OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD...ONE TAKE ON THE GREATEST CRIME EVER PERPETRATED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE...,

Conclusive Evidence of Ineligibility

  The Implications of Unanswered Questions

   “No person…except a natural born citizen, is eligible to the office of the President,…” US Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

   Much has been written regarding the clear proof that Barack Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen since his  father was not an American citizen but instead was a foreign visitor, which is clearly outside of the definition of what a natural born citizen is.  Mario Apuzzo and Leo Donofrio, as well as myself and others have written extensively on the subject, conveying the irrefutable reasons why someone with a foreign father is automatically ineligible to the office of the President, and what we’ve written isn’t based on speculation or unknown facts, but rather, on facts that are known and not hidden, facts stated plainly on the counterfeit images of supposedly existing official Hawaiian birth documents, as well as in his autobiographic writings.
The fact that an alien was the father of Barack Obama, not an American citizen,  led to him basing his alleged eligibility on the assumption that he was born within the United States rather than on the qualification of having been born to an American mother and an American father.  He was relying on the baseless assumption that being a US citizen via the 14th Amendment makes one a natural born citizen and therefore eligible to be President.  But there is a huge problem with that assumption.

It is due to the fact that no one whose citizenship is dependent on the 14th Amendment has ever been eligible to be the President since it was written for those who are not natural born citizens but rather, have an alien parent, or parents.  When it was written, slaves and their children faced discrimination due to not having a legally defined right to U.S. citizenship, and also, children of resident domiciled foreigners were in a legal limbo since it wasn’t legally determined whether or not they were to be considered citizens of the U.S.  or of the  nation of their parents former lives.  While those issues needed to be settled, what did not need to be settled, and never has been, is the citizenship of natural born Americans. It was not addressed in the Constitution, nor any amendment, nor any legislation, nor any court ruling because it is a fact automatically.  It is a fact based on natural law,  The Law of Nations, English tradition, Western tradition, Roman tradition, and human tradition.  It is “a given”", -a fundamental fact based on political birthright.
But recently the White House has severed its connection to  pro-Obama web pages that extolled the fact that the 14th Amendment declares that Barack Obama is a United States citizen and therefore is eligible to be President.  It must be assumed that someone with a brain in their head finally realized that 14th Amendment citizenship precludes one from being eligible to be the President.  So they had that connection scrubbed from all the previous White House links. Evidence of radical alteration is seen in the fact that the original “fight the smears”.com web page (http://web.archive.org/web/20100102233242/http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html) now re-directs to: http://my.democrats.org/page/content/president-obama-birth-certificate -and most of the page is newer than the date he released the pdf image of a long-form birth certificate in late April, 2011 yet the copyright year for the page only extends to 2010.  What is the Obama camp trying to hide?  It is these words from the original web page:
FACTCHECK.ORG    “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.   Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”
This statement means he was born with dual-citizenship, and no person with dual-citizenship is eligible to be the President, and that fact has begun to be recognized, so they had to re-think and retreat from that fact and hide it.
So since he isn’t eligible merely for being a U.S. citizen, then what is the basis of his eligibility?  Well…actually there is none.  He must rely on the pretense that since he is a citizen, and all American citizens can grow up to be the President (?), therefore he is just like everyone else.  The problem is that he isn’t just like everyone else.  Most of us don’t personally know a lot of citizens who had a foreign father, and those who do are not natural born citizens like you and I and nearly all the people we know.  They are Constitutionally different.  Their citizenship is founded on statutes and court decisions, not on an unalienable incontestable right.
But the situation regarding Obama’s eligibility gets even worse.  No one who was not even born as a U.S. citizen is eligible to be President, and that is a fact that the public isn’t deceived about, and a fact that is behind all of the intrigue surrounding Obama’s birth documents, (-documents that do not really exist or else they would be viewable by the public, bu instead, the only things viewable by the public are computer manufactured look-alike images of such documents, images that are not the result of a scan of real paper documents but the result of digitally composited images using essential parts of various documents from which text was extracted in order to create the counterfeits).
The far ranging facts related to Obama’s two birth-document images are inexplicable, unless one is willing to deduce the logical conclusion that can and should be drawn from what is known.  Listed below are many of the reasons why nothing but mystery surrounds them, but first I’ll just cut to the chase.  The conclusion that one will come to sooner or later as a result of the fact that he has released two manufactured fakes, is that he can’t show real Hawaiian birth documents either because the hand-written affidavit in the Hawaiian records office, which accompanies the typed record, reveals that he was born in Canada, or because his mother failed to provide credible documentation as to where he was actually born and therefore no long form certificate could be produced.  Either of these possibilities, would be something he would have to hide in order to avoid talk and action of impeachment, or or the loss of credibility needed to be qualified to run again.
READ MORE...