OBAMACARE PROVIDES FREE HEALTH CARE FOR MUSLIMS?
(YOU WILL BE FORCED TO PAY FOR IT AND YOUR PREMIUMS WILL ALSO INCREASE)
OH, YOU CAN ALSO TELL THE DUMB AND IGNORANT OBOTS TOO!
Taitz alleges that indeed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L, No111-148 (Hereinafter Healthcare Act) is invalid as violative of the Commerce Clause and the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause for a number of reasons:
1. Currently passed Healthcare Act made it mandatory for everyone to pay into the Healthcare program or be penalized. It created a national Healthcare system, that will be used by everyone, regardless of religious affiliation, however this act exempts millions of individuals, who happen to be Muslims from paying a cent into the system, as according to Sharia law, insurance is considered a form of usury and gambling, so those individuals will be using the benefits of the National healthcare, but not paying anything into it.
Currently Taitz and her husband are paying some $18,000 a year for them and their three children for health insurance. As the healthcare bill will be enforced, they will have to pay for Muslim families who do not pay for the insurance, but will get the benefits. Moreover, such schemes encourage individuals to convert into the Muslim religion, as it provides them with perks and benefits. This is a clear violation of the Establishment clause and 14th amendment equal protection clause. Taitz is seeking to proceed on this cause of action and to obtain a class certification, not only for her, but for millions of other families, who happen to be Christian or Jewish and who will have to participate in this plan against their will and in violation of the Establishment clause and 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause.
2. Taitz is a Doctor of Dental Surgery and currently pays around $6,000 per year for the Healthcare insurance for each of her dental Assistants. Under the new Healthcare plan employers, who are similarly situated and who happen to be Muslims, will have an unfair advantage in not having to pay for such insurance. As such Taitz is seeking a class certification for millions of employers, who are similarly situated, who are Christian or Jewish, and who will have to participate in this plan against their will and in violation of the Establishment Clause and 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause.
3. Taitz is a doctor and a medical provider who took a Hippocratic oath and finds it morally repugnant to participate in a scheme, where a state is promoting a Muslim religion, which is teaching stoning, lashing and beating as part of the religious ritual. Taitz is attaching a recent article, describing a Muslim judge, seeking a surgeon to sever a spinal cord of a defendant and artificially paralyze him as a punishment for leaving a victim paralyzed as a result of a brawl. Taitz would like a certification of a class to form a class of plaintiffs, doctors, nurses and other Healthcare providers, who find such Healthcare act to be violative of their moral believes and violative of the Establishment clause and the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause.
4. Taitz provides Exhibit 4, a newspaper article, showing stoning of victims, which is a ritual of Muslim religion. Taitz finds such practices to be barbaric and violative of Judeo-Christian beliefs. Taitz is seeking a class certification of millions of similarly situated individuals, who find that the fact that the State is promoting Muslim religion and de facto repressing of the Christian and Jewish religion is violative of the establishment Clause and the 14th amendment Equal Protection Clause.
5.Taitz submits an Exhibit 5, a picture of beating of a Muslim woman, per Sharia law. As an educated American woman Taitz is horrified by the fact that under the Healthcare Act she is forced to tolerate and financially support a religion, which is so repressive and barbaric against women. Taitz is seeking a certification of a class for millions of similarly situated American women, who are forced to participate in a plan, set by the state that promotes Muslim religion in violation of their 14th amendment equal protection rights and establishment clause.
Taitz is seeking discovery to show that Obama indeed committed fraud in wrongfully claiming his eligibility for office, by obfuscation of his vital records, that as a result of this scheme he pushed for the Healthcare act, which constitutes a veiled attempt to promote his Muslim beliefs (Obama was educated in a Muslim Madrasa and both his father and step father were Muslim). As stated, above five distinct large groups of US citizens were damaged by this act, which was signed into law by an ineligible individual. A favorable decision in this case would redress the plaintiff's injury, as the Healthcare act will be found invalid, as signed by the ineligible individual and violative of the 14th Amendment equal protection rights and of the Establishment clause. As such Taitz has perfect standing to proceed under the Establishment clause and the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause and moves the court to grant her Motion for Reconsideration.
TELL YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT THIS! PLEASE!