Why is the birth certificate number for Virginia Sunahara classified Top Secret?
Questions Remain: Did Team Obama Steal Dead
Baby BC Number - Selective Service Fraud?
Posted By Adrien Nash @ ORYR Facebook
“Who
doesn't know that government is highly populated by union-loyal,
party-loyal devoted Democrats who would have sold their first-born to
see their dynamic new messiah elected President?”
Have you ever heard of Virginia Sunahara?
She was the baby born when Obama was born, but died within days. Her birth certificate number is top secret.
The
judge who heard the suit against the state by the baby's 50 year old
brother ruled against his obtaining a copy of her birth certificate. The
judge, like thousands in the government and media, are Obama sycophants
or are intimidated by information obtained via the NSA. Hence his
rightful request was denied by the state and the judge.
This was because the forger adopted her birth certificate number for Obama's forgery. Same situation with the SS registration card. People die, and their records and identifies are taken over by others. Bill Ayers, Obama's good friend, neighbor, and fellow director of an Annenberg foundation, wrote all about it in his autobiography.
No one has the information as to who did or didn't originally have the number on Obama's forged Selective Service card. If it was forged then such a number would be needed, and it couldn't belong to anyone living.
Gorefan asked:
"2) How did the forger get an obsolete, round Postal Stamp from the Makiki Station but not a 19xx plug that he could cut the first two digits from?"
There is no proof that the forger did because no original card has been produced and examined by any document examiner to determine if a real stamp produced a real postmark. You keep forgetting what age you live in. It’s the age when anything and everything can be forged in a second generation reproduction copy.
The image of an old stamp could have been used and manipulated to alter the appearance of the year by the lazy method of erasing a decade date (20**) and leaving only an altered year date. The only logical explanation for the completely off-center, year-only date is the forger's laziness or over-confidence. No stamp maker in the world would produce a two-digit stamp that was completely off-center.
"3) How did the forger get the forged card onto the Selective Service microfilm rolls?"
We don't start from what we don't know, and we don't know that it exists in the microfilm rolls. If it did exist in the rolls then how would we know since no one will be allowed to examine them? Same with the non-existent hospital birth certificate that will never be seen by any non-sycophant of Obama.
"4) Why did the Selective service Administration on three occasions before the 2008 Presidential election verify that then-Senator Obama did follow Federal law in registering for the Selective Service?"
Who doesn't know that government is highly populated by union-loyal, party-loyal devoted Democrats who would have sold their first-born to see their dynamic new messiah elected President?
This was because the forger adopted her birth certificate number for Obama's forgery. Same situation with the SS registration card. People die, and their records and identifies are taken over by others. Bill Ayers, Obama's good friend, neighbor, and fellow director of an Annenberg foundation, wrote all about it in his autobiography.
No one has the information as to who did or didn't originally have the number on Obama's forged Selective Service card. If it was forged then such a number would be needed, and it couldn't belong to anyone living.
Gorefan asked:
"2) How did the forger get an obsolete, round Postal Stamp from the Makiki Station but not a 19xx plug that he could cut the first two digits from?"
There is no proof that the forger did because no original card has been produced and examined by any document examiner to determine if a real stamp produced a real postmark. You keep forgetting what age you live in. It’s the age when anything and everything can be forged in a second generation reproduction copy.
The image of an old stamp could have been used and manipulated to alter the appearance of the year by the lazy method of erasing a decade date (20**) and leaving only an altered year date. The only logical explanation for the completely off-center, year-only date is the forger's laziness or over-confidence. No stamp maker in the world would produce a two-digit stamp that was completely off-center.
"3) How did the forger get the forged card onto the Selective Service microfilm rolls?"
We don't start from what we don't know, and we don't know that it exists in the microfilm rolls. If it did exist in the rolls then how would we know since no one will be allowed to examine them? Same with the non-existent hospital birth certificate that will never be seen by any non-sycophant of Obama.
"4) Why did the Selective service Administration on three occasions before the 2008 Presidential election verify that then-Senator Obama did follow Federal law in registering for the Selective Service?"
Who doesn't know that government is highly populated by union-loyal, party-loyal devoted Democrats who would have sold their first-born to see their dynamic new messiah elected President?
If
his entire success in the election hinged on his government documents
then it would have been absolutely crucial to validate them or else his
candidacy would have gone down the toilet.
You can't continue to pretend that we live in a world populated by angels who never lie, who never put the ends ahead of the means.
You can't continue to pretend that we live in a world populated by angels who never lie, who never put the ends ahead of the means.
People
who are appointed to high government offices are just as likely to lie
or pervert the law as the politicians who appoint them due to their
party loyalty.
Same with Supreme Court justices.
By Adrien Nash –
See more at:
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.