Rubber Stamped Fraud
•December 20, 2011 • 21 Comments
Left: reg. stamp on recently obtained short form COLB - Right: stamp on obama's long form COLB
The color of the paper in these images was altered purposefully so that the stamps would be in sharper relief, particularly the image on the left. CLICK on the above image to enlarge if you wish to observe the many easily noticeable differences between the two Registrar stamps.
We know that there are multiples of the official stamp at the Department of Health in Honolulu. The thing that strikes me is that the stamps should all be nearly identical. Except that one may be used more frequently than another, thus being perhaps less sharp,they should otherwise look the same.
The company that manufactures the stamps should have the master on file, and if new stamps are required they would be generated from the master. At least when I used to deal with similar rubber stamps years ago, that is how the company that I ordered them from explained the process to me.
Why such a striking difference between the two? Oh, I know, I know – the obama birth certificate is a fraud top to bottom, but still……….there is more that is dissimilar between the two stamps than there is similar.
Now lets compare the image on the left above with the rubber Registrar stamp that was (allegedly) on obama’s short form COLB (certificate of live birth) released on FactCheck, obama’s propaganda website, during the 2008 campaign:
CLICK to enlarge:
Left: recently obtained COLB stamp - Right: stamp on obama's FactCheck 2007 COLB
Next up is a side by side comparison of the 2011 obama long form COLB Registrar stamp, and the stamp on the 2007 obama short form COLB provided by FactCheck:
CLICK to enlarge:
Left: 2011 obama long form COLB Reg. stamp - Right: Reg. stamp on the 2007 obama short form COLB
Perhaps it was in Oct. 2008, which is when they began titling BOTH the long form and short form versions of the birth certificates “CERTIFICATE of Live Birth” instead of the short form having that title while the long form was titled “CERTIFICATION of Live Birth”. The Department did that to end the rising confusion and burgeoning suspicion over why obama’s shorty birth certificate had a different title than the birth certificates that other Hawaiians displayed.
Just sayin.
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
Putting an "x" instead of an "h" improbably a very common practice in the Xawaiian Islands.
ReplyDeleteRe: Putting an "x" instead of an "h" improbably a very common practice in the Xawaiian Islands.
ReplyDeleteIt's not a common practice for stamping documents with a rubber stamp.
And don't anyone say that this was an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) error. Open up the pdf in Adobe Illustrator. Then you can see that the entire registrar's stamp (with the TXE and smiley face) was a linked element from another source that was scaled and rotated -90 degrees. That is not a scanning error. Indeed it proves that Obama's long form birth certificate was not a scan of a paper document but was entirely fabricated.
This rubber stamp fraud may be the key to bringing down the usurper. This is prima facie evidence that the birth certificate is fraudulent. What to do?
ReplyDeleteHawaii Statute §338-18 Disclosure of records. Paragraph (g)(4).
(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:
(4) A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings;
Find any of the lawsuits where the defendant has made any reference to the long form birth certificate. Then the plaintiff can use §338-18(g)(4) to force the officials in Hawaii to verify that the document Obama put on the White House website is a true and correct copy of the "certified original" that Fuddy gave to Obama's attorney Corley. So under this statute, Hawaii does not have to release any of Obama's records, they just have to comply with the law and perform the verification. If Hawaii officials state that what they have on record has a misspelled "TXE" and a happy face in the registrar's stamp, then we know that Hawaii officials created the fraudulent document and there is no authentic birth certificate. If Hawaii officials say their records do not have the misspelled "TXE" and happy face, then Obama created a forgery because there is no authentic birth certificate in Hawaii. Forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and is multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47, Sec.1028. Who is going to take the fall for this crime?