Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==

Barack’s Black Panther Endorsement: Suddenly Too Hot?
by Margot Schulzke on March 22, 2008
This Black Panther stuff is serious business. Shades of John Kerry. On his campaign website, Obama posted the endorsement of the New Black Panther Party, a resurrection of a domestic terrorist group of the sixties (Hillary has links to the original group, but we’ll save that till another day). Then he removed it. Interestingly, Obama still occupies a position of honor on the New Black Panthers home page:
While you can’t directly control who endorses you, Barack (think Louis Farrakhan), you don’t post stuff on your site if you don’t welcome it. That is, until you get caught by the bloggers and right-media. Worldnet Daily reports:
“The removal [] by the Barack Obama campaign from its official website of an endorsement from the black supremacist New Black Panther Party, or NBPP, was decided upon for “understandable political reasons,” according to the party’s national chairman.
“It’s the game of politics,” the NBPP’s Malik Zulu Shabazz told WND. “The Obama camp’s move to remove our blog doesn’t mean much because I understand politics. We still completely support Obama as the best candidate.”
“Shabbaz, who has given scores of speeches condemning “white men” and Jews, said today Obama “is the best guy to bring the kinds of racial changes supported by our community at the New Black Panthers.”
“The NBPP, which inherited its name from the Black Panther Party of the 1960s, is a controversial black extremist party whose leaders are notorious for their racist statements and anti-white activism. The organization’s own website also was taken down today too.”
Notice the Black Panther slogan in the logo: “Freedom or Death”. Death for whom? Now you see it, now you don’t. Teaches us not to blink, eh? At least not when we deal with a guy whose hand is faster than the eye.
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.