Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Do You Trust The Obama Regime?...

Trust me, would I lie to you?

A simple request made by a proven prevaricator. Hardly anything of importance has passed through Obama's lips, that haven't been couched in half truths or outright lies. Global warming. Do you believe? He wants you to. Never mind the underpinnings are based on manipulated data, or in plain speak, a lie.

ObamaCare? It's constitutional. Do you believe? ObamaCare is cheaper than what we have now. Do you believe that also?

How about a very fundamental issue. His birth certificate? Real or forged? Obama was on record saying he's shown his birth certificate, that it's been posted online for 3 years. Hawaii said they had one, the Governor personally searched for it but came up empty handed, that is until Obama "felt " he needed to put an end to the silliness. Suddenly the document appears. Anything strange about that?

The Bin Laden narrative, in general are you satisfied with that? No photos, immediate burial at sea, Instantaneous DNA testing turnaround times, no eye witness testimony, just spooks that must remain anonymous. A demolished clunker helo left behind or was it a necessary part of a no prisoner ruse?. One could almost make a case saying the whole thing was fabricated, Obama has been so trustworthy to date, why wouldn't we believe him?

Of course Obama understands there are those ever present racist, conspiracy theory, teabagging, right wing fringe, extremist, astroturf haters, that will never believe him, no matter what derogatory names he has called them. How so very unfair. How useful in predicting the reactions of non believers when ever it suits the purpose.

Obama has been part of more staged events than big time wrestling. The Obama fainters in crowds during the 2008 campaign were $50 Acorn plants. City after city- "It's okay folks, give them some room, We're Ok We're ok, is there a doctor... ha ha ha, pookie is a little over excited is all...." The town hall counter protesters were $50 Acorn plants. Many here in the Houston area during those days, didn't even speak English. they were paid sign holding Mexican illegals picked up from the "day laborer" gathering places in the barrios. SEIU's anti Scott Brown, Martha Coakley supporters, were $50 paid appearance union workers.

So what's not to believe about the Bin Laden narrative, version 1.0,2.0,3.0,4.0,...or 15.0 and counting?

Why would you kill the #1 terrorist in the world when he was unarmed and available for capture and interrogation? Consider the Al Qaeda networks and plans that could be unmasked, think of the damage which could be wrecked upon them. The SEALs that went into the compound were highly disciplined, HIGHLY disciplined, individuals, not some trigger happy shoot first, ask question later, amateurs. These guys understand what the term high value target means.

For what it's worth, I'll give you my opinion of what really happened in Abbottabad.
Bin Laden was taken prisoner. He's in a rendition house somewhere in Europe. He's being waterboarded, and will be interrogated until the last drop of information is extracted by CIA "torturers". When they are finished, Bin Laden will disappear, he will not stand trial in New York City, nor will he be given a military tribunal. Bin laden will be executed, cremated and his ashes scattered.. If the SEALS wanted Bin Laden dead, why have a shoot out? Weren't they carrying grenades? They would have first  fragged the room then gone in and shot him a few times. As for the other men at the compound, heavy firefight my ass, one resister against 24 expert marksmen SEALs, that was an uneven fight if ever there was one, all other men shot though unarmed? Loose threads gotten out of the way is more likely. What about Bin Laden's wife, the on again, off again human shield, first she was shot then she wasn't, what about her? She was left behind on purpose, not because somebody had a brain fart Do you find it believable the SEALs had no contingency plans for prisoners ? But what if, to give credibility to the cover story, a helo was destroyed as part of the "no room" for Bin Laden's wife explanation?

A C-47 Chinook can transport 50 people. There were allegedly 24 SEALs and a dog, they had two, 11 passenger Blackhawks and the Chinook. No room for a woman? She was left behind to be the witness that Bin Laden was "killed". The flawed narrative even mentioned how the SEALs had to "double up" on the Blackhawk. Nope 11 or 12 max could get aboard,, after that the thing won't lift off. Especially in the high mountainous thin air altitudes of Pakistan and Afghanistan. The CH-47 was brought along for a reason. To haul documents, computers, half of the 24 member SEAL team and at worst a body, at best a prisoner. But only one, no more. If Bin Laden's wife had presented a problem, she too would have been terminated, but some house occupant was pre ordained to be left alive with the impression Bin Laden was killed by the SEALs. Have the Pakistani ISI confirmed any forensic evidence taken at the scene as belonging to Bin Laden? Where's the blood splatter tests was it Bin Laden's or a pint or two from a blood bank?, What about bone and tissue fragments, from this double tap? Where's the recovered bullet that blew out the back of Bin Laden's skull with his tissue on it? Bin Laden's 23 year old wife, may have been in the room initially during the confrontation, but did she see him go down? Was she lead out of the room, so the SEALS could stage a death scene, then fire off a couple rounds out a window, leaving her with the impression Osama was killed? I bet Bin Laden, once the SEALS realized he was unarmed, was subdued, drugged, stuffed in a bag and transported out. They are trained to look at the target's hands for weapons, not see if the guy has a scared look on his face. What's the truth? Dead men tell no tales that's one truth. Another is  high value targets are worth more alive than dead, that is until they serve no further purpose. If the ISI can find no forensics matching Bin Laden, don't you think they will share that with Al Qaeda, and they will know the CIA is holding him somewhere?  Another truth,  cover stories can be fabricated, some are, and are told better than others.

Bin Laden is a dead man talking. All this other stuff being reported is a staged fairy tale, to placate the Left and cover the CIA's tracks. Obama doesn't want his followers to see him as worse than George Bush, much less as no different.

I believe Leon Panetta is in charge of this whole operation, and Obama is along for the ride. What Obama  gets out of this are a preceived  clean hands image and a bump in the polls. Obama sees this as a 2012 campaign win win for himself, with little to no downside. The MSM in general hasn't spoken one outraged word about a straight up execution of three unarmed terrorists. Jake Carney explained it away as there are "other" ways to resist. What they shouted Alluh Akbar screw you SEALs? Shouldn't Eric Holder file war crime charges against Obama for ordering  a kill only mission?  Where's the same self righteous indignation, expressed during Abu Gare?

 Useful idiots, that's all they are, these Obama followers and approvers .

Osama Bin Laden was an inconvenient, convenient  incident. Political lemonade made out of failed presidential lemons. Osama Bin Laden is Obama's soon to be dead,squeezed to a pulp, pigeon .  Obama says, "We are better than they" and  "we don't want to incite the Muslims". How on the face of it, is it any different to order the death of someone from the other side, than it is when they do it to us?

Don't get me wrong, if I had the chance to kill Bin Laden, I wouldn't lose a wink over it and I wouldn't give a crap about muslim sensitivities. Obama is a self serving lying hypocrite when  he says these things after allegedly ordering a hit in the first place.  Hypocrite goes double for the media.and his drone propaganda  knaves and all of Obama's basely behaving base..


Steve

2 comments:

  1. How soon we forget! Two years ago we saw Marines being sentenced to prison for having defended themselves in a REAL fire-fight in which a civilian woman shield had caught flack.

    HOW can a "war" be fought when there are "situational" and variable rules of engagement? It seems to ME that in an all volunteer military each volunteer would have the absolute right of recission of his contract IF the contract was unilaterally changed to enhance the odds that s/he will be killed in an engagement because of "politically correct" rules of engagement working to his/her disadvantage -- OR, if s/he were ordered to participate in what appears to be a political hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You forgot about the alleged Islamic ceremony. Could it be that the U.S. Navy did that to show that they know that Obama is nothing more than an Islamofascist bootlicker (to be polite)? Did Lt. Cdr. Fitzpatrick allude to that?

    Personally, I think Obama's goose is cooked. He'll get a bounce alright. A bounce out of office and a bounce into prison.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.