Saturday, April 16, 2016
Barack Hussein Obama has made it abundantly clear through his actions that he is the enemy–from a long line of enemies–here to destroy the United States, her allies, and her position in the world. The U.S. is being crippled with debt, overloaded with Muslim refugees, and stripped of her power as President Obama works feverishly to rebuild the Axis of Evil by using the United States as its handmaiden. President Obama’s “transformation” of America is our destruction.
ByAlan Jones and Mary Fanning |
Note: This is a joint project of Alan Jones of 1776 Channel and Mary Fanning of The American Report
What do a Cessna in the blue waters of the Pacific Ocean, an Islamic cult, a Chicago family, and a Soviet spy ring all have in common with a sitting U.S. President?
Strap yourself in for an unsettling espionage action-thriller that sounds like a Tom Clancy spy novel. But this cloak-and-dagger exposé is non-fiction. Political non-fiction.
The perplexing sequence of events begins as a Cessna carrying nine people inexplicably descends into the Pacific Ocean off the coast of a Hawaiian island. A passenger wearing a lavender sweater appears calm during the final seconds of flight. The plane enters the water. Some will later speculate the unusual circumstance was a controlled water landing made to look like an accident.
Friday, April 15, 2016
LOTS MORE STUFF ABOUT THE PHONY KNOWN AS LYIN' TED....
Ted Cruz, Rafael Edward Cruz, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, father, family tree, ancestry, genealogy, dates, birth certificates - Republican presidential candidate
![]() |
| Ted Cruz, Rafael Edward Cruz, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, family tree, ancestry, genealogy, dates, birth certificate, |
UPDATE: 03/15/2016: I'd sent my original blog post and research to a few reporters who were researching Ted Cruz's history. Only one got back to me and said thanks. I now see some of the reporters I sent my research to wrote articles about the ancestry. Here's an interesting one. Ted Cruz had a child after she was separated from her first husband. That child born Michael Darragh Wilson was born and died in 1966 in London. That doesn't change anything but it did give me the correct birth date for Eleanor's first husband. Obviously Eleanor told her son Ted a different story to save face. If Ted knew his mother got pregnant by someone other than her husband, he would have called her a "whore" like he did to the mother of one of his friends who did the same.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20160116-cruz-family-drama-mothers-first-husband-is-an-ex-pat-texan-in-london.ece
I don't have Ancestry international because it costs $29. If you hover over the international document, you get a preview. Here is Michael Darragh Wilson's preview of his birth record.
![]() |
| Ted Cruz, Rafael Cruz, Michael Darragh Wilson, born in London, Middlesex 1966, died in London |
I just realized the significance of Ted Cruz's mother's last name being "Wilson" on the birth certificate. That would appear to mean Eleanor was not married to Cruz's father Rafael when he was born. They divorced in 1997. I see no marriage certificate. Perhaps they were never married and Eleanor wanted the divorce so she wouldn't be stuck with Rafael Cruz's debts. If that is so, then Ted Cruz is a bastard child and his mother is a "whore" per Ted Cruz himself. Ted Cruz stated the mother of a friend was a "whore" as she had a baby out of wedlock. Cruz Sr did not find Jesus until 1975.
03/14/2016: @ObligedFriend pointed out something to me about Ted Cruz's legal nationality. A child born of a Cuban citizen abroad is legally Cuban. Ted Cruz allegedly renounced his Canadian citizenship. Did he also renounce his Cuban citizenship? Legally Ted Cruz was born 1/2 Cuban and 1/2 American. I don't believe Cruz Sr ever became a legal US citizen. He stated he'd show the documents then never did. I also posted the information about the real Rafael Bienvenido Cruz who died in 2012. That person has same name and birth date as Cruz Sr. No response from Cruz Crew.
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
The debate over whether or not Senator Ted Cruz is eligible for the U.S. Presidency is about to end. It has now been confirmed that Senator Ted Cruz is neither a “U.S. natural born Citizen” or a “legal U.S. citizen.”
© 2016 JB Williams
The debate over whether or not Senator Ted Cruz is eligible for the U.S. Presidency is about to end. It has now been confirmed that Senator Ted Cruz is neither a “U.S. natural born Citizen” or a “legal U.S. citizen.”
According to all relative legal citizenship documentation available at present,Senator Ted Cruz was born Rafael Edward Cruz, a legal citizen of Canada on December 22, 1970 and maintained his legal Canadian citizenship from birth until May 14, 2014, 43 years later.
The Cruz Campaign for the U.S. Presidency has claimed that Senator Ted Cruz was a “citizen at birth” via his U.S. mother and a “dual citizen” of both Canada and the United States in 1970 and that by renouncing his Canadian citizenship in 2014, he would become eligible for the Oval Office.
There are several problems with this claim… which make the claim false
- “citizen at birth” is a 14th Amendment naturalization term based upon “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
Senator Cruz was born in Canada, subject to the jurisdiction of Canada. Further, any U.S. citizen by virtue of the 14th Amendment only, is a “citizen” and not a “natural born Citizen,” as you will see below. (Source is Cornell Law on the 14th)
- “dual citizenship” was prohibited in Canada in December 1970. (Source is Canadian Law)
From May 22, 1868 until December 31, 1946, all residents of Canada were British subjects. There was no such thing as a Canadian citizen or Canadian citizenship until January 1, 1947.
From January 1, 1947 until February 15, 1977, Canadian law prohibited “dual citizenship.” Foreign parents giving birth to a child in Canada in 1970 were forced to choose between Canadian citizenship only, or citizenship in another country, and to declare that with Canadian officials at the time of birth. The parents of Ted Cruz chose and declared “Canadian citizenship” for Rafael Edward Cruz.
- United States laws make it possible to be a legal U.S. citizen by only the following means…
a) NATURAL BORN CITIZEN – “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.” (The Natural Law as understood by the Founders in Article II of the US Constitution)
b) NATIVE BORN CITIZEN – All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. (The 14th Amendment definition for “citizen”
c) NATURALIZED CITIZEN – the legal act or process by which a non-citizen in a country may acquire citizenship or nationality of that country. It may be done by a statute, without any effort on the part of the individual (aka anchor baby), or it may involve an application and approval by legal authorities, (such as a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) form filed with the US State Department at the time of birth). (This includes “anchor baby” or “citizen at birth” born here or abroad, under the 14th) Source is U.S. State Department
- “dual citizens” are prohibited from being “natural born Citizens” as it pertains to Article II requirements for the Oval Office.
As the stated purpose of the Article II “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office is to prevent anyone with foreign allegiance at birth from ever occupying the Oval Office, and all “dual citizens” at birth are born with “dual national allegiance” at birth. The mere condition of “dual citizen at birth” would be a direct violation of the known purpose and intent of the natural born Citizen requirement in Article II. Source is a letter from Founder John Jay in proposing the NBC requirement for the Oval Office.
Now, Senator Ted Cruz has repeatedly stated that he has never “naturalized” to the United States, which eliminated the possibility that Ted Cruz is a “naturalized” U.S. Citizen.
Senator Ted Cruz has also documented the fact that he was not a “native born citizen” of the United States, but rather a “native born citizen” of Canada on December 22, 1970, who maintained his legal Canadian citizenship until May 14, 2014.
All of this explains why Senator Ted Cruz has no legal U.S. citizenship documentation of any kind…
The Harvard opinion letter written by two of Senator Cruz’s Harvard friends, Neal Katyal & Paul Clement, a mere “commentary” on the subject, relies upon the 14th Amendment naturalized citizen at birth concept, despite the fact that Ted Cruz was not “born in or under the jurisdiction of the United States,” was never “naturalized” to the United States, and completely ignoring the fact that Canada prohibited “dual citizenship” in 1970, as well as the fact that “dual citizenship” alone would prevent him from “natural born U.S.” status.
All of this explains why Senator Ted Cruz has no legal U.S. citizenship documentation of any kind. He is not a “natural born” – “native born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States. Because someone must be one of the three in order to be a legal citizen of the United States, Senator Ted Cruz cannot possibly be a “legal U.S. citizen” of any form.
Only days ago, a 17-year-old first time voter at a New Hampshire town hall meeting for Senator Ted Cruz asked a very reasonable question… “How and why, until recently, were you unaware that you were a Canadian citizen?”
As the young man explained, this is not an eligibility question, but a credibility question… which Senator Cruz refused to answer, preferring instead to regurgitate the talking points carefully crafted by his Harvard friends and eventually, shouting the young man down, after a Cruz fan in the audience shouted “better a Canadian than a Kenyan!” (VIDEO) Meanwhile, a growing number of Constitutional Law Professors agree, “Cruz is NOT eligible.”
Of course, Senator Marco Rubio is also “ineligible,” as a “native born citizen at birth” by virtue of 14th Amendment “anchor baby” policies only.
In the end, the only possible way to consider Senator Ted Cruz eligible for the Oval Office is if every “undocumented resident alien” is eligible for the Oval Office, which I personally believe is the real agenda of both political parties, as they work to meld the USA into the global commune where there is no legal difference between “natural born Americans” and “undocumented aliens.”
The fact that so many Americans do not know or care to know the truth about the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, demonstrates just how far down the road of “hope and change” for the destruction of the Constitutional Republic, the enemy within has already achieved.
Soon, “natural born Americans” will be in the American minority… and they will be ruled by foreigners who have no legal U.S. citizenship at all.
Ted Cruz Has No US Citizenship Of Any Kind – One Week To Drop Out
Ted Cruz Is Not US Citizen Of Any Kind – One Week To Come Clean
Sometimes people are willing to allow themselves to be deceived in spite of the most obvious of evidence that it is taking place. Ted Cruz supporters can see that their candidate is playing Hussein Obama’s game and sealing his records for the same reason that Obama did. They won’t allow themselves to consider why he’s going to so much trouble rather than simply producing what every citizen and legal immigrant have to produce when they go to work in the US, proof of eligibility. They were critical of Obama’s $4 million spent hiding who he is but don’t give a second thought when Cruz does exactly the same thing.
Cruz is a foreigner, quite possibly an illegal alien, with no legitimate ability to run for president of the United States. At issue is not only the requirement that a president be natural born, it is clear that Cruz is probably not even an American citizen of any description. He has offered no paperwork to substantiate his citizen claims, a process and product for foreign born Americans provided by the States Department. For those of you who think it citizenship documents just magically appear as part of the placenta, they don’t. There is a process; documentation must be provided to the State Department and official documents of citizenship issued in return by the federal government. There is no short cut and it is not automatic.
Cruz was born in Canada and no naturalization or any other documentation has taken place since. Those who fail to register a foreign birth by the age of 18 are out of luck; their window of opportunity is slammed shut and birthright citizenship is no longer available. That’s why Cruz has refused to provide his information. Just as with Hussein Obama, he can’t provide what doesn’t exist.
On the April 3rd edition of the Podcast of the North American Law Center, host JB Williams put Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz on notice, that he had two weeks to quit the race voluntarily or he would spill the beans. Williams has evidence that Cruz is attempting to become our second consecutive imposter president. One week has passed without action from the candidate.
Constitutional Attorney Steven Pidgeon joined JB Williams for a discussion of the threats to our Constitution and our sovereignty from the Globalist cabal who, if we fail to stop them this election, will have succeeded in stealing the country from the American people. Cruz is chief among those globalist threats.
Williams says, “For years we’ve been talking about election fraud, we’ve been talking about dead voters, we’ve been talking about felon voters, we’ve been talking about illegal alien voters, okay? We’re not talking about that anymore, we’re talking about stupid voters. We’re talking about people who are American citizens, who do have a right to vote and are not smart enough to tie their own shoes if they think a guy whose Canadian born is eligible to be a US president, without any documentation whatsoever.”
Williams puts the campaign on notice, saying, “If Ted continues on, within the next two weeks, I’m going to make a prediction. Within the next two weeks, if he is still in this race, we are going to release the files we have. Two weeks from tonight and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics.”
He says, “I’m sick of it, I can’t believe we actually have to take this guy down this way, I cannot believe the American people are not smart enough to figure this out on their own, but they’re not; so we’ll figure it out for them.” He adds, “If we have to expose this guy, if we have to expose this guy in order to stop him from defrauding this nation then we are going to do that. I hope somebody with Ted is listening tonight, I hope you go play this for him, send him the podcast, make sure he understands he’s got two weeks to come clean with the American people or we’re taking him down.”
That broadcast was a week ago, and no action has yet been forthcoming from the Cruz campaign. If anything he’s upped the tempo of the dirty politics, lies and underhanded delegate manipulation and theft and questionable election results.
Attorney Steven Pidgeon added, “There is absolutely no chance, following this election, to recover the American Constitution. No chance, if we don’t do it here, there’s no chance. The next opportunity you’re going to have is going to be with a Molotov cocktail against a tank, with a FEMA camp behind it. People need to understand how close we are to a total socialist overthrow.
Cruz now has one week, the truth will be revealed on April 17th if Lyin’ Ted hasn’t come clean with the American people by that time. The compelling arguments are also posted on the North American Law Center website and are worth reading.
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
TED CRUZ AND MARCO HAVE NO RIGHT PLAYING A PART IN THE AMERICAN ELECTION PROCESS...THEY ARE BOTH CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE FRAUDULENT CANDIDATES...
Cruz, Rubio join forces in Arkansas to block Trump delegates
Ted Cruz's and Marco Rubio's supporters have teamed up in Arkansas to pack the state delegation with individuals who'll turn against Donald Trump in a contested convention.
Since Rubio ended his presidential bid March 15, his network of party insiders has lined up behind Cruz to win delegates who'd vote for the Texas senator once they're no longer bound to Trump in a floor fight. Trump won Arkansas' GOP primary March 1 with 32.8 percent of the vote compared to Cruz's 30.5 percent and Rubio's 24.9 percent. But Cruz's canny operatives, with Rubio riding shotgun, is likely to thwart Trump in the delegate election.
SORRY TED...YOU CAN NEVER EVER BE A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...
Presidential eligibility of George Romney
by Pinckney G. McElwee of D.C. Bar
June 1967, The Congressional Record 6-14-1967
by Pinckney G. McElwee of D.C. Bar
June 1967, The Congressional Record 6-14-1967
The Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103) provides in pp 104: “And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the seas, or out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens."In Osborn v. Bank, 22 US (9 Wheat) 738, l.c. 827, Chief Justice Marshall said:A naturalized citizen is indeed made a citizen under an Act of Congress, but the Act does not proceed to give, to regulate, or to prescribe his capacities. He becomes a member of the society, possessing all the rights of a native citizen, and standing, in the view of the Constitution, on the footing of a native. The Constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge those rights. The simple power of the national legislature, is to prescribe a uniform rule of naturalization, and the exercise of this power exhausts it, so far as regards the individual. The Constitution then takes him up, and, among other rights, extends to him the capacity of suing in the Courts of the United States, precisely under the same circumstance under which a native might sue. He is distinguishable in nothing from a native citizen, except so far as the Constitution makes the distinction. The law makes none.Thus the Act of March 26, 1790 would be unconstitutional if it attempted to enlarge the rights of a naturalized citizen to be equal to those of natural-born citizens under the Constitution.Although it is not within the power of Congress to change or amend the Constitution by means of definitions of languages used in the Constitution so as to mean something different than intended by the framers (amendments being governed by Article V) an argument might be advanced to the effect that the use of identical language by Congress substantially contemporaneously might be considered in later years by a court to reflect the same meaning of the same words by the framers of the Constitution; and under this argument to attach importance to the Act of Congress of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103).This argument fades away when it is found that this act used the term “natural born" through inadvertence which resulted from the use of the English Naturalization Act (13 Geo. III, Cap 21 (1773) as a pattern when it was deemed necessary (as stated by Van Dyne) to enact a similar law in the United States to extend citizenship to foreign-born children of American parents. In the discussion on the floor of the House of Representatives in respect to the proposed naturalization bill of a committee composed of Thomas Hartley of Pennsylvania, Thomas Tudor Tucker of South Carolina and Andrew Moore of Virginia, Mr. Edamus Burke of South Carolina stated, “The case of the children of American parents born abroad ought to be provided for, as was done in the case of English parents in the 12th year of William III." (See pp 1121, Vol 1 (Feb. 4, 1790) of Annals of Congress.) The proposed bill was then recommitted to the Committee of Hartley, Tucker and Moore, and a new bill containing the provision in respect to foreign-born children of American parentage was included, using the Anglican phrase “shall be considered as natural born citizens." Manifestly, Mr. Burke had given the wrong reference to the Act of Parliament of the 12th year of William III which was an inheritance law. But, it was a naturalization bill and the reference to the English acts shows the origin of the inadvertent error in using the term natural-born citizen instead of plain “citizen" came from copying the English Naturalization Act.Mr. James Madison, who had been a member of the Constitutional Convention and had participated in the drafting of the terms of eligibility for the President, was a member of the Committee of the House, together with Samuel Dexter of Massachusetts and Thomas A. Carnes of Georgia when the matter of the uniform naturalization act was considered in 1795. Here the false inference which such language might suggest with regard to the President was noted, and the Committee sponsored a new naturalization bill which deleted the term “natural-born" from the Act of 1795. (1 Stat 414) The same error was never repeated in any subsequent naturalization act.The Act of 1795 provides:The children of citizens born outside of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States.In 1802, when Congress repealed entirely the law of 1790, it enacted that “the children of persons who now are, or have been citizens of the United States, shall, although born outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, be considered as citizens of the United States" (2 stat 153). (R.S. 1993) This was followed by the Act of 1855 (10 Stat 604) which repealed the Act of 1802.In United States v. Perkins, 17 F S 117, the syllabus reads:Child born in England of mother who had been born in United States, and had married Englishman in England, held not a ‘natural born citizen,’ within the provisions of Federal Constitution, whether child became citizen at birth by reason of mother’s citizenship or by her subsequent repatriation (Cable Act. 8 U.S.C.A. Sections 9, 10, 367-370; 8 U.S.C.A. sections 6 and note, 7, 8, 399 c (a); Rev. St section 1993; Convention with Great Britain May 13, 1870, art. 1, 16 Stat. 775).And the text of the opinion on page 179 reads:But I think it is immaterial, for the purpose of the instant suit, whether petitioner became an American citizen at his birth by reason of his mother’s citizenship or later by means of the repatriation of his mother. I do not think the authorities sustain his claim that he is a natural-born citizen within the meaning of the provisions of the Constitution, either of section 1, clause 4, or article 2, that ‘No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President,’ or of the Fourteenth Amendment, that ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.* * *I find no proper legal or historical basis on which to conclude that a person born outside of the United States could ever be eligible to occupy the Office of the President of the United States. In other words, in my opinion, Mr. George Romney of Michigan is ineligible to become President of the United States because he was born in Mexico and is, therefore, not a natural-born citizen as required by the United States Constitution....Pinckney G. McElwee
Monday, April 11, 2016
TED CRUZ IS NOT NOR HAS HE EVER BEEN AN AMERICAN CITIZEN...
Rafael “TED” Cruz’s eligibility - The whole sordid affair
Rafael Bienvenido Cruz was born in Matanzas, Cuba on March 22, 1939. His father was Rafael Cruz who came to Cuba from the Canary Islands, Spain. His mother, Emilia Laudelina Diaz, was a teacher in Cuba. As was customary in the Hispanic culture, it appears that Rafael may have taken his mother’s surname and referred to himself as Rafael Bienvenido Cruz Diaz. At some later date he dropped the second surname and just referred to himself as Rafael Bienvenido Cruz. Rafael B. Cruz claims that as a youth in Cuba he joined the Cuban Revolution an organization of pro-Communist youths, in support of Fidel Castro against Fulgencio Batista. Rafael also claims that after being captured and tortured by the Batista regime he decided to leave Cuba. Rafael has stated that a family friend bribed an official from the Batista government and was thereby able to get an exit visa to leave Cuba to attend college in the United States. Rafael states that he obtained a student visa at the U.S. Consulate in Havana in 1957 . The problem with that story is that you didn’t get a student visa from the USA unless you had already been accepted into a university, a process that takes months to complete. It doesn’t seem logical that any University would accept a student who has NO money as he claimed, or who spoke very little English, mainly because immigration law did not allow this. This is the statute in effect at the time Cruz came to the U.S. as a foreign student in 1957:
Such alien shall establish specifically that:
(1) He has a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning;
(2) He is a bona fide student qualified to pursue, and is seeking to enter the United States temporarily and solely for the purpose of pursuing, a full course of study.
(3) He will attend, and has been accepted for attendance by, an established institution of learning or other recognized place of study in the United States.
(4) He is in possession of sufficient funds to cover his expenses or other arrangements have been made to provide for his expenses;
(5) He has sufficient scholastic preparation and knowledge of the English language to enable him to undertake a full course of study in the institution of learning or other place of study by which he has been accepted.
(6) He intends in good faith, and will be able, to depart from the United States upon the termination of his status.
There are NO records of a Rafael Bienvenido Cruz (Diaz) immigrating to the USA during that time from Cuba. ‘Subject of Records’, from Ancestry.com produced a record of a Bienvendio Gregorio Cruz y Lara who was born in Havana on March 22, 1939, and emigrated from Cuba to the United States but he was a different person with a different history and public records indicate that he died in 2012. Rafael also claimed he arrived in the USA in Key West, but the problem is that Key West did not have an immigration port of entry so if he came legally he would have had to arrive in Miami. Rafael then claims that he made his way to Austin, TX, where he enrolled at the University of Texas, Austin in 1957 and worked washing dishes at fifty cents an hour to pay for his education. This too is a problem, as U of T did not allow its students to work full time, and required all students to be fluent in English.
All of this would be in Rafael’s ‘Alien File’ if he had one. "A-Files" are individual files identified by a subject's Alien Registration Number ("A-number"). An A-number is a unique personal identifier assigned to a non-citizen. A-Files became the official file for all immigration and naturalization records created or consolidated since April 1, 1944. Rafael Bienvenido Cruz (Diaz) would have been issued an A-number and A-File upon arrival in the USA.
In January of 1959, Rafael Cruz was shown holding a pro-Castro sign during a rally in Texas published in the Havana Times. In the article Rafael B. Cruz stated that he planned to return to Cuba in May of 1959 for the summer and come back to the United States in September of 1959 to continue his education. If this trip actually occurred, it would have been documented in his A-File and would prove that he was in the USA legally.
The University of Texas, Austin, Registrar’s Office confirmed that a Rafael Bienvenido Cruz did receive a BA degree with a major in mathematics on June 3, 1961. Student visas required that students return to the country of their origin once they completed their education, so if he was here legally, he would have been required to return to Cuba. Rafael claims he applied for Political Asylum after his graduation and received a Green Card. Again, it would be expected that if he applied for Lawful Permanent Resident status that these events would have been documented in his A-File. It is more likely that he wasn’t deported because no one knew he was in the USA illegally.
Rafael’s first marriage to Julia Ann Garza occurred on January 1, 1959, and it is not known if she was a citizen of the United States, but this may also be why he wasn’t deported after graduation. Either way he would have had to file for Lawful Permanent Resident status. The birth of Rafael and Julia’s first child was November 22, 1961, Miriam Ceferina Cruz. The birth of their second child, Roxanne Lourdes Cruz was November 18, 1962. Sometime in early 1967 after 8 years of marriage, Rafael moved to New Orleans without his family to begin work in an oil-related job, with the intention of having his wife and daughters join him once he settled into his new job. One of the very first people Rafael met at work was fellow mathematician and co-worker Eleanor Elizabeth (Darragh) Wilson. (The marriage, both births, the job, and moving to New Orleans should have all have generated A-File entries.)
Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh was born in Wilmington Delaware November 23, 1934. In 1956, at 21 years of age, Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh married Alan Wilson who she met at Rice University in Houston when she was studying mathematics. Wilson was a Ph.D. student in mathematics who had earned three degrees from Rice: a bachelor of science in electrical engineering in 1949, a masters in mathematics in 1956 and his Ph.D. in 1958. In 1960 after four years of marriage, the couple moved to London England where Alan still lives today. According to Alan Wilson, shortly after moving to London, the couple began having serious marital problems causing Eleanor to move out, leaving him with no idea where she went. So in 1962 he filed for divorce, siting abandonment, which he was granted since she never contested it. He doubted that she even knew that the divorce was finalized as the only thing he ever heard about her was by chance when both were being treated at the same hospital and a nurse told him that "his wife" was at the hospital. Wilson was just a little surprised as he no idea at that time that she was pregnant. With no real contact after separating, Alan had absolutely no way of knowing who she was with or if she ever gained British citizenship. It is doubtful that she cared about the divorce anyway, with the fact that Alan and her were married in the USA, she probably didn’t feel that it mattered, as there was no record in England of her marriage to Alan Wilson and as far as anyone else knew, her last name was Wilson so there was no way to look it up, even if someone had a reason to.
British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act - Part III - 10 National status of married women
(1)Subject to the provisions of this section, the wife of a British subject shall be deemed to be a British subject, and the wife of an alien shall be deemed to be an alien.
(1)Subject to the provisions of this section, the wife of a British subject shall be deemed to be a British subject, and the wife of an alien shall be deemed to be an alien.
What happened next is unclear, but it is believed that Eleanor became involved with an Englishman whom she left Alan for. Keep in mind that at this point all of her identification, visa and other documentation all stated that she was Eleanor Wilson. The name of the Brit she was involved with is unknown at this time, as is whether or not he knew she was already married, but it is suspected that she married the Brit in order to provide her with all of the benefits of British citizenship which was automatic upon marriage, and that she kept her name as it was on all of her ID, Eleanor Wilson. One thing that is certain is that she eventually had a child with the Brit in early 1966 who she named Michael Wilson. (Alan Wilson claims he did not know anything about what became of the child until the recent interview, or why the child had the same last name as him, but he was absolutely certain that the child could not have been his.) (Eleanor also used her last name of Wilson on Ted’s birth certificate even though she was supposedly married to Rafael) December 9, 1966 just before the age of 1 Michael Wilson died and was buried in Kensal Green Cemetery in Kensington, England. Michael’s birth and death certificates would most likely fill in the missing pieces as they would have the names of the mother and father, marital status and citizenship. That would provide the information needed for a records search for a British marriage license and citizenship change. A copy of Alan and Eleanor’s divorce decree would also clear up a lot of questions.

After the death of her son Michael, her relationship with the Brit fell apart and by early 1967 Eleanor decided that the best thing for her to do would be to return to her family in Houston Texas and leave the 8 years in London behind her. It is not known if she divorced the Brit or not. Soon after arriving back in Texas, Eleanor began looking for work in her field of mathematics and soon located a job in New Orleans with an oil-related company.
The newly hired Eleanor and Rafael started working together as mathematicians for the New Orleans oil company in 1967, and with both being from Texas, alone in an exciting city, it didn’t take long for them to become involved, even though they were both married to other people. Within months they were scheming to make their new found love permanent. A real life Desi and Lucy. The problem was that they were both still married to other people and neither was a US citizen. Eleanor was now British and there was a record of her US marriage to Alan but no record of a US divorce, and the only reason Rafael was still in the US was because he was married to a US citizen, if he divorced his wife Julia and she turned him in then he would be deported. It is highly questionable why he never filed to become a US citizen during these 8 years of marriage.
As mathematicians in their jobs they analyzed geographical seismic data from areas where various oil companies were searching for oil. One of the areas that the company was getting a lot of business from was the Calgary Canada fields and as the analysts assigned to the project, they found their answer. By moving to Canada there would be no record of any previous marriages or divorce, no need to worry about Rafael getting a divorce and being deported. The best part of this plan was that according to the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947, as a British subject Eleanor was entitled to Canadian Citizenship after living there one year. Then marrying Rafael in Canada would make him a Canadian citizen after one year too. It seemed like the perfect plan so within 6 months of starting their new jobs and meeting each other, they quit and headed to Calgary together, telling family and friends that ‘work’ was sending them there. (Rafael’s move to Canada should have also generated an A-File entry.)
Among the changes introduced by the Canadian Citizen Act of 1947 were the following:
- All Canadian citizens would have automatic right of entry to Canada.
- As a rule, immigrants (including those from the Commonwealth) would not qualify for full citizenship until they had been resident in Canada for five years and had taken out citizenship papers. However, immigrants who were already British subjects would not lose their existing rights, including the right to vote after they had resided in Canada for only one year.Immigrants who had served in the Canadian armed forces during the First or the Second World War would qualify for naturalization after only one year.
- Married women would be given full authority over their nationality status.
- Citizenship would be lost under certain circumstances, such as the adoption of citizenship of another country. (Canada did NOT allow dual citizenship.)
- Provision would be made for instruction in the rights and responsibilities of citizenship and for appropriate citizenship ceremonies, including a revised oath of allegiance.
Once Rafael and Eleanor arrived in Canada they used their mathematics skills and previous experience to start a seismic mapping company called R.B. Cruz and Associates which serviced the oil industry in Alberta. Once Eleanor received her citizenship in 1969 after their first full year in Canada, they got married so that Rafael could also get his Canadian Citizenship. In 1970, as Rafael B. Cruz has so often claimed, he obtained his Canadian citizenship. Keep in mind that it was IMPOSSIBLE to get Canadian Citizenship without first living there for at least FIVE (5) years (Bullet 2 above). So how did Rafael get Canadian Citizenship in less than 3 years as he claims? There is only ONE WAY he could have achieved that, and that is by marrying a Canadian citizen, one Eleanor Elizabeth Wilson, allowing him to become a citizen 1 year after they were married in 1969. Canadian voter rolls after that time period show that both Eleanor and Rafael were registered to vote, which would be impossible if they were not citizens. These are undeniable facts. (Again, all of these events by Rafael should have generated entries into his US A-File.)
By the time Rafael received his citizenship, their relationship was showing signs of strain and the business faltering. Rafael was making frequent trips back to the US to see his children and presumably his American wife Julia, telling them he was still ‘on assignment’ in Calgary. It is probable that Rafael fully intended to return to the USA once he had his Canadian citizenship, but by then Eleanor was already pregnant, and on December 22, 1970 Rafael and Eleanor Cruz gave birth to Rafael Edward Cruz in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. After Ted’s birth they both began drinking heavily as the fights and arguments escalated. By 1974 the business was in dire straits so Rafael sold the ailing R.B. Cruz and Associates to Dave Robson, who turned it into Veritas Seismic Ltd.. Once the business was sold, Rafael abandoned Eleanor and his 3 year old son Rafael Edward Cruz in Calgary with very little money or income and returned to his American wife Julia Ann (Garza) Cruz and their 2 daughters Miriam and Roxanne, in Texas. (Once again, all of these events by Rafael should have generated entries into his US A-File.)
As ‘Ted’ Cruz tells it, Rafael had a ‘come to Jesus’ moment when he became a member of a Dominionist Church after which he returned to Eleanor and Ted and renewed their relationship. The truth is closer to Eleanor packing up everything she had in Calgary and left the 8 years there behind her and once again returning to her family in Texas, where she proceeded to track Rafael down, not that she won him back 100% though. Rafael B. Cruz continued in BOTH marriages, raising all three of the children into adulthood, at least until 1997, when he filed for divorce from both women, one in the USA and the other in Canada, ending his bigamist lifestyle.
The following facts must be considered concerning Ted’s citizenship:
- At the time of Ted’s birth neither parent was a citizen of the United States. Both had become Canadian Citizens. Rafael had never been and Eleanor gave up her US citizenship in England.
- When applying to become a Canadian Citizen, applicants must take an ‘Oath Allegiance’ renouncing any previous citizenship.
- Canada allows American immigrants living in Canada ONE (1) year to file a Consular Record of Birth Abroad (CBRA) after which if the consulate has not received the CBRA, then Canada will permanently grant any child born on Canadian soil exclusive Canadian citizenship. That child will not have citizenship in any other country.
- If Ted is a US citizen then there would be a CBRA on record in both the USA and Canada. Producing that would end any question about his citizenship.
- The Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947 explicitly forbids dual citizenship under any circumstance. If you are a Canadian citizen by naturalization or birth, you could not be a citizen of any other country
- Rafael and Eleanor were both registered to vote in Canadian elections.
- If Rafael maintained his contact with USCIS, the birth of his son Ted would have generated an A-File entry.
- In order to enter the U.S., Ted would have had to have been documented as either a Canadian or United States citizen. If not then he would be considered an illegal alien. If Ted was claimed as Rafael’s son, an entry would have been entered into Rafael’s A-File.
- If Ted entered the USA legally as a Canadian citizen which he was, then an A-Number and an A-File would have been generated for him.
- If Eleanor had retained her U.S. citizenship, she would have had to fill out paperwork documenting her Canadian husband. This would have been entered into his A-File.
- Rafael B Cruz would have needed to re-apply and receive Lawful Permanent Resident Status in 1975 when he returned to the U.S. as a Canadian Citizen which would be in his A-File.
- Rafael B Cruz maintained his Canadian citizenship until 2005. As a foreign national he would have had to update his status annually with USCIS which should have generated A-File documentation.
- Rafael B Cruz became a naturalized United States citizen in 2005. According to the USCIS, he would have had to send copies of a number of documents requested under the Document Checklist for Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, as well as submitting a rather lengthy form which currently Totals 21 pages. He may also have filed a form G-28 Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative which would be a part of his A-File.
- The 2005 Application for Naturalization would require documents such as proof that all earlier marriages ended which would have required the submission of divorce decree(s), annulment(s), or death certificate(s), and all correspondence with the IRS regarding any failure to file any income tax return since becoming a Lawful Permanent Resident (which would presumably have also applied to the years he was in Canada).
- Section 349 of the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act which stipulates that American citizens who swear allegiance to another country automatically lose their American citizenship. If Ted’s mother applied for British and/or Canadian citizenship then she would have had to swear allegiance to another country in doing so. She would have lost her US citizenship.
- Article II of the US constitution says about natural born Citizen “enjoin sole allegiance”, which means anyone born in the U.S. is "subject to the jurisdiction" and is a Citizen. Where "subject to the jurisdiction" means a full and complete jurisdiction meaning "NOT OWING ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ONE ELSE. THAT IS WHAT IT MEANS" This is an exact quote, those are the words of the man who wrote most of the 14th Amendment - Lyman Trumbull. The United States never intended to allow dual citizenship either and it is clear that you must be born on US soil of TWO US citizens to be ‘natural born’ and cannot have ALLEGIANCE to Canada.
Cruz’s mother on the Canadian voter list
The UnConstitutionality of Citizenship by Birth to Non-Americans
US Citizenship is not ‘automatic’.
Donald Trump may have the best standing to bring a lawsuit against Rafael Edward Cruz.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.