With Obama's birth certificate,
we see an almost-identical pattern developing when it comes to the
media: a seeming-impossible supposition is mocked, evasive answers go
unchallenged by the press and eventually the evidence is ignored until
pubic pressure demands action - we're entering the last part of that
last stage.
1. Obama makes a non-denial-denial
2. Obama's wife Michelle making 3-year-old statements like this, essentially admitting that Obama was born in Kenya:
3. Obama, himself, says, "It's good to be home" - in Kenya!
4. Trump plays the 2011 version of the role that Matt Drudge played in the 1990's by demanding information:
5.
Under growing media pressure, after three years(!) Obama releases what
is purported to be a scan of the original birth certificate. IT IS A FAKE, AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW.
WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?
IT'S
IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHAT LITTLE HAS COME TO BE KNOWN ABOUT OBAMA'S PAST
MAKES HIM A HORRENDOUS PERSON TO CONTROL THE ECONOMY AND NUCLEAR
ARSENAL.
Obama
began his political Career in the home of American terrorist Bill
Ayres. Here is Donald Trump agreeing with Sean Hannity about Obama's
horrific past associations:
When Obama met Ayres, Ayres was already married to Bernadine Dorn who was the actual leader of the violent 1960's - 1970's left-wing terrorist organization, The Weather Underground. The Weather Underground killed people and blew up buildings.Ayres and Dorn were two of Obama's closest friends and have apparently remained so. Here is Bernadine Dorn becoming famous on the CBS Nightly News in 1970:
If this doesn't wake you up, nothing will:
Ayres and Dorn surrender to police:
Ayres and Dorn, still happily married with the overthrow of America still in their sights and their friendship to the President of the United States undiminished:
Joseph
M. Newcomer, who exposed the "Killian documents" as fraudulent in
2004, has said that the Obama birth certificate released by the White
House on April 27 of 2011 is a "highly suspicious" document that
deserves professional forensic examination.
"There
are artifacts in the birth certificate document that are strongly
suggestive of a forgery. The document screams out that something is
wrong."After explaining the problems, Newcomber concluded, "If
I saw these differences in a document I was examining, it would scream
out at me that the document was a 'cut-and-paste' fraud."
Newcomber
was instrumental in providing expert analysis on the “Bush National
Guard document scandal” in which documents were fabricated – faked – to
try to bring down the Bush presidency. Result? The producer of the
segment was fired from CBS News and long-running anchor Dan Rather, a
hard-core activist democrat, who ran with the story, according to the CEO of CBS, "Dan
Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken responsibility
for his part in the broadcast. He voluntarily moved to set a date to
step down from the 'CBS Evening News' in March of 2005." He added, "We
believe any further action would not be appropriate."
Here is a FOX NEWS discussion after Rather resigned - all this, because of Newcomer's astute and irrefutable analysis.
You
can see, things like the Obama birth certificate forgery are nothing
new. If you are interested, you can read about the whole “Rathergate”
scandal – which appears very much like a prior similar example of the
Obama birth certificate fraud - at Wikipedia, here
Newcomer
is much more straightforward in this audio discussion with several
other experts, all of whom agree that Obama's birth certificate is an
amateurish forgery. How much more evidence does anyone need?
NEWCOMER'S CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS ALMOST CERTAINLY A FAKE.
_______________________________________________
2. EXPERT ~ MARA ZEBEST
Mara
Zebest has co-authored several hard-cover books on Photoshop that sit
on the shelves of every legitimate graphics studio in the
English-speaking world, edited almost 100 more and is a graphics trainer
and consultant for Fortune-500 companies. Zebest, a lifelong democrat
who should be protecting Obama is political ideology was her motivation,
is more direct than Newcomer. Zebest calls Obama's birth certificate a "pathetic, amateurish fake".
Here she is speaking on the issue for herself:
And again...
ZEBEST'S CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS DEFINITELY AN AMATEURISH FAKE.
Retired,
50-year typesetting expert veteran Paul Irey, who started and owned
Bergan Graphics in Fort Lee, N.J., which at its height had 60 employees
working three round-the-clock shifts and had prestige clients that
included Montgomery Ward and Acme Markets, has identified DIFFERENT
TYPE STYLES in the same words on the document, a smoking gun of evidence.
"My
analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the
different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have
been typed by one typewriter," Irey told World Net Daily.
"Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the fly like that," he said. "This document is definitely a forgery."
He has a theory as to how this happened in the forgery process:
"The forgers did not want to make the same mistake Dan Rather made," he said. "So,
they used letters they picked up from actual 1961 birth certificates,
making sure the typeface that appeared in the document was authentic to
the era."
The mistake, Irey claims, was to use more than one birth certificate from which to select the letters. "Even if the typeface was from the period," he said, "the
mistake was to forget that each typewriter has its own fingerprint. No
two typewriters, even of the same make and model, will type any given
letter exactly the same."
IREY'S CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A DEFINITE FAKE.
______________________________________________
4. EXPERT ~ DOUG VOGT
Scanner-expert Doug Vogt, an international expert on scanners and document-imaging software, and who has owned Archive Index Systems Inc. - since 1993, in Bellevue, Wash., a company
that sells a wide variety of document scanners worldwide and develops
document imaging software – and who before that owned Nova Typesetting
for 11 years, has filed a criminal charge with the FBI, charging that
the long-form birth certificate released by the White House is
criminally fraudulent.
“…this form is a created forgery."
Vogt produced a long and compelling graphic analysis that lays to waste
the believability of the Obama long form birth certificate. It can be
read in total here http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=305705
A
couple of examples - to make it brief for you - is that letters on the
otherwise bent page do not bend with the page, pointing to an obvious
superimposition – a fake.
Another
is that some letters in the same word are shown to have soft, blended
edges while others are sharp and harsh, the opposite of soft and
blended. This means that the two could only every have been superimposed
together from different sources. One scan of one document creates a
uniform pattern – soft or harsh - one way or the other. Two have both
at the same time is literally optically impossible even in this day and
age. It is an obvious forgery.
VOGT'S CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS AN "OUTRAGEOUS AND OBVIOUS FRAUD".
Gary Poyssick has been involved in the creation and development of Adobe graphics software since the beginning. Adobe – with Poyssick’s help -
created “Photoshop”, a program so extensively used that the term
photoshop has come into the lexicon of common language for digital
manipulation such as the brand “Xerox” for decades was used generically
to reference photocopying.
After
extensive examination of the document released by the White House as
Obama’s long form birth certificate, an analysis in-depth which can be
read HERE
Poyssick concludes the following
I,
Gary Poyssick, have been involved with digital imagery since prior to
Adobe – the developers of Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Acrobat,
and many other digital imaging and communications applications for more
than 25 years, and was co-author of the second title on Adobe Press, a
book called Workflow Re-engineering. I am considered an expert in the
field.
The following discussion concerns a supposed copy of President Barack
Obama's birth certificate – the so-called “Long Form” he indicated was
provided by the State of Hawaii….
(significant and complex graphic analysis follows)
Conclusion
The document is a forgery. It was created from some number – more than
one – original birth certificates from Hawaii. In an attempt to hide the
fact that it was digitally created, old letters from a typed document
were found and placed on top of the original scanned document.
POYSSICK'S CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A FAKE.
_______________________________________________
6. EXPERT ~ Ivan Zatkovich
Ivan Zatkovich has 28 years experience in computer science and document management and for more than 10 years has been an expert witness providing testimony in federal court in both criminal and civil litigation. His company, Tampa-based eComp Consultants,
which consults on intellectual property for telecommunications, web
publishing and ecommerce and has provided services for corporations such
as McGraw-Hill, Houghton-Mifflin, Citicorp and Amazon.com.
Zatkovich says there are serious problems with the birth certificate.
"When a paper document is scanned on a
scanner and saved as a PDF file it normally contains only a single
layer of graphical information. The PDF that appears on the White House
website however, contains multiple layers of graphic information.
Multiple layers usually appear in a document like this when it is being
edited or modified in some fashion.
"It
is possible to take a single layer PDF and inadvertently create
multiple layers, without changing the image in any fashion. But that
does not appear to be the case here. The multiple layers in the PDF
document are a result of changes made to the image," his report said.
Among the various items that were separated into different layers
include the main text, the mother's occupation, the dates accepted, the
stamp and signature of the state registrar and the time stamp of the
state registrar:
ZATKOVICH'S
CONCLUSION: "The content clearly indicates that the document was
knowingly and explicitly edited and modified before it was placed on
the web."
________________________________________________
7. MY OWN ANALYSIS ~ PROE GRAPHIQUE
While
I in no way hold myself up next to the experts cited above, whose
credentials are unimpeachable as essentially the pinnacle in each case
of their specific expertise, I do have 25 years-plus experience in
professional graphics and also come at it from my own professional
vantage point: the document is not a new copy of an old document, it's a new copy of a new document.
Obama's
birth certificate supposedly scanned from the original shows absolutely
no sign of aging whatsoever over 50 years, even though the supposed
"scan" contains soft-edges of warm-gray pencil marks. So either the
pencil marks were picked up but the aging was not, which is an optical
impossibility, or the document has not aged and is as new and
plastic-looking a piece of documentation as has ever been seen, which is
a statistical impossibility.
Here
are some comparisons between Obama's birth certificate and all manner
of like-dated documents. All the others share similarities picked up by
the scanning process: inconsistent opacity of the typewritten letters,
carbon smudges, creases, staining and deterioration from the acid-heavy
paper of the day, buckling from humidity . Only magic Obama's is
magically perfect, and it isn;t because as President he gets the best of
everything: his birth certificate is supposed to come from the same
general place as that of everyone else: an office with a modest budget,
in his case, from records 50 years old. Yet his is brand-new perfect,
this supposed 50-year-old document. Impossible.
Above,
Trump's birth certificate shows carbon smudging, creases, buckling from
humidity and the like, Trump's parents were wealthy. Obama's modest
parents must have had the resource to keep Obama's birth certificate in
cryogenic suspension, because his is perfect.
Below, various samples of different documents:
MY
CONCLUSION: OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A TERRIBLE FAKE AND IF
COMMISSIONED BY AN AD AGENCY AS A PROP OF A SCAN OF A 50-YEAR-OLD
DOCUMENT WOULD BE CERTAIN TO GET THE ARTIST FIRED IN 2 SECONDS.
TEST
IT FOR YOURSELF: HOLD YOU OWN BIRTH CERTIFICATE NEXT TO THE IMAGES ON
THIS PAGE OF OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE. OBAMA WAS A COMMON PERSON FROM A
COMMON FAMILY WHEN HE WAS BORN. HIS SHOULD LOOK AS OLD AS YOURS.
DOES IT?
________________
__________________________
ADDITIONAL
EVIDENCE OF THE FORGERY AND SUSPICION OF OBAMA'S NATIVITY STORY AND
ELIGIBILITY TO SERVE AS PRESIDENT, PRESENTED IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER
WHAT YOU CAN DO
This one is simple: Only
public pressure such as existed when Clinton was found out with
Lewinsky will force the media to stop protecting Obama on this issue
which goes right to the heart of his eligibility to even serve as
President, regardless of his race or how many people voted for him.
Go to http://www.obamafake.blogspot.com,
our non-profit sister site (does not even have the usual "donate"
button or advertising), to learn how you can get the word out!
This site is non-profit; no advertising, no donate button, and has no
sponsor. This is about addressing a severe and possibly devastating
political situation, and hopefully weaken Obama's election chances
considerably. No matter whether it's twitter or Facebook or your
favorite blog, please spread this site link everywhere you possibly
can. This issue is genuinely important, and like with Clinton/Lewinsky
which was many times less important, but enough to warrant Clinton's impeachment, the media refuses to address it.
So please take a few minutes and spread this website address everywhere you can.
In response to: 7. MY OWN ANALYSIS ~ PROE GRAPHIQUE
You, and others, have made an incorrect presumption. The pdf image is not an image of a real document. Instead it is an extrapolation of text imagery from supposedly one birth certificate, (but it must be assumed to be from two or more). It isn't an image of an original because no original exists. You know that much, but you also need to know that Hawaii does not created photo-image "True-Copy" documents since they went all digital sometime about 10-15 years ago. No Hawaiian birth certificate is a True Copy photo-copy of the original, -they are all "Abstract" images of the extracted text from the micro-film back-up captures of original documents. The image of the micro-film was enhanced to boost the contrast to such a degree that all of the aged, blemished paper area of the certificates turned pure white while the text turned pure black except for greyish text which was digitally saved as grey-scale imagery instead of pure black text imagery. The all-white paper background space was then deleted, leaving only the text on an invisible background. The text was then layered over the image of security paper and from there the mystery manipulation began. Layers were added, things were extracted, the smiley face was added, and scanning was involved, resulting in the gray-scale imagery being embedded in the background layer instead of the text layer. But some things still remain a mystery, such as the text-halo effect on the security background. See my graphic expose of the bc at http://obamabc.wordpress.com, and http://obama--nation.com http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/obamapdf_full_story-25.jpg?
These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read at various web sites such as:
The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.
If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.
By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.
MCSO Cold-Case Posse P.O. Box 74374 Phoenix, Arizona 85087
Translate
THE TERRY LAKIN STORY
STOP THE USURPER!
PLEASE CLICK IMAGE TO HELP
Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.
The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805
CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.
On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:
"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...
Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."
Patrick Henry continued:
"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.
The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!
I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."
Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her
We post so much information here at GIVE US LIBERTY and at a very high rate...much more than most other blogs. It would serve you well to check back and look at older posts if you are not visiting two or three times a day. You don't want to miss a thing! There is an absolute goldmine of relevant information in our archives. Thanks for all you support, keep visiting and please tell your friends! - GUL
Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Email us with tips, suggestions, or leads. Networking is the key to successful blogging, please contact us to promote your site and hopefully you will do the same.
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." -- Abraham Lincoln
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." -- John Adams
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." -- Thomas Jefferson
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams
THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.
Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.
The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.
But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.
Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.
We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.
All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 185 Gatzmer Avenue Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831 October 18, 2009
EDUCATE YOURSELF! EVERYTHING ABOUT OBAMA FROM BIRTH THRU HIS FIRST 100 DAYS OF USURPATION
In response to:
ReplyDelete7. MY OWN ANALYSIS ~ PROE GRAPHIQUE
You, and others, have made an incorrect presumption. The pdf image is not an image of a real document. Instead it is an extrapolation of text imagery from supposedly one birth certificate, (but it must be assumed to be from two or more). It isn't an image of an original because no original exists. You know that much, but you also need to know that Hawaii does not created photo-image "True-Copy" documents since they went all digital sometime about 10-15 years ago. No Hawaiian birth certificate is a True Copy photo-copy of the original, -they are all "Abstract" images of the extracted text from the micro-film back-up captures of original documents. The image of the micro-film was enhanced to boost the contrast to such a degree that all of the aged, blemished paper area of the certificates turned pure white while the text turned pure black except for greyish text which was digitally saved as grey-scale imagery instead of pure black text imagery. The all-white paper background space was then deleted, leaving only the text on an invisible background. The text was then layered over the image of security paper and from there the mystery manipulation began. Layers were added, things were extracted, the smiley face was added, and scanning was involved, resulting in the gray-scale imagery being embedded in the background layer instead of the text layer. But some things still remain a mystery, such as the text-halo effect on the security background.
See my graphic expose of the bc at http://obamabc.wordpress.com, and
http://obama--nation.com
http://h2ooflife.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/obamapdf_full_story-25.jpg?
Adrien Nash OBAMA--NATION.COM