Friday, May 10, 2013
Those of you who have been in denial since September 11 last year, and going back to the 2008 election – you need to man up.
Something is very wrong in this administration and in our country.
*************************************************
BBC Apologizes for Benghazi Coverage: Hillary In Trouble, 'Heads Will Roll'
“The
Obama Administration is about to finally be held accountable for an
unforgivable cover-up that started back in September and has lasted
straight through to today.”
Mark
Mardell, the BBC's North American editor, issued a mea culpa of sorts
today after Jonathan Karl at ABC News dropped his bombshell that proves
beyond any doubt that the Obama Administration lied about its
involvement in editing the CIA's talking points surrounding the
September 11 attack on our consulate in Libya.
In a piece titled, "After Benghazi revelations, heads will roll," Mardell writes,
"In the interests of full disclosure I have to say I have not in the
past been persuaded that allegations of a cover-up were a big deal." He
adds, "It seemed to me a partisan attack based on very little."
That all changed with today's revelations. Mardell now believes:
This is the first hard evidence that the state department did ask for changes to the CIA's original assessment.
Specifically,
they wanted references to previous warnings deleted and this sentence
removed: "We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to al-Qa'ida
participated in the attack."
There's
little doubt in my mind that this will haunt Hillary Clinton if she
decides to run for president, unless she executes some pretty fancy
footwork.
State
department spokesperson Victoria Nuland is directly implicated, and the
fingerprints of senior White House aides Ben Rhodes and Jay Carney are
there as well.
Big hat tip to @RaganEwing. If
the rest of the mainstream media shows the integrity Mr. Mardell just
did, the Obama Administration is about to finally be held accountable
for an unforgivable cover-up that started back in September and has lasted straight through to today.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.