Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Democratic Congressional Candidate Removed from Ballot for Being Constitutionally Ineligible

House candidate not eligible to serve, records show
Russell Lissau @ Daily Herald

A suburban Democratic candidate for Congress is ineligible to hold that office because he hasn't been a U.S. citizen long enough, records show.

Aloys Rutagwibira, 53, of Hainesville, is a native of Rwanda who became a naturalized American citizen on July 6, 2006, according to voter registration records acquired by the Daily Herald.

Congressional service requires seven years of citizenship. Rutagwibira won't be eligible until July 2013.

Rutagwibira is one of five candidates seeking the Democratic nomination for the 10th District seat now held by Republican Bob Dold.

Rutagwibira has not returned multiple telephone calls requesting interviews. He also failed to attend a scheduled candidate interview session Tuesday at the Daily Herald office in Libertyville.

When asked via email about his citizenship, Rutagwibira refused to confirm the date he took the citizenship oath.

He also expressed offense that the Daily Herald discovered the discrepancy during a search of public records rather than by first asking him. MORE HERE: http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120131/news/701319649

U.S. House of Reps candidate removed from ballot.
He is not constitutionally eligible to serve, records show
Commander Charles Kerchner(Ret.)

Read the full report here: http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120131/news/701319649

Well, they are enforcing Article I Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution as to who can serve as a U.S. Representative, when are they going to start enforcing Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution as to who can serve as the President and Commander in Chief instead of giving the current usurper resident of the White House a pass. Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” since his father was a foreign national who was never a U.S. citizen and thus Obama is clearly not eligible to be the President. MORE HERE: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/u-s-house-of-reps-candidate-removed-from-ballot

ARTICLE II ELIGIBILITY FACTS HERE: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

The Lights are on…But for How Long?


by Sharon Rondeau
(Jan. 31, 2012) — 4:32 p.m. ET – It’s been a long five, almost six days.
As Arlen Williams generously posted here and here during The Post & Email’s inadvertent downtime, on January 20, our host, GoDaddy LLC, claimed that our site created a problem for other websites by utilizing too much space and shut it down after we hired someone to troubleshoot it.  We were not advised of the problem until the following morning.  On Thursday, January 26, just after publishing our account of the hearings in Atlanta on Obama’s eligibility, the site was shut down again without warning, purportedly for generating a “query” which caused a “runaway code” resulting in the same risk to other sites.  GoDaddy had informed us that its policy is that the site owner is not given advance warning of an impending shutdown.
We are not convinced that the overloads were not caused by hackers or other ill-wishers to the dissemination of the truth.
When we purchased the hosting plan in late September 2010, we were given unlimited bandwidth and assured that the server was adequate to our needs.  We know our readership has grown exponentially since that time and certainly wished no harm to come to other sites on the server.
Our second website developer called today to inform us that he was able to bring up the site, but it is still on the shared server rather than the dedicated server which we purchased in good faith to avoid over-capacity problems in the future.  For the last five days, we have paid for two hosting packages and been unable to utilize either one.
The website professional still had unanswered questions which were expressed to an executive assistant earlier today in a conference call, and within the last five minutes, it appears that GoDaddy responded to them as requested.  However, the message concluded with the following:
I noticed that your website is producing an error at this time.  Please let us know if you need further assistance from us regarding this migration or getting your setup completed..  We are happy to assist you.
Please contact us if you have any further issues.
Who knows what that means?  Are they referring to the old hosting account, where The Post & Email currently resides and is an apparent risk to other websites, or the new hosting account, where The Post & Email was supposed to go and for which we paid almost $800?
The website developer has told us that we are “OK for now,” but that the site will go down again after a technical change takes effect.
The Post & Email wishes to formally thank Arlen Williams of Gulag Bound for his gracious posting of our work during our absence from the web. Last evening, Sharon Meroni of Patriots Heart Network also posted our update, and ObamaBallotChallenge wrote an article in response to our latest update which was published this morning.  If we have neglected to thank anyone else who posted our work, it is because we are unaware of it.
We would also like to thank everyone who has donated to our emergency fundraiser to cover the unexpected expenses of the “move.”  We have learned that maintaining a prominent place on the web is not an inexpensive business and have raised just over $700 of our $1,500 goal.
My office is in a state of chaos from the last five days, so it’s back to work on the breaking news of the day…for as long as it lasts this time around.
Obama’s Contempt for the Rule of Law
By Gina Miller On 31 Jan, 2012 
Listen to the author read this article
The so-called “mainstream” media are despicable. The government propaganda news reporters of the past in places like Soviet Russia and their modern contemporaries do not hold a candle to the current communist Democrat mouthpiece news “reporters” here in America in their ability to lie to the people. Those of us who have watched the sickeningly fawning, fiercely biased reporting on Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) since before the 2008 presidential election know exactly what I mean. Reporters for the media establishment would not report the truth about Obama even on pain of death.
So it comes as no surprise that the most spiked (unreported) story of the past several weeks is that of three legal complaints against Obama in the State of Georgia that demand he prove his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President, and thus, his ability to legally be on the ballot in Georgia. This story has not been covered by the mainstream media, except in rare isolated instances of vitriolic presentation. Have you seen it on your local evening news? Have you read it in your local bird cage liner newspaper? Nope and nope.
This story is huge, yet the Obot media, in lockstep with the sinister character in the White House, refuse to report on it. In the event you are unaware of this story, the bottom line is that finally after more than three years’ worth of legal challenges, one judge has been willing to allow the case against Obama to proceed on its merits. At last, we find a judge who appears to respect the Constitution. That judge is Michael M. Malihi of the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings.
Judge Malihi rejected the Obama team’s demand that he dismiss a subpoena requiring Obama to appear in court in Altanta to prove his eligibility. The judge refused. Then, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, tried to go around Judge Malihi’s court and sent a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp demanding that he abolish the court case and announcing that neither Obama nor his counsel would attend (“contempt of court” anyone?). To his credit Secretary Kemp basically told team Obama to put it in their pipe and smoke it.
So the hearings were held last Thursday sans Team Obama. Arguments were heard which include that Obama is not a natural born citizen—as required by the Constitution—because his supposed father was not a U.S. citizen and that Obama possibly possesses a fraudulent Social Security number. The judge has yet to issue a ruling.
He could have issued a default ruling against Obama, but as WND’s Bob Unruh reported last Friday,
“Attorneys who argued in a Georgia court this week that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president say Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi considered granting a default judgment before they even argued the case.
That presumably could have recommended that Obama failed to prove his eligibility and therefore should not be on the 2012 ballot, since he and his lawyer snubbed the hearing, for which Obama was subpoenaed.
But the attorneys argued against such an easy victory on the point of the single hearing, expressing instead their desire to get the evidence concerning Obama’s eligibility or lack of it in the record, so that it would be there should the case elevate to an appellate level.
The attorneys also said the strategy decision by Obama to simply ignore the subpoena and the hearing may ultimately backfire, because judges typically aren’t pleased to listen to arguments from someone who wants to introduce evidence during an appeal.”
The fact that Obama did not show when subpoenaed further illustrates his complete contempt for the rule of law in America. He has repeatedly violated the United States Constitution with non-recess recess appointments, taking over private sector car companies, signing the takeover of the health care industry and mandating that all Americans buy health insurance, running guns into the hands of enemies of America in the Mexican drug cartels, bypassing Congress to enact his will, etc.
As I have said before, Obama is behaving as a dictator, and someone needs to hold him accountable. I am not holding my breath for anyone to arrest him for contempt of court, but someone most certainly should. Despite what he seems to believe, he is not above the law; however, if no one is willing to hold him accountable to the law, by default he is above it. This is a terrible place in which we find our nation—with an utterly lawless man in the office of President.
Besides Orly Taitz and Mark Hatfield, another attorney who argued against Obama before Judge Malihi last Thursday was Van Irion, co-founder of the Liberty Legal Foundation. He had some serious observations about Obama’s disregard for the authority of the court, and in part, he wrote,
“One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: ‘Nixon Resigns!’ President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.
Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process, Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.
The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.”
Yes, indeed.
There is most certainly contempt in every aspect of Obama’s being. He displays contempt for our nation, our military, our freedoms, our Constitution and rule of law, all while insulting our intelligence with his interminable lying. We will have to wait to see what Judge Malihi decides. I have no word on when he may issue his ruling, but it is said to be soon. I pray—and patriots throughout our nation pray—that he makes the right decision.
It is far past time for someone to hold this lawless criminal in the White House accountable. Yes, I said criminal! If you consider that to be too strong of a word to describe the behavior of Barack Obama, then you are simply uninformed or of like mind with him. The time for mincing words and playing polite with this communist Democrat regime is over—actually, the time for it never was. Now, more than ever, we must tell it like it is with this administration and shout it from the rooftops.
When you consider polling (if you believe any of the polls) that indicates about fifty percent of Americans support Obama for reelection, then you know how much trouble we are in. If after three years of Obama’s outrageous behavior in office, we see that many Americans are still truly so clueless, it is only a matter of a very short time before the commie zombies will completely rule over us. We must fight to educate and inform the voter zombies where we find them, and hope they will listen. Otherwise, it may soon be too late.

Attorney Van Irion Interview 1/26/12 Atlanta, Georgia

Please consider making a secure online donation to Article2SuperPAC by credit card or check by clicking here.
 MORE FROM obamaballotchallenge

You may not have heard much about:

Attorney Mark Hatfield (Representing Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell)

Attorney Van Irion (representing David Welden) was a guest of David Oxley on Radio Sandy Springs
The response to yesterday’s show on the Georgia Eligibility Case was very good.
Here is the direct link to our podcast for you or to pass on if you’d like:  http://radiosandysprings.com/podcasts/TLAFJan30.2012.mp3
This is so important and in my opinion Brian Kemp the Sec of State has no choice but to omit or disallow Obama’s name on the ballots.
David Oxley
 Van Irion’s organization: http://libertyleaglfoundation.org

Both of these attorneys are pushing the natural born Citizenship aspect. Orly Taitz is more on the identity fraud/document forgery side, emphasizing that not only is he not NBC, but may not be any kind of a citizen and might not even be “Barack Obama. She also brings up NBC.  Both approaches are useful.

How Obama’s Eligibility Fiasco Poses Trouble For Dems

If Georgia’s Secretary of State says Obama is off the ballot,it will set in motion a scary domino effect that will devastate down ballot Democrats.
It’s doubtful that the media will explain what is likely to happen if there is a blank space at the top of the Democrat slate in Georgia next November,but here’s a likely scenario.
The results the latest IBD/TIPP survey hold nothing but bad news for Obama and his Democrats. Almost 2 /3 of the respondents agreed that we are preparing for the most important election since 1860.  Even in the absence of hard evidence,can there be any doubt that those who are disinterested and feel no sense of urgency about this election probably have very little connection to our America except as a place to demand from to pay for their America?
“Voter Interest” in this election can rightly be used interchangeably with “voter intensity”,which in turn translates to “voter enthusiasm” to vote.
Last March,Republican enthusiasm was 5 points higher than Democrat enthusiasm,but that difference had grown to a 21 point edge in an October CNN survey.
CNN found that 64% of Republicans are either extremely or very enthusiastic about voting in November which was up 3 points from June. Democrats by contrast had just a 43% enthusiasm level as they looked forward to voting in November.
These kinds of numbers are the stuff of titanic defeats for Democrats.
A 2010 enthusiasm edge of 19 points at 63/44 for Republicans gave them pickups of  680 state level legislative seats and 64 Congressional seats.
Today’s IBD/TIPP survey shows that Republicans are 26 points more enthusiastic than Democrats with no telling how far the gap will grow.  Clearly getting rank and file Democrats out to vote for Barack Obama or anyone other Democrat  will be an uphill battle.
Very dangerous territory for Democrats
A December Gallup mega survey of 5000 voters in 12 swing states revealed non-white enthusiasm was 32%. Compared to  2008 when 65% of blacks voted  97% for Obama,this is a stunning number.
If black enthusiasm to vote is already less than half 2008 levels, one has to wonder how many blacks will turn out to vote for ANY Democrat without Obama at the top of their ticket.
If the Obama Citizenship cases in other states are successful,it will  be a disaster for down ballot Democrats like never before.

Improved sound...

MEDIA BLACK-OUT ON OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY HEARING... Deliberately Hiding That Obama Isn't Really President... Georgia Ineligibility Hearing Videos: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4

Web host shuts down site twice, promises to migrate,
then leaves customer in the lurch

By Sharon Rondeau
The Post & Email (site is under maintenance at time of publishing)
(Jan. 30, 2012) – Due to high traffic on both January 20 and 26 after Atty. Orly Taitz announced breaking news regarding the Georgia ballot challenges, The Post & Email’s web host, GoDaddy LLC, shut the site down without warning.
We worked quickly to hire a website developer to optimize the site and restore the twice-daily news alerts which had stopped working.  He began work almost right away and was about to start the optimization process when GoDaddy shut the site down for the second time.
Although both the website developer and I contacted GoDaddy immediately and explained the steps we were taking to correct any overages, GoDaddy refused to turn the site back on.  It made no difference that tens of thousands of readers were depending on the newspaper to report accurately, quickly, and in detail the breaking news of the day, which is vital in these days of the Obama regime.
On January 26, we prepaid $800 for a new hosting plan on a dedicated server to resolve the issue.  We had already paid the website developer more than $200 to do his work.  In a three-way conference call, GoDaddy told us that it would take up to 72 hours to prepare the server and that they would migrate the site content from the old server to the new.  However, on the third day, they changed their story and said it was the website developer’s job to migrate the content.
He attempted to do so and after three hours stated that he was unfamiliar with their server, deferring to GoDaddy to do it.  GoDaddy then put The Post & Email at the end of another 72-hour queue.  I asked to speak with a supervisor and did so, but nothing changed.  Later on January 29, the word from GoDaddy was that the migration had not even been started yet.
I am spending the last of The Post & Email’s funds to attempt to get the site up and running again.  I may have to hire a specialist after the migration is done, as I had to sign a disclaimer acknowledging that problems with connections might be encountered.  Having to pay another professional will most likely deplete the small amount of cash we have left.
Your editor has been working without pay for many months to bring you the news, complete with personal interviews, court documents, inside investigations, and detailed follow-up.  However, even though we have tens of thousands of readers each month, only a relatively few actually support the paper.  If we cannot get past this hurdle, The Post & Email will close, which is exactly what our enemies want.
GoDaddy can be reached at 480-505-8877, and the corporate office phone number is 480-505-8800.  A detailed letter has been mailed to Bob Parsons, CEO, and a message left with one of his corporate staff this morning.  I have pledged to withhold the contents of the letter from publication until after Parsons has had a chance to respond and act upon it.
If you wish to see The Post & Email return and grow, please send money via Paypal to payments@thepostemail.com.
Or send checks to:
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
We need approximately $1,500 to overcome this obstacle.  Can that be raised from a monthly readership of possibly 200,000?
Thank you for your support.
Sharon Rondeau, Editor

Monday, January 30, 2012

Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

Obama Attorney Knows Eligibility Hearing Was Disaster For The President

barack obama9483 Obama attorney knows eligibility hearing was disaster for the president
Though we’ll not know the outcome of the Georgia hearing regarding ballot eligibility for the nation’s number 1 undocumented worker until the first part of February,Barack Obama’s high-powered attorney apparently suffered an attack of rapid,shallow breathing just before the courtroom drama was about to unfold.
One day prior to the scheduled hearing before Administrative Judge Michael Malihi,Obama attorney Michael Jablonski addressed both a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp AND an email,directed to the Secretary via one of the court’s hearing officers,asking Kemp to cancel the hearing.
Georgia law allows “any elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” to file an objection to that candidate’s inclusion on the State ballot. (1)
Such objection filings go to the Secretary of State who makes a determination to either overrule or pass them along to the State Administrative Court for disposition. Michael Malihi was the Administrative Judge to whom a number of these objections were directed by the Secretary and he found them worthy of pursuing in court.
The dozens of similar suits questioning Obama’s eligibility,filed in other venues around the nation were dismissed because the plaintiffs “lacked standing”—that is,were unable to prove direct,personal damage if Obama were to be permitted to remain in or run again for the office he holds.
But Georgia law trumped that defense,throwing Obama and Jablonski into uncharted waters. And forced to follow the new tack of actually having to lawfully and properly PROVE Obama’s eligibility,in the weeks since the original filing,Jablonski had pretty much emptied his quiver on behalf of the acting president.
On January 3rd his motion for an outright dismissal of the lawsuits was denied by Judge Malihi. And on Friday the 20th,his motion to quash subpoenas demanding the presence of Obama in the courtroom along with original copies of his Hawaii birth certificate and all Social Security information was denied as well.
But what degree of audacity,arrogance,hutzpah and perhaps downright panic does it require to demand that the Georgia Secretary of State cancel arguably the most anticipated hearing in state history less than 24 hours before its scheduled start? Never mind that it was Secretary Kemp who believed the suits had enough merit to be explored in the first place!
Jablonski’s letter alternately reads like a threat,a whine and a prayer as he misstates Georgia statute,belittles Judge Malihi,refers to irrelevant previous findings and ultimately states that because he and his revered client are not receiving the absolute acquiescence they so richly deserve at the hands of these minor Georgia officials,they will take their marbles and go home.
Indeed,so much in a dither was the mighty mouthpiece,he actually winds up his petulant epistle by telling Secretary Kemp that he doesn’t have the legal right to inconvenience the president in the first place!  “…No law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot,” writes Jablonski. “…The attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.” (2)
It is not difficult to imagine Jablonski writing these words as he wags a finger in Kemp’s face while threatening to hold his breath until he turns blue!
In his written reply to Jablonski,Kemp briefly corrects the attorney’s incorrect reading of Georgia statute while issuing a friendly though unmistakably direct warning:“…if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.” (3)
Obama supporters and other useful idiots around the country are laughing at what they consider the efforts of a backward,Southern state to capture the national spotlight for its 15 minute allowance of fame.
But rest assured that Michael Jablonski does NOT see the humor! And Americans who recognize Barack Hussein Obama for who and what he is might be a fortnight away from breaking news which even the New York Times will be forced to print.

To read more use these links:
(1)     http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/court-obama-must-be-constitutionally-eligible/
(2)     https://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/jablonski-letter-to-secretary-of-state-kemp/
(3)     http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4122

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

What Witnesses Testified To At Obama’s Georgia Citizenship Hearing

President Obama6538 What witnesses testified to at Obama’s Georgia citizenship hearing

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” Private Investigator Susan Daniels told Judge Michael Malihi under oath,as she reviewed her research into Barack Obama’s social security numbers investigation!
Her analysis centered on a Connecticut resident “born in 1890″ whose official registration somehow is mixed in with the Obama social security investigation.  Testimony at the court  hearing of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot for reelection in 2012 revealed stunning sworn facts that clearly places into question the sitting president’s authenticity.
In an interview after the administrative hearing,Daniels said,“I discovered immediately. . .( that social security number) was fraudulent. . .was..  no way it was accurate.”  The live internet video stream suddenly went black when she said,“He’s using a . . . “  While I was able to glean some startling testimony,other witness responses to Attorney Orly Taitz’s questioning seemed garbled and had certain interruptions at key moments of the proceedings.
A remarkable source determined to bring the truth to the American people,namely htt://art2superpac.com,should allow you to view the hearing if it somehow can still stay up.
Attorney Taitz’s first witness keyed in on the non-natural born citizen status of Barack Obama senior,a fact clearly stated by his son’s own words admitting his father was born in Kenya,a protectorate of Great Britain at the time of our sitting President’s birth.      Another forensic witness stated under oath that “1-the serial number is out of sequence 2-the (Nordyke) twins born after (Obama). . .their serial numbers are lower. . (you) would expect them to be higher. . .a certifying paragraph is different. . .the name of the registrar is different. . .(you) would expect the same (name) since they (twins and Obama) were born within 24 hours” of one another!   The forensic expert said,“There is credible evidence to warrant further investigation!”  Another computer scanner expert went through lengthy analysis of a soft wear creation of the birth certificate released last April as compared to a document simply scanned from the original.
African American Pastor James David Manning is calling out officialdom for keeping the American people in the dark about this never before hearing of a sitting U.S. president’s eligibility challenge.  “This is a big story,” he says on his web video.  Pastor Manning says our media outlets,our Republican candidates,the Supreme Court,all members of Congress are involved in a “Conspiracy” (his words) to hide from us what is really going on.
Dr. Jerome R. Corsi,author of several Barack Obama books,says Judge Malihi’s witnesses show “Barack Obama is slam-dunk-disqualified” to appear on the Georgia official 2012 ballot.   For him and his attorneys to not attend this official hearing was stunning.
Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp warned them  if “you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings,please understand that you do so at your own peril.”  One commenter said,“I demand to know if my president is legal or not,no fooling around.”  Perhaps the biggest news story of our country’s recent history is under blackout in an omerta or code of silence  unprecedented in journalism.

To read more use these links:


Obama eligibility challenges spread to 6 states

Decision in Georgia case expected soon, but ballot concerns going viral

An administrative law judge in Georgia could decide as early as this week whether voters in the state convinced him Barack Obama’s name should be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot because he is not qualified to hold the office.
But win, lose or draw, the fight isn’t going to be over, as other cases are erupting across the nation, with challenges being raised anew even in Obama’s own adopted political network in Illinois.
The Georgia hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi, and while none of the lawyers who appeared in the proceedings was willing to predict what the decision will be, several did confirm that Malihi had considered simply granting them a default victory, because Obama and his lawyers expressly stated they would not participate in a hearing to provide evidence that he is qualified to be on the ballot.


Arpaio's Phoenix offices temporarily evacuated

PHOENIX (AP) — The downtown Phoenix offices of Sheriff Joe Arpaio were temporarily evacuated Monday morning because of a suspicious envelope addressed to the sheriff containing a white, powdery substance.
A spokesman refused to release details to the The Associated Press until an afternoon news conference.
The Arizona Republic (http://bit.ly/yp8VBf ) reports the envelope was opened on the 19th floor of the Wells Fargo building where the sheriff's office has its headquarters. The unknown substance was found inside the envelope.
A Phoenix Fire Department hazardous materials crew responded.
The crew removed the envelope, and people working in the area were allowed to return.
Officials were still investigating. No injuries were reported.
Information from: The Arizona Republic, http://www.azcentral.com

Attorney Leo Donofrio: The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed

The Dirty “little” Secret Of The Natural Born Citizen Clause Revealed
Attorney Leo Donofrio

I have emphasized the word “little” because the truth of the law on this issue is very simple, folks. So simple that the mystery is deciphered by application of one of the most clear, concise and undeniable rules of law; the code of statutory construction governs, and therefore, “natural born Citizen” must require something more than being born in the United States.

Let me put it to you in appropriately simple language:

Clause A = “Only a natural born Citizen may be President.”

Clause B = “Anyone born in the United States is a Citizen.”

(While these two clauses reflect Article 2, Section 1, and the 14th Amendment, I shall refer to them as “Clause A” and “Clause B” for now.)

The code of statutory construction is learned by every student in law school, and every practicing attorney has confronted it. Every judge is required to apply the rule equally to all statutes, and the Constitution. There is no wiggle room at all. The rule states that when a court examines two clauses, unless Congress has made it clear that one clause repeals the other, the court must observe a separate legal effect for each. More specifically, regardless of the chronology of enactment, the general clause can never govern the specific.

Clause B is a general rule of citizenship, which states that all persons born in the country are members of the nation.

Clause A is a specific clause that says only those members of the nation who are “natural born” may be President.

According to the rule of statutory construction, the court must determine that Clause A requires something more than Clause B.

How's that Hopey Changey doin' for ya'?...

Here’s recap of Hope and Change since President Obama took office in Jan 2009. Comparing economic indicators starting in Jan 2009 to present day:
1. Federal debt has increased by 43% from $10.6 trillion to $15 trillion.
2. Americans living in poverty have increased by 16% from 39.8 million to 46.2 million.
3. Total unemployment (U6) has increased by 68% from 13.7 million to 23 million.
4. Price of gasoline has increased by 80% from $1.86/gal to $3.35/gal.
5. Americans on food stamps have increased 42% from 31.8 million to 45.2 million.
6. Home foreclosures per year have increased by 34% from 850,000 to 1,140,000.
7. Total bankruptcy filings per year have increased by 42% from 1,117,641 to 1,593,081.
8. Median Household incomes have declined by 4%.
9. Average selling price of new homes has declined by 10%.
10. US dollar compared to foreign currencies has declined by 8.7%. [US dollar index of 85.9 in Jan 2009 to 78.5 in Dec 2011.]
11. US dollar compared to gold has declined 105%. [ $855/ounce to $1750/ounce


He (OBAMA) is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.

Obama the Chicken is Being Plucked

Pages: 123
By Mark McGrew
Obama the Chicken is Being Plucked. 46480.jpeg
AP photo
January 29 through the 31st, 5% of the sheriffs in America are in Las Vegas Nevada, learning how to tell the Federal government agents to pack sand and get out of town. 20% of the 50 United States of America have been presented with lawsuits and or legal filings challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama to be on the ballot for the 2012 election.
Congressional representative Allen West summed up the American people's feelings for the Obama administration today when he told Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid to, "Get the hell out of The United States of America!". His talk can be seen here.
Ten people will be murdered today in Mexico with guns provided to drug cartels by Eric Holder, the United States Attorney General. Politicians are calling for him to resign. Resign??

There is enough evidence presented to Congress to arrest him and prosecute him for an Act of War against the nation of Mexico, accessory to murder of thousands of innocent citizens in Mexico and America as well as the murder of United States Border Patrol agent Brian Terry. Resign?? Besides sending illegal guns to Mexico, Holder and his associates sold guns to criminal street gangs inside the United States where the guns will be used inside the United States. It will take years to find the thousands of guns these criminals sold to killers.
Eric Holder and his criminal operatives in his office and the Department of Justice need to be dragged out in handcuffs, jailed with no bail and put on trial with a jury of American citizens who are not federal government employees.
Like a dead chicken being plucked, Obama has lost his power and his support. Six months or so ago, French President Sarkozy called Obama, "Insane". Other world leaders have publicly called him incompetent and other derogatory names.
Since then, major news in America has been slowly, quietly, as if testing the waters, pointing out Obama's faults and crimes. Little by little they are feeding America, and the World, the truth about the man they fought so hard to cover up for these past four years. Feather by feather, the chicken known as Obama, is being plucked. The most hated psychopath on Earth and his administration are going to be thoroughly plucked, gutted, tossed in an oven, cooked and devoured. And like any dead carcass with no use, Obama and his faithful supporters will be thrown onto a garbage heap until they rot to nothing.
The thing known as Obama is committing one large theft after another of the American people's money, work and trust. He is the most disgusting example of human life we have ever witnessed.
Like all stupid people, he thinks everyone else is stupider than he is. There is, however, one thing he has done well. Every facet of American life and business has gone down considerably, except for foreclosures, unemployment, bankruptcies and business closures.
The mistake he made was to think that We the People, would just sit back and take his arrogant insulting crap.
Pamela Barnett was a plaintiff in a case brought by Orly Taiz demanding proof that Obama was eligible to be President. That court arrogantly and illegally refused to hear their complaint. Pamela Barnett's character reflects that of most Americans: When you treat her like a dog, she'll jump up and bite you. So she formed an organization to teach and help people how to have Obama taken off of all 50 State ballots. And it is working very well. Her site is here: http://obamaballotchallenge.com
And it is working. Obama has been denied to be on the primary ballot in Alabama until he proves he is eligible. Georgia has a ruling pending in 3 weeks to keep Obama off the ballot until he can prove he is eligible.
The amazingly tenacious, Carl Swensson, fighting to get Obama out of the office of the President, by knocking on every official's door he could find for four years, finally found two government employees who were not traitors and took their Oath of Office seriously: The Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp and Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia Office of Administrative Hearings. Meet Carl Swensson at this site: www.RiseUpForAmerica.com
And quit being a jerk. Send him 5 or 10 bucks for his legal bills. His wife wants him home to spend more time with the cat. Carl Swensson credits his wife for his stamina in being able to run his business and being able to expend the energy and the capital in fighting the treasonous federal elected employees.
Only a Natural Born Citizen can be President. There are at least three US Supreme Court cases defining Natural Born Citizen. The Us Constitution refers to "The Law of Nations", which defines Natural Born Citizen. There are dozens of letters of correspondence from the signers of the Declaration of Independence and creators of the US Constitution defining Natural Born Citizen. The United States Congress, in the past nine years has made eight unsuccessful attempts to change the wording of the US Constitution to say that foreign born or children of foreign born parents can be the President of the United States of America. These elected employees have repeatedly proven that they know damn well what a Natural Born Citizen is. The record is clearly established, through

Entire Georgia Obama Ballot Access Challenge Hearing Video Now Available in One Video

Entire Georgia Eligibility Challenge Hearing, Atlanta Georgia, January 26th 2012Article II Super PAC Email The archived video of the complete January 26, 2012 Georgia State Administrative Hearing on...

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Georgia on My Mind: Full Faith and Credit

©2012 drkate
Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to cheat his way back into the pResidency.
The stunning victory of the Constitutionalists over Barack Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah in Georgia on January 26 was also a victory for the judicial system and the rule of law.  No doubt the pressure on Georgia officials is significant so it is important to remind them of the support that exists for their courage.
Defiant Obama–nothing new, of course–blows it by not showing up, but when has he ever showed up even through his lawyers?  He has dismissed all of us as just so much toilet paper, and his attack on the judiciary, the people, and the states will not stop with this positive ruling.
The Obama ballot challenge and the Article II SuperPac have had a considerable impact in beginning the process of outright removal of his name from the ballot and has the additional very important impact of raising awareness and doubt about Obama in the electorate.  Rather demoralizing for the Obots, Congress, and the media to have spent their wad, ‘credibility‘, and resources defending a fake, fraud, liar, and criminal, don’t you agree? They will stay home, not vote, and ‘blame it on Bush’.
Its time now to go on the offense and cripple Obama in the states he needs to “win” the election.  Some 130 electoral college votes are needed in the states of Pennsylvania, Florida, Texas, Ohio, and New York in order for Obama to give the appearance of  have(ing) a chance of winning the 2012 election.  Given the Georgia ruling, our next step is…get prepared…use the Constitution: (h/t slcraignbc)
U.S. Constitution Article IV Section 1.
Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.
In General
Article IV, Sec. 1, has had its principal operation in relation to judgments. Embraced within the relevant discussions are two principal classes of judgments. First, those in which the judgment involved was offered as a basis of proceedings for its own enforcement outside the State where rendered, as for example, when an action for debt is brought in the courts of State B on a judgment for money damages rendered in State A; second, those in which the judgment involved was offered, in conformance with the principle of res judicata, in defense in a new or collateral proceeding growing out of the same facts as the original suit, as for example, when a decree of divorce granted in State A is offered as barring a suit for divorce by the other party to the marriage in the courts of State B.
The English courts and the different state courts in the United States, while recognizing “foreign judgments in personam” which were reducible to money terms as affording a basis for actions in debt, originally accorded them generally only the status of prima facie evidence in support thereof, so that the merits of the original controversy could always be opened. When offered in defense, on the other hand, “foreign judgments in personam” were regarded as conclusive upon everybody on the theory that, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall, “it is a proceeding in rem, to which all the world are parties.”
The Obama ballot challenge must move now to these states as a new State Challenge Campaign, and those readers here in those states I would hope would immediately contact the Obama Ballot Challenge and the Article II SuperPac to initiate proceedings:
A State District Court filing of a Show Cause Order asking why the State of (x) should not honor the State of Georgia’s determination under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, addressed to the State Gov., Atty Gen., SoS , and State Election Commission/Board/Agency as Respondents is a logical next step. (h/t slcraignbc).
Already ballot challenges in Illinois and Alabama are underway, for  30 more electoral votes.  If we raise enough awareness and enough challenges to make our state officials pay attention, Obama is going to have to flip more than 30 million votes to win the election.
The knowing liar
And don’t forget Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and the report due out in February.  The justice department and individuals have threatened the Sheriff with removal and death, and are finally being held accountable.  I doubt that Arizona will have an easy time of putting him back on the ballot, notwithstanding Governor Brewer’s lack of courage and membership in the usurper’s’ ‘council of governors‘.
We will not forget that everything Obama has signed as an illegal occupant of the White House has no effect in law.  Think of the tens of thousands of people, including our soldiers, that have died under this illegality.
Section 2 of Article 4 states, in part:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
How correct it would be to have the charges against Obama in any state lead to the arrest and detainment of Obama?  Would it stop his endless campaigning?
No Enthusiasm for the Usurper
Obama has already lost the youth vote to Ron Paul.  There is no enthusiasm for the Obutt or Moose-hell anymore.  Oh, and they’ll have to arrest the OWS people first before they declare martial law, as the Patriots will be at home keeping our power dry.  And there is nothing more ugly than the left scorned.  We told you Obots, you’re the first ones to be detained under martial law.

Conservative Powerhouse:If Obama Raises Taxes,GOP Will Impeach Him

Ben Johnson,The White House Watch

The move to impeach Barack Obama is moving forward —either in this term or,Heaven forfend,in the next. This week,one of the most influential conservative heavyweights raised the prospect of ignobly kicking the president out of office between elections. Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform is the author of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge,a promise signed by hundreds of office-seekers that under no circumstances will they raise taxes. On Thursday,Norquist told the National Journal:
NJ: At the end of 2012,a number of major tax provisions,including the Bush-era cuts,are set to expire. Do you have any predictions?
NORQUIST:We’re focused on the fact that there is this Damocles sword hanging over people’s head. What you don’t know is who will be in charge when all of this will happen. I think when we get through this election cycle,we’ll have a Republican majority,[though] not necessarily a strong majority in the Senate,and a majority in the House. The majority in the House will continue to be a Reagan majority,a conservative majority. Boehner never has to talk his delegation going further to the right.
If the Republicans have the House,Senate,and the presidency,I’m told that they could do an early budget vote—a reconciliation vote where you extend the Bush tax cuts out for a decade or five years. You take all of those issues off the table,and then say,“What do you want to do for tax reform?”
Then,the question is:“OK,what do we do about repatriation and all of the interesting stuff?” And,if you have a Republican president to go with a Republican House and Senate,then they pass the [Paul] Ryan plan [on Medicare].
NJ: What if the Democrats still have control? What’s your scenario then?
NORQUIST: Obama can sit there and let all the tax [cuts] lapse,and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach. The last year,he’s gone into this huddle where he does everything by executive order. He’s made no effort to work with Congress. (Emphasis added.)
Grover is no fly-by-night gadfly. He is one of the most powerful figures on the right-flank of the Republican Party. As his profile on Wikipedia states:
Norquist was listed as one of the five primary leaders of the post-Goldwater conservative movement by Nina Easton in her 2000 book,“Gang of Five”. Working with eventual Speaker Newt Gingrich,Norquist was one of the co-authors of the 1994 Contract with America,and helped to rally grassroots efforts,which Norquist later chronicled in his book Rock the House. Norquist also served as a campaign staff member on the 1988,1992 and 1996 Republican Platform Committees.
Simply put,when Grover speaks,D.C. Republicans listen.
Norquist is a single-issue conservative. Although he has been associated with other intellectual undercurrents and movements —for instance,his support for anti-Communists in the 1980s and his more recent service in the National Rifle Association —he eats,sleeps,and breathes tax policy. In this week’s comments,he has laid down a potent marker for the president:If Obama goes forward with his plan for “job-killing tax increases”in 2013,Norquist will see that he is consigned to an early retirement.
It’s enough to make me wish momentarily that Obama had already raised taxes.
Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign. Click here to sign the Impeach Obama petition.




From CitizenWeIIs

FEC Hassan opinion quotes Natural born citizen requirement
On July 5, 2011, Abdul Hassan, an attorney from NY, submitted a request for an advisory opinion from the FEC. Hassan acknowledged that he was a naturalized citizen and not a natural born citizen. Abdul Hassan posed the following questions:
“1. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am included in the meaning of
“candidate” or “person” or “individual” running for President as used in the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”)?
2. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I am prohibited from receiving matching funds under the FECA?
3. Whether, as a naturalized American citizen, I would be in violation of 2 USC §
441h(b) ifi solicit and/or receive presidential campaign contributions?
4. Whether, in light of the steps I have taken in my presidential run as outlined above, I am subject to the expenditure, contribution and record-keeping requirements of FECA and the regulations thereunder? (Note: I have not yet crossed the $5,000 threshold that triggers the registration and reporting requirements – it is therefore important that I receive an answer before
these requirements are triggered.).”
The FEC responded with an Advisory Opinion on September 2, 2011.
Here are some interesting exerpts:
“We are responding to your advisory opinion request concerning the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, and Commission regulations to your campaign for President of the United States, given your status as a naturalized citizen.
The Commission concludes that the Act does not prohibit Mr. Hassan, a
naturalized citizen, from becoming a “candidate” as that term is defined under the Act. However, Mr. Hassan will not be eligible to receive Federal matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act.”
“Mr. Hassan indicates that he satisfies all of the constitutional requirements for
serving as President, except the natural born citizen requirement in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution. 1″
“2. As a naturalized American citizen, is Mr. Hassan eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act?”
“No, as a naturalized American citizen, Mr. Hassan is not eligible to receive
presidential matching funds under the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act (“Matching Payment Act”).
The United States Constitution provides that “[n]o Person except a natural born
Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .” U.S. Const. art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.”
“2 The Act does not contain separate definitions for candidates for different Federal offices. The Constitution’s “natural born Citizen” provision only pertains to “the Office of President.” U.S. Const., art. II, sec. 1, cl. 5.
3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”
“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″
“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”
The FEC refers to the US Constitition requirement for the presidency, natural born citizen.
The FEC notes the distinction between a natural born citizen and naturalized citizen.
The Fec states that a naturalized citizen is not eligible for the presidency.
The FEC states that only a natural born citizen may receive presidential matching funds.
The FEC acknowledges that although they do not have the authority to keep ineligible candidates off of ballots, some of the states do.
“3 Mr. Hassan’s status as a “candidate” under the Act does not in any way affect whether Mr. Hassan will be  eligible to appear on State ballots or to be a candidate under various State laws. In fact, it is the Commission’s understanding that some State ballot access laws provide that a person cannot appear on the
ballot or be considered a candidate unless the person will be qualified for the office he or she purports to seek.”
Hence the GA and other state ballot challenges to Obama.
The FEC still acknowledges the US Constitution.
However, in 2007 when Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie submitted an advisory opinion request on behalf of Barack Obama to keep open the option for presidential matching funds, Bauer knew that Obama was not a natural born citizen. Ellen Weintraub, on the FEC committee that responded with an advisory opinion in the affirmative for Obama, was a former Perkins Coie staff member. Fraud was committed by Obama and Bauer and one has to question the ethics of Weintraub’s involvement.
The FEC acknowledges with these statements:
“Although the Matching Payment Act does not specifically address the citizenship requirement for serving as President, it sets forth the eligibility requirements to receive matching funds. See 26 U.S.C. 9033; 11 CFR 9033.2. See also, e.g., Advisory Opinion 1996-07 (Browne for President) (describing the steps a candidate must take to become eligible for matching funds). These provisions collectively reflect Congressional intent to ensure that U.S. Treasury funds in the form of matching funds are only paid to eligible candidates. 5″
“The Commission is charged under the Matching Payment Act with administering the Federal matching funds program and has some discretion when certifying eligibility for matching funds. While the Commission may not “appraise candidates’ good faith, honesty, probity or general reliability when reviewing the agreements and other forwardlooking commitments required” by the Matching Payment Act, see LaRouche v. FEC, 996 F.2d 1263, 1269 (D.C. Cir. 1993), situations may exist in which, “without assessment of subjective candidate intent, the Commission might conceivably withhold funds despite
formal compliance with the statutorily expressed criteria.” Id. Clear and self-avowed constitutional ineligibility for office is one of the few instances where the Commission’s exercise of its discretion to withhold funds is appropriate.”
that there are eligibility requirements for receiving presidential matching funds and that the FEC is charged with administering these funds. It is clear
that the FEC should always require proof of eligibility. It should have done so in 2007. We know there was inherent bias in 2007 (see part 4 of this series).
Court cases also clarify the powers given to the FEC. The FEC has more power than they have alluded to.
See Doug Teper, et al V. Zell Miller, et al, April 24, 1996.

obama socialists communists marxists progressives
Deputy Chief Judge
Michael Malihi
obama socialists communists marxists progressives
Georgia Sec. of State
Brian Kemp

The target is Obama!
  Henry Lamb Full Story
To listen click here
Many people are convinced that this President has done more to destroy the United States in three years than all the other presidents combined. The only hope of preventing another four years of even more drastic destructive policies is the election of one of the four remaining Republican candidates. The two frontrunners are using their time and resources, even on national television where they can be seen by the public, arguing over whether Newt’s consulting contract with Freddie Mac is “lobbying,” or whether Mitt is a moderate. Wake up gentlemen; the target is Obama!

Saturday, January 28, 2012

The Most Polarizing President Ever

Beyond the Constitution’s Tipping Point

by Michael Oberndorf

We have reached a tipping point in this country The fraud in the White House threw all pretense of adherence to the Constitution to the wind and made several blatantly illegal “recess” appointments of extreme leftists to positions of power within the government. Clearly,this was a move to avoid letting the Senate exercise its advise-and-consent authority over appointments. The thing is,Congress was not in recess,so the move was illegal.
It would seem,however,that we conservatives are not the only ones who have noticed how spinelessly co-operative Congress has become in foisting totalitarian socialism on America in the past few years. The Marxist/neo-fascists who run the Democrat Party and write the speeches and policy for the Sock Puppet in the White House,appear to be keenly aware of the compliance of this worthless body. Confronted with the reality of a massive defeat at the polls in November – assuming,of course that an honest election could actually take place (entiende “fat chance,” amigos?) – they have pulled out all the stops and are imposing their agenda on the country,the Constitution and federal laws be damned. The Reichstag has been burned.
Strategically,from the point of view of the radical left,this makes total sense. If they can continue to get away with over-the-top lawlessness,as they have with their cover-up of the Fast and Furious debacle that resulted in the deaths of over 200 Mexican citizens,and two American federal agents;numerous obvious,but unprosecuted cases of Democrat voter fraud;the looting of the Treasury,disguised as “stimulus;” collusion with Big Unions and “green” corporations in return for huge bribes euphemistically called “campaign donations;” their refusal to close the border and their actual facilitation of the invasion of illegals by refusing to build the fence mandated by law,their refusal to enforce immigration laws,their refusal to deport apprehended illegals,and their withdrawal of National Guard personnel from the border,et cetera,et cetera,ad nauseam,then it is likely that they will get away with what amounts to a coup d’etat. And so far,they are succeeding.
I find this especially disheartening since it was only a couple of weeks ago that Obama- Soetoro’s hero and role model,Marxist dictator Hugo Chavez,publicly called him a clown and accused him of wrecking the country. Why is it that a ham-fisted communist dictator can speak the truth,but our self-proclaimed conservative “leaders” in Congress are as silent as the grave they appear to be digging for American freedom and liberty?
I can’t help but think that one of the events that encouraged the Marxist Democrats to go on the offensive – and folks,their actions have been offensive,in every sense of the word – is the fact that all but a small handful of members of both the House and the Senate voted for the Constitution-crushing National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA),including some whom I had previously considered genuine conservatives. Continue reading Beyond the Constitution’s Tipping Point