Monday, October 8, 2012

Updates on West Virginia, Indiana and U.S. Supreme Court Cases


Posted By Sharon Rondeau 

WHY IS INVESTIGATION OF OBAMA’S QUESTIONABLE DOCUMENTATION NO ONE’S RESPONSIBILITY?

by Atty. Orly Taitz

Democrat Natalie Tennant is West Virginia’s Secretary of State. She was born on Christmas Day, 1967, to two schoolteachers
(Oct. 7, 2012) —[Editor's Note:  Additional recent developments on the part of Secretaries of State named as defendants in Taitz's case Judd v. Obama were reported on Octber 5.  An attorney representing members of the media listed as defendants IN the case also responded to Taitz late last week.]
I got a call from Atty. Dorian Brell, the deputy attorney general of West Virginia representing Secretary of State Natalie Tennant.  Keith Judd ran for office in West Virginia and got 41% of the vote.  He filed a complaint with Secretary of State Tennant demanding an investigation in light of Obama’s forged IDs, and she just threw it in the garbage.  She is the chief elections official in the state.  Keith wanted me to stipulate that I would agree to a 30-day extension for them to file papers. I stated that I would consider agreeing to this if they would stipulate to a stay of certification of all votes for Obama pending adjudication of the issue of evidence of forgery in all of his IDs and Social Security number.
[Editor's Note:  Natalie Tennant appeared on Fox News last February to denounce voter fraud, stating "We don't tolerate election law violations."]
They’re claiming that they cannot look at the qualifications of the president.  So why are we paying Secretaries of State their salaries?  If they are doing nothing and deciding nothing, why not just pay an inflatable doll?  We could save ourselves quite a bit.  With 50 of them who are probably making some $200,000 plus benefits,  that’s a lot of money.
READ MORE...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.