Sunday, January 2, 2011

Follow-up from Ms. Tickly at obamasgarden.wordpress.com...Be sure to also read the story posted below from PixelPatriot which ties in to this post...

No Comment.



[SEE UPDATES AT THE END OF THIS POST.]
_____________________________________
Which of these things is not like the other? (For Obots, this is a tough question.)
I received a response from Mr. Farah of World Net Daily to my request for answers and a retraction.
It pains me to inform my readers that World Net Daily has no comment for me on this issue.
Why? Because I won’t provide them my real identity. I won’t risk the safety and well-being of my family for absolutely no good reason. Below is my full response back to Mr. Farah. Please note that I will likely update this post many times at the realization of what the complete lack of answers from WND means:
“Dear Mr. Farah-
My real name has absolutely no relevance to the facts that exist. This discrepancy is evident. Crystal clear. It cannot be reconciled from the information we’ve been given. I do have professional experience in the field of graphic design, but, feel free to disregard that, because I won’t be releasing any private information about myself.
I made my request for answers, WND refused. I am afraid you will have to refuse others, too. And, I am frankly surprised at your response simply because I want to protect my identity and my family. This does say a lot about your organization, indeed.
My readers understand this fraud is evident – regardless of my willingness to divulge my identity. A person only needs to have eyes to see that one sheet of paper does not match the other – not in color, not in texture. Any woman who ever ordered wedding invitations is more than qualified to judge whether a sheet of paper is white or cream.
Let’s face it, anyone past kindergarten could make this call.
I know some of my readers have contacted you. They have eyes, too. I will let them know that WND has no comment for me on this subject and your reason. But, this clear evidence should have set off alarm bells galore at WND. One would think, anyway.
Thank you for your time, Mr. Farah.
Sincerely,
-MT”
_____________________________________
[UPDATE 1 (1/1/11): If WND truly cared about addressing this fraud or investigating the 'Obama birth certificate controversy' – then they just cost all of us extremely valuable time worrying more about me (and my bachelor's degree) than the brazen fraud that's been perpetrated on America. The evidence in front of them does not require my identity nor my credentials to warrant their full and immediate attention. I am not a firsthand witness to this fraud, I merely pointed out the obvious.

Purposely or inadvertently, WND just paved the way for this fraud to continue and have bought the criminals behind this fraud, through their lack of action and response, precious time for a cover up and invention of facts to ensue. I think I speak for a lot of people when I say--thanks a lot, WND.(sarc.)
By the way, Mr. Farah was impressed with my work yesterday, before he had no comment for me today.]
_____________________________________
[UPDATE 2 (1/1/11): Here's another researcher's take on typography discrepancies that WND can also ignore.]
_____________________________________
[UPDATE 3 (1/1/11): To be clear, I don't need any attribution of any of the work or writing presented at this blog pertaining to WND's article on the 'Kapi'olani Hospital Letter.' WND may freely use it for use in their own stories about this fraudulent activity. So, WND does not need my real name, as far as this is concerned. They have my email address to contact me if they want to attribute anything to me, and certainly they can attribute my work to 'MissTickly' or 'TerriK' if they wanted. But I don't even require that much.
WND is the witness to this fraud--NOT ME. I merely made an observation and brought it to their attention. This evidence has been there since Mr. Kovacs wrote the article--it has nothing to do with me or my name. I have no firsthand knowledge of anything, I am not a 'source'--I only asked that WND correct an OBVIOUS error I noticed on their website.

I won't make my identity public and risk my personal safety and that of my family. Call me paranoid, but if I were to be harmed by someone, that person could claim that I freely gave out my name and info, and therefore, who could really say with any certainty who harmed me. Call me overly cautious, I don't care.
I do not give permission for my real name to be used anywhere by anyone. And, I will not be providing my mailing address for donations, but thank you to the sincere folks who have inquired about this--it's PayPal or nothing. No amount of money is worth my safety.
At least THIRTY people have STRONGLY and WISELY advised me directly against giving out any personal info, including my name – not that I would – but WND is adamant that they won't address the evidence of fraud with me without it...and there is one other person who has contacted me several times to encourage me to provide WND my real name. WHY?
Anyway, that's how UPDATE 3 came to be.
P.S. If any harm were to come my way due to my work on this issue, I hope you guys would raise hell on my behalf. I know my family and friends have been told the same. And, of course, they would. I always keep my police officer brother-in-law up-to-date on what I am doing and he knows all my concerns, too--including my concerns stemming from this. And, FYI, I've told my husband and my two closest friends to make an announcement on my blog should it ever become necessary. So there is that. (By the way, all three are democrats, but they did not vote for Obama. They do not support Obama. And, honestly, Obama really doesn't have the support the MSM fakes for him.=)

Overly cautious or not, I am not playing games with my safety.
So, there should be no more requests for my name or address from WND or anyone. If you ask me for any of this info, don't even expect me to respond. It's out of the question.]

1 comment:

  1. "Miss Tickly", Unless things have changed in recent years, official business letters from the president are printed on the whitest "Crane's" brand 100% cotton paper which, when held in front of a light, shows a watermarked image of The White House, plus the year the letter was written. Unless the letter concerns serious official business, or is of a personal nature, it is faux "signed" by an "autopen device". Both signatures you have posted were done by an "autopen" (since autopen matrix plates are so simple to make, the signature on the ALLEGED "hospital letter" could easily be, and is highly likely, a forgery, as is the entire document). White House note cards, which are auto-generated in untold numbers daily, are printed on medium cream color "Crane's" brand 100% cotton rag card stock and bear a metallic gold seal at the top. (These folks can provide the most accurate and detailed information regarding paper - http://ipst.gatech.edu/amp/)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.