Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Obama White House probe of Obama White House finds no Obama White House impropriety on Sestak
The L.A. Times
May 24, 2010 2:22 am
Obviously, nothing to see over here, folks. Move along now.
+++++++++++++++++++++
Just had to post the LA Times and their lead line, on Sestak Gate. Ahh part of the "MSM" tanking for Obama. So familiar to the birthers.
Just heard Congressman Issa back off the call for possible Impeachment. Why's that Issa?
Either the law was broken or it wasn't, why is Obama above the law? If it was broken, that's impeachable because the law calls for jail time. Can we have a felon serve as President?
When it comes to witness believability one side versus the other, it gets down to reasonable doubt. If Obama can't tell what happened right now, without stonewalling, his credibility to sway reasonable doubt washes away. Add to that, Obama's Attorney General refusing to appoint a special prosecutor. These are not acts of an innocent man.
Steve
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.