BREAKING! SUNAHARA V. HDOH DISMISSED
dean@birthersummit.org
202.241.3648
Posted: March 8, 2012
© 2012 The Birther Summit
The Judge treated this as a motion for summary judgment because the Judge considered matters outside the pleadings. However, the Judge did not give any reason or explanation for the ruling but just granted it in favor of the State.
We had a long discussion about HRS 338-13(a), and the Judge may have ruled that the statute provides for various forms of either a certified copy of a certificate, or contents, or any part thereof. The Court may have decided that the Director has the sole discretion as to the form of certificate it provides, but again there was no explanation given.
The State is going to prepare the Order then it will be filed. At that point there will be thirty (30) days to appeal the Judge's decision.
We will be discussing these results with him to determine what he believes Duncan's next step should be. Personally, I believe that this could be the result of the immense poisoning of vexatious and incompetent litigation that has plagued the Hawaiian court system, as this case should have been very easily won--if nothing but the law were considered. What other motivation could a state have for denying someone a photocopy of his deceased sister's original birth certificate? Developing . . .
Damn Shame---corruption and fraud in the judicial and government is deeper than anyone can describe----.
ReplyDeleteIf the mother is still alive, could you ammend the complaint with her name also ? Since she is party to the BC ( her name and signature being on it ), how can the state deny her access to the document since she is a legal party ?
ReplyDeleteHDOH already said a year ago, that they COULD NOT FIND Virginia Sunahara's "original" Birth Certificate. They even tried to say they had "no record" of her ever being born in Hawaii. YET, they list her in their 1960-1964 Birth Index!!!!! There's something fishing going on here! Her Birth Certificate Number would have been within the range of Pres. Obama's B.C. Number, and the Nordyke twins' Numbers!
ReplyDeleteSunahara received a certified copy of the "short form" BC, like the first one Obama released, then requested a certified copy of the long form. HI doesn't do that except where there is an expressed, approved need. Sunahara sued, not only to get a long-form BC, but to be there in the vault when the DOH workers retrieved the original. The docs are online if you would like to read them.
ReplyDeleteALL states will send you a certified copy of an "original" birth record, when you do "genealogy research!"--and Hawaii used to, also! This just goes to show HOW LOW and HOW CORRUPT state and federal agencies have come, in NOW refusing to do so, just since Obama became President!!! Our news media is in the SAME CATEGORY as the Russian news media---they only print and announce what the government "allows" them to!
ReplyDeleteThis case is NO DIFFERENT FROM ANY OF THE OTHER FILINGS BEFORE THE SAME JUDGE. It should have been before a new judge.
ReplyDeleteShe is just like Mahili LAND & Wright in Georgia courts.
The JUDGES ARE WIRED: get that through your head.
All these cases have merit & every judge wants you to believe at the expense of the judges reputation that the cases are frivolous. Therefore: No reason for the decision because THE DECISION LACKS CRITICAL THINKING
STOP BLAMING OTHER LAWYERS. SEE IT AS IT IS: Obama's insurgents have a noose around their necks. He thinks he is winning, No way will he last 4 more years.
Impeachment proceedings on OTHER MATTERS WILL COMMENCE if he is re-elected. AND CONGRESS IS ALL GOP. They are awaiting. For sure.
THEN THE NOOSE WILL BE AROUND HIS.