Saturday, October 9, 2010

An organization that says it linked an Army doctor challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility with a new legal defense team contends the unveiling of the president’s birth certificate would prove one of two things: he was a dual citizen or there has been “the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.”
Leaders of the United States Patriots Union have told WND the officer’s arguments need to go beyond the quest for the president’s original birth certificate because that would reveal only some of the evidence needed.
“A birth certificate would only prove one of two things – 1) Barack Hussein Obama (Sr) is his bloodline birth father and Barack Jr. was thereby a ‘dual citizen’ rather than natural born citizen at birth. In this case, Obama fails constitutional requirements,” a statement prepared by the organization said.
Or, in the second case, “Barack Hussein Obama (Sr) is NOT his stated birth father on the birth records, in which case Obama has committed the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.”
“A birth certificate cannot solve Barack Hussein Obama’s problem, unless and until an unconstitutional precedent can be set in court that ‘natural-born’ – ‘native-born’ and ‘naturalized’ are all one in the same. We know that they are not the same things, and why the Founders limited eligibility for the office of president to only ‘natural-born’ citizens. Anything less creates a very real national security crisis,” the organization stated.
The statement was provided to WND by spokesman J.B. Williams, who explained the union and Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely helped introduce Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin to a new attorney, Lt. Col. Neal Puckett.
He reported the union also is putting together an “A Team” of expert legal counselors to support Puckett and Lakin.
Exactly what strategic changes, if any, will be made in Lakin’s case are yet to be revealed. Lakin’s position has been to maintain that there are enough legitimate questions about Obama’s eligibility to support his conclusion that orders under Obama’s chain of command could be illegal and he would, therefore, be required to disobey them.
source: WND.com, story by Bob Unruh

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.