Please by patient with my frequent contacts at this time. I just finished up with meeting both the Secret Service and the Capitol Police.
The first man to talk to me said I need psychiatric help. I told him that was his opinion. By the end, he asked me to go home.
I really wish other Americans came here with me to help articulate the desire I have to have the President tried for his crimes. However, I believe in time God will make a way.
My finances may run out and I may have to return home. Also, the Secret Service said something about having to come see me again if I remain in DC.
At any rate, it is the Birther community who lead me to believe in the illegality of Obama due to his forged birth certificate, fraudulent SSN, and etc. I know many of you did not feel the need I felt to either produce videos or come to DC to proclaim, as an American, that Obama must be arrested.
At this point, I feel the Secret Service, while claiming not to be threatening me, have done their best to scare me away. If they excuse their actions to be more aggressive with me, or something tragic happens due to corruption and sin against me, I pray I could be buried in the earth in victory not shame.
On the other hand, if God sends victory to our nation, I would be happy to celebrate with all of you and millions more. Please come to DC and join me. I don't truly know how long I can stay, but will consider it each day.
May those with the power of print, like WND, and Post and Email follow my story and share publicly. What is the Secret Service going to say? That all Americans who seek the arrest and trial of the criminal Obama are mental patients?
The corrupted people do not follow the law. This is why my safety could be in jeopardy. I have said Obama is the terrorist, and so it is. Whether you agree with my methods or not, those of us who are tired of being terrorized DO NOT have to take it anymore. Stop taking it. Follow my lead, and join me.
We can convince the media, Congresspersons, etc. of what is right. But not by living in fear and intimidation. In fact, I will not live in a dictatorship and in tyranny while I have the knowledge of it.
Thank you for your patience. May God speak to your hearts, and may his angels be with me and my family.
I will gladly suffer and die, should the Secret Service or someone else attack or kill me for you people and for the Flag and my family. It doesn't have to come to that, and it won't by my own hand. I will stand for what's right as long as I can reasonably be here, and God allows.
Rush Limbaugh: Barry Soetoro; No Identity Papers; Suspended Elections - 9/30/2011 - VIDEO HERE LiveLeak.com: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify - FULL INTERVIEW HERE Numerous...
Ben Johnson,The White House Watch
Even as the Obama administration celebrates the killing of American-born al-Qaeda operative Anwar al-Awlaki and his traitorous friend Samir Khan in Yemen,its analysts are beginning to admit their war by decree in Libya empowered Islamic extremists bent on exporting jihad throughout the region. Thanks to Obama’s policies,al-Qaeda-linked radicals may be pillaging Muammar Qaddafi’s stockpile of weapons and receiving shipments of contraband from overseas.
In the closest thing to an admission Obama administration figures lied us into war,Reuters reports:
During the half-year campaign by rebels to drive Muammar Gaddafi from power,U.S. and NATO officials downplayed fears that al Qaeda or other militants would infiltrate anti-Gaddafi forces or take advantage of disorder to establish footholds in Libya.
Since then,however,the assessment of top experts inside the U.S. government has sharpened.
Former CIA asset and Obama adviser Bruce Riedel summarizes,“There is a great deal of concern that the jihadi cadre now are going to be exporting their ideas and weapons toward the east and west.”
This author reported the cause of their alarm a month ago. The National Transitional Council (NTC),the body the United States now exclusively recognizes as the official government of Libya,elected Abdel Hakim Belhaj commander of the Tripoli Military Council in late August. Belhaj is the co-founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG),which the State Department designated a foreign terrorist organization in December 2004. The New York Timesrelates that LIFG members received “combat experience in Iraq or Afghanistan” —fighting the United States. Belhaj,who met Osama bin Laden twice,now commands 8,000 troops,Libya’s largest fighting force.
U.S. analysts,who covered up the links the “rebels”have to Islamic fundamentalists,now worry Belhaj and his LIFG warriors have raided Qaddafi’s arsenal,despoiling it of anti-aircraft weapons that could one day be turned against U.S. or NATO planes.
The radicals may not need Qaddafi’s weapons,as other nations in the area are reportedly replenishing their cache. Rebels in the city of Zintan intercepted a cargo shipment to Belhaj from the nation of Qatar,which Belhaj insisted contained food and milk. Those who opened it say it contained weapons. Taking note of the interference Mohamed Benrasali,a leading figure in the Libyan government,replied,“We are very sorry the Qataris have taken the decision to support Belhaj’s brigade. This will backfire on our Qatari friends.”
Despite Benrasali’s tough talk,one suspects the fire will aimed in his direction.
Qatar was influenced to support the rebels by Sheik Ali Salabi,a Libyan Islamic scholar who lives in the monarchy…. Read more.
Researchers Hack Voting Machine for $26
By Matt Liebowitz
Published September 30, 2011
| TechMediaNetwork
Campaigning for the 2012 presidential race has already begun, but what the candidates don't know is that come election day, hackers could be the ones whose votes have the biggest impact.
Researchers from the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois have developed a hack that, for about $26 and an 8th-grade science education, can remotely manipulate the electronic voting machines used by millions of voters all across the U.S.
In an interview with conservative radio icon Sean Hannity, former President Clinton adviser and campaign manager Dick Morris stated that, after speaking with a Democratic strategist, he thinks it is “very possible” that President Obama might acquiesce to requests from the Democratic leadership in Congress and bow out of the 2012 race, leaving the door open for him to return sometime in the future. [YEAH RIGHT!...PRISON IS WHAT'S IN OBAMA'S FUTURE!]
You may no longer be on active duty, but your duty to defend your fellow soldiers did not end with your DD-214.
An honorable and patriotic retired military officer has been criminally assaulted and deprived of his rights, and is being unlawfully incarcerated by a criminal act of attainder.
And you are now being called back to active duty – to do your level best to right these wrongs and set our fellow warrior free.
Here’s the scenario – in a nutshell:
LDCR Walter Fitzpatrick, III (US Navy-Ret.) was taken by force on a public street on 23 September, 2011 in Monroe County, TN, and thrown in prison under a 6 month sentencing by a corrupt judge in an unlawful court. Here are the facts:
·There were no formal charges against him ever issued;
·No one signed a complaint, and there were no witnesses to any unlawful acts;
·He was charged with an act that was never proven to have occurred, and, in fact, never did occur;
·An unlawfully seated Grand Jury, with no sworn or lawful Grand Jury foreman, presented a No True Bill of a non-crime;
·A warrant was sworn out for LCDR Fitzpatrick’s arrest – for not showing up in court for a hearing that did not need his presence, and he was not even notified of. As a result:
·LCDR Fitzpatrick suffered a home invasion: a ‘no-knock’ forced entry by sheriff’s deputies. The homeowner (LCDR Fitz) resisted the invasion –and was instead assaulted, tasered, and wounded (ear almost torn off), and was himself charged with (counter) assault and resisting arrest.
He was held for 2 months in 2010 under deplorable conditions in the Monroe County jail for resisting that criminal and unwarranted home invasion.
On September 23, 2011, LCDR Fitzpatrick appeared in the Monroe County Court for ‘sentencing’ on a non-crime conviction (not the home invasion) by an unlawful court and an unlawful Judge based on a NO True Bill presentment by an unlawful Grand Jury led by an unlawful and unsworn foreman (Mr. Gary Pettway – ‘foreman’ for 27 years in a row, in violation of TN law that allows for no consecutive 1 year terms, even if lawfully sworn).
LCDR Fitzpatrick read a statement that he did not recognize the Court or the Judge or its validity – based on the foregoing, and walked out.
The Judge sent armed deputies after him, to capture him and bring him back into the unlawful Court, so the Judge could then have the audacity to say, in effect and with unlawful prejudice: I was going to give you Community Service, but since you disrespected this Court, I’m sentencing you to 6 months in prison.
Your assignment is to phone the elected public servants, sworn to uphold the Constitution and the rights of their constituents, to demand that LCDR Fitzpatrick be set free – and the criminal perpetrators be brought to justice:
My name is ____________, and I am calling to inform (Title)(Name) that a fellow (officer)(member of the military) is being unlawfully held by Attainder in the Monroe County jail, and I am demanding that every effort be made, as required by (Title)(Name’s) oath of office, to effect LCDR Fitzpatrick’s immediate release – with a full investigation of the Monroe County Judicial and Law Enforcement systems.
Here are the names and phone numbers of the 5 people to call:
__ Governor Bill Haslam ( 615) 741-2001
__ Lt. Governor Ron Ramsey(615) 741-4524
__ Representative John J. Duncan, Jr. (202) 225-5435
__ Senator Lamar Alexander (202) 224-4944
__ Senator Bob Corker (202) 224-3344
Additionally, please send a note to Lt. Commander Walt Fitzpatrick so he knows he has support and is not forgotten and that his continued service to our country, his courage and persistence are greatly appreciated. The address where letters can be sent can be foundhere.
More details and contact numbers can be found here: Contacts Made on Behalf of Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III -
P.S. There are over 25 million veterans alive today in America. 1 million calls is all we ask.
P.P.S. You don’t have to be a veteran to make those calls. With over 100 million patriotic Americans still alive and well, lets burn up those phone lines.
"FIRST LADY" SLUMMING AT TARGET (...WAL-MART NEXT?)
...THOUGHT SAKS OR NORDSTROMS WAS MORE HER STYLE
...ANYWAY MORE PHONY PR FROM AMERICA'S NO.1 GRIFTERS
Why is the cart almost empty?...yet she is carrying two or three bags in her hand while pushing the cart. Photo op stuff?
Why has no one noticed her? She's big as a horse, wears shades and a baseball cap and has obviously just come out of the checker aisle where she must have been for several minutes.
AND HOW MANY AMERICANS ARE ASKING THE SAME THING? September 29, 2011 New Hampshire State Representative Harry Accornero has charged Barack Hussein Obama with treason Editor, Why is it our elected Representatives in Congress do not...
Employer Linda Jordan on TruNewsRadio: Obama's Connecticut Social Security Number Failed E-Verify System - VIDEO HERE Failed E-Verify Letter to Barack Obama From Linda Jordan - Obama's Connecticut...
There are basically three schools of thought regarding the removal of the current illegal resident of our White House: removal through arrest, removal through impeachment, and removal through the election process. While each school maintains its particular points of belief, the beliefs of the first two schools have not been able to gain much traction beyond the "what should be" crowd. While the "what should be" group fully understands that Obama's acts of fraud and forgery are sufficient for his arrest or impeachment, those with the duty and the authority to act, stubbornly and wrongfully retain membership in the "what is" club, refusing to uphold their oaths of office to defend the Constitution.
The third school is the most constitutionally troubling, as those within it typically cast aside the legal concerns about Obama's ineligibility, and contend that there are many other more pressing issues for us to address, and that we should just concentrate on getting him voted out of office. What these milquetoasts apparently fail to understand is that there is no more important issue than the fact that our Constitution has been trampled upon, for if one clause of the Constitution is rendered of no effect, then the entire document is thus desecrated.
More important than the specific offenders in this multi-layered crime serving time for their transgressions (and yes, there should be prison time for those who helped propagate this calamity) is the vital matter of precedent. If we simply allow this fraudulent "presidency" to stand, it will provide the template for future constitutionally ineligible individuals to usurp the highest office in our land, as well as bolster the efforts of liberals who have been trying for years to remove this significant requirement from our Constitution altogether.
Because we are navigating previously uncharted territory as a nation, we must determine the legal principles that apply, and proceed based upon those; however, we must not fool ourselves into thinking this journey will be an easy one, as the miscreants in Congress will likely try to continue their complicit stonewalling. We must be indefatigable in our resolve to right this heinous wrong.
In a marriage that was the product of coercion or fraud, the rightful legal remedy is annulment. In such cases, the offended party is returned to the condition that existed before the fraudulent act was perpetrated, and thus, in the eyes of the law, it is viewed as never having happened in the first place. As fraud has been the entire basis of Barack Obama's illegal tenure in the White House, the offended party (America) is rightfully owed the equivalent of an annulment, which, legally, would put us back to the condition that existed before January 20, 2009.
Of course, there are many things that have occurred since that fateful day in 2009 that simply could not be undone, but, based upon the massive fraud of this "presidency," every piece of legislation, every executive order, and every appointment, that can be reversed, must be. Not one piece of this illegal administration can be allowed to stand, to the extent that each piece can be undone. Yes, we're talking about a nightmare maze of heretofore unknown proportions, but this is America, and we are governed by the rule of law—regardless of the consequences.
In light of this understanding, The Birther Summit has considered its necessary function, and has determined that it must prepare itself for a much broader role in addressing this national nightmare. Accordingly, a foundation was hired to establish a new 501(c)4 non-profit organization that will soon absorb The Birther Summit as but one of its initiatives.
The new entity, Vatteligibility, Inc., will promote public education and awareness of this constitutional issue, as well as serve as a fundraising organization to support other individuals and groups who will work to rectify this abatement of the law. From bringing the guilty parties to justice through the courts, to advocating and accomplishing the nullification of every illegal act performed by this administration, Vatteligibility, Inc. will work to help provide the necessary revenues these tasks will require. This will be a massive undertaking, and will certainly not be realized in a short period of time.
As a pronunciation aid, this name is a combining of the words "Vattel" and "Eligibility." Simply say "Vattel-igibility."
As the Board of Directors works with the hired foundation to complete all the necessary documentation, The Birther Summit will continue its daily operations until it is absorbed by, and becomes an initiative of Vatteligibility, Inc.; but we believe the entire process will be seamless and virtually unnoticeable.
Vatteligibility has established its first presence on the Internet with the website www.obamasgottago.org, with "Obama's Gotta Go" being the organization's first informational/fundraising campaign.
A new report prepared by Russian Deputy Finance Minister Tatyana Nesterenko about the Eurogroup meeting of the Informal Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) in Wroclaw Poland on the growing European debt crisis states that EU Finance Ministers were “left stunned” Friday after they were told by US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner that President Obama was “not in charge.”
According to this report, the “uninvited” US Treasury Secretary showed up at the ECOFIN conference and engaged in what can only be described as a “temper tantrum” where he slammed Europe’s economic policy makers for their intransigence in provided further bailouts to Greece and when queried by European Central Bank (ECB) Chief Jean-Claude Trichet as to if this was “Obama’s position too” was told by Geithner, “He’s (Obama) not in charge, I am.” Post Continues on usahitman.com (CLICK TO READ REST OF AR TICLE)
If David Brooks at The New York Times feels he was taken for a ‘sap’ by Barack Obama, we shudder to think how everyday Americans will feel, once they find out the Truth. Obama’s Mother And Son photo was falsified to deceive us.
Courtesy, The Obama Campaign
Recognize it? Yes, that’s the same photo as was used on the cover of Janny Scott’s A Singular Woman, her biography of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother.
It’s the same photo Obama used in his Obamacare television ad.
So what’s the big deal? In a moment, we’ll tell you. For now, all you need to understand is this: The photo was falsified to deceive us.
Truth is, mama Stanley Ann didn’t have long hair when Barack was young. Until, of course, with photoshop-type tampering, The Obama Campaign made sure we’d think that she did.
Here’s a peek into Truth. All that darkness, making us think we’re seeing long hair, is nothing but graphics illusion:
Another reality-check:
As if the deceit with her hair weren’t insulting enough, in the view below, note the futzing with the corner of her mouth, in order to widen it. See the [pink] added tooth. Look closely, you’ll see her original top lip line, curving down to the last white tooth – and the fake new lip lines, extending past the fake, pointy, pink tooth … And while you’re looking, don’t miss the fake ‘closed’ eyelid applied to her open eye.
Her nose, we’ll leave for another discussion.
Hey, David Brooks: you’re in sap good company.
Now, you may be wondering: why does it matter, whether mama’s hair was short or long? Whether her mouth was narrow or wide? Or why her eyes seem always half-closed, and hidden?
Here’s why: Obama was worried you’d find her in places, at key strategic times, with people he couldn’t let you know about.
People like Malcolm X. Times like the early and mid-1960′s. Places like New York City.
For instance – what if you saw this image? The image of his mother, Stanley Ann, in February 1965, at the wake / funeral of militant black leader, Malcolm X?
What if you recognized her?
Obama sure as heck wouldn’t want you to view the video in which her image resides: “Eyewitness To The Assassination”
Why not? Because though he claims his mother was thousands of miles away in Hawaii, the fact is,there Stanley Ann was in New York City, February 1965, there, right there, at Malcolm X’s wake and funeral.
So it just may be that Barack Obama’s father isn’t Barack Obama “Sr”, after all.
The Truth lies in the long and short of it. Of Stanley Ann’s Hair, that is.
Take a moment to view the video again. As you do, note Stanley Ann’s “habit of tilting her head to one side” as documented in The Telegraph article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/8534532/Barack-Obamas-mother-the-hidden-influence-on-the-American-president.html
While you’re watching, see if you can’t recognize Stanley Ann’s boyish-looking appearance, and her weight struggle, as noted by Tribune national correspondent Tim Jones: [http://www.courant.com/technology/chi-0703270151mar27-archive,0,6704277.story ] “Boyish-looking, Stanley Ann … didn’t like her nose, she worried about her weight”.
If you need extra confirmation, take a few moments and study these two youthful photos of Stanley Ann, also released by The Obama Campaign.
In the first image, though her eyelids have also been altered [pulled down, with the skin above them highlighted], her lips extended, and her chin sharpened into a point, take note of the basic shape of her face, her nose and her ears. And don’t miss those eyes, those big, dark, penetrating eyes – which, by the way, also have been altered.
Courtesy, The Obama Campaign
The next photo depicts her mouth more accurately – once you get beyond the tampering that’s been done to her lips [and to her eyes, and big-time to her nose]:
Courtesy, The Obama Campaign
Honestly, have you ever seen a girl with two such mismatched eyes?!
Try as The Obama Campaign did to occlude it, Truth will out, won’t it? From the “Eyewitness To The Assassination” video: witness Stanley Ann’s grin:
From the Campaign’s own photo, posted above, excusing the efforts to widen her mouth, here’s that same grin:
Hmmm.
Did you ever wonder why The Obama Campaign never issued video footage of his mother? The eyewitness video tells it all: Obama’s mother’s mannerisms and facial tics, as well as the way she moves her mouth, are distinctive, easily recognizable in this Malcolm X funeral footage.
Oh dear. There’s only so much a Campaign can control.
If you’re not yet fed up, and can stand it, study mama’s hairline in official photos. The ‘widow’s peak’ dip on her forehead, to the right of her nose. The idiosyncratic ‘quarter moon’ curve demonstrated in her hairline profile – which by the way can be verified by The Obama Campaign’s official Mother And Son photo, above.
At first, you may not recognize Stanley Ann, with her hair cropped close. Not to worry. After all, The Obama Campaign has spent more than four years convincing us that she had long hair.
Don’t let the image-changers’ drooping her eyelids, or layering false hair, or reshaping her nose and mouth and chin, or casting false shadows or light fool you. The Truth is in her false hair. And in her eyes – her big, dark, penetrating eyes.
Hey, Time magazine: Are “We All Saps” yet?
In closing, think about this: in the “Eyewitness To The Assassination” video, Stanley Ann, standing beside the speaker, is traumatized. Why?
Because her lover, her idol, the father of her son Barack – Malcolm X – had just been assassinated.
Still don’t believe it’s she? You don’t have to take our word for it.
Malcolm X scholar Manning Marable, in his April 2011 biography, states that Malcolm’s “teenage lover” was seated in the front row at the time of the shooting. The eyewitness in the video states that he was in the front row. In this footage, mama Stanley Ann stands comfortably at this man’s side.
To make the story steamier: Marable further states that Malcolm’s “teenage lover” had been having an affair with one of his entourage [guards, assistants, etc.] This speaker could be the man to whom Marable refers.
America is starved for answers, ravenous for Truth. America, where the media is more afraid of printing Truth than they are of printing lies. Why?
And why would Obama hide his origins?
Because having a biological father like Malcolm X – a radical black nationalist – would have impeded Obama’s chance for election.
Still not convinced that’s Stanley Ann at Malcolm’s wake? Then answer this: in family photos for a Presidential Campaign, why would a candidate release tampered images of his mother?
Can you give us one solid reason?
And oh, all ye defenders of darkness – in case you’re thinking of flaunting the Riverhead Books version of the Mother And Son photo – the one with the background tastefully tinted grass-green behind her neck, to hide the Truth about her hair – you needn’t bother. We know all about it.
WILL ONE COUNTY SHERIFF UPHOLD HIS OATH TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION? September 29, 2011 Sheriff Joe Arpaio has recently promised to open an inquiry into the birth certificate released by Barack Hussein Obama on April...
Ben Johnson,The White House Watch
When asked what policy would most benefit the citizens of east Tennessee and help put the Volunteer State back to work,one state Senate candidate had a simple answer:impeach Barack Obama.
The Knoxville News Sentinel gave the three women seeking the Republican nomination a questionnaire asking if they could be guaranteed of passing just one law,what would they choose? Victoria DeFreese,a 37-year-old teacher and former Knox County Commissioner,responded:
Because the federal government manages the macro-economy and that impacts all states,if I could introduce one piece of legislation that would be ensured passage,I would suggest a resolution calling for the impeachment of President Obama. If we could join with other states and pursue that,that is what I would like to do.
DeFreese is seeking Tennessee’s 6th district state Senate seat being vacated by Jamie Woodson,who has served in the Senate since 2005 and is presently Speaker Pro Tem. Republican voters will weigh in today on the decision.
A lifelong educator who is certified as a “highly qualified”teacher with the State of Tennessee,DeFreese says she chose to homeschool her four children based on the advice of Dr. James Dobson. As a supporter of educational choice,she favors taxpayer funding of some private schools,saying “it would be a good move to allow tax dollars to follow the parents’choice.”She opposes the No Child Left Behind Act.
DeFreese is an across-the-board conservative who has called for punitive measures against the employers of illegal immigrants,cutting spending and regulation,and upholding states’rights in light of new “unconstitutional health care plans from the Obama Administration.”She opposes eminent domain,supports the direct election of judges,and has expressed “100 percent support”for the Second Amendment. She alone of the three candidates supports a student’s right to keep and bear arms on Tennessee’s college campuses. DeFreese also boasts a 100 percent pro-life record.
In Tennessee,as everywhere else in the country,jobs are the top issue on voters’minds. She would encourage growth through…. Read more,and see videos at the link.
“STRATEGY OF A MANUFACTURED CRISIS” September 28, 2011 Dear Editor: The following letter was sent to an Iowa sheriff: From: Neil Sankey Sent: Wed 9/28/11 2:38 PM To: lpulkrab@co.johnson.ia.us Dear Sheriff, So far, the collective... September 28 2011 / Read More »
Taitz v Astrue, Reply to Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration, Obama's E-Verified Failed Connecticut Social Security Number
Request for Oral argument to be held within 20 days
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (Hereinafter “Taitz”) submits this reply to opposition to motion for reconsideration and respectfully requests emergency hearing and oral argument on the merits within 20 days, based on newly discovered information and based on an assertion of clear error and manifest injustice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is based on the instant Memorandum of points and authorities, exhibits herein, and any matters present at oral argument.
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Opposition by the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue did not oppose any substantive points of the motion for reconsideration and the motion should be considered unopposed on the merits. In case the court believes, that the substantive points were addressed, the Plaintiff provides the following argument in reply to opposition and in support for motion for reconsideration.
EMERGENCY CITUATION
Defendant Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security administration through his attorneys, Department of Justice-US Attorneys' office, is claiming that the fact that Barack Obama, an individual without a valid social security number according to e-verify, is occupying the position of the US president and Commander in Chief, does not represent an emergency situation and therefore there should not be a reconsideration.
In response Plaintiff herein is using Your Honors' own lexicon: "They are either toying with the nation or showing their stupidity".
Taitz provided irrefutable evidence, showing that Barack Hussein Obama has used in his tax returns and his selective service a Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-verify. Even without e-verify, fraud is evident, as the number starts with 042, a number sequence assigned to the state of CT, where Obama never resided. Can our Commissioner of Social Security and our Department of Justice led by Eric Holder be so completely brain dead to suggest, that having a criminal with a stolen social security number and a forged birth certificate and an unknown allegiance does not represent an emergency?
For Michael Astrue, a licensed attorney, Commissioner of Social Security Administration; for the US attorneys, representing him, to even suggest, that there is no “legitimate public interest” in knowing whether we have a criminal in the White House with a fraudulently obtained Social Security number, is simply unthinkable, it represents a total lack of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, that they were sworn to protect. This behavior by the Commissioner of the Social Security administration and US attorneys representing him, is simply criminal, it simply amounts to obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting Social Security fraud and possibly treason against the United States of America. If this is not an emergency, what is, if there is no public interest in knowing, whether we have a criminal in the White House, when is there a public interest? Can there be a more dire emergency? We have a breach of the national security in the highest office in the land, and our Department of Justice does not grasp that this is an emergency?
It is hard to believe that we have such an unprecedented stupidity, therefore we are left to deduct, that we have an unprecedented level of corruption in all three brunches of our government, which allows this crime to go on for nearly three years. Specifically because it is the highest level of emergency, we need Your Honor to address the evidence and reconsider the motion for summary judgment.
‘Obama may not be a natural born citizen … Why would anyone let him get away with the crime of the century?’
SEATTLE – After Linda Jordan, a Seattle resident, entered Obama’s name, birth date and Social Security number into the E-Verify system, a system set up to determine employment eligibility, she received a “Notice of Mismatch with the Social Security Administration Records.”
Over the weekend, Jordan, as per the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, followed through by mailing a letter to Obama informing him of the no-match notice; requested he confirm his name and SSN, and asked that he confirm or correct his citizenship status, which she entered into E-Verify along with his name, birth date and SSN.
Jordan stated, “As one of your employers I used due diligence attempting to find a copy of your I-9 on the White House website and other public records websites and could not. I am including one for you to fill out so I can keep it on file as required by law.”
Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, is what every employee hired after Nov. 6, 1986 must fill out upon being hired.
Section 1 of the form asks for the employee’s name, birth date, address and SSN. It also asks the employee to attest, under penalty of perjury, that he is one of the following: a citizen of the United States, a non-citizen national of the United States, a lawful permanent resident (Alien #), or an alien authorized to work (Alien # or Admission #) until (expiration date, if applicable – month/day/year).
The employee signs the form acknowledging: “I am aware that federal law provides for imprisonment and/or fines for false statements or use of false documents in connection with the completion of this form.”
The Form I-9 also requires the employer to examine one document from List A or, examine one document from List B and one from List C, as listed on the back of the form.
The employer then fills out and signs Section 2 of the form, attesting, under penalty of perjury, that he has examined the documents listed as presented by the employee, that the document(s) appear to be genuine and to relate to the employee named, that the employee began employment on (date) and that to the best of the employer’s knowledge the employee is eligible to work in the United States.
Last year, while still seeking an explanation for Obama’s use of a Connecticut-issued SSN, issued around April or May 1977, while Obama was attending high school in Honolulu, I queried a congressional aide to find out if elected representatives were required to fill out a Form I-9 upon being elected to office and placed on the U.S. taxpayer-funded payroll.
Member Services for the U.S. House of Representatives responded by saying elected officials were not required to fill out a Form I-9.
The reason given for not requiring a Form I-9 was because the Constitution requires anyone who runs for a seat in the House to be a U.S. citizen for a minimum of seven years. And, when a person runs for office, they must file proof with their state’s election office that they meet the requirements of the office.
However, that proof appears to only be a sworn statement by the candidate that he’s eligible for the office he seeks and no one appears to be responsible, as are employers in the private sector, for certifying, under penalty of perjury, that they’ve examined any documents and that the documents appear genuine and relate to the candidate, who simply signs a document swearing to his eligibility.
There is also no apparent law or written policy that exempts elected officials on taxpayer-funded payrolls from the requirements outlined in the IRCA, including filling out a Form I-9.
Jordan took her quest one step further on Monday and sent letters to members of Congress.
Dismayed, in light of all the credible evidence indicating Obama is “a fraud, a fake and a forger,” Jordan stated, “And, there wasn’t one single person with the legal responsibility and authority to protect our nation from this usurper, who was willing to do their job.”
Jordan noted there wasn’t a single “Catch-Me-If-You-Can” FBI agent, anyone in the CIA or the military, not a single judge or attorney general, senator or representative, no one in the Social Security Administration, the Hawaii Department of Health or the Federal Elections Department – nobody, and said, “Nobody cared for our republic.”
Because the Notice of Mismatch flagged Obama’s SSN with an indicator code reserved for cases of fraud, Jordan said she will pursue this matter until she gets the truth, and wrote, “Obama may not be a natural born citizen but he is a natural born liar. Why would anyone let him get away with the crime of the century?”
The Republicans have been squabbling over potential candidates for the 2012 presidential poll, lurching between established party figures and outsiders to nail down a conservative who can beat Barack Obama.
But the party’s leaders and grass roots collectively swoon over the person they believe makes the ideal choice for vice-president, a Florida senator who has been on the national stage for barely a year.
I called Lieberman's office to discuss Obama's SS number and the staff person told me this:
To paraphrase and summarize: "Everything about Obama's eligibility and and criminal charges has been debunked and this office is not talking about it, we have moved on."
Granted Lieberman is a Democrat...or is he an Independent, which I think might be the same thing,.....but a Repub would have likely been no different.
Anyway, for all practical purposes it sounded as if the office was even trying to tell me any future evidence had already been debunked.
Leah Durant,FloydReports.com
This week marks the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation’s 41st Annual Legislative Conference,which was be held on September 23,2011,in Washington,D.C. Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas served as the host. The title of the conference was,“African-Americans:Joining the Leading Edge of the High Tech Boom!”and the conference was slated to touch upon a number of high tech subjects. Unfortunately,the conference would not address mass immigration,a policy that has had many negative repercussions for the black community.
The Congressional Black Caucus and its partners in the Obama administration are both guilty of pursuing immigration policies that worsen the country’s economic crisis. The Obama administration announced last month that it will adopt a case-by-case review process for the approximately 300,000 illegal immigrants currently facing possible expulsion from the U.S. The administration will concentrate its efforts on deporting illegal immigrants with criminal convictions and will essentially pardon what it deems as “low-priority cases.”
Jackson-Lee and her colleagues in the CBC have also supported a number of wrongheaded immigration policies in the last decade. In 2005,Jackson-Lee supported “Save America Comprehensive Immigration Act”(H.R. 2092),a bill that would have granted legalization to aliens who have resided in the U.S. for five years,who demonstrate knowledge of English,who have no criminal convictions,and who complete 40 hours of community service. This bill has been resurrected in subsequent years while maintaining strong electoral support from CBC members. The “Comprehensive Immigration Act”is just another egregious attempt to court a subset of voters while creating programs that reward unlawful behavior and further endanger American workers. African-American workers are likely the demographic group most harmed by our failure to protect the borders and enact aggressive workplace penalties. The unemployment rate for African-Americans surged to…. Read more.
For the past six months, retired Army Colonel Lawrence Sellin has been writing columns here at Canada Free Press (CFP), averaging around three per week. His columns have been studiously focused on the subject of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States.
Skip Tracer Al Hendershot Video Promo Linking Barack Hussein Obama II and Harrison J. BounelExplosive New Cook County, Illinois Property Tax Records Released Skip Tracer Al Hendershot Jr. performs...
UPDATE: CDR CHARLES KERCHNER (RET) TO REPRESENT THE BIRTHER SUMMIT AT THE VALUES VOTERS SUMMIT UPDATE: CPT PAMELA BARNETT (RET) WILL ALSO REPRESENT THE BIRTHER SUMMIT AT THE VALUES VOTER SUMMIT
The Birther Summit's Executive Director, Dean Haskins, will be attending the Value Voters Summit in Washington, DC October 7-9, and will be on hand to discuss the various issues surrounding Barack Obama's ineligibility to be president of the United States, as well as the initiatives of The Birther Summit.
It is The Birther Summit's position that those who will attend this event are precisely the people who should be the most vocal about the constitutional subversion and blatantly fraudulent acts that have been perpetrated upon the American people, so it is essential that The Birther Summit be represented at this event as part of our ongoing efforts of citizen education and raising public awareness of this crucial matter.
Mr. Haskins will be available for interview or discussion at the Omni Hotel from Wednesday evening October 6 until after the Faith, Family, and Freedom Gala Dinner Saturday evening October 8. To arrange a meeting, please contact him at the information provided above. UPDATE: Commander Charles Kerchner (Ret) has agreed to provide additional representation for The Birther Summit at the Values Voters Summit. As detailed on The Birther Summit website, Commander Kerchner took a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and feels it is his duty to support and defend the United States Constitution pursuant to that oath.
Commander Kerchner the lead plaintiff and his co-plaintiffs in the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al maintained in the Twelve Counts in their lawsuit filed by Attorney Mario Apuzzo that the putative president, Barack Hussein Obama, is not a "natural born Citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution and that no one in the election process, including the U.S. Congress which had a duty to investigate the charges against Obama's eligibility (as they did for similar charges against McCain) has fully investigated Obama's hidden and sealed original records as to his early life and have not vetted Obama's Article II eligibility to constitutional standards.
Please visit CDR Kerchner's Org Website: www.protectourliberty.org and his blog: http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com UPDATE: The Birther Summit is pleased to announce the addition of CPT Pamela Barnett (Ret) to our list of representatives who will attend the upcoming Values Voters Summit. As her website states, CPT Barnett is “suing Obama to force the release of all records that will reveal all of his different citizenships. According to Obama’s website he is a “native born” citizen, not a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN as required by the U.S. Constitution. Are we a nation of laws?”
She “attended both the Obama, Columbia treason trial in Harlem, NY, and the court martial trial of LTC Terrence Lakin. Also, was a regional campaign manager for Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. I have an active lawsuit in California (pro se, non-attorney) suing the Secretary of State and Jerry Brown for election fraud in the 2008 general election and the 2010 primary.”
Barnett is also the author of the soon-to-be-released book Never Vetted/Unlawful President The Loophole in our Democracy. Her website is www.unlawfulpresident.com.
###
If you would like more information about the Birther Summit, please visit our website often at www.birthersummit.org.
Are you willing to continue the fight for freedom for our Posterity?
As people who believe in the principles and philosophies of the United States Constitution, we number in the majority. As folks that dare to consider standing against the tyranny being perpetrated by the Obama administration, we are in the majority across this great country. But the clock is ticking. Will we continue to entertain the idea that sitting on the couch complaining as we watch the news on television is an effective strategy, or are we ready to take action, and do more than rally at Tea Party events, or occasionally write an email to our representatives? Are we ready to do more than complain? Are we willing to, as the signers of the Declaration of Independence stated in the last sentence of the document, put on the line our “Lives, Fortunes, and sacred Honor?”
Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. - E. Vattel
JUST HOW DEVIOUS AND CORRUPT IS OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF MISCREANTS, PERVERTS AND LIARS?
Keeping Track of Obama Lies, Broken Promises
By Peter Andrew – ConservativeAmerican.org – Leading the way Right.
“President Obama is himself a broken promise. The love affair Americans had with the idea of the beautiful racial harmony we would get if we elected a half-black man to the White House has been ruined by the reality that President Obama means nothing that he says and intends to keep none of his promises.” – David Kraemer, ConservativeAmerican.org
The list below contains all of the Obama Administration mistakes, blunders, broken promises, flip flops, gaffes, lies, etc. That’s too long of a name, so we called it “the Official Obama Administration Scandals List.” This list covers Barack Obama and his pals from day one through September 4th, 2011. At that point, the list was discontinued. However, you can see information on more recent scandals on our NEW Obama Scandals List by clicking here! We present this list to you as an accurate and complete historic detail of the Legacy of Lies President Obama leaves behind for the time period starting with his youth and going until September 4th, 2011. Not responsible for any broken or out-of-date links. They worked when we posted them. Some may redirect you to the wayback machine.
You can visit all the pages of the Official Obama Administration Scandals List!
Pending an acceptable outcome of the vitally-important 2014 election—which affords the opportunity to elect a Congress that is willing to initiate impeachment proceedings against Barack Hussein Obama, and thereby stop, or even remove from office, this fraudulent usurper and his inner circle of collaborators—We the People of the United States of America affirm our allegiance to the timeless principles upon which our nation was founded, as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and upon the foundation of those principles, declare the causes which impel us to seek this despotic president's impeachment and removal.
We hereby allege that the history of the current President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over the American people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world—
ARTICLE 1—Contempt for the Constitution
Mr. Obama has engaged, throughout his despotic tenure as president, in rule by edict and executive decree, bypassing Congress, and thus the will of the people, to enforce policies entirely of his own creation. Ignoring the federal government's foundation of a separation of powers, he has routinely violated duly enacted statutes of the Legislature, as well as defied the Courts, in pursuit of ultimate supremacy over the United States of America. In so doing, he has exhibited an unmistakable pattern of contempt for the U.S. Constitution, which prior to his ruinous tenure had served two centuries as the Law of the Land.
We therefore demand that this criminal, treasonous individual be removed from office without delay and held accountable for his destructive behavior, and that all his unlawful acts as president be considered of no effect or validity. We believe that the only effective way to achieve this urgent goal is to initiate impeachment.
ARTICLE 2—False pretenses
Mr. Obama has attained the office of president in a verifiably fraudulent and criminal manner, and upon a false identity and false pretenses.
We therefore demand immediate release of all currently sealed documentation of who he is; what his true history entails; what his earlier school, travel, and other records reveal about him; what his original (not photocopied) birth certificate makes clear; and all other relevant information in the public record now suppressed or intentionally falsified regarding him. We the People of the United States have a right to know such things about a man who currently serves as Commander-in-Chief of our nation's armed forces and oversees the entire Executive Branch of the U.S. government. We believe that the only effective way to force release of these records is impeachment.
ARTICLE 3—Criminal fraud
Upon taking office, Mr. Obama criminally defrauded Congress and the American people with false promises, uttered repeatedly in the public record about the nature, scope, and effect of his signature legislative achievement, "Obamacare," in a deceptive effort to gain passage of this catastrophic measure, which authorizes a sweeping federal takeover of America's healthcare industry.
We therefore demand that this healthcare travesty be immediately revoked, defunded, and declared null and void, and that this president be held accountable for intentionally misleading and defrauding the citizenry by means of this insidious scheme—a scheme that has already diminished the rightful choice of most Americans regarding their healthcare, has caused millions to lose their jobs due to its workplace requirements, and will cost our nation its material viability and vitality if allowed to go forward. We believe that the only effective way to ensure the dismantling of Obamacare is impeachment.
ARTICLE 4—Deliberate bankrupting of the U.S.
In a deliberate scheme to force the financial collapse of the United States, Mr. Obama and his collaborators have pushed the nation's "public debt"—that is, the difference between public spending and public receipts—to an unsustainable 17 TRILLION dollars, an amount exceeding our nation's Gross Domestic Product (or total value of goods and services) and more than doubling the debt's previous rate of growth. The effect is to impose an indebtedness of over $50,000 upon every man, woman, and child in the U.S., and more than $150,000 per taxpayer, numbers that indicate the U.S. is headed toward insolvency and our posterity will be forced to bear the dire consequences. The effect is even more dire when "unfunded liabilities" are factored in.
We therefore demand that the individual behind this destructive scheme assume all liability, upon his own person, for the amount the national debt has increased during his tenure, in company with all others who have collaborated with him in the Executive and Legislative Branches of the federal government in enacting this policy, listing them by name, and that the American people at large be absolved—by binding decree—of any and all liability for such wanton abuse of the public purse. We believe that the only effective way to attain such simple, reasonable justice is impeachment.
ARTICLE 5—Treasonous national security policy
By insidious design and outright treachery, Mr. Obama has dangerously weakened America's national security—through his emasculation of our military; his unilateral reduction of our missile defense system, thereby weakening American military superiority and inviting nuclear conflagration at home and abroad; his deceitful promotion and arming of radical Islamic interests in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and elsewhere; his catering, in domestic and foreign policy, to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is on record seeking the destruction of the United States; his fraudulent relations with Iran that will likely ensure this radically hostile nation succeeds in developing nuclear weapons; his continuing disregard for the vital interests of longtime American ally Israel; his unreasonable handicapping of our military's rules of engagement, dangerously favoring America's enemies; his alarming pattern of dismissing high-ranking military officers for groundless or superficial reasons; and similar anti-American policies and actions too numerous to mention.
We therefore demand that the Obama administration be forced immediately to cease and desist from its treasonous, unconstitutional, conspiratorial plot to take down America, and our allies with it, and that a sane, pro-American policy be adopted in its place for the purpose of protecting our nation from all threats to its continuance. We believe that the only effective way to enforce this urgent demand is impeachment.
ARTICLE 6—Treasonous cover-up of Benghazi
Mr. Obama has deceitfully sought to cover up his administration's involvement in a covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, that ran afoul September 11, 2012. The president's fabricated narrative of the causes and nature of the episode, which resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans, has been shown to be a cynical attempt to divert attention from what actually happened, including reports of treasonable administration dealings with terrorist insurgents in Syria. The administration's interference with investigations by Congress into the matter, and its the muzzling of witnesses and participants, hints that only the tip of the iceberg has yet been revealed regarding Mr. Obama's contemptuous behavior and dereliction of duty in this bloodstained scandal.
We therefore demand that all witnesses who have firsthand knowledge of the truth regarding the Benghazi fiasco be permitted to come forth without threat of retaliation and give their account of any and all relevant facts—including mounting evidence of Obama administration sympathy for Islamic terrorist organizations. We believe that the only effective way to ensure such unsuppressed testimony is impeachment.
ARTICLE 7—Plot to disarm the citizenry
Mr. Obama has repeatedly attempted to take advantage of isolated acts of violence in our nation involving firearms in the hands of deranged individuals to deprive law-abiding Americans of their constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms, in a direct assault on the Second Amendment by someone who himself poses a growing threat to the security and well-being of our nation; and he has repeatedly made known his intention to succeed with his unconstitutional goal of disarming the people despite any setbacks he may encounter in Congress. So intent is he on imposing gun control that he even engaged in a deadly gunrunning hoax known as "Fast and Furious" to incite sympathy for tightening U.S. gun laws, then invoked executive privilege to cover up his administration's criminal involvement. He and his administration have also withheld or destroyed vital physical evidence that would corroborate events at Newtown, CT, in which 20 schoolchildren and six adults were reportedly killed by a disturbed gunman with an assault rifle—an incident the president has shamelessly exploited in his push for oppressive new gun legislation.
We therefore demand that the president immediately abandon such pursuit of tyranny and seek refuge in a nation more to his liking, one that already bans, or severely restricts, gun ownership by law-abiding citizens in consequence of despotic notions of governance. We believe that the only way to hasten this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 8—Undermining U.S. border security
Similarly, Mr. Obama has repeatedly sought to undermine U.S. border security, and by extension America's very independence, by pushing misnamed "immigration reform" that would in reality open wide our borders, overburden the public coffers, and grant amnesty to the many millions of unlawful occupiers who have entered the country by stealth. Unable to achieve this agenda lawfully, through Congress, he has undertaken to achieve it dictatorially, in open violation of the Constitution and statutory immigration law. Ostensibly, the president intends, by his abandonment of longstanding U.S. immigration policy, to create a permanent under-culture of dependent immigrants who have little allegiance to America's founding ideals, upon whom to stand to remain in power indefinitely—either by himself, or in the person of likeminded schemers within his party.
We therefore demand that our nation's borders be made effectively secure, that existing immigration laws be reasonably and fairly enforced, that all persons seeking citizenship play fundamentally by the same rules, no matter the petitioners' origins, and that Mr. Obama's immigration policy and initiatives be rejected by Congress as the threat they are to our nation's security and strength, with his deceptive drive for "immigration reform" relegated permanently to the backwaters of history. We believe that the only way to ensure this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 9—Engaging in mass surveillance
Mr. Obama has engaged in notorious overreach regarding domestic surveillance. A certain degree of targeted domestic surveillance may be considered justified, even essential, to protect American citizens from harm if conducted with appropriate oversight and in harmony with reasonable law—but indiscriminate spying on all citizens is indefensible and constitutes the very essence of a police state.
We therefore demand that the routine eavesdropping now being conducted by the National Security Agency (NSA) be curtailed to conform with appropriate safeguards, to permit only those functions that can be constitutionally defended. We believe that the only way to leverage this outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 10—Abusing IRS authority
Likewise, Mr. Obama and his IRS subordinates have notoriously abused the public trust by singling out, and arbitrarily penalizing, patriotic organizations awaiting approval of tax-exempt status so they might fundraise legally. By delaying approvals and sharing confidential information with potential adversaries, for purely political reasons, the Obama administration has violated federal statutes, and unlawfully handicapped these groups in their efforts to counter Mr. Obama's tyranny.
We therefore demand substantial monetary damages for these aggrieved organizations, and expedited approval of all "Tea Party," "conservative," and "libertarian" groups in the future. More to the point, because of its unavoidably political nature, we seek abolition of the IRS itself, and its replacement by a reasonable consumption or flat tax. We believe that the only way to bring about such an outcome is impeachment.
ARTICLE 11—Subverting America's morality
Most far-reaching and adverse of all his insidious deeds, in the acknowledged biblical perspective of our Creator, is that Mr. Obama has undertaken to subvert America's moral strength and means of perpetuation by promoting measures that weaken the natural, God-ordained family, and escalate the unthinkable aborting of America's posterity. As part of this corrupt effort, he has sanctioned the unconstitutional silencing of conscientious citizens and clergy who oppose homosexuality and its growing inclusion in lawful marriage; and he has approved stipulations in his healthcare plan that would force Americans opposed to abortion, or to anything related involving abortifacients or contraceptives, to directly fund such morally-offensive practices. These immoral, destructive policies—integral to the president's sweeping plan to transform America—militate not only against the Constitution, but the foundations of Judeo-Christianity upon which America is historically premised, to which the president appears to have an aversion.
We therefore demand that biblical morality be once again allowed the place of respect it has long enjoyed at the center of our nation's culture—on its own merits, without federal interference of any kind that would violate the First Amendment. We also call for immediately ending the moral and material travesty known as "Obamacare," including any requirement that American citizens or businesses personally underwrite abortion. We believe that the best way to ensure this fortuitous outcome, and reverse these federally-enforced intrusions, is the president's impeachment.
In every stage of these and other oppressions that could be cited, we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms—but our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury and blatant lies. A fraudulent usurper whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people, much less their president.
We the People, therefore, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare, that because Barack Hussein Obama has verifiably corrupted, compromised, and endangered the essential institutions of the American Republic, as well as threatened the nation's very survival, we hereby appeal to the next Congress of the United States—which will convene in January 2015—to begin impeachment proceedings against Mr. Obama, and his fellow lawbreakers and facilitators within the Executive Branch, for the purpose of removing them from office with all diligence.
For the support of this action, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, We the People mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor, to save our beloved nation and preserve the rights and freedoms bequeathed us by God and protected by our revered Constitution.
These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read at various web sites such as:
The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.
If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.
By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.
MCSO Cold-Case Posse P.O. Box 74374 Phoenix, Arizona 85087
Translate
THE TERRY LAKIN STORY
Barack Obama is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” and is thus constitutionally ineligible to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military. Obama was born to a FOREIGN NATIONAL FATHER who was NEVER a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. For no other U.S. President in the history of the nation since the founding generation (who were exempt from the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution via a grandfather clause in Article II Section 1) was that the case, i.e., having a foreign national father who was never a U.S. Citizen or even an immigrant to this country. Obama being seated as the putative president is an outrageous violation of Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, the presidential eligibility clause. Obama was not born with sole allegiance to the USA. Sole allegiance and unity of Citizenship at birth was the goal and purpose for putting the natural born Citizen clause into Article II Section 1 of the Constitution as to who could serve as president once the founding generation has passed away. Obama (II) was born a British Subject via his foreign national father Obama (Sr.) who was a British Subject. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen of the United States” to constitutional standards since he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship. The founders and framers did not want anyone with foreign allegiance to ever get command of our military, i.e., be the president. Obama is constitutionally not eligible to be president and commander in chief of our military.
The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805
CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR DR. HERB TITUS(Not Mark Levin)
DESCRIBES "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN"December 12, 2011 (TPATH) The honorable John Jay, the first leader of the United States Supreme Court, initiated the insertion of "Natural Born Citizen" into the Constitution for the purpose of setting a higher standard for the office of the President.
All of the verbal gymnastics being put forth by the left, as to the meaning of the term, will eventually be proven to be just what it is.
Unlawful defense of an individual and political party at the expense and detriment of this country.
When you watch this video you will begin to wonder how this country continues to allow such simple and precise language to be twisted, manipulated and convoluted.
WATCH THE VIDEO PART ONEWATCH THE VIDEO PART TWO
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on.
On MARCH 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which was meeting in Richmond's St. John's Church due to British hostilities:
"I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery...
We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated...We have prostrated ourselves before the throne...
Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence."
Patrick Henry continued:
"There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations...who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us.
The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave...
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God!
I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death."
Miki Booth’s book, Memoirs of a Community Organizer in Hawaii, will be released in late November, 2011. The book chronicles events and experiences over a lifetime culminating in the biggest adventure of all for the writer—an “Adventure in American Politics.” When Miki found others that shared her
Usurper In The White House-Constitutional Crisis
AMERICA IN DISTRESS
Obama Sr a Kenyan was never a US Citizen. He could not pass on US Natural Born Citizenship status to Barack Obama Jr. No matter what is on Obama's birth certificate, no matter where he was born, he can NOT satisfy Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution.....No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of the President, neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
"Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." -- Abraham Lincoln
"Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it." -- John Adams
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite." -- Thomas Jefferson
"If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." -- Samuel Adams
THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.
Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.
The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.
But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.
Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.
We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.
All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq. 185 Gatzmer Avenue Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831 October 18, 2009
EDUCATE YOURSELF! EVERYTHING ABOUT OBAMA FROM BIRTH THRU HIS FIRST 100 DAYS OF USURPATION
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
