Sunday, September 2, 2012
Natural Born Defined: Natural Born Citizen vs. British “Common Law” Natural Born Subject Given that “natural born” is a status achieved only upon birth, it is unreasonable to assert that later changes in citizenship affect that at-birth status. The requirement for natural born citizen status in this country is birth to two U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. Conclusion Concerns about where Barack Obama was born and what the disputed Birth Certificate might reveal are entirely irrelevant considerations , given known facts. Obama could have been born on the 4th of July, in swaddling clothes, in a manger, on the steps of the U.S.Supreme Court, and witnessed by all Nine, and it still would not affect his qualification for Office. As was true of our Founders, who had to grandfather themselves to be President,Barack Obama had allegiance to Britain upon birth, through his father, making him forever incapable of being a natural born citizen of the United States, thereby entirely unqualified to hold the Office of President.Also, it should be pointed out that there is far more likelihood that Barack Obama was at birth a Natural Born SUBJECT of Britain than a natural born subject of these United States,given the legislative expansion by the British Crown, according to the same British common law argued by Justice Gray in Wong Kim Ark and asserted by the British at the founding of this Nation.One cannot reasonably be both a natural born Subject of Britain and a natural born citizen of the United States.
Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 9:38 PM