Eminent takeover of Marxism and communism in the United States of America
Game Over
Yes, friends, anyone who has been following the presidential campaign over the past couple of weeks, even the most praetorian republicans amongst us, have to realize that the time has come fess-up to reality while understanding that candidate Donald Trump will never become the next president of this great land of ours. That is right, I said Trump will never be our next president, meaning Hillary Clinton will become the first woman ever to hold that office in the history of the nation. I have come to this rudimentary conclusion, not based on the highly devious national polls, which, in my humble opinion, are, in fact, as corrupt as is everything else in what’s left of this great country of ours, mind you, but on the self-evident truths of the clustered future now looming in our horizon - our new United States of America; a far cry from the once glorious Constitutional Republic which proudly served as bastion of hope for all of mankind – all of it, amidst a magnanimous ideological revolution set-out to transforming the nation in ways which, I dare say, not many Americans even comprehend, if yet are willing to support and sponsor.
A revolution which has gained foothold amongst the masses of the less-adept, the envious, the jealous, albeit in a universe which has been promised a rite-of-passage by Big Government, at the expense of all those who “made it” in a capitalist society; all those who fulfilled the American dream. In short, dear friends, Marxism at its best. Re-distribution of wealth. ‘Taketh from the richest and giveth to the poorer’. Hello! By the way, in case you had not noticed, “making-it” in todays’ U.S. Marxist culture is a sinful accomplishment, worthy of repentance and government chastisement.
Neither did I base my sorrowful prediction on other peoples’ opinions, to wit, that flood of expert commentators, all of whom, night after night, seem to pollute the airwaves of the nation, with insights into one of the most convoluted presidential elections, ever. Matter of fact, in looking back, I have no doubts that these elections were over for Mr. Trump even before they started. Simply put, Mr. Trump had an uphill battle from the start – a battle he could not ever win, regardless. I have even thought that the whole primaries production, his defeating the 16 other candidates and the popularity he once enjoyed then, vs., the relentless crusade to destroy him now, were just a well-planned ploy for the ultimate destruction that lay ahead for Mr. Trump.
And, no, I definitely do not think Trump’s failure or evident road to ruin has anything to do whatsoever with the explicit damage resulting from the alleged sex scandals, his lewd conversations about women or the rape allegations that have, ironically surfaced in the last few weeks, almost at the same time that the cat got out of the bag with the myriad of WikiLeak newsflashes regarding Clinton’s compromising emails. Matter of fact, Trump’s deficiencies, are petty compared to Hillary Clinton’s conduct throughout the years, however, Trump’s accusations are, in fact, what they [the] enemy would want us to believe and remember. In time, take my word for it, a great majority of Americans will attribute Trump’s downfall to his trifle womanizing habits; his untimely remarks on women, when, in fact, he was doomed from the start even if there had not been any sexual overtures.
Eminent takeover of Marxism and communism in the United States of America
The truth of the matter is that Trump’s disdainful character or questionable moral turpitude, in and of itself, while aggravating to a large segment of the voting universe, especially women, remains, still, a trivial motive for Trump’s downfall if compared to Hillary Clinton’s misdeeds. Instead, we now know that Trump’s rack and ruin could be more directly credited to the “State-of-the-Union”; to a silent insurgency now undermining every fabric of our society. Little to do with Trump’s sexual aberrations and all to do with the eminent takeover of Marxism and communism in the United States of America.
To be clear, Mr. Trump’s opponent in his bid for the presidential race was never Hillary Clinton alone, per say. Mr. Trump’s opponents were a whole host of zealots including but not limited to a fringe leftist media; to a massive destructive campaign conducted by the most renown mass media groups in the nation, newspapers, T.V. and social media; to an iconic guild of Hollywood’s most acclaimed actors and actresses; to a grassroots majority on the nation’s top colleges and universities; to the most evil and corrupt government in the history of the nation; to a horde of radical millennials and a legion of underachievers, and last but not least, to the rank and file of Trump’s own republican party insiders – a legendary clan of corrupt establishment politicians. That’s it. Game over, Mr. Trump.
Just think of it this way, both Hillary and Bill Clinton are career criminals. The trail of corruption of these two dates back to the 1970s and the infamous Whitewater scandal - a real estate deal gone bad, where, allegedly, the Clintons used their political clout to coerce someone in a failing Savings and Loan Association into making an illegal loan. If you really think about it, the Clintons’ Resume is riddled with felonious controversies, including some gruesome deaths of people such as was the mysterious demise of Vince Foster in July 1993 - the deputy White House counsel during Bill Clinton’s presidency, previously associated to the presidential couple in the aforementioned Whitewater scandal, not to mention Hillary’s role in the Benghazi embassy massacre, yielding the deaths of four noble Americans, which, in my books has to top her unending trail of criminal acts, much a part of an eerie career, relentlessly in pursuit of wealth and prowess.
Continued below...
Of all of the Clinton’s misdeeds, crimes and carousel of lies, however, the one that strikes me as the must hideously repulsive, taking the prize for the ultimate show of dishonesty, has to be, the Haiti Controversy itself. If you all recall, on January 10th, 2010, the country of Haiti was devastated by an earthquake. No need to mention the fact, that this is one of the most impoverished nations in our hemisphere, and was even before the earthquake. Immediately after the earthquake Hillary went to Haiti to pledge her full support to the destitute nation on behalf of the U.S.A. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, acted as United Nation’s Special Envoy to co-lead in the “HIRC” Haitian Interim Reconstruction Commission along with Haitian Prime Minister Jean Max Bellerive. In short, in the aftermath of the earthquake, the Clintons skillfully positioned themselves at centre stage of the whole Haitian reconstruction drive.
As would and could be expected, the HIRC, led by Bill Clinton, totally disregarded projects of relief, and focused exclusively on projects where Clintons would receive donations. Matter of fact, back in the time, all relief efforts were channeled through the Clintons. If you wanted to do business in Haiti, you had to have a relationship with the Clintons. Digicel—a tele-communications company owned by Irish billionaire Dennis O’Brien was given special treatment which awarded O’Brien’s company exclusive rights to transfer relief money to Haitians whereby the company made more than 50 million dollars in revenues, in exchange for Obrien’s contributions in the millions to the Clinton Foundation. In the end, all money that flowed in for Haiti’s earthquake relief was expediently funneled through the IHRC, Bill Clinton and Haiti’s Prime-Minister.
Clinton, whose life of lies and double-standards can make Donald Trump look like the next coming of Mother Teresa
Where have we come as nation, I ask, when a majority of us, are willing to elect a criminal with one of the muddiest and most corrupt backgrounds ever to the presidency of the United States of America? How low can we go? Yes, friends, Mr. Trump may very well be a ravaging womanizer, but guess what? I will take him over a career criminal, any day, any time. Common folks, let’s get real here. Mr. Trumps’ sexual assault allegations, while disdainfully inexcusable, nevertheless, pale if compared to a woman who simply said has no moral code of values whatsoever – a woman whose life of lies and double-standards can make Donald Trump look like the next coming of Mother Teresa.
Now, the nation talks about Mr. Trump’s moral improbity, but just think about this, if you will, our apparent next president, married a proven sexual predator – one she willfully and graciously condoned while putting her to shame in front of nation, all in lieu of her boundless desire of reaching the White House as her ultimate objective. In other words, the wealth and glory that awaited Clinton in her pursuit of the ultimate political prize, was far more incentivizing than censuring and condemning her husband’s reproachful acts – hello, is this the same hypocrite who claims to champion women as [the] most relevant issue in her twisted political platform?
Where have we come as nation, to even consider this woman to be our next president? Are we that naïve, or are we that stupid? Or both? Think of it this way, if you or I had done a smidgeon of what this woman has done, you and I would probably be locked behind bars, more likely than not, held in solitary confinement. Seriously folks, you think about it, the fact that Hillary Clinton was able to delete 33,000 emails after receiving a congressional subpoena from the House Select Committee on Benghazi; the fact that, according to the FBI, Justin Cooper, an aide to former President Bill Clinton was ordered to destroy two of Hillary Clinton’s phones breaking them with a hammer and the fact that the FBI found no criminal wrongdoing in their investigation of Clinton, while chalking it up to “extreme carelessness” has to be, as far as I am concerned, a telltale sign of our decadent State of the Union - clear evidence that our nation has really hit rock bottom. Repugnantly abhorrent if you ask me.
In closing, I am just going to briefly make mention of Clinton’s failed policies as Secretary of State inasmuch it appears that the real issues facing the nation today have become somewhat irrelevant, extraneous and inconsequential, while “morality” and “integrity”, ironically, have expediently taken a center-stage place in the presidential campaign. Suffice it to say that Clinton’s curriculum vitae in her role as the ultimate representative of our nation in the world platform, is also marred by a trail of failures. To mention a few, Clinton’s Russian reset soap-opera, eventually led to Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the invasion of Ukraine; as Secretary of State, Clinton has been a cheerleader of enemy-states aiding in overthrowing governments friendly to the United States such as Egypt. Matter of fact, many of our friends in the region ended up being replaced with the Muslim Brotherhood, dictatorships and chaos, leading to the formation of ISIS, and their takeover of Iraq and Syria.
No matter where you turn, whether you talk about Iran’s expansion in the Middle East, Russia’s overt aggression and expansionary threats, or whether you talk about nuclear proliferation in rogue states such as North Korea, or China’s bid for regional hegemony, it is very clear to me that Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration have been an ignominious disgrace, every which way you look at it. Under the Clinton tenure as Secretary of State, America’s foreign policy establishment has all but developed into a culture of failures, at times making our great nation become the laughing stock amongst our most spiteful adversaries in the world.
Last but not least, let me close by converging on the issues, again, at center-stage of these elections. Clinton’s campaign themes appear all to be focused on Mr. Trump’s flawed qualities such as his sexual dysfunctionality, corruption, dishonesty and the like. The greatest irony of it all is that it all comes from one of the most dishonest and corrupt characters in political history, bar none. While Clinton’s campaign touts of her values, her forthrightness and righteousness, I chuckle as I do a quick one on one, fact-searching comparison of these two. On the one hand, here is this self-made, multi-billionaire, which, notwithstanding his evident philandering flaws, has still been able to raise what appears to be a nice family. Trump’s children, as seen several times throughout the campaign, each mindfully endorsing and supporting their father’s campaign, are, as they say, a reflection of Trump’s parenting capabilities, and, if judged in the court of public opinion by the way they conduct themselves, Mr. Trump should have nothing to be ashamed of.
On the other side, I see two greedy impostors, who went from rags to riches by virtue of their political Ponzi schemes – ultimately designed for their own self-enrichment. By their own admission, the Clintons claimed to be “dead-broke”, when they left the White House back in 2001, the reason, perhaps, why after leaving, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House china, furniture and artwork that she had stolen. Can you imagine? The wife of the President of the United States of America, stealing from their presidential residence. Can you really imagine, this petty-thief becoming the next president of the United States? And, she dares talk about Donald Trump’s “immoral” code of ethics.
The Clintons today appear to be filthy rich, with a combined worth over 100 million dollars. The nation, the fringe media, you and I, should, at the very least, ask how was this possible to achieve in such a short period of time, considering there was no business behind the Clinton’s frantic financial growth. Or was it? The fact of the matter is that there was a business after all. Indeed, there was. There was that deceitful Clinton Foundation, which is not, as many have been led to believe, a righteous charity organization, if you can believe that. Cause if you do, dear friends, if you are that naïve and gullible to be believe that, then you, dear friend, I venture to say, may very well be in a fairyland of your own. Either that or you are, in fact, delusional.
Come to think of it, all things considered, the Clinton Foundation is really an ingenious plot, if I ever saw one. Kudos to the Clintons for their dexterity and mastery of deceit. In the most unabridged and straightforward account I can think of, the Clintons expediently have used the inherent clout afforded them by their political statures, one as ex-President of the U.S., and the other one as Secretary of State, to exchange political favors in the name “charity”, while conveniently diverting and comingling monies given to the Foundation to their own pocketbooks, while always shielded and pontificated as dedicated humanitarians. Clever, eh? Matter of fact, the Foundation is, in fact, the quintessential “quid pro quo” sham—a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something.
The only problem being that, these two cheats, the Clintons in their never-ending quest for riches and power, have even used the so-called Foundation as a vehicle for granting favors to enemy states, the prize of the exchange varying relative to the size of the favor. For instance, take the Clinton’s Uranium One deal as the ultimate example of how far these two are willing to play with our nation’s security. This is a deal where Russia was able to acquire uranium mines in the U.S., via the acquisition of U1- a uranium mining consortium, structured by Bill Clinton, for which the Foundation received a contribution of $31 million dollars and a pledge for another 100 million dollars. The Russian acquisition of U1, was projected to have control over what could amount to approximately 50% of the world’s uranium output by 2015 - symbolically speaking, a major share of the precious mineral and a real and present danger to the future of nuclear warfare given the fact that Russia would not falter in sending uranium to its client state, Iran. Shortly after the Russians had announced their intentions to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. Uranium to Russia? Treasonous? Indictable? Felonious? Talk about Trump’s immorality?
Now, the nation talks about Mr. Trump’s moral improbity, but just think about this, if you will, our apparent next president, married a proven sexual predator – one she willfully and graciously condoned while putting her to shame in front of nation, all in lieu of her boundless desire of reaching the White House as her ultimate objective. In other words, the wealth and glory that awaited Clinton in her pursuit of the ultimate political prize, was far more incentivizing than censuring and condemning her husband’s reproachful acts – hello, is this the same hypocrite who claims to champion women as [the] most relevant issue in her twisted political platform?
Where have we come as nation, to even consider this woman to be our next president? Are we that naïve, or are we that stupid? Or both? Think of it this way, if you or I had done a smidgeon of what this woman has done, you and I would probably be locked behind bars, more likely than not, held in solitary confinement. Seriously folks, you think about it, the fact that Hillary Clinton was able to delete 33,000 emails after receiving a congressional subpoena from the House Select Committee on Benghazi; the fact that, according to the FBI, Justin Cooper, an aide to former President Bill Clinton was ordered to destroy two of Hillary Clinton’s phones breaking them with a hammer and the fact that the FBI found no criminal wrongdoing in their investigation of Clinton, while chalking it up to “extreme carelessness” has to be, as far as I am concerned, a telltale sign of our decadent State of the Union - clear evidence that our nation has really hit rock bottom. Repugnantly abhorrent if you ask me.
In closing, I am just going to briefly make mention of Clinton’s failed policies as Secretary of State inasmuch it appears that the real issues facing the nation today have become somewhat irrelevant, extraneous and inconsequential, while “morality” and “integrity”, ironically, have expediently taken a center-stage place in the presidential campaign. Suffice it to say that Clinton’s curriculum vitae in her role as the ultimate representative of our nation in the world platform, is also marred by a trail of failures. To mention a few, Clinton’s Russian reset soap-opera, eventually led to Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the invasion of Ukraine; as Secretary of State, Clinton has been a cheerleader of enemy-states aiding in overthrowing governments friendly to the United States such as Egypt. Matter of fact, many of our friends in the region ended up being replaced with the Muslim Brotherhood, dictatorships and chaos, leading to the formation of ISIS, and their takeover of Iraq and Syria.
No matter where you turn, whether you talk about Iran’s expansion in the Middle East, Russia’s overt aggression and expansionary threats, or whether you talk about nuclear proliferation in rogue states such as North Korea, or China’s bid for regional hegemony, it is very clear to me that Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration have been an ignominious disgrace, every which way you look at it. Under the Clinton tenure as Secretary of State, America’s foreign policy establishment has all but developed into a culture of failures, at times making our great nation become the laughing stock amongst our most spiteful adversaries in the world.
Last but not least, let me close by converging on the issues, again, at center-stage of these elections. Clinton’s campaign themes appear all to be focused on Mr. Trump’s flawed qualities such as his sexual dysfunctionality, corruption, dishonesty and the like. The greatest irony of it all is that it all comes from one of the most dishonest and corrupt characters in political history, bar none. While Clinton’s campaign touts of her values, her forthrightness and righteousness, I chuckle as I do a quick one on one, fact-searching comparison of these two. On the one hand, here is this self-made, multi-billionaire, which, notwithstanding his evident philandering flaws, has still been able to raise what appears to be a nice family. Trump’s children, as seen several times throughout the campaign, each mindfully endorsing and supporting their father’s campaign, are, as they say, a reflection of Trump’s parenting capabilities, and, if judged in the court of public opinion by the way they conduct themselves, Mr. Trump should have nothing to be ashamed of.
On the other side, I see two greedy impostors, who went from rags to riches by virtue of their political Ponzi schemes – ultimately designed for their own self-enrichment. By their own admission, the Clintons claimed to be “dead-broke”, when they left the White House back in 2001, the reason, perhaps, why after leaving, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House china, furniture and artwork that she had stolen. Can you imagine? The wife of the President of the United States of America, stealing from their presidential residence. Can you really imagine, this petty-thief becoming the next president of the United States? And, she dares talk about Donald Trump’s “immoral” code of ethics.
The Clintons today appear to be filthy rich, with a combined worth over 100 million dollars. The nation, the fringe media, you and I, should, at the very least, ask how was this possible to achieve in such a short period of time, considering there was no business behind the Clinton’s frantic financial growth. Or was it? The fact of the matter is that there was a business after all. Indeed, there was. There was that deceitful Clinton Foundation, which is not, as many have been led to believe, a righteous charity organization, if you can believe that. Cause if you do, dear friends, if you are that naïve and gullible to be believe that, then you, dear friend, I venture to say, may very well be in a fairyland of your own. Either that or you are, in fact, delusional.
Come to think of it, all things considered, the Clinton Foundation is really an ingenious plot, if I ever saw one. Kudos to the Clintons for their dexterity and mastery of deceit. In the most unabridged and straightforward account I can think of, the Clintons expediently have used the inherent clout afforded them by their political statures, one as ex-President of the U.S., and the other one as Secretary of State, to exchange political favors in the name “charity”, while conveniently diverting and comingling monies given to the Foundation to their own pocketbooks, while always shielded and pontificated as dedicated humanitarians. Clever, eh? Matter of fact, the Foundation is, in fact, the quintessential “quid pro quo” sham—a favor or advantage granted or expected in return for something.
The only problem being that, these two cheats, the Clintons in their never-ending quest for riches and power, have even used the so-called Foundation as a vehicle for granting favors to enemy states, the prize of the exchange varying relative to the size of the favor. For instance, take the Clinton’s Uranium One deal as the ultimate example of how far these two are willing to play with our nation’s security. This is a deal where Russia was able to acquire uranium mines in the U.S., via the acquisition of U1- a uranium mining consortium, structured by Bill Clinton, for which the Foundation received a contribution of $31 million dollars and a pledge for another 100 million dollars. The Russian acquisition of U1, was projected to have control over what could amount to approximately 50% of the world’s uranium output by 2015 - symbolically speaking, a major share of the precious mineral and a real and present danger to the future of nuclear warfare given the fact that Russia would not falter in sending uranium to its client state, Iran. Shortly after the Russians had announced their intentions to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock. Uranium to Russia? Treasonous? Indictable? Felonious? Talk about Trump’s immorality?
Of all of the Clinton’s misdeeds, crimes and carousel of lies, however, the one that strikes me as the must hideously repulsive, taking the prize for the ultimate show of dishonesty, has to be, the Haiti Controversy itself. If you all recall, on January 10th, 2010, the country of Haiti was devastated by an earthquake. No need to mention the fact, that this is one of the most impoverished nations in our hemisphere, and was even before the earthquake. Immediately after the earthquake Hillary went to Haiti to pledge her full support to the destitute nation on behalf of the U.S.A. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, acted as United Nation’s Special Envoy to co-lead in the “HIRC” Haitian Interim Reconstruction Commission along with Haitian Prime Minister Jean Max Bellerive. In short, in the aftermath of the earthquake, the Clintons skillfully positioned themselves at centre stage of the whole Haitian reconstruction drive.
As would and could be expected, the HIRC, led by Bill Clinton, totally disregarded projects of relief, and focused exclusively on projects where Clintons would receive donations. Matter of fact, back in the time, all relief efforts were channeled through the Clintons. If you wanted to do business in Haiti, you had to have a relationship with the Clintons. Digicel—a tele-communications company owned by Irish billionaire Dennis O’Brien was given special treatment which awarded O’Brien’s company exclusive rights to transfer relief money to Haitians whereby the company made more than 50 million dollars in revenues, in exchange for Obrien’s contributions in the millions to the Clinton Foundation. In the end, all money that flowed in for Haiti’s earthquake relief was expediently funneled through the IHRC, Bill Clinton and Haiti’s Prime-Minister.
As a matter of fact, as recently as October 4th, Hurricane Mathew, one the worst storms in recent history made landfall in Les Anglais, in southwestern Haiti killing almost 900 people and leaving tens of thousands homeless. As the images of the devastation hit our airwaves I could not help but to think, how many of those who perished, did so, by virtue of the fact they were homeless. And, by virtue of the fact that they were homeless because the relief money earmarked for providing them a modest home and roof six years earlier during the earthquake, ended up in the vaults of the Clinton’s Foundation. Accomplices in genocide, these Clintons?
Look, I have gone as far as I can go trying to make a point here. I may be wrong but I truly think it is over for Trump. Just today, I heard some political insider say, that only a “miracle” could save Trump. As I don’t believe in miracles, I think that it is over for candidate Trump. Like I said earlier, game over. Some say that the next presidential debate or yet some bombshell by WikiLeaks could turn the tie in Trump’s favor. I say, I don’t think anything can really save Trump now. For all I know, WikiLeaks can come up with a ghastly story on Clinton, and it would not make a bit of difference to those supporting this Clinton cheat.
The only thing left for me to say is that while the game is over for Trump, it is just as over for our nation. With the little democracy that is left, still, I shall invoke my first amendment rights, my freedom of expression rights, just to let those of you who plan on voting for Hillary Clinton know, that, I truly hope you rot in hell with her. Traditionally, again, in the name of democracy as we once knew it, I used to be forgiving about other peoples’ rights to choose and vote for whomever they thought was the right choice. This time around, however, I will forsake the political correctness that has characterized most of my dissertations and just warn you to be very careful in what you wish for as it may just happen.
In lieu of all that is at stake here, the questionable future that awaits future generations of Americans if we elect Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States, I will have to hold all of you, voting for this woman, accountable and responsible for our nation’s demise. I will take this whole thing a step further and go as far as predicting that, should this woman be elected to the White House, our only way out of the chaos that awaits us, would probably be another Civil War – maybe the reason why democrats are steadfast putting up the fight they are for gun control, who knows?
My fellow-Americans, there is not much more I can say, except but to ask all of you out there who share in my beliefs to just go out and vote for Donald Trump in forthcoming elections on November 8th. If nothing else, let us try our best in reaching-out for that miracle for which we are all hoping and praying. I pray to God to save us all and save this great nation and spare us from all the evils that now abound in the nation. I pray that Hillary Clinton is not voted the next president of the United States of America – for your sake, mine and all generations that follow.
The only thing left for me to say is that while the game is over for Trump, it is just as over for our nation. With the little democracy that is left, still, I shall invoke my first amendment rights, my freedom of expression rights, just to let those of you who plan on voting for Hillary Clinton know, that, I truly hope you rot in hell with her. Traditionally, again, in the name of democracy as we once knew it, I used to be forgiving about other peoples’ rights to choose and vote for whomever they thought was the right choice. This time around, however, I will forsake the political correctness that has characterized most of my dissertations and just warn you to be very careful in what you wish for as it may just happen.
In lieu of all that is at stake here, the questionable future that awaits future generations of Americans if we elect Hillary Clinton as the next president of the United States, I will have to hold all of you, voting for this woman, accountable and responsible for our nation’s demise. I will take this whole thing a step further and go as far as predicting that, should this woman be elected to the White House, our only way out of the chaos that awaits us, would probably be another Civil War – maybe the reason why democrats are steadfast putting up the fight they are for gun control, who knows?
My fellow-Americans, there is not much more I can say, except but to ask all of you out there who share in my beliefs to just go out and vote for Donald Trump in forthcoming elections on November 8th. If nothing else, let us try our best in reaching-out for that miracle for which we are all hoping and praying. I pray to God to save us all and save this great nation and spare us from all the evils that now abound in the nation. I pray that Hillary Clinton is not voted the next president of the United States of America – for your sake, mine and all generations that follow.
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.