Obama as the choice of Democrats for their party's nomination, and Rudy Giuliani was tied with John McCain for the Republican nomination (Giuliani pulled further ahead of McCain through most of 2007).
Even though most observers assume Obama will run for re-election, from time to time he has said he would be content to be a one-term president if he accomplished his goals. There is also the very real question of whether Clinton, or any other Democrat, will mount a challenge to Obama as 2012 approaches. That decision will in turn depend in part on Obama's perceived strengths and job approval ratings next year. These data show that conservative Democrats are the least likely to support Obama when Clinton is his hypothetical opponent, suggesting that Obama may be most vulnerable to a possible challenge from that wing of his party.

OOOPS ANOTHER OBAMA ELIGIBILITY PROBLEM!...EMANUEL NOT A CHICAGO RESIDENT...INELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR MAYOR...HEY THAT WON'T STOP HIM...

By Jim Johnson


CHICAGO (WLS) - Attorney Burt Odelson, a noted elction-law expert, is predicting Rahm Emanuel will be ineligible for mayor because he is not a legal resident of Chicago.
Odelson told Roe and Roeper on WLS Radio that when Emanuel leased out his Chicago home he could no longer claim he is a resident.
“He rented his house out in Sept 09 and has not been back since and has no residency in Chicago,” Odelson said.

Odelson says he has been involved in several residency cases in Illinois that “the law is clear.”

Alan Grayson’s fate is sealed according to new poll just out

September 29, 2010 by VotingFemale| 17 Comments

According to a new poll just out, a majority of Florida District 8 voters agree that Alan Grayson is nuts… and do not intend to send him back to Congress.
What will Grayson do after his is voted out of office? Perhaps Obama could hire him as a cabinet member to replace Axelrod, or… special diplomatic envoy to North Korea.
From Real Clear Politics…

LTC Lakin v. COL Lind: Brief in Support of Petition for Extraordinary Relief - Writ of Mandamus and Application for Stay of Proceedings.

LTC Lakin v. COL Lind: Brief in Support of Petition for Extraordinary Relief - Writ of Mandamus and Application for Stay of Proceedings.

Update: As previously reported here, a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed in the Army Court of Criminal Appeals on behalf of LTC Terry Lakin. The Petition and supporting Brief embedded below....

More Obamacare Follies

More Obamacare Follies

By Doug Brady

It seems every week more information on how the farce that is Obamacare will wreck America's health care system trickles out, something I noted in my two most recent posts on the topic here and here. Last week, in a brilliant Facebook Note, Governor Palin chronicled many of the distortions and outright lies that have characterized the Democrat takeover of the industry since the unpopular bill was passed against the wishes of the people last March. In her post she noted that, contrary to what Obama claimed, Obamacare will make it far less likely that Americans will be able to keep their current insurance plan or doctor:

Remember when the president said, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor”? Not true. In Texas alone a record number of doctors are leaving the Medicare system because of the cuts in reimbursements forced on them by Obamacare! The president of the Texas Medical Association, Dr. Susan Bailey, warns that “the Medicare system is beginning to implode.”

Today Avik Roy at Forbes has written a comprehensive piece detailing one of the many ways Obamacare jeopardizes your current healthcare coverage:

Imagine if you ran a business, and one day the government told you that you would be fined if you: (1) minimized unnecessary expenses; (2) hired workers to specialize in customer service; (3) invested resources in order to ensure you wouldn’t get victimized by fraud. What would you do? Think quickly: because three months from now, this very system will be the law of the land for our nation’s health insurers.

Last Friday, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners—the association of the 50 state insurance commissioners—issued its draft guidelines for how insurers will need to calculate “medical-loss ratios,” or MLRs. The wonkiest among you will recall that the medical loss ratio is loosely defined as the dollar amount that an insurer spends on the health care of its beneficiaries, divided by the total dollar amount the insurer collects in premiums. Section 2718 of our new health care law mandates that insurance plans sold to individuals and small employers must spend at least 80 percent of their premiums on health care, and plans sold to large employers must spend at least 85 percent.

But, like everything else with Obamacare, the devil is in the details: how do you define health care? How do you define “insurance plan”? Now that the NAIC has spoken, we have a good idea of how the final regulations will look. And the news is not good: the MLR regulations are likely to lead to a significant disruption of the health insurance market, with many insurers exiting the market, driving premiums up and choices down.

[...]

The NAIC draft guidelines are open to public comment until October 4. The organization plans to submit its final recommendations to Secretary Sebelius later in the month. PPACA gives Sebelius the freedom to enact whatever regulations she likes on the MLR matter, though she is likely to accept the NAIC’s recommendations so as to avoid stoking further controversy. She is likely to wait until after the November elections to issue the final regulations, leaving insurers less than two months to radically reorder their businesses, or face crippling fines.

Residents of states whose insurance markets aren’t up to Washington’s snuff are in for a serious disruption of their health care. This situation has all the makings of a giant mess. And if a mess does indeed come to pass, let no one pull the wool over your eyes as to how and why it happened.

There is a lot of information in Roy's piece and you really need to read the whole thing to get a sense of the true nightmare Obamacare has created. Obamacare is, as Governor Palin and others have noted, a one-size-fits-all plan designed by Obama, Pelosi, and others like them who aren't qualified to run the French fryer at the local McDonalds, let alone one-sixth of the U.S. economy. In their quest to take over the entire U.S. healthcare system, Obama and company have usurped state insurance laws by replacing them with what is effectively a government monopoly. Any first year economics student understands that attempts to limit competition, as Obamacare does, inevitably results in higher prices, lower quality, and fewer choices. How anyone can be surprised that this is exactly what is happening is itself surprising.

Obama’s Domestic Terror Network...

©2010 drkate
It is apparent that the Obama agenda has been an assault on America–the Constitution, its institutions, the economy, and social structure.  No one has been spared from this institutionalized assault, which has been put in place over decades and is now poised to inflict maximum damage.
When one views the pace of events since the 2008 election, the loss of American wealth, elimination of opportunity, and the stifling of public debate,  the effect is similar to terror perpetuated on the homeland, or ‘domestic terror’. This is classic Alinsky and Cloward-Piven, of course, to confuse, overload and destroy. The danger now is that the resources of the entire federal government, including the military, are at the disposal of individuals who are committing crimes against the United States.

Yes, the foxes are already in the hen house, and have labeled the hens the ‘domestic terrorists’.  Good excuse for eating them us one by one or  en mass. Foxes Domestic Terrorists are clever that way, seizing the language for their own use.  Too bad they can’t read the sign, TIME’S UP, as they are in for a nasty surprise.
Continue reading ‘Obama’s Domestic Terror Network’

SUMMER OF RECOVERY...

Voters Hammer Obama With Angry Questions on the Campaign Trail

President Barack Obama is on the campaign trail defending his economic policies in the face of increasingly tough questions from skeptical Americans less than five weeks before congressional elections that threaten his fellow Democrats' grip on Congress. Voters are complaining about taxes, lack of jobs and the huge deficits growing under Democratic rule.
FULL STORY

PATTY MURRAY: THE STUPIDEST PERSON IN AMERICA: The Coulter Column That Could Sink Sen. Murray

PATTY MURRAY: THE STUPIDEST PERSON IN AMERICA: The Coulter Column That Could Sink Sen. Murray

Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com
No liberal has standing to call any Republican stupid as long as Patty Murray remains in the U.S. Senate.

Soon after being elected to the U.S. Senate in 1992, Murray went on a radio show and said:

"When I was growing up, the big fear in my life was the nuclear war. I remember second- and third-grade teachers giving us skills to deal with it, if that big alarm goes off, which was 'Hide under your desk.' Would that do any good? I don't know. But as a child, that gives you a feeling there's something to do beyond panic. Today the biggest fear our kids live with is whether ... the kid beside them has a gun. We have to give them skills so they feel confident to deal with it."

The woman is not sure if ducking under a school desk would help in a nuclear attack. Not only that, but she wants to do something similarly pointless to help children "deal with" school shootings. Maybe imaginary bullet-proof vests!

With amazing understatement, one of Murray's Democratic colleagues in the state senate told The Seattle Times in 1992: "She just doesn't strike you as somebody who's been reading The New York Times every day for the past five years." I wonder when Katie Couric is going to ask Murray what newspapers she reads.

After Murray was elected to the U.S. Senate, the Democrats tried to keep her locked in her office to prevent her from saying anything that might end up in a newspaper. But in the confusion after the 9/11 attack, the leadership must have lost the keys and Murray escaped to say this about Osama bin Laden:

"He's been out in these countries for decades, building schools, building roads, building infrastructure, building day-care facilities, building health-care facilities, and the people are extremely grateful. He's made their lives better." READ MORE...

Posted by Idiots For Obama

Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny »

ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION...

Court grants motion in Obama eligibility case »

KERCHNER V. OBAMA CLEARS LEGAL HURDLE by Sharon Rondeau (Feb....

Taitz seeks Obama’s records to defend herself in CA Bar complaint »

BRIEF FILED IN D.C. COURT BEFORE JUDGE LAMBERTH SEEKS RESPONSE...

Kerchner case will test Third Circuit Court’s adherence to the Constitution »

APPELLANTS’ BRIEF LEAVES NO WIGGLE ROOM by John Charlton (Feb....

Allen vs. Soetoro appealed to 9th Circuit Court »

CASE INVOLVES FOIA REQUEST FOR RECORDS OF BARRY SOETORO &...

The Chessboard is Now Set in the Middle East »

“CIVILIZATION AGAINST BARBARISM” by Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) (Sept. 29, 2010) — It appears while our State Department and White House are asleep at the switch; the Iranians have been busy and fastidious...
September 29 2010 / 2 comments / Read More »

MEDIA MATTERS
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Rush Limbaugh: Obama
twisting Holy Scripture
'There's a lot of people who don't know
details of their own religious belief'
--WND

No, You Can’t Keep Your Coverage

September 30th, 2010 Andrew Cline, The American Spectator

There’s a reason President Obama tries so hard to convince Americans not to watch Fox News. He keeps shamelessly lying about easily verifiable facts. Evidently he figures that left-leaning media outlets won’t call him on it, so if he can only convince people not to watch FOX, he’ll be OK. Unfortunately for the president, the American people simply have to look around them to see that he isn’t being honest with them.
Campaigning in Des Moines, Iowa, yesterday, the President repeated his biggest health care reform whopper: You can keep your current health insurance. Here is what he said:
“There’s nothing in the bill that says you have to change the health insurance you’ve got right now. If you were already getting health insurance on your job, then that doesn’t change.”
Yet hours before he uttered that line, the Boston Globe reported that Harvard Pilgrim Health Care was canceling its Medicare Advantage coverage specifically because of new regulations imposed by Obama’s health care law.
Read more.

From Pam Geller of ATLASSHRUGS...Beckel is a disgrace...are you paying attention Hannity?...

FOX Business: Hate Sponsor CAIR on Steroids, Waterboy Bob Beckel Squeal and the Ground Zero Mosque

I have been doing a lot of media, and Atlas readers are well aware of the campaign of destruction of freedom defenders by the leftist/Islamic machine.



Tonight's Ground Zero mosque segment on Eric Bolling's Money Rocks perfectly illustrates this, and the perverse marriage of the left and the jihad. The particularly vile (though typical for unindicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood front CAIR) Ahmed Rehab did his usual nazi jig, and he had the grotesque Bob Beckel as his water boy. I had been fortunate, up until today, not to have to be in the same studio with that slob, but tonight I was not spared the abuse of Beckel's presence. I was the only female on the panel, and as we were prepping (getting mic'ed etc) for the show, Beckel was regaling his victims (Bill Hemmer, David Webb and Bolling) with sordid tales of pole dancers and the like. Grotesque and deliberate. Nobody was backslapping this pig, trust me.
Once we went into the live tape, Beckel carried the CAIRanimal's water -- and he was richly rewarded for his dhimmi status. You'll noteRehab 's constant referral to Beckel's "we have to get over 911." It got ugly between Beckel and me both during the show and after the show. When we cut to break, Beckel chided Bolling for not bringing "Jewish slumlords" on the show (referring to Bolling's segment on Imam Rauf's status as a New Jersey slumlord, so named in a lawsuit against Rauf by Union City). When I heard Beckel's Jew-hating belch, I said, "and you're an anti-semite." He  told me to "kiss his ass," to which I responded that he would never get anyone anywhere in the world to get with that.
The leftists and the islamic supremacists cannot counter our arguments, so they resort to personal destruction. This is what happens to anyone who stands against them and for freedom today: they will comb through what you have said and done to try to find material they can use to discredit you, no matter how much they have to misrepresent it and lie about your real intentions to do so. They will shout you down and call you names, all the while accusing you of doing what they are actually doing. They will stop at nothing to destroy you, so that not only will no one take you seriously or listen to you, but also anyone whom they can associate with you, however tenuously, is also tainted.
But all this means only this: that lovers of freedom must stand up all the more, and speak out all the more loudly, and never rest in the cause of justice and the right. Because their evil, thuggish, bullying tactics must not prevail. And they will not prevail.

UPDATE: The Lid has this: Beckel Threatens Pamela Geller

Here's something you don't hear very often from a Fox News Contributor "You're a woman, you better be careful about saying who I carry water for," but that was the threat Bob Beckel made to my friend, Pamela Geller editor of Atlas Shrugs during a heated exchange on Eric Bolling's Fox Business News show Money Rocks last night.

After a discussion of the 60 Minutes report on the Ground Zero mosque controversy (that ran the night before) Bolling brought in Ahmed Rehab of the CAIR who instead of discussing the Mosque stooped to calling Ms. Geller names. That's the same CAIR who was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Terrorist funding case and as recently as this past March, whose terrorist ties were reaffirmed by the FBI.

Then Beckel, looking visibly angry was brought in to discuss an insensitive statement during his last appearance on Money Rocks, in which he said, 

"Look, at some point, I know it's sensitive here in New York and probably New Jersey, but we have to get over 9/11."

Beckel's response to the query about his statement to tear into Pamela, saying that on her site she once said she felt President Obama was an anti-Semite.

Obviously Beckel felt intimidated by Geller because he could not even look at her while he started his childish name calling. But as he got his "sea legs" the progressive apologist began to get abusive toward Pamela, still unable to look her in the eye:

Geller:  I would like to address Mr. Beckel's point.  I don't know why you're carrying water for the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world today.  There have been 20,000 documented radical Islamic attacks since 9/11.  Each one with the imprimatur of a Muslim cleric...

Beckel:  You better be very careful.  You're a woman, you better be very careful about who you say I carry water for, because you have no idea what you're talking about.   And don't start putting me in the middle of your crap!

Geller:  Don't you point to me!

Beckel:  I'll point to you all I want!

Geller:  Don't you point to me.  You're a misogynist.

Beckel:  You're getting yourself fifteen minutes, you get yourself fifteen minutes of fame because you're (Bolling) picking on a bunch of Muslims.

Geller:  You're picking on a bunch of women.  You're a woman hater.

Beckel:  A woman hater?  A woman hater?

Geller:  Look how you're talking to me.  It's outrageous.

Beckel:  You are nuts.

Geller:  Yea, I'm nuts.

The lid has more. Go.

UPDATE: The Blaze on it.

UPDATE: Hawkins isn't having it.

UPDATE: Instapundit said:

BOB BECKEL DOESN’T KNOW WHO HE’S DEALING WITH, if he’s threatening Pam Geller. Really, Bob, stick to reading the White House talking points. You don’t want to open up the can of whupass you’ll open up here . . . .
UPDATE: Charlie Martin emails: “I expect Pamela will deliver Beckel to his next of kin in three shopping bags.” Yes, but they’ll be from Bergdorf Goodman.
ANOTHER UPDATE: In the comments, the meanest thing you can say about Bob Beckel: “Beckel was campaign manager for Walter Mondale’s 1984 presidential campaign.”

DUMBEST COLLEGE STUDENTS? Obamania: Is the President Putting His Words in Others’ Mouths?

DUMBEST COLLEGE STUDENTS? Obamania: Is the President Putting His Words in Others’ Mouths?

There's still humans left on Earth who actually believe the shit that comes out of Obama's mouth? What a bunch of idiots...


Speaking to a crowd of about 26,000 at the University of Wisconsin on Tuesday, President Obama did his best to rile the base. One of the arrows in his rhetorical quiver was a to make the college audience feel trivialized by quoting “they,” the pundits in Washington, who are saying that the Democratic base is “apathetic” and that a “bloodletting” is in order because of an “enthusiasm gap.”

But that’s not quite the case. The “news” that Obama mentions has been filled this week with Democrats saying exactly what Obama is trying to pin on “they” and “Washington.”

For example, on Monday Vice President Joe Biden encouraged Democratic donors to “remind our base constituency to stop whining and get out there and look at the alternatives.” When MSNBC later asked if he wanted to retract that statement, he said no, and added, “Those who — didn’t get everything they wanted, it’s time to just buck up here, understand that we can make things better.” READ MORE...

Posted by Idiots For Obama

The Anatomy of a Court-Martial, Part II »

OFFICERS GUILTY OF CONSPIRACY HAVE NEVER BEEN BROUGHT TO JUSTICE by Sharon Rondeau (Sept. 29, 2010) — The interview which follows is the second...
Sep 29 2010 /  Read More »

BARBARA BOUNCER...ER I MEAN BOXER...MUST GO!...ABSOLUTELY THE MOST USELESS, INCOMPETENT EXCUSE FOR A SENATOR IN CALIFORNIA HISTORY...

Barack Obama’s Manipulative Sermonette

September 29th, 2010 Ben Johnson, Floyd Reports

The nation’s most seethingly secular president is having his day in the religious sun. “Obama increasingly talking publicly about his Christian faith,” reads a headline in The Seattle Times. Candidate Obama told Pastor Rick Warren being a Christian entails “a sense of obligation to embrace not just words but through deeds, the expectations I think that God has for us.” How do the deeds of President Obama match up with his professed faith? And was his sudden display of religiosity all it seemed — or was it intended to secure political rather than heavenly grace and forgiveness?
Read more.

Reps Bachmann and King Looking Into Pigford Billion Dollar Fraud

Would You Care To Rephrase That Makmoud ?

Remind Me Again, Who's The Paranoid Conspiracy Theorist In The Room?

Chris Matthews of MSNBC likes to throw around labels. Conspiracy labels in particular. Matthews must be a charter member of JournoList. Call'em racists, call'em Tea Baggers, call'em Conspiracy Theorists. Alinsky style mud slinging.

If we cared to investigate I would wager the 911 truther movement is a leftist founded Bush discrediting Alinsky modeled action.

Those who question Obama's eligibility, are label"birthers" and conspiracy racists.
Anytime someone speaks out in opposition, they get an anti Obama label. Lt Col Lakin has even had his sanity questioned by these name calling hypocritical liars.

Someone refresh my memory, exactly which side was it that conspired to bilk the world out of it's wealth, using the Global Warming hoax? Which side has conspired to plant a usurper in the oval office?

Matthews now accuses US business of a new conspiracy. According to Matthews Wall Street is collusively hoarding cash instead of turning on the economy saving money spigot. Matthews didn't stray from his pet word, because the useful idiots wouldn't understand the meaning of a new 9 letter word. Matthews' pot soaked no brain audience has barely managed to rote learn the word "conspiracy" means a bad thing; to weigh them down further at this late date would be expecting too much of the low lifes.

Steve

"Fathom the odd hypocrisy that Obama wants every citizen to prove they are insured, but people don't have to prove they are citizens".
 ~ Ben Stein

"What is even more peculiar is Obama asking anybody to prove anything."

Steve

Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny »

ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION...

Court grants motion in Obama eligibility case »

KERCHNER V. OBAMA CLEARS LEGAL HURDLE by Sharon Rondeau (Feb....

Taitz seeks Obama’s records to defend herself in CA Bar complaint »

BRIEF FILED IN D.C. COURT BEFORE JUDGE LAMBERTH SEEKS RESPONSE...

Allen vs. Soetoro appealed to 9th Circuit Court »

CASE INVOLVES FOIA REQUEST FOR RECORDS OF BARRY SOETORO &...

Judge Arthur J. Gonzalez claims right to commit fraud »

RULING, DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, ATTEMPTS TO STRAIN GNATS AND...

 
  

Open Letter to All Active Military Members »

WILL YOU ALLOW THE LAST VESTIGES OF FREEDOM TO DIE? by Jeff Tetreault (Sept. 29, 2010) — To all Active Duty Personnel: I have mentioned what I am about to say on various blogs and...
September 29 2010 / No comment / Read More »

Action Alert: New Report on LTC Terry Lakin's court-martail hearing including video. My response and request to the Obama Propagator.

Action Alert: New Report on LTC Terry Lakin's court-martail hearing including video. My response and request to the Obama Propagator.

Local CBS affiliate W*USA9 continues the Obama talking points from an organization that employed Obama and domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. Below is a snippet from W*USA9's report on LTC Lakin's court-martial...

NRSC Senators Protecting Their Establishment Turf--Power Before Country

Republican senators lash out at Jim DeMint

Some of his colleagues say Sen. Jim DeMint is intensifying a rift within the Republican Party.

By MANU RAJU
9/29/10

South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint last week accused his Senate Republican colleagues of doing “everything” in their power to help Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s write-in campaign against GOP nominee Joe Miller.

And he pounded them in a fundraising solicitation for doing “business as usual,” just as he “thought Republicans in Washington were beginning to get the message.”
Turns out Republicans got his message — they just didn’t like it.

A number of Republican senators told POLITICO Tuesday that DeMint was skewing the GOP Conference’s position solidly backing Miller, saying he was intensifying a rift within a party that’s trying to unite following a divisive primary season. And Republican leaders say DeMint’s decision to lay out to his supporters the debate about Murkowski in the closed-door meeting was a clear breach of protocol where senators don’t discuss private sessions between colleagues with outsiders.

“I personally think it’s very counterproductive,” said retiring Sen. Kit Bond of Missouri, scoffing at what he and other GOP senators see as DeMint’s apparent attempts to build his national profile at the expense of his colleagues.

Asked whether DeMint’s message was helpful to the Republican Party, Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison simply said: “No.”

Despite saying his party was united in the final stretch of the campaign season, DeMint’s attack against his colleagues was his second since the primary elections ended earlier this month. His first came after the Delaware Senate primary, when he wrote to supporters that the Washington GOP was “quietly rooting for Christine [O’Donnell] to lose so they can continue to peddle their discredited line that conservatives cannot win.”

DeMint now says he was “perhaps overly aggressive” with his colleagues in his latest fundraising e-mail about the Alaska Senate race, but he defends his decision to talk about the meeting publicly because he said much of the closed-door talk already had been reported by the “Hill rags.”

And he acknowledged in an interview that his tactics “could be” hurting his cause by burning bridges with his GOP colleagues whose support he would need to advance legislation.

But DeMint insists that he’s “pretty popular outside the Beltway,” where he claims he’s standing with a “majority of Americans right now.”


for the rest of the story click the link

Excuse me?...from the LIAR-IN-CHIEF>>>

Obama: GOP hasn't been honest with Americans

Terror Suspects Were Active in Obama’s Socialist “New Party”

September 29th, 2010 Trevor Loudon, NewZeal blog

On September 24, about 20 FBI agents spent most of the day searching the Logan Square residence of Chicago activists Stephanie Weiner and her husband, Joseph Iosbaker, reports the Chicago Tribune.
Working for Willie Delgado


In 1998 the duo worked as leaders of the Chicago New Party, alongside Frankie Torres, Deborah McCoy, Jose Kader, Bob Palmer, Rafael Rodriguez (Board of Directors, Rosenberg Fund for Children), Yakira Nunez, Vinnie Izurieta, Pryianka Basu, Dave Rolston, and Mary Robles. Joe Iosbaker was at the time serving as Precinct Captain for Miguel del Valle in the 13th Ward (Remember that name, we investigate del Valle a little further down). He had been working election day at this same precinct for “progressive” candidates for about a decade – since far left Chicago mayor Harold Washington won re-election in 1987. Weiner and Iosbaker supported New Party candidate and member, Willie Delgado in his bid for the 35th Ward seat in the Illinois House of Representatives.
Delgado had signed up to the New Party in 1995, along with Barack Obama, Lou Pardo and Communist Party supporter Alice Palmer. Like Obama himself, Delgado was also endorsed by the Chicago Democratic Socialists of America. In 1998 won the seat against Elba Rodriguez by a very slim 241 votes. Delgado was to hold the seat until 2006.
Read more.

READ IT AND WEEP...WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO?...

BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Army judge tells officer:
Shut up and be punished!
Defense counsel warns 'fair trial'
impossible under military rulings
--WND

It has been 30 years since Americans last came together to throw out a tyrannical government who, with Marxist lies and unabridged arrogance, stole our treasure
A Tea Party Tribute: The Age of Reagan and the Tyranny of the Elite
 By Fred Dardick Full Story
Sometimes there comes a time when a free people of a free nation must stand together and choose their fate. Sometimes it comes through war, sometimes famine, sometimes from of a fleet of planes marked by the rising sun crossing the horizon.

VOTE !!! 

This is disgusting, to put it politely.
Your help is needed.    

This is just sickening.  Only 56% have voted on the FOX poll to NOT ban the flag in school and something like 36% voted YES, to ban it (Note: Latest count, at 1:30 PM on Friday, is 72% NO and 21% Yes, which is still unthinkable).  What is going on in this country??  Read below.
    
Fox is running a poll about whether the flag should be banned in schools in order not to inflame Hispanic students. The poll is being sandbagged by SEIU and we should mount a counter action if you agree with me that the flag should be taken down for no one. 
Moveon.org, funded by George Soros, Organizing for America , and SEIU, “Service Employee International UNION”, have been twittering today to go to Fox Poll and vote to BAN the Flag and right now it is still working (21%). 
It's time to SHOW THEM WHAT TRUE PATRIOTS BELIEVE!!! 

GO HERE NOW: 

 http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/06/american-flag-banned-america/

VOTE.........and then pass it along!

It Ain't Gonna Work

Blame Pelosi. The new chord being struck by the commucrats. With the House pretty much assured of flipping in 35 days, the Obamaists feel safe in laying blame off on Nancy Pelosi.

Desparate to get the stink off for the mass failures of the Obama regime, the lefties are serving up the soon to be ex Speaker of the House. Black voters in particular are articulating it was the white dumbass from San Francisco that tripped up their black messiah.

This group of voters more than any are in need of a major reality check.

Steve

The Hitler Comparisons Keep On Coming

Barry Soetoro was in Wisconsin today trying to rally what's left of his supporters.Senate incumbent  Russ Feingold was at first nowhere to be found, then reluctantly agreed to a photo op with the poison pill -in-chief.

As Obama addressed his base- the democrats or progressives (code word for unamerican Amercian communists) his closing statement stuck me as Hitlerish. Obama is extremely sensitive to that well earned moniker, less the gassings and the mass shootings. Note mass shootings doesn't mean no shootings.Hitler wasn't a natural born German citizen, he was Austrian. Obama has never established that he is even a legal American, Indonesian is more his legal country. Hitler personally blew away rival  Ernst Rome, the gay leader of the National Socialists party or what was  later commonly known as the Nazi Party. Bisexual Obama has blood on his hands as well, 2 men, a gay ex lover and a state department security officer marked for death, as a loose end after the "passport break in October '08" and an unwanted bastard child. Hitler had a personal army the SS, spawned from the National Socialists. Obama wants a private army the Civilian National Security Force/ born from the group called Organizing For America.
Hitler won support by passing a health care program, made sure there was food on the table, indoctrinated the youth by taking over  education,and controlled the media.At one point it was a capital offense to listen to non approved broadcasts. Obama's fledgling program called the Fairness Doctrine is a step in that direction.  These are all endeavors Obama has undertaken. We have more people on food stamps and extended unemployment than at any time in our history. Obama demonizes the Tea Party, Hitler had the Black Hand society. Hitler had the political buffoon Herman Goering, Obama's inept  lackey is Joe Bidden. Hitler speeches were rants and ravings of a lunatic sociopath. Obama's speeches are filled with lies and inaccuracies, Obama often is blustery and confrontational, he shouts and ridicules. Obama is a narcissistic sociopath.

Obama has made economic and social war on America beginning as early as 2006 when Obama entered his  "Reichstag." on his way to the "Chancellery" 3 years later. The Jews have been a shared enemy and focal point of his demagoguery. Hitler blamed greedy Jewish bankers for Europe's economic woes and specifically Germany's economic depression. Obama hasn't referred to "them damn jews" per say as the problem bankers, but he has referred to Wall Street  as "Fat Cat Bankers". Hitler used the term vermin, Obama mirrorsthat  by also using a sluristic animal gene-us .   Kristallnacht, served as the beginning  of nationalizing private property, Obama had his own kristallnacht disguised as bailouts or tax payer funded buy outs, in the early months of his regime.

The parallels don't end here, but perhaps today signals the beginning of the end. At the end Hitler holed up in a bunker, racked by drugs and paranoia. Delusional up to the end. Hitler ended his life cursing the German people as being unworthy. Adolf H.Obama, today in Wisconsin signalled the end is near for his political life.

Steve




One closing remark that I want to make: It is inexcusable for any Democrat or progressive right now to stand on the sidelines in this midterm election…
Everybody out there has to be thinking about what’s at stake in this election and if they want to move forward over the next two years or six years or 10 years on key issues like climate change, key issues like how we restore a sense of equity and optimism to middle-class families who have seen their incomes decline by five percent over the last decade. If we want the kind of country that respects civil rights and civil liberties, we’d better fight in this election…
We have to get folks off the sidelines. People need to shake off this lethargy, people need to buck up. Bringing about change is hard — that’s what I said during the campaign. It has been hard, and we’ve got some lumps to show for it. But if people now want to take their ball and go home, that tells me folks weren’t serious in the first place.

------Obama in Wisconsin today

Dual Citizenship and the Presidency

First published Sunday, September 26, 2010

©2010 drkate
The Usurpathon actions include finding new ways to talk about Obama’s ineligibility for the Presidency.  One such tactic is to use the concept of ‘dual nationality’ or ‘dual citizenship’ to underscore that Obama has divided allegiance.  This theme was emphasized in the letter delivered to Congressman Issa’s office.
A review of past Presidents’  status regarding dual citizenship indicates that all of the Presidents before Obama, with the exception of Chester Arthur, met the criteria of natural born citizen, that is born in the United States of two U.S. citizen parents.  James Buchanan’s father came to America in the early 1780′s, becoming a ‘citizen of the United States at the Adoption of the Constitution’.  James was born in the United States in 1791.
With the exception of Chester Arthur, all Vice Presidents have also met the natural born citizen criterion, including Spiro Agnew, who was born in the United States to a naturalized U.S. Citizen father and an American mother.
However, Chester Arthur successfully hid his father’s non-Citizen status from the American electorate during that time period by lying about his exact year of birth and burning all his family records.  The true facts were only confirmed recently upon historical research of the naturalization records from that time period which revealed that Arthur’s father was not yet a Citizen when Chester Arthur was born.  And there were no legal court challenges to him at the time, just rumors as to which side of the Canadian border he was actually born on. (H/T CDR Kerchner)
In an astute historical analysis, Commander Charles Kerchner further identifies why being a “born Citizen” is not sufficient to be President of the United States.
Continue reading ‘Dual Citizenship and the Presidency’

MUST READ...Note the author also believes that a serious investigation of Obama will result in resignation...

Occams Razor and Presidential Eligibility

First published Friday, September 24, 2010 

©2010 drkate

Occam’s razor (or Ockham’s razor) is often expressed in Latin as the lex parsimoniae (translating to the law of parsimony, law of economy or law of succinctness). The principle is popularly interpreted as “the simplest explanation is usually the correct one”. When competing hypotheses are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selection of the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities while still sufficiently answering the question.  It is in this sense that Occam’s razor is usually understood.

As applied to the question of Obama’s failure to produce even one document that affirmatively identifies him as a natural born citizen, the following question applies:

What is the likelihood that Obama is hiding documents that:

1. are harmless and benign?
   
2. contain damaging information?

Separating the two options with a razor, it is clearly door number 2.
Continue reading ‘Occams Razor and Presidential Eligibility’