To all,
I have been reading a great deal about the issue of standing. I believe the argument that the Constitution is a contract between the people, the states and the Federal Government is a valid argument. I am unable to see why the judges in the federal courts do not recognize this basic principle of the law of our land. The Constitution is my contract with the Federal Government. The federal government has only those powers given to them in this document. They are prohibited to have or take additional powers. The federal judges accept the premise that no one has standing to oppose any act of government. In other words only the government can object to what the government is doing. In the judges eyes the people have no standing to oppose the government even if it is openly committing illegal and unconstitutional acts.
In December we are facing a crisis beyond any one’s imagination. The illegal alien who is in the White House who is recognized by our legislature as the President of the United States is planning to surrender our national sovereignty to a communist one world government. I have read the constitution and I fail to see where the President has been given the power to do this. Further neither the legislature nor any branch of government was ever given the power to enact or ratify any treaty that surrenders our sovereignty. I do not believe the constitution grants the power to anyone or any body of people to surrender our country to a foreign power and negate the Constitution, even in an actual war. Each and every one of these elected officials has taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. However, they stand ready and willing to break that oath and commit this act of treason.
Clearly, the surrender of our country, our country’s sovereignty and our country’s constitution to a foreign power such as a one world government is prohibited by the Constitution. It should be possible to file an injunction prohibiting this act of treason until the Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Courts of each individual sovereign state determine the constitutionality of this act.
I am a natural born citizen of the United States of America. Before the time of my birth and when I drew my first breath to the day I die I am guaranteed the individual protections, as granted in perpetuity by the Constitution of the United States, from any and all forms of government. If Obama believes I am willing to surrender everything that I hold dear to a world communist government he is grossly mistaken. This brings into focus our Constitutional right to oppose all enemies of our country both foreign and domestic. When will our military act to remove these criminals.
I, like every sane person, am aware of horrors that will ensue if this travesty is allowed to take place. When the people wake up to what has transpired nothing will hold them back. If Obama surrenders our national sovereignty we will face civil war. If an injunction is possible it should be filed as soon as possible to prevent war in the streets. If it is not possible then the convention of the Second Continental Congress should be held as soon as possible and the first resolution must be to condemn this treaty and declare all those who are instigating this travesty as domestic enemies. I believe open armed rebellion has not started yet because there is no leader and no elected body or Continental Congress has declared war. Without a leader and direction the country will disintegrate to anarchy. The administration and the puppet attorney general have classified all that oppose them in any way as terrorists. In other words if you oppose the surrender of the United States to a communist world government you by their definition are a terrorist and not allowed the protection of the US Constitution nor the protection of the Geneva Convention. In short if you oppose Obama you may be shot on sight.
I fear for our country. If no one effectively acts to prevent the surrender of our sovereignty, the United States as I have known it all my life will be gone before the New Year. What will follow will defy imagination. Will our military rise up and preserve the constitution? Who will act?
Dave
Friday, October 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
Great article Dave. You have credibly summed up our position here at GUL. We are most certainly on the verge of the Second American Revolution.
ReplyDeleteQuite frankly the next march on Washington DC should focus not on Healthcare, Cap & Trade, Amnesty, etc. but on the fundamental fact that we have a usurper in the White House and a Marxist government that is intent on destroying our freedoms and our American way of life. The Congress is corrupt and our elected, so-called "representatives" no longer serve the people but rather themselves while promoting an anti-American ideology.
The next march and there will be one - should be 10 million strong! Sooner rather than later.
Keep the faith in spite of (maybe because of) Kerchner Motion to Dismiss being granted!
ReplyDeleteOrly’s two cases (Fed District Cts. in Ga and Ca) are pivotally different from Kerchner (Fed District Ct. in NJ).
In fact, it’s no coincidence that Kerchner was dismissed — after waiting many months — right after the the two Orly cases successfully provided avenues to get Obama to account in a way which would NOT throw the courts and nation into constitutional crisis — the big fear of the federal courts (re political question etc.).
Judge Land (Orly penalty) case is currently all about Orly merely showing her case not frivolous (premised on need not to chill the rest of Americans from addressing their constitution). Checkmate against Obama!
Likewise, Judge Carter (Keyes) case does not have to deal with the constitutional nightmare of ousting Obama, that is, merely recovery of damages in fraud tort (even nominal) by Candidate Keyes against “Candidate” (not “President”) Obama will do the job — since Congress and the Dems would be politically compelled to oust Obama. Again, checkmate against Obama!
Were either and/or both Orly cases to move forward (standing is ALL that’s needed since it’s SLAM DUNK that Const Art. 2 requires two citizen parents for POTUS eligibility), it’s all over for Obama, because politically his remaining in the Whitehouse, again, would be completely untenable even for the Dems and Congress.
Thus, after Orly files for Motion for Summary Judgment, premised even on all facts in dispute going for Obama (noting that Obama has declared to the world in what as admission against interest, that his dad was Kenyan/British citizen on Baby O’s birth) the Courts can take the case without ever having to deal with discovery on the sole legal issue of meaning/applicabability of Const. Art. 2.
This leaves Team Obama really with its last remaining legal argument (noting that Fed. Ct. can get pendant jurisdiction over Keyes’ tort action):
Const. Art 2. “natural born citizen” = “citizen by birth”
Const. Art 2. “citizen” = “citizen by naturalization”
Nice try, but no cigar!
… especially since all the fuss about McCain and the Senate Resolution would be shown.
So, take heart — and if I’m wrong that’s the current end of our Constitutional Republic (and could mean the second American Revolution since all other means have been turned back by a Government currently under unconstitutional coup d’etat).
I truly sympathize with Judge Carter, and our prayers should be with him, as he says he reads the internet and is aware of these factors (including the possible RICO implications recently filed by Orly and ongoing scrubbing of Obama-foreign born refernces in the Honolulu Advertiser just last week before our very eyes — and during the pendency of Stay on Discovery (apparently being exploited by the “Government” and Dept. of ‘Justice’, no less).