
In his well-researched book,Horner describes how the EPA arrives at its allegedly “scientific” conclusions:
the EPA now brazenly and routinely selects the interpretation—sometimes the only such interpretation—of a set of data that can justify its power grab. If a study can possibly be read to show a significant health benefit from regulating,the EPA will read it that way. Regulators and activists routinely ignore the weaknesses in their favored studies and contrary evidence from other peer-reviewed research that doesn’t support the alarmists’ agenda.Well,if things were that bad at the EPA during the Bush administration,the zealots are on steroids under the Obama administration.
In addition to cherry-picking,EPA bureaucrats and other fear-mongers manipulate the evidence in a wide range of ways,for example by simply funding huge numbers of scientifically shoddy studies. (Horner,Christopher C. [2007-02-12]. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming:And Environmentalism [Politically Incorrect Guides] [Kindle Locations 852-853]. Regnery Publishing. Kindle Edition.)
Brian Sussman,author of Climategate:A Veteran Meteorologist Exposes the Global Warming Scam describes what the EPA is like under Lisa Jackson,one of the most fanatical anti-fossil fuel energy zealots to ever run the EPA….
Read more.






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.