Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized

Another teachable moment. US Attorney General-usurper appointed, Eric "Knee Jerk" Holder, is repeating his master's moment of acting "stupidly".

"KJ" Holder, supposedly the nations top law enforcement officer, admitted today to a biased opinion against an Arizona law, which he hadn't even read during his responses to a Congressional panel.

Who's the racist?

Nothing new here, he's equally guilty of being just as racist as Obama. Apparently nothing has come from the Beer Summit, and no teachable moment has occurred other than to further expose these two as part of the problem, and not any part whatsoever a part of the solution.

This isn't even the first time the buffoon twins have been caught with their black asses showing in public. The New York terrorism trials were already a forgone conclusion, according to these champions of civil rights. KSM was going to be "tried,found guilty,and executed" as stated by Barry and KJ. For all their mirandizing, protections afforded all, and blah, blah, blah BS they regurgitate,Obama and Holder, are nothing. The presumption of innocence before guilt is proven, is as meaningless to these two low brows, as is racial equality.

Both talk a good game, but the stupidity is in their mind and hatred is in their hearts. What else would you expect from the top thugs of this criminal gangstamocracy.

The long arm of the law awaits these two hoodlums; these convenience store robbers dressed in Armani. Like I say they're nothing.

Steve
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



May 13, 2010

By Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who has been critical of Arizona's new immigration law, said Thursday he hasn't yet read the law and is going by what he's read in newspapers or seen on television.

Mr. Holder is conducting a review of the law, at President Obama's request, to see if the federal government should challenge it in court. He said he expects he will read the law by the time his staff briefs him on their conclusions.

"I've just expressed concerns on the basis of what I've heard about the law. But I'm not in a position to say at this point, not having read the law, not having had the chance to interact with people are doing the review, exactly what my position is," Mr. Holder told the House Judiciary Committee.

This weekend Mr. Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press" program that the Arizona law "has the possibility of leading to racial profiling." He had earlier called the law's passage "unfortunate," and questioned whether the law was unconstitutional because it tried to assume powers that may be reserved for the federal government.

Rep. Ted Poe, who had questioned Mr. Holder about the law, wondered how he could have those opinions if he hadn't yet read the legislation.

"It's hard for me to understand how you would have concerns about something being unconstitutional if you haven't even read the law," the Texas Republican told the attorney general.

The Arizona law's backers argue that it doesn't go beyond what federal law already allows, and they say press reports have distorted the legislation. They point to provisions in the law that specifically rule out racial profiling as proof that it can be implemented without conflicting with civil rights.

But critics said giving police the power to stop those they suspect are in the country illegally is bound to lead to profiling.

Mr. Holder said he expects the Justice and Homeland Security departments will finish their review of the Arizona law soon.