Ben Johnson,The White House Watch
Barack Obama’s “Uncle Omar”may have gotten out of jail following his drunk driving arrest last month,but some Republican congressmen want to cross-examine him —and Obama’s stealth amnesty program —themselves.
Rep. Steve King of Iowa,one of the staunchest critics of illegal immigration,said Monday,“We have to bring drunken ‘Uncle Omar’in front of the House Judiciary Committee,drill down into this,and tell America what’s going on.”It appears he wants to haul the illegal Kenyan immigrant —Onyango,that is —before Congress.
Police in Framingham,Massachusetts,say they arrested 67-year-old Onyango Obama,whom the president refers to in Dreams from my Father as “Uncle Omar,”on August 24 after he nearly hit a police officer at a stop sign. They say they measured his blood alcohol level at nearly twice the state’s legal limit. Although the government ordered Onyango deported in 1992,he remains in the country awaiting a new hearing on his status.
Obama’s aunt,Zeituni Onyango,received similar preferential treatment after she was found illegally living in public housing and receiving welfare. After her asylum case was denied in 2004,the same judge,Leonard Shapiro,reversed course and granted her claim in May 2010.
Although Zeituni carried a massive chip on her shoulder toward her nephew’s country and violated immigration and welfare laws,her actions did not endanger anyone’s life. Onyango’s actions do,and that may be too much even in an Obama-run nation.
The senator from the state where Onyango illegally resides wants to see him gone. Sen. Scott Brown,R-MA,told talk show host Howie Carr authorities should put Omar “through the [immigration] process and see what happens.”
White House spokesman Jay Carney said Uncle Omar will indeed undergo government hearings,where he would be treated “like any other immigration case.”
Texas Congressman Lamar Smith finds that talk hollow. “It appears there is a double standard — one for President Obama’s family and one for everyone else,”he stated in a press release. “Last year”….
Read more.
Barack Obama’s “Uncle Omar”may have gotten out of jail following his drunk driving arrest last month,but some Republican congressmen want to cross-examine him —and Obama’s stealth amnesty program —themselves.
Rep. Steve King of Iowa,one of the staunchest critics of illegal immigration,said Monday,“We have to bring drunken ‘Uncle Omar’in front of the House Judiciary Committee,drill down into this,and tell America what’s going on.”It appears he wants to haul the illegal Kenyan immigrant —Onyango,that is —before Congress.
Police in Framingham,Massachusetts,say they arrested 67-year-old Onyango Obama,whom the president refers to in Dreams from my Father as “Uncle Omar,”on August 24 after he nearly hit a police officer at a stop sign. They say they measured his blood alcohol level at nearly twice the state’s legal limit. Although the government ordered Onyango deported in 1992,he remains in the country awaiting a new hearing on his status.
Obama’s aunt,Zeituni Onyango,received similar preferential treatment after she was found illegally living in public housing and receiving welfare. After her asylum case was denied in 2004,the same judge,Leonard Shapiro,reversed course and granted her claim in May 2010.
Although Zeituni carried a massive chip on her shoulder toward her nephew’s country and violated immigration and welfare laws,her actions did not endanger anyone’s life. Onyango’s actions do,and that may be too much even in an Obama-run nation.
The senator from the state where Onyango illegally resides wants to see him gone. Sen. Scott Brown,R-MA,told talk show host Howie Carr authorities should put Omar “through the [immigration] process and see what happens.”
White House spokesman Jay Carney said Uncle Omar will indeed undergo government hearings,where he would be treated “like any other immigration case.”
Texas Congressman Lamar Smith finds that talk hollow. “It appears there is a double standard — one for President Obama’s family and one for everyone else,”he stated in a press release. “Last year”….
Read more.
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.