HYPOCRITE...PHONY...
Rep.
Duncan Hunter: Concerns About Obama's
Birth
Certificate: Following As It Progresses
Dear William:
Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts regarding
President Obama's eligibility to be President of the United States. I
appreciate the opportunity to respond.
I understand there are still concerns about the authenticity
of the President's birth certificate—and therefore his constitutional ability
to serve as President as a natural born citizen. I believe that all groups and
individuals should continue to have the opportunity to present any facts on
this matter. This is an issue that I am following as it progresses, while
keeping your thoughts in mind.
Thanks again for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to
let me know of any concerns in the future.
Duncan Hunter
Member of Congress
Here's Mr. Lolli's response back to Rep.
Hunter:
Congressman Hunter,
Thank you for your reply to my concerns that the president
continues to engage in felony activity by the continued propagation and use of
forged documents.
Your response below, however, is typical of Washington
sophistry, as it skirts the issues as well as your oath of office.
Let me put it this way:
If you were notified that someone used forgery to gain
access to your bank account and stole all your money, you would notify the
authorities, would you not?
So imagine your response when the authorities respond to
your concerns with the placation that they believe that "groups and
individuals should continue to have the opportunity to present any facts on
this matter" and that they would follow the theft of your money "as
it progresses".
Needless to say, I believe that you would conclude that the
authorities were lacking moral clarity, skirting their sworn duty to uphold the
law, and cared not one whit about on-going criminal activity.
In such a case, would you not agree that such authorities
are not fit for public office? I would. And just in case I am not making myself
clear-- I am speaking of you.
If you continue in this amoral stance to refuse to examine
and take action on the evidence that is now available from law enforcement, I
will have no choice but to oppose you in the next election-- and do all in my
power to see to it that you are removed from office. As we have learned from
the case of Bob Filner, even Democrats will support law enforcement when the
crime is blatantly significant. Why can't you?
Thanks,
William Lolli, MCSE
[.]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.