Shirley Sherrod...Where are you?...

SHIRLEY SHERROD: THE REST OF THE STORY...

Remember Shirley Sherrod, the dept. of Agriculture gal, who seemed to
be 'racist' and lost her job??? Well as Paul Harvey used to say, "here
is the rest of the story".... and it is not pretty. The surprise
ending has not been shared nor reported upon by the media, but it is a
whopper!! Thanks to the Wall Street Journal for bringing this to
light. It takes some reading below,

to the 6th paragraph for sure, before you will realize what happened
here. You can 'Google' the word Pigford and it pops up, then click on
The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit.... and
check this information out for yourself.

You thought you knew what happened with the Shirley Sherrod story, but
you may have missed the twist and big ending. The hook was baited, the
fish bit hard, then you found out you were playing an entirely
different game. Please read it all. Any of you banging your head yet?
How does this keep happening, and why do we let it be ignored. Cover
up after cover up, plain corruption at its best, and it is costing us
dearly folks.

Pigford vs. Glickman

This came in this morning in response to the WSJ article published
yesterday on Obama dividing America on race. There is no need to make
any other comment other than pass along this mind boggling
information...all comments that follow are from this article:

Andrew Breitbart is a media genius. He proved it originally with his
brilliant handling of the ACORN 'hooker' scandal which he skillfully
manipulated so that the corrupt media was forced, against its will, to
broadcast corruption in one of Obama's most powerful political support
groups. But Breitbart's handing of that affair is nothing compared to
his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod 'white farmer'
scandal.

It all began Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror,
Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his "Big Government" site
which showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of
Agriculture laughing to a roomful of NAACP members about how she'd
discriminated against a destitute white farmer and refused to give him
the financial aid he desperately needed. As she smirked to the room,
she'd sent him instead to a white lawyer - 'one of his own kind' - for
help. The black woman was Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately she
became the center of a firestorm of controversy which exploded
throughout the country. Within a day of the release of that infamous
tape, the head of the Dept. of Agriculture, spurred on by Obama,
demanded - and received - Sherrod's resignation. Breitbart had won.

But then seemingly Breitbart's actions began to explode in his face.
As Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of
her speech last March to the NAACP. And there on tape Sherrod was
shown supposedly repenting of her racism against a white farmer and
instead championing his fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat.
Within hours of that entire tape being revealed, the entire world
turned against Andrew Breitbart . Conservatives throughout the country
were enraged that he'd endangered their reputations by releasing a
'doctored' tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had dealt a fatal blow to
the conservative media.

I confess that I also was horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness
and stupidity of Breitbart's in 'doctoring' a tape to make a
supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now I discover I have been
as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the Dept. of
Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.

Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart's release of
that tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media
into exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the
federal government - a little known legal case called "Pigford v.
Glickman".

"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States
Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied
USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to
1997." The case was entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the
black farmers won their case. The government agreed to pay each of
them as much as $50,000 to settle their claims.

But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in
relation to that original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed
to release more funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering $1.25
billion. This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400
black farmers - had now swollen in a class action suit to include a
total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America .

There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America
doesn't have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally
verified census data, the total number of black farmers throughout
America is only 39,697. Oops.

Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And
how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks, you'll just
have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of
her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" but
whose family received the highest single payout (approximately $13
million) from that action - Shirley Sherrod. Oops again.

Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the
United States - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at
the government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more
interesting.

Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in
this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford v.
Glickman" in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But
in 2008, a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and
allow more black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack
Obama.

Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst
of a worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle
a race claim.

But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a
trap which Sherrod - and Obama - stumbled headfirst into which has now
resulted in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt
financial judgment. Yes, folks - Breitbart is a genius.

As for Ms. Sherrod? Well, she's discovered too late that her cry of
'racism' to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on
Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and her
corruption. Sherrod has vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it
seems, have come home to roost. Oink! Oink!!