“A Navy official familiar with the circumstances of the investigation stressed it was not related to personal conduct.”
By Sorcha Faal
October 28, 2012
Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette
Commander, Carrier Strike Group Three
Rear Adm. Gaouette assumed command of Carrier Strike Group Three, April 5, 2012. He most recently served as Deputy Commander, U.S. Naval Forces, U.S. Central Command.
Gaouette grew up in San Diego, and graduated from the University of California, Davis in 1981. He entered the Navy under the Submarine Strategic Weapons program and was commissioned at Officer Candidate School in April 1982. He is a qualified submarine officer and served as communicator in USS Gudgeon (SS 567) and combat systems officer in USS Lapon (SSN 661).
Gaouette transferred to Surface Warfare in 1987. He served as navigator and damage control assistant in USS Arthur W. Radford (DD 968), combat systems officer in USS Fletcher (DD 992), commissioning combat systems officer in USS Port Royal (CG 73) and executive officer in USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60).
Gaouette grew up in San Diego, and graduated from the University of California, Davis in 1981. He entered the Navy under the Submarine Strategic Weapons program and was commissioned at Officer Candidate School in April 1982. He is a qualified submarine officer and served as communicator in USS Gudgeon (SS 567) and combat systems officer in USS Lapon (SSN 661).
Gaouette transferred to Surface Warfare in 1987. He served as navigator and damage control assistant in USS Arthur W. Radford (DD 968), combat systems officer in USS Fletcher (DD 992), commissioning combat systems officer in USS Port Royal (CG 73) and executive officer in USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60).
Gaouette
is a graduate of the Air War College, where he earned a concurrent
master’s degree in Public Administration from Auburn University. In
2003, he was awarded the Vice Admiral James Bond Stockdale Award for
inspirational leadership in recognition of the hard work by the crew of
USS Oldendorf, which he commanded from 2001 through 2003. He is the
recipient of various personal decorations and unit awards.
A shocking new report prepared by the Foreign Military Intelligence Main Directorate (GRU)
of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, and circulating in the
Kremlin today, states that President Obama has fired one of the United
States Navy’s most powerful Admirals over growing fears the US Military
is planning an overthrow of his government.
According to this report, yesterday (27 October) Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette [photo 2nd left] from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) [photo 3rd left] currently located in the Middle East.
CSG-3
is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the
US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a
variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and
projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.
The
aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group's
current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike
Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers
USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of
Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer
(DDG-108), USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius
(DDG-69).
US
news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy
Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.
General Carter F. Ham
This
GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President
Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
General
Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military
intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama.
And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this
growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military
leaders:
GRU analysts in this report state that Obama’s “greatest fear”
during the 11 September terrorist attack on the American Consulate in
Benghazi was that a strong US Military response would hurt his
reelection chances as the American peoples appetite for war has all but
disappeared, and he would, also, be open to attacks from his far-left
base who remain firmly opposed to further US military actions in the
Middle East.
As we had, also, reported in our 17 September report “China Warns World War III Being Planned To Oust Obama,” White House fears are growing by the day that Obama is being pushed into a “Total War” scenario by the Pentagon in an action not unlike the situation faced by President John F. Kennedy when he faced off with against the powerful US Air Force General Curtis Lemay during the October, 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
Known well to Obama, this report continues, was the 1962 Pentagon proposal to Kennedy named “Operation Northwoods”
that called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other
operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in US cities and elsewhere.
These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create
public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become
communist under Fidel Castro.
Fearing
his being faced with a similar Pentagon threat, GRU analysts say in
this report, Obama’s reluctance to allow a US military response to the
11 September attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi was due to his
not knowing who was really behind it, or what their ultimate objective
really was.
Obama’s
fears, apparently, were confirmed by the Federal Security Service
(FSB), and as we reported on in our 9 October report titled “Monsanto “War” Kills US Ambassador To Libya” which blamed the Benghazi attack on the shadowy Italian eco-terror group Il Silvestre.
Following the attack on Benghazi, this FSB report further states, the eco-terror group Il Silvestre brutally assassinated
British oil executive Nicholas Mockford, 60, who worked for the US oil
giant ExxonMobil, two weeks ago on a street in Brussels, Belgium.
Though
the links between either the Pentagon or CIA relating to Il Silvestre
have yet to be firmly established, this GRU report concludes, it can not
be ruled out that further attacks against Obama’s interests by the US
Military are not in the offing.
Most cryptic in this GRU report, however, was its noting, that based upon the 1962 American movie titled Advise & Consent, and the 1962 novel Seven Days in May
(made into a movie in 1964), the warnings to President Kennedy about
any American leader daring to challenge the Pentagon would be met with
swift and harsh punishment. Kennedy, however, failed to heed these
warnings and suffered the consequences.
To
what Obama’s fate will be, especially should he continue to be in
conflict with the Pentagon, it is not known. What is known, though, is
that the American people themselves continue to remain ignorant of the
dangers they face as the world around them continues to spin out of
control as they continue to rely on lies and half-truths spoon fed to
them by their vast mainstream propaganda apparatus designed to keep them
from knowing any truths at all.
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
very intresting. Must investigate further
ReplyDelete