Republicans want review of birthright citizenship, don't be fooled by the RINO word games and disinformation..

Republicans want review of birthright citizenship, don't be fooled by the RINO word games and disinformation..

Commander Kerchner Exclusive: Republicans want review of birthright citizenship - comments on that issue by CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) -

Watch carefully how these key but sneaky Republican leaders (RINOs) will cleverly game this move of theirs to try and work on the very real "anchor baby" problem in the USA, and while trying to correctly define who is a "born a Citizen of the United States" per the 14th Amendment of the Constitution to solve this "anchor baby" problem, they will also try and confuse the 14th Amendment part of the Constitution with another part of the Constitution, i.e., who is "natural born Citizenship of the United States" as required in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution as to who is eligible to be the President. The "natural born Citizens", as defined by natural law, are people born in the USA to two citizen parents, and they are by far the most populous sub-group of those who are "Citizens by birth". The remainder are made "Citizens by birth" per Statutory Laws passed by Congress such as Title 8 Section 1401, the 14th Amendment, and U.S. court decisions interpreting those laws and amendments, not always correctly. See the historic and scholarly legal treatise by Vattel, The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law, Volume 1, Chapter 19, Section 212, which was used by the founders of our nation and framers of the U.S. Constitution to write our founding documents The Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution to learn more on the difference between "Citizen by Birth" and being a "natural born Citizen by birth". Adjectives mean something in man-made law and in natural law. Also, see this article I wrote for more on that. http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/citizen-at-birth-cab-does-not-equal.html

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_republicans_birthright_citizenship

These key Republican leadership Senators KNOW there is a difference in the wording, meaning, and intent of the 14th Amendment, the Wong Kim Ark 1898 and Supreme Court decisions as to whose is a "Citizen of the USA", ... and the wording in Article II as to who is a "natural born Citizen of the USA". They know that those two extra adjectives have very special meaning rooted deeply in natural law. But they are going to deliberately blur the lines on purpose because of what these same Senators and both political parties did in the 2008 election, i.e., both political parties putting up candidates for President who had suspect Article II "natural born Citizen" status. Both candidates from the two major political parties for the first time in history did not meet the historic and natural law Article II meaning of the legal term of art "natural born Citizen of the United States", which is being born in the USA to two citizen parents. McCain was born in Panama and Obama's father was not a Citizen of the USA, not even an immigrant to the USA.

These self serving clever politicians have tried 5 times legislatively since 2001 to blur the meaning of "natural born Citizen" by statute but have failed.