INS Hawaii Arrival Records Missing for Critical Week in 1961
INS DOCUMENT FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961
“The
only certificate of acquired citizenry issued based on the grounds of
birth to a U.S. citizen abroad was coincidentally also issued in the
same time frame during which Barack Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961…
Dunham’s
passport information was known to have existed from the 1960s, but was
said by State Department officials to have been conveniently discarded
as a part of an administrative order to make more file storage space in
the 1980s…
Divorce
decree documents for Dunham and Obama Sr. revealed that a conspicuously
missing page from the section of the court proceedings declaring the
custody of Obama Jr. is the same page which corresponds to other divorce
records where a birth certificate would be required by a judge in order to determine original parentage at birth for a custody ruling based on HRS 571.”
By Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN
of THE DAILY PEN
IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s
constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that
a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory
citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child
born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa.
The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued
for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than
18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world.
*****************
A
recently discovered rare immigration record found by researchers
working on behalf of an ongoing investigation into the Constitutional
eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S. from the Kenyan region of Africa between July and December of 1961.
The
record shows demographic and status classifications for a passenger who
was explicitly recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born to a U.S. citizen parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December 31st, 1961.
This
information and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the
rare nature of the issuance of certificates of citizenship for children
who acquire their citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in
this particular region of Africa.
Read about “Acquired Citizenship”: http://www.kterry.com/citizenship/certofcitizenship.htm#acquired
These dates not only align with the alleged date of Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961, but also with evidence indicating that Ann Dunham departed from Hawaii beginning in February, 1961, shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama Sr.
The table below shows there were a total of 13 children of U.S.
citizens who entered the U.S. from Africa’s Kenyan region. It also shows
there were 11 from the United Kingdom in the same time in comparison,
to demonstrate the consistency of this class of arrivals, regardless of
the country of embarkation.
These
children were classified by the INS upon arrival based on a passport
which already named them when they departed from the U.S. prior, or they
received requisite documentation, pre-approved by the U.S. before
embarkation, which identified them specifically as children of U.S.
citizens who were up to 18 years old.
However,
a child who enters the U.S. who was not named on a passport prior to
the use of that passport to depart the U.S. must undergo another form of
identification process upon returning. A child who did not exist when
the parent departed the U.S., in the absence of a passport, must be
classified as one of three definitions, a non-resident alien, a derived
citizen by parentage or marriage, or a child with acquired citizenship
by birth or legal adoption by a U.S. citizen. The following table shows
the quantity of children who were granted acquired citizenship from
Africa.
Also
supporting this data is the implication of an African trip by the
absence of Dunham’s passport information which is known to have existed
from the 1960s, but which was said by State Department officials to
have been conveniently discarded as a part of an administrative order to
make more file storage space in the 1980s.
We
know Dunham used a passport at that time on at least one occasion for
her departure with Obama Jr. to Indonesia where the two lived with Lolo Soetoro, Dunham’s second husband. If
Dunham had filed for a “renewal” of an old passport, rather than for a
new passport in the mid 1960’s for the Indonesian trip, which would have
been the common practice for the life of a passport, this would have
been indicated on the missing application which would have been included
with the series of documents released by an FOIA request in early 2010.
The
Immigration and Naturalization Service published its annual Report of
the Immigration and Naturalization Service in 1963, for the year of July
1st, 1961 ending on June 30th, 1962. According to information on page
99 of the report the only certificate of acquired citizenry issued
based on the grounds of birth to a U.S. citizen abroad was
coincidentally also issued in the same time frame during which Barack
Obama’s alleged birth date occurred on August 4th, 1961.
Successive
yearly reports add COC recipients to their roster for previous years as
applicants receive those certificates for the year they were born.
Table 48 appears to show the data of the acquisition of citizenship by
birth, not the year the COC is delivered. Review of later annual reports
shows that each year’s COC by birth quantities increase as applicants
born in those years receive the COC, regardless of the year of
reception. However, in almost all cases, the COC is delivered for the
child within a year of the birth date. COC delivery is often delayed
while the circumstances of the birth abroad are confirmed for older
births who might apply for retroactive COC. However, when a newborn
child enters the U.S. bearing a foreign birth registration from an
official medical facility or institution identifying the citizen parent,
a COC is expedited based on the registration form, the parent(s)
testimony and inspection of the child by the INS. In those cases, a COC may be delivered in days, not months or years.
According
to the INS, Certificates of Citizenship are issued upon arrival in the
U.S. to those who have acquired statutory citizenship (not natural-born
citizenship) by birth to at least one U.S. citizen parent within the
previous year while that parent(s) was temporarily in another country.
COC are notifications provided by the American
Consulate Service, via the INS, to individuals born to at least one
U.S. citizen abroad in order to provide interim citizen alien status
while immigration status is processed and secured. COC are not issued to
natural-born citizens or children born to non-U.S. citizen parents
arriving in the U.S., nor are COC received through the same process as
required for naturalized citizenship, according to the INS.
A COAC is issued to an arriving child from abroad who is:
- born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one parent with “alien” non-citizen status, or
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody).
- born in the U.S. to two alien parents who both naturalize after the child’s birth, or
- born abroad to a U.S. citizen who did not live in (or come to) the United States for a period of time prior to the child’s birth, or
- adopted and is permanently residing in the United States and can become a U.S. citizen by action of law on the date on which all of the following requirements have been met:
- The child was lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and
- Either parent was a United States citizen by birth or naturalization; and
- The child was still under 18 years of age; and
- The child was not married; and
- The child was the parent’s legitimate child or was legitimated by the parent before the child’s 16th birthday (Stepchildren or children born out of wedlock who were not legitimated before their 16th birthday do not derive United States citizenship through their parents.); and
- If adopted, the child met the requirements of section 101(b)(1)(E) or (F) and has had a full and final adoption; and
- The child was residing in the United States in the legal custody of the U.S. citizen parent (this includes joint custody).
There is yet other historical documented evidence supporting the plausibility that Ann Dunham
possessed a birth registration for Obama Jr. from Kenya. In 2009,
divorce decree documents for Dunham and Obama Sr. revealed that a
conspicuously missing page from the section of the court proceedings
declaring the custody of Obama Jr. is the same page which corresponds to
other divorce records where a birth certificate would be required by a
judge in order to determine original parentage at birth for a custody
ruling based on HRS 571.
As
previously reported by Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND and other sources, the
void of documented and testimonial evidence accounting for Ann Dunham’s
presence in Hawaii between February and early August of 1961 implies
that she had reasons to travel to Kenya shortly after her undocumented
marriage to Obama’s alleged father in February of 1961.
According to the widely accepted but highly suspicious uncorroborated
account of events, Dunham would have been at least three months pregnant
at the time of the marriage. It was documented that Obama Sr.’s
father, living in Kenya at the time, denounced the marriage leaving the
couple with a reconciliatory reason to travel there.
Following
the completion of her classes at the University of Hawaii in winter
1961, the only evidence accounting for Dunham’s presence was months
after the alleged marriage, in late August 1961.
A transcript of registration to attend fall extension classes at the
University of Washington, in Seattle, beginning in late August, 1961 was
discovered in 2009.
The
previous year’s INS report shows that no other Certificates of Derived
Citizenry by birth were issued to anyone arriving from the Kenyan region
of Africa between July 1st, 1960 and June 30th, 1961. During this time, the INS recorded 282 alien arrivals from Kenya by air, and three U.S. citizens.
The arrival of these Kenyan aliens is corroborated by the African American Students Foundation Report of Activities 1959-1961
which documents the arrival of the same number of students in the U.S.
on September 7, 1960 from Nairobi, Kenya via the second sortie of the
Airlift America Project, a project initiated in April 1959 by the AASF
and Kenyan politician, Tom Mboya, to bring African students from Nairobi
to study in the U.S.
It should noted that the AASF sent more than 800 students to the United States via the Airlift Project from East Africa in the early 1960s. Some of the student are not accounted by the 1961-1962 Immigration report as having departed from Kenya in the third airlift transport in fall of 1961. However, several of these students attended the University of Chicago where it has been widely speculated they had expenses paid for by six separate U.S. families including the family of Tom and Mary Ayers, parents of domestic terrorist and long-time Obama affiliate, Bill Ayers, with whom Obama served on the Annenberg Education Project Fund board for almost 10 years.
Recent testimony from a retired postal worker who delivered mail to the Ayers’ Glen Ellyn, Chicago residence collaborates with AASF report accounts and indicates the Ayers may have a longer history of supporting foreign exchange students than initially suspected. Barack Obama II, was likely one of these foreign students supported by the Ayers in the late 1980s which would explain his engagement to serve with Ayers on the Annenberg Fund board, perhaps as appreciation for the Ayers’ help.
A COC is also considered a primary form of identification by the State of Hawaii in 1961 to prove a foreign born infant’s residency in the U.S. prompting the issuance of a standard Certificate of Live Birth under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 which would then allocate the location of the birth to the mother’s residence.
Corroborating
data from passenger arrivals of flights entering the U.S. between July
1st, 1961 and June 30th, 1962 indicates this one individual may have
been originally classified as an alien upon arrival prior to application
for derivative citizenship. The INS report shows there was only one
individual who was originally classified by the INS as an alien arriving
by air from Kenya. This individual was possibly inspected by INS
officers in Hawaii upon arrival at the INS station located within
Honolulu International Airport sometime in early August of 1961.
Unfortunately,
the report does not give data supporting that this individual was
accompanied by a U.S. citizen parent. This may be explained by the
disparity of time between being classified as an “alien” in the interim
until a COAC was granted and the collection of data for this report’s
date of publication.
According to the INS report data, a
voluntary birth to a U.S. resident in Africa in 1961, away from the
quality of care offered at U.S. hospitals was extremely rare with only
eight such cases in more than two years. The rarity of this event
would leave an easily referenced recording of the birth abroad. Hawaiian
law also specifies that documentation used to issue birth certificates
by the Hawaiian Health Department includes certificates of citizenship
issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service upon arrival of
children born to U.S. citizens abroad.
_____________________________________________________
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Emergency Motion Filed: National Archives Caught
Altering Hawaii Arrival Records For August 7, 1961
SIBLEY
PRESENTS EVIDENCE TO COURT OF CRIMINAL TAMPERING OF RECORDS RELATED
TO OBAMA’S BIRTH AND JUDGE BATES REFUSES TO RULE ON MOTIONS TO HOLD
OBAMA IN CONTEMPT
WASHINGTON D.C. - The multifaceted litigation that Montgomery Blair Sibley has initiated in an attempt to get to the truth regarding the birth records of Barack Hussein Obama II has both produced fruit and met judicial stonewalling.
Yesterday, Sibley filed an Emergency Second Motion for Order to Release Privacy Act Protected Records. That motion presented photographic evidence to Judge Bates that someone has tampered with the evidence related to Obama’s putative birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Sibley had subpoena from the National Archives the “Arrival Records” for August 1 through August 10, 1961, of all passengers arriving in Honolulu, Hawaii to see if records existed that Obama and his mother arrived in Hawaii during that time frame. What NARA produced were two microfilm spools of the arrival records for July 28 through August 1, 1961 and August 8 through August 12, 1961. As detailed in the Emergency Motion, the original date on the box of “August 7” has been altered by “white-out” and a new date of “August 1” had been written on the box. Proof of that alteration comes from a photograph of the same box taken nine months earlier which reveals the date was originally “August 7”. Thus, indisputably the box has been tampered with – a criminal offense – to hide the fact that the microfilm for the August 2 through August 7, 1961 arrivals is now missing.
Judge Bates continues to ignore Court Rules and stonewall the resolution of Sibley’s pending Motions for a Contempt against: (i) Obama 1st and Obama 2nd, (ii) Harvard Law School, (iii) the Social Security Administration, (iv) the Selective Service System and (v) the State Department.
Sibley said: “To me, Judge Bates is no Judge John Sirica of the same Court who, in 1973, ordered President Nixon to turn over subpoenaed tapes of White House conversations. As all who remember know, when the Supreme Court upheld Judge Sirica’s order in July 1974, Nixon resigned in the face of impeachment and nineteen officials from the Nixon White House were convicted. It is a sad commentary on the state of our so-called judiciary that even when faced with evidence of criminal behavior related to birth records of Obama, Judge Bates refuses to rule in order to shield Obama from the engine of truth which is a judicial proceeding.”
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.