Thursday, September 6, 2012

Natural citizens are nature-made, and require no law, statute, policy, judicial ruling, or treaty to produce their citizenship nor legitimize it in any way. That’s why their citizenship is not found in any law ever passed by Congress. Congress was given no authority to legislate regarding citizenship except in regard to those who are not natural citizens. Those who are not natural citizens have direct connections to foreign nations, whereas natural citizens do not. Their only connections, if any, are indirect, -through grandparents, -not through parents.

The Questionable & Covert Nature of Obama’s Citizenship

The most important, though covert, issue of the 2008 presidential election was that of Barack Obama’s ancestry.  His American ancestors went back hundreds of years.  No, wait.  Make that his African ancestors who went back hundreds of years.  No, -make that thousands of years, no-wait, -make that tens of thousands of years.
If his native-African father had married an indigenous American, (forever erroneous labeled “Indians” by Columbus) then there would have been a truly colossal clash of native ancestries; -different continents, different cultures, different languages, different religions, different races, and different countries.
Instead his significant ancestral clash was not in any of those realms but in that of his parents’ nationalities. Which citizenship would he be born with?  British? or American? Or both?  The answer is that few people still living know the answer and that is because it depends on whether or not the executive branch in 1961 followed the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940 or ignored it, -which they had the power to do since they didn’t have to answer to Congress in regard to the execution of the naturalization law.
READ MORE...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.