Monday, February 28, 2011

Another National Talk Show Host Calls Obama “Impeachable”

February 28th, 2011 Ben Johnson,
The number of people acknowledging that Barack Obama’s lawless actions deserve impeachment has risen by one more. Obama’s refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is “impeachable,” according to a nationally syndicated, widely quoted talk show host. Bryan Fischer is director of Issue Analysis for Government and Public Policy at American Family Association and host of “Focal Point,” which is heard on the 148 radio stations of the American Family Radio Network. Fischer wrote on the AFA’s website:
Obama is violating his oath of office by refusing to defend DOMA. The Constitution he took a solemn and sacred oath to “preserve, protect and defend” requires him in Article II, Section 3 to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” This refusal to do his sworn duty makes him derelict in his duty, and is both inexcusable and even impeachable.
Fischer also dedicated a segment of his Thursday program to the DOMA decision.
The Christian broadcaster’s influence is only growing. Newsweek magazine (which apparently still exists) paid Fischer a backhanded compliment in a tongue-in-cheek hit piece entitled, “How Bryan Fischer Became the Newest Media Darling.” It describes how Fischer’s straight talking common sense and Biblical conservatism have attracted a growing national audience — a fact that has caused the dinosaur media to frequently distort, mock, and ridicule Fischer’s message and audience.
Fischer joins a growing list of center-Right (and occasionally far-Left) personalities who believe the president should be investigated, and perhaps impeached and removed from office. Radio talk show host Tammy Bruce called for Obama’s impeachment for bringing the Muslim Brotherhood closer to power in Egypt. (It would be difficult to think of two people further apart politically than Fischer and Bruce.) Another Bryan, Bryan Preston of Pajamas Media’s blog, put impeachment on the table the day before Fischer’s blog.
Within the last two weeks alone Newt Gingrich, ACORN expert Matthew Vadum, and others have stated the president’s actions violate the rule of law, ignore legal precedent, and establish a “rule of men” presided over by Obama — and all have had the courage to say these actions could merit impeachment.
Read more.

Obama: ObamaCare is too Important to be Unconstitutional

February 28th, 2011 Doug Book,
Imagine asking the judge who just revoked your driver’s license if you’ll still be allowed to drive. Last month, Northern Florida Federal Judge Roger Vinson declared the individual mandate–the centerpiece of ObamaCare, also known as the Affordable Care Act–to be unconstitutional. And as Vinson ruled that the mandate could not be separated from the rest of the Act, the entire law was struck down.
Now never having attended law school means that, unlike attorneys, when it comes to thinking and decision making I’ve been reduced to a reliance upon common sense, common decency and a simple understanding of the difference between right and wrong. Of course, lawyers aren’t limited by such pedestrian restraints. So the same people who maintain that the Constitution is far too complex to be deciphered by anyone but a lawyer, are now claiming to not understand the meaning and consequences of the word “unconstitutional.”
”Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void”, writes Judge Vinson in his opinion. And if this were not a  plain enough declaration of his intent, Vinson tells interested parties why he considers injunctive relief unnecessary, stating “…there has been a long-standing presumption that officials of the Executive Branch will adhere to the law as declared by the court. As a result, the declaratory judgment is the functional equivalent of an injunction…There is no reason to conclude that this presumption should not apply here. Thus, the award of declaratory relief is adequate and separate injunctive relief is not necessary.”
So how does the Obama Regime respond? By having the Centers for Medicine and Medicare Services begin adding 650 employees to implement the plan; by continuing to issue waivers to select businesses and groups; by having the IRS go forward with the hiring of 1,000 new auditors and staffers and by including 465 million dollars in the White House budget submitted to Congress for the implementation of the law.
And to provide some slim measure of cover for the breathtaking exhibition of arrogance required to ignore the ruling of a federal court, on February 17th White House attorneys filed a “Motion to Clarify.” As the Heritage Foundation explains this remarkable bit of Democrat stagecraft….
Read more.

Birthers Go Global: Dual citizenship could force Thai leader from office; He automatically holds British citizenship just like Obama AKA Soetoro

~ Thailand’s Usurper Vejjajiva  and America's Usurper Obama ~  Dual citizenship could force Thai leader from officePhil Boehmke-American Thinker- Late last week during a debate in Parliament,...

Notre Dame Professor Charles Rice: Obama's eligibility could be biggest political fraud in the history of the world; time for a new approach

Professor Charles Rice on Obama's 'eligibility' By Matt C. Abbot-Renew America- There's been a lot of discussion in certain circles on the topic of President Obama's "eligibility." (Incidentally,...

Constitutional Options for Removing Obama

©2011 drkate
I am republishing this today as we move closer to Obama’s “American Moment”–the subject of an upcoming new post–where he will be removed by the people.  We are out of time.

In consideration of the now overwhelming  evidence in the public sphere that Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born citizen” and was never eligible for the Presidency, it is important  for Congress to exercise the Constitutional remedies available to it to correct this egregious fraud perpetuated on the American people.
Those in the  media, some members of Congress and their staffers, the judiciary, and some in the military both fear and stoke the fires of ‘chaos’  and ‘riots’ if Obama is removed, based upon the old line of race or their own twisted white guilt.  This is a tactic to ignore the tools our founders left us to resolve circumstances such as  a ‘constitutional disability of the President’.
While the anti-Americans, New World Order, and communists by proxy would rather we devolve into chaos  so as to enable marginalization, manipulation, or martial law, it will not be necessary: the solution is found in the Constitution.
Constitutional Measures for Removing the Executive
A careful reading of the Constitution demonstrates that the Congress has sufficient authority to resolve the issue of a President who has a constitutional disability. Those specific words  are mentioned in Article II, and the Twelfth and Twentieth Amendments. The term “disability” is also used in the Twenty Fifth Amendment and can be applied broadly to cover any disability of a President.

Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio Show (TLAF Radio) On America's Web Radio: An Interview with Miki Booth; Live on 2/28/11 @ 3pm Eastern

Terry Lakin Action Fund Radio: Miki Booth on TLAF Radio Feb 28, 2011 at 3pm Eastern An Interview with Miki Booth... Miki is a Hawaiian-born community organizer who has focused on the eligibility issue...

...and what is Congress doing about this?...


Pigford vs.  Glickman
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997."
The case was entitled "Pigford vs. Glickman" and in 1999, the black farmers won their case.
The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to settle their claims.

But then on February 23, 2010, something shocking happened in relation to that original judgment:  In total silence, the USDA agreed to release more funds to "Pigford".
 The amount was a staggering...... $1.25 billion.  This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers had now swollen, in a class action suit, to include a total of 86,000 black farmers throughout America .

There was only one teensy problem:

The United States of America doesn't have 86,000 black farmers!!!!
 According to accurate and totally verifiable Official USDA 2007 Census census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America  is only 39,697.
 Hmmm... by the Official USDA 1992 Census data the US had only 18,816 black farmers!!
 Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into the fraudulent 86,000 claims??

And how did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion??
Well, folks, you'll just have to ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in 1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network", but whose family received the highest single payout  (approximately $13 million) from that action -  Shirley Sherrod.    Oops again!!
Yes, folks it appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the history of the United States  - -  a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the government and cowed them into submission.  

And it gets even more interesting...
Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted her in this race fraud.    

As it turns out, the original judgment of  "Pigford vs. Glickman" in 1999 only applied to a total of about 16,000 black farmers. 2008, a junior US Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more black farmers to sue for funds.
   The Senator was Barack Hussein Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence, and because the woman responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official,  American taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a worldwide recession to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race claim.
But Andy Breitbart knew.  And on Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap which Sherrod  - -  and Obama + his  cronies  - -  stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt financial judgment.  
As for Ms. Sherrod??  Well, she's discovering too late that her cry of 'racism' to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has instead thrown that spotlight on herself and the huge corruption    Sherrod has vanished from public view.    
But the perpetrator of that law passed in dead silence leading to unlawful claims & corruption..... is still trying to fool all of US.
Go to Google and read for yourself "Pigford vs. Glickman", or "Pigford Obama".
As some have said, "The Republic can survive a Barack Obama.  It is less likely to  survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their President."
.... there are many more ...
Why haven't we heard more about this???

Natural Born Citizen Seeks Certification

thanks to the

Steven L Craig
Natural Born Citizen Seeks Certification
February 8, 2011 Oklahoma City, OK – A Response to Show A Cause Order in the US Court of Appeals 10th Circuit has been released to the public today as the paperwork makes its way to the 10th Circuit Court Clerk for filing. The legal definition of the Constitutional idiom “natural born Citizen” is the focus of the suit.
The Appellant, an Oklahoma resident, has spent the last 2 ½ years requesting the Federal Government or the Courts to “certify” him as a natural born Citizen. He argues that if he, born of two American citizen parents on US soil, can not be determined to be natural born Citizen, then no one can be certified as such and therefore no one is eligible to run for the office of US President or Vice-President. Furthermore, he found that the US Citizenship and Immigration Services Administration in the publication, “The Citizen’s Almanac” changed the wording for President/VP eligibility as a “native-born citizen” requirement. He contends that this usurpation of authority to “abridge, enlarge, and/or modify the Constitutional “idiom” of natural born Citizen (US Constitution Clause V, Section I, Article II) further dilutes the question of who is eligible to run for President. He has requested the Supreme Court as the Constitutional authority to resolve this issue by finally defining the “idiom”.
When he was asked why he thought it was important to publicly release the current filings, he explained that it was an issue of both national security and for his own protection. “The public needs to know.”
This “Response” is a must read for all those who follow or are engaged in politics in the US.
To read the “Response” online, visit;



Posted by Reliapundit

Sunday, February 27, 2011

What's up?...Get rid of the bastard!...

Déjà Vu, George III Lives
 By Dr. Gerald Stephens Full Story
Mr. Obama’s declaration that the Defense of Marriage Act, a United States Statutory Law, law of the land is unconstitutional begs the highest order of attention. Even he, having taught constitutional law, albeit, briefly, knows he has no authority to declare any U.S. law UNCONSTITUTIONAL. He further knows that this conduct clearly rises to the level of an impeachable offense. So what’s up?
 Arizona’s Proposed Interstate Birth Certificate Compact Law Is Both Unconstitutional and Contrary to the Best Interests of the United States

Arizona’s Proposed Interstate Birth Certificate Compact Law Is Both Unconstitutional and Contrary to the Best Interests of the United States »

ARE ARIZONA LAWMAKERS NOW TRYING TO COVER FOR OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY? by Mario Apuzzo, Esq., ©2011 (Feb. 27, 2011) — Arizona is considering passing a law that, among other things, would allow a child born in...
February 27 2011 / 5 comments / Read More »


Colonel Hollister: Obama's Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants Comes Back as "Fail" and “SSN Not in File (Never Issued)”

This is very interesting news, according to Colonel Gregory Hollister of Hollister v Soetoro, the questionable social security number reserved for Connecticut applicants/residents that Obama is using...

Pixel Patriot: An Open Letter to 2012 Presidential Candidate Andy Martin...

*AN OPEN LETTER TO ANDY MARTIN*By Pixel Patriot February 25th, 2011 Andy Martin National Campaign Headquarters P. O. Box 1851 New York, NY 10150-1851 Telephone: (866) 706-ANDY E-mail: Dear...

Huh?...Is that right Newt?...It's our understanding that Marco Rubio may not be a natural born citizen (parents were not American citizens at the time of his birth) and thus ineligible to be vice-president or president....

Gingrich says Florida home to four potential 2012 veeps

by George Bennett | February 24th, 2011 WEST PALM BEACH — Former House Speaker and potential 2012 presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, arriving at tonight’s Palm Beach County GOP Lincoln Day dinner, says several Floridians could end up on the Republican presidential ballot next year.
“Florida has two and maybe three potential vice presidential candidates right now, maybe four if you count Jeb Bush,” Gingrich said. He mentioned Sen. Marco Rubio, U.S. Rep. Allen West, R-Plantation and Gov. Rick Scott.
Gingrich says he’ll announce his presidential plans within a few weeks.
Asked about Florida’s 2012 primary date, Gingrich said Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina should be the first states to hold 2012 presidential primaries or caucuses. After that, he said, “it’s up to Florida. At that point Florida has to negotiate with the RNC.”
The Republican National Committee wants Florida to move its primary from January to March.
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve?
WND's complete archive of news reports on the issue
Why Obama Refuses to Defend Marriage: Marxist Theology v. Natural Law
 By Kelly O'Connell Full Story
imageObama just announced he will not defend DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, designed to block gay marriage legalization. Barack stated the reason—because it is “unconstitutional.” But is it any coincidence Marxist doctrine teaches marriage is a subset of the state; whereas our Founder’s Natural Law only countenances heterosexual unions?
By stating he will not honor legally ratified Amendments of the Constitution, Obama openly rejects the rule of law. He has pushed the presidency from a defender of our laws into being its destroyer. The reason is that, despite any disagreement Barack has with particular pieces of legislation, he swore an oath to defend the whole Constitution. If he were to challenge this law in a law-abiding manner, this would at least respect our institutions. But to simply declare a particular law “illegal,” is certain to sow future chaos and an antinomian spirit into our Republic.

Zenga Zenga- I've Lost My Dictatorship

Saturday, February 26, 2011


Gaddafi: Barakeh Obama is friend

Libyan leader praises US president: 'He is of Muslim descent, his policy should be supported, as he now leans towards peace'
Roee Nahmias
Published: 04.17.10, 15:15 / Israel News

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi considers the US president a blessing to the Muslim world. In a speech published in London-based al-Hayat newspaper on Saturday, Gaddafi praised Barack Obama, called him a "friend" and said there is no longer any dispute between his country and the US.

Speaking in the Libyan city of Sirt at an event marking the 24th anniversary of an American attack on Libya, he said, "At the time, we were the target of the American cannon, the American navy challenged us in the gulf of Sirt and attacked us all along Libya's shores. America tested Libya, and the Libyan people resisted the large country, but today, thank God, the difference is great."

Gaddafi: Palestinians should have nukes / AFP

Libyan leader says Arab nations and 'even the Palestinians' should be allowed nuclear weapons as long as Israel's nuclear ambitions are tolerated. He adds he would oppose Iran acquiring nuclear weapons if it acknowledges such a goal
Full Story

He said, "Now, ruling America is a black man from our continent, an African from Arab descent, from Muslim descent, and this is something we never imagined – that from Reagan we would get to Barakeh Obama."
Gaddafi stressed that Obama's presidency is "a major historical gain" and said, "He is someone I consider a friend. He knows he is a son of Africa. Regardless of his African belonging, he is of Arab Sudanese descent, or of Muslim descent. He is a man whose policy should be supported, and he should be assisted in implementing it in any way possible, since he is now leaning towards peace."
He continued, "I urge all peoples to give him this chance and to support this policy, because America is a country that, when its policy is bad – harms the world, and when it is good – it helps the world."


How the West Was Won by Moammar Gaddafi

Posted by Judi McLeod on Feb 26, 2011

Gaddafi-financed Nation of Islam and its leader, Obama friend Louis Farrakhan imageThe horror story starring Muammar Gaddafi does not begin with the ongoing bloody Revolution in Libya.
If the megalomaniac were to use the $3 billion he parked in London to write his memoirs, it could easily be entitled, How the West Was Won because the story of Gaddafi is, in effect, the story of the corruption of Western leaders, and how it ultimately leads to the decline of Western civilization.
Both Canada and the United States helped put Gaddafi on his perch and helped keep him there.
It is largely thanks to the brilliant website American Thinker that we can help trace the decline of the west through the corruption of western leaders in the pocket of Gaddafi, the man President Ronald Reagan called the “Mad Dog of the Middle East”.


Obama Sanctions Murderous Friend Gaddafi, AWOL on UN Sanctions Against Libya

Pam Geller  *

Be afraid, be very afraid. More of the monster behind the mask. Have you started working on Obama's ouster in 2012? Get to work.
When Libya's riots broke out, I was the first to predict that Obama would do nothing here. First on the story I wrote:
I fear Obama will do and say nothing. Back in July of 2008, I posted that Gaddafi had come out and fully endorsed Obama, going so far as to say: "People in Arab And Islamic World, Africa... May Have Been Involved In Legitimate Contribution Campaigns [to Obama]."
In April 2010, the Libyan president Gaddafi praised Obama here: "Barakeh Obama is friend..." "He is of Muslim descent, his policy should be supported...."
After Gaddafi came to New York and spoke at the UN (!) in 2009, he headed to the Libyan mission for more than an hour and was visited by limelight-loving radical Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan was his only visitor. Farrakhan has a special relationship with Obama's pastor of twenty years, Jeremiah Wright. Gaddafi pal and Jew-hating firebrand Louis Farrakhan labeled Obama "the hope of the entire world" and compared him to the founder of the Nation of Islam, the group Farrakhan heads (Associated Press, February 25).
I was not wrong. Obama's absence speaks volumes. This is the same spineless, gutless pattern he practiced before he was President. Barack Hussein Obama had missed 314 (24%) out of 1,300 roll call votes since Jan. 6, 2005.
(NY Post) — The UN Security Council convened an emergency session yesterday to draft sanctions against Libyan mad- dog Moammar Khadafy.
But as the UN struggled to put out the fires in the Mideast, America’s top UN rep was nowhere to be found.
In fact, US Ambassador Susan Rice was 8,000 miles away from UN headquarters, taking tea in South Africa with fellow diplonuts.
South Africa?
Continue reading "Obama Sanctions Murderous Friend Gaddafi, AWOL on UN Sanctions Against Libya" »

Eyes on

Political deeds and misdeeds and by whom.

How Do I Diss Thee Obama?

 February 25th, 2011
By Aaron Cantor
Where to begin, you have certainly given us a lot of reasons over the past two years.
Your actions have given proof positive that you do not have  even a slight clue that you know what the hell you are doing.
It was apparent in Carter’s days as President that aircraft carrier presence was ‘pulled’ to allow a, ‘lame,’ excuse to allow the Shah of Iran to be deposed and to lend an excuse to allow American hostages to remain in the hands of their Iranian captors for 444 days.
You must be a student of, ‘an Inept President,’ as you too offer a somewhat lame excuse for the impossibility to provide a, ‘No Fly Zone,’ over Libya.
If it were possible to establish a ‘No Fly Zone’ utilizing aircraft from an off coast carrier there would be thousands of lives saved and a notification made to the world, ‘America still is the power to be reckoned with.’  Instead it is your position that due to a lack of presence in the Mediterranean of aircraft carriers you are helpless.
As America’s Commander in Chief, you can blame no one other than yourself for this serious faux pas!
You sir are nothing more than a useless pile of human feces, and you need to step down, as you are ineffectual at best, and downright dangerous to the nation.
You could well be compared to a rudderless, powerless derelict ship, adrift in a heavy sea and ready to go under with the next swell.
You might want to consider the fact that not too many years ago, another Democratic President got himself impeached while being too smart for his own damned good.
You may consider yourself the smartest guy in the room, but let me SPLAIN it to you bubba, YOU AIN’T!
You have yet to show your bona fides to prove that you are even eligible to assume the duties of POTUS.
We keep asking why you have spent over $2Million and employed a fleet of 17 DOJ lawyers to keep all your records from public view, if you are the real deal.
Even the timeline in your books don’t add up correctly as to who you are , where you are from, and no one can be found that was in any of your supposed classes,
Until you prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that you are in fact eligible, you remain a two-bit, phony sidewalk commando and more and more of us everyday are becoming not only disenchanted, but downright pissed at your arrogance in ignoring the questions that need to be answered.
Several states are putting together bills that will make it mandatory that any and all candidates must prove up before being allowed on the ballot, and none too soon either.
The people who allowed you onto the ballot without properly vetting you should all go to jail and you too for the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
Let us see you lie or tap dance your skinny butt out from under this one.



and comments from the blogosphere:

Bill Ayers ( is a leftist radical communist who co-founded the weather underground organization (, which was responsible for such attacks as the 1970's bombing of the United States Capitol, the Pentagon, the Department of State, and attacks on police stations and court houses. Bill Ayers and his gang estimated that when the communists come to power, as much as 25 million Americans will have to be exterminated because they will not be able to be re-educated (brainwashed) into accepting communism ( Sounds looney doesn't it? Obama has very real connections to this murderer of law enforcement officials dating back 16 years ( Obama was also mentored by a man named Frank Marshal Davis (, a known communist investigated by congress. He cannot produce his birth certificate (I live in Hawaii, the Governor here cant find the original), everything about his background remains a mystery and he has ties to radical communist murderers. The scariest part about this man is he is your president!!! You know whats also scary, Bill Ayers and his terrorist friends are mostly professional educators at universities - like the one your son will go to someday. Bill Ayers also writes books for teachers on how to educate your children ( Scary eh? Communist indoctrination has to start somewhere why not in your child's public school that he currently attends. While we are on the subject of communist indoctrination check this video out: It is a seven part video by Yuri Bezmenov ( Yuri Bezmenov was a KGB defector who specialized in this exact thing. Watch the video and realize that this type of subversion does not go away. It gets handed down from generation to generation, the lies begin to take root and neither you nor I escaped this crap in our public education. Maybe that's why nobody in America knows their Constitution anymore eh?

Don't forget about Larry Sinclair who claims that Obama had a torrid gay love affair with him in 1999 while also abusing cocaine amongst other things? Frank Marshall Davis who admitted to having sex with children as well as being "bisexual" amongst other disgusting sexual deviancies! Obama's stated "father figure" and reputed biological father which the Obozobots dismiss as fantasy, but when you compare the Obama with Barack Sr. and Frank Marshall Davis, he looks most strikingly like "Uncle Frank" not Barack Sr., so who is Obama's REAL father? His mother has had more dark meat than Kim Kardashian? The only way to ascertain the truth is a DNA test, though I would bet money that we will never see that happen?! The work it must have taken to cover up Obama's background is absolutely astounding, when you start penetrating the veil of secrecy put up by his handlers? The wall is coming down, slowly but surely, as the truth about his background leaks out!
stupid moron. how about doing a couple of things" (1) look up the founder of planned parenthood. Once you find out the purpose of planned parenthood, then come back here and tell monorities and other "undesirables" why you support and organization that was created to eliminate them. (2) DEMOCRATS have NOT passed a budget in over a year moron.; and (3) Obama is partying and dancing today celebrating motown. I am sure he is has a "laser focus" on jobs right now. He is also "laser focused" on the 1.00 increase in gas per gallon since he got into office. the 30% increase in food costs since he took office. The 4.5 trillion dollar addition to the deficit since he took office. The meltdown of the middle east.

Must be nice to play golf, eat wagu beef, go on countless vacations and play basketball. It must be great to use the people's house for your parties as well. All the while, the rest of the country is suffering from a depression, loss of jobs, unemployment, oil prices spiking and severe uncertainties that grow each day. Must be nice OBlunder. We have watched you and listened to you. You have been found wanting in every department of leadership. You will be shown the to the door to your public housing we provided you when we boot you out in 2012. It cannot happen fast enough.
I am so sick of this. The endless vacations, parties, and golf outings, etc.. The president who voted present is absent, except when he can sign a bill that screws the rest of us!

Well, Mr. and Mrs. Marie Antoinette sure look like they are having fun in the WH, while the people at large try their best to make headway in a bad economy made worse by Obama's policies and sheer incompetence. I hope that Michelle isn't overdoing it--you know she just came back from skiing in Vail. I'm surprised her legs aren't tired.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Left Wing of Caliphate Almost Complete

From right to left, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia. Algeria is teetering with talk of shutting down it's oil production. After Algeria, only Morocco remains before the entire left wing of an Islamic Caliphate forms. Removal of the 40 year dictators is the hard part. Sweeping aside a democratic youth movement will be childs play. The Muslim Brotherhood will soon turn it's attention to the eastern part of the Middle East. Bahrain,Yemen,Jordan,Saudi in that order to form the right wing of the Caliphate.

The heart of the Caliphate? Turkey. Turkey is the great uniter. Islamists have a saying with respect to Muslims being under one flag, the black flag.--" One and half billion Muslims in Islam are waiting for Turkey to rise."


Somebody Playback Obama's Touchy Feely Foreign Policy Statement From January 2009 Ask Yourself If It's Working

Look where the reaching out to the Muslims has gotten us. Look at what trying to be the fly on the wall has done for stability. Obama even got Qaddafi's favorite Pan Am bomber out of a Scottish jail.

This is what you get when the Kim Jung Ils and Quackdaddy in Libya get a free reign. Obama's "allow me to lay down while you screw me," international foreign policy has gotten the United States walked on by the tyrants of the world. Obama must have been stoned when somebody was giving out the life tool of " give them an inch and they'll take a mile." Check that Obama missed that part of Americana, he was in an Indonesian madrases chanting the hate of the Koran.

Obama played to the bleeding heart liberals, and spoke the politically correct speak, and they and the low attention spaners fell for it in 2008.

Doesn't this remind you of an old western, where the wagon train fool wants to leave the safety of the barricade and talk peace with the blood thirty savages. Remember how John Wayne would always slap the pee, out the jerk, before he got them all killed?

Raise your hand if you want to slap the pee and more out of the dumb ass pretending to be President? Hopefully it happens before he gets us all killed.


See the interview revealing that muslim supremacist Khalid al Mansur raised money and support for Obama to go to Harvard. Please, forward this far and wide. People need to know who stands behind Obama


Hey NEWT...That's a start...but really...Is that the best you can do?...What about USURPATION of the presidency and a myriad of crimes against the Constitution and the American people that precede this latest criminal activity by the FRAUD-IN-CHIEF? Let's get real!

Gingrich: If Palin Took Obama Actions, There Would Be Calls for Impeachment

Friday, 25 Feb 2011

By Jim Meyers and Ashley Martella
In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV Friday, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said President Barack Obama’s decision not to fully enforce the Defense of Marriage law could lead to a constitutional crisis as he has directly violated his constitutional duties by arbitrarily suspending a law.

Gingrich even suggested that, if a “President Sarah Palin” had taken a similar action, there would have been immediate calls for her impeachment. (Speaker Gingrich stressed that we are not currently in a constitutional crisis, nor was he calling for the direct impeachment of the president. His statements were meant to illustrate the hypocrisy of the left and the mainstream media.)

Obama Attorney General Eric Holder said on Wednesday that the administration will not defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in the courts, which has banned recognition of same-sex marriage for 15 years. President Clinton signed the act into law in 1996.

Obama’s decision to forego a legal defense of the law has caused a firestorm of anger from conservative groups.

Gingrich slammed Obama for his decision, telling Newsmax that he is not a “one-person Supreme Court” and his decision sets a “very dangerous precedent” that must not be allowed to stand.

Story continues below video.

In reacting to President Obama ordering no defense of the Defense of Marriage act, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich says if Sarah Palin were president and ordered no enforcement of Roe v. Wade, the N.Y. Times and the left would have demanded her impeachment.
“Imagine that Governor Palin had become president. Imagine that she had announced that Roe versus Wade in her view was unconstitutional and therefore the United States government would no longer protect anyone’s right to have an abortion because she personally had decided it should be changed. The news media would have gone crazy. The New York Times would have demanded her impeachment.

“First of all, he campaigned in favor of [the law]. He is breaking his word to the American people,” Gingrich says.

“Second, he swore an oath on the Bible to become president that he would uphold the Constitution and enforce the laws of the United States. He is not a one-person Supreme Court. The idea that we now have the rule of Obama instead of the rule of law should frighten everybody.

“The fact that the left likes the policy is allowing them to ignore the fact that this is a very unconstitutional act,” Gingrich said.

Gingrich said it is absolutely critical for Obama to comply with Congress and  the constitutional process.

“I believe the House Republicans next week should pass a resolution instructing the president to enforce the law and to obey his own constitutional oath, and they should say if he fails to do so that they will zero out [defund] the office of attorney general and take other steps as necessary until the president agrees to do his job.

“His job is to enforce the rule of law and for us to start replacing the rule of law with the rule of Obama is a very dangerous precedent.

“Clearly it is a dereliction of duty and a violation of his constitutional oath and is something that cannot be allowed to stand.”

Gingrich adds: “I don’t think these guys set out to create a constitutional crisis. I think they set out to pay off their allies in the gay community and to do something that they thought was clever. I think they didn’t understand the implication that having a president personally suspend a law is clearly unconstitutional.”

Oregon Liberals Re-Elect Insane Person

Oregon Congressman David Wu.

What is it with liberals electing certifiably insane people into government? 2008 one termer Alan Grayson of Florida comes to mind. Pete Stark of Calynutzville. Now this fruitcake David Wu of Oregon. He is so off his rocker his own staff quit en masse', and recommended a mental evaluation for him.


Even GOP activists are turning against Sarah Palin
ROCK HILL, S.C. — As Sarah Palin wonders whether to run for president, she might want to talk to people in places such as South Carolina.
She'd find her star fading, and her prospects daunting.
Republicans still like her, but now they openly question whether she could or should be nominated for president, let alone elected.
At a recent gathering in South Carolina, the site of a crucial early presidential primary next year, party activists said the former Alaska governor didn't have the experience, the knowledge of issues or the ability to get beyond folksy slang and bumper-sticker generalities that they think is needed to win and govern.
Many are shopping for someone else. They're looking at Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., for example, and seeing what they call a smarter, more experienced candidate who's equally as conservative.
"Sarah Palin with a brain," said Gail Moore, a Republican from Columbia.
While national polls show that Palin still would win the support of about one in five Republicans in a national face-off today for the nomination, she no longer can claim the dominant role she enjoyed when she burst out of the 2008 campaign as the undisputed star of the party. She's also losing ground quickly among independents, who hold the keys to the White House.
"Her major weakness is that she needs to bone up on how the government works," said Don Long, a retiree from Lake Wylie, S.C. "I don't know if she's done as much of that as she needs to."
Long was one of about 150 Republicans who showed up for a fundraising dinner of the York County Republican Party, where they ate barbecued pork sandwiches from Bats BBQ — "You'll love the way we rub your butt" — and talked presidential politics.
Many already had seen potential candidates in person, such as Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, and came this time to hear Bachmann.
In interviews, most volunteered criticism of Palin.
"I like Palin," said Joseph Kejr, a Republican from Rock Hill who works in information technology for a Christian ministry. However, he added, "she's not polished in national government. In terms of leadership, I don't know about her."

"I'm not a big Sarah Palin fan," said Joe Thompson of York, who manages a small business and is the president of the South Carolina District 5 Patriots, a group devoted to the Constitution and against big government spending, taxes and programs. "I like her ideas. I'm not sure she'd be able to manage a lot of things she'd have to handle as president."
"She's not really creative," said Swain Shepperd, a retiree from Rock Hill. "She just repeats what's already been said by others."

Some said she hurt herself by quitting halfway through her term as governor of Alaska, robbing herself of a platform in government.

That shortfall's become more glaring as party activists have cheered on people who are now governing and fighting to cut spending, such as Govs. Chris Christie in New Jersey, Nikki Haley in South Carolina, Rick Scott in Florida and Scott Walker in Wisconsin, as well as Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives such as Bachmann.
Also, Palin could have problems beyond the party. Polls show that the more the American public has seen of Palin, the less they've liked her.
Since she lit up the national stage in the fall of 2008 as the party's plain-talking vice presidential nominee, the ranks of people who have favorable impressions of her have dropped and the number with an unfavorable impression has spiked.
A Gallup poll taken in September 2008, for example, found that 53 percent had favorable views of her and 28 percent held unfavorable views. Last month, the same poll found the numbers were almost reversed, 38-53.

Even worse for GOP activists, she looks weak against President Barack Obama, a crucial factor for Republicans yearning for a champion who can oust the Democrat from the White House.
A recent McClatchy-Marist poll found that Obama would trounce her by 56-30 percent if the election were held now.
That was by far the weakest among three big-name Republicans tested; Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee each fared better against Obama. And it was considerably weaker than her standing just a month before, when she trailed Obama by 52-40 percent.
The key reason: She's lost support among independents, and she gets far less support from that swing bloc than the other two Republicans tested do.

It's been a surprising turn since 2008, said Lee Miringoff, the director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion in New York, which conducts the McClatchy-Marist Poll. Despite a barrage of criticism of Palin by Democrats and the news media, she came out of the election looking as if she'd be the major force for the party's nomination.
"She doesn't appeal to the center, and she hasn't been trying to," Miringoff said.
"There's a general sense among Republicans that this is someone they like being part of the 2012 narrative," Miringoff said. "They don't mind her pushing the edge of the envelope on issues. But there's concern about electability, about polarization. They're not necessarily sure she should be the nominee."

Video of the Day: Obama’s Gay Marriage Dereliction is “An Impeachable Offense”

February 24th, 2011 Below is a video from a supporter of “civil unions” for homosexuals who, despite his view that the government should have no role in supporting traditional marriage, recognizes the failure to enforce and defend the law is an unconstitutional action and hence an impeachable offense. He adds, so, too, is its refusal to enforce immigration policy. If you agree, click here to sign the petition to impeach Obama. Click here to learn more about the Impeach Obama Campaign.

Fax this Memo to your Congressman

Fax this Memo to your Congressman »

A DISCUSSION OF NATIVE AND NATURAL-BORN CITIZENSHIP by paralegalnm, blogging at Paralegalnm’s Blog (Feb. 24, 2011) — The concept of birthright U.S. citizenship by native-birth alone is a carryover from English law as practiced by...
February 24 2011 / 5 comments / Read More »


Article II Constitutionalists;
On Feb 20th, 2011, Judson Phillips posted a FORUM article entitled ‘The Eligibility Issue’, a topic that is usually ignored or left as ‘untouchable’ by most Tea Partiers.
Despite all the articles and clamoring and shouting by Article II Constitutionalists (pejoratively called ‘Birthers’), Tea Partiers have steadfastly refused to carry or promote signs that say:
Usually discussion replies/comments on the Tea Party Nation run from 10 to 100 (say 200 max.) over the life of a posting, but look at the responses to the ‘Eligibility Issue’ this time (619 in just 4 days).
The article is posted below, as is a most interesting post made by Steve Tonchen, with some excerpts from a posting at Leo Donofrio’s

Aside from the fact that Leo blows the new proposed AZ ‘anchor baby’ bill (SB 1308), proposing natural born Citizen status for persons born with dual citizenship, wide open, he also points out that one of the reasons that the GOP won’t touch the eligibility issue may be:
Remember, if Obama is found to be ineligible, there's a good chance that McCain is ineligible as well, since both candidates were subject to foreign jurisdiction at birth. Neither candidate was born under sole and complete US jurisdiction. Obama did not accept any Federal campaign financing, but McCain did. So, if McCain is ineligible, the Federal government has the right to demand that the RNC refund all Federal monies it received in 2008 for McCain's (illegitimate, if not fraudulent and illegal) run for President. That could bankrupt the RNC.
And this:
Don't think that Obama hasn't told the GOP, "If you bring me down, I will do everything in my power to bring you down with me, and I'll make sure it hurts your pocketbook a lot more than mine."
Let’s keep this in mind as we go forward in our efforts to Oust the Imposter.
In Liberty,