How Barack Obama avoids prison
By Lawrence
Sellin
A political deal will be struck
to save the Democrat Party from total collapse and protect the Republican Party
from revelations of complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the
American people.
A growing number of Americans
are now learning that Barack Obama, according to Article II, Section I, Clause 5
of the U. S. Constitution, is an illegal President. The law requires a candidate
for the Presidency to be a "natural born citizen," that is, a second generation
American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of
the candidate's birth.
Obama's father was a citizen of
Kenya and a British subject at the time of his birth, which made him forever
ineligible for the Presidency.
Practically speaking, that issue
is not a problem for Obama because the Republican Party also wants to violate
the Constitution. Many Republicans are aggressively advocating Florida Senator
Marco Rubio as Mitt Romney's Vice Presidential candidate. Rubio is ineligible
because, even though he was born in the United States, his parents were Cuban
citizens at the time of his birth.
Since 1975, both Democrat and
Republican politicians have been trying unsuccessfully to amend Article II,
Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution. The election of Obama has allowed
them to do so, not legally, but by fait accompli.
According to the wishes of
Democrat and Republican politicians, Anwar al-Awlaki, killed by a drone strike
on September 30, 2011, was eligible to be President because he was born in New
Mexico of Yemeni parents. Al-Awlaki was the "spiritual leader" of al-Qaida in
the Arabian peninsula, whose sermons at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in
Falls Church, Virginia were attended by two hijackers who carried out the 9/11
attacks, Nawaf al-Hamzi and Hani Hanjour. Likewise, accused Fort Hood shooter
and alleged al-Awlaki disciple, Nidal Malik Hasan, is eligible to be President
because he was born in Virginia of Palestinian parents.
There are also persistent
questions about the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate, Selective Service
registration and his use of a Social Security number not issued to him, all
serious crimes with the potential for lengthy prison sentences.
The law, however, is not a
problem for Obama because any serious investigation would implicate far too many
Democrat and Republican politicians. That is why the political establishment and
the media are suppressing every effort to uncover the truth about Obama's
personal history because it would expose their own corruption and
hypocrisy.
The greatest danger to Obama is
the potential collapse of the Democrat Party from the failed policies engineered
by his Administration and the Party's progressive wing.
The Clinton faction and other
Democrats outside of Obama's circle of supporters now fear he may be leading the
Party, not only to certain electoral defeat, but to political oblivion. They are
actively working behind the scenes, likely with the collusion of Republicans, to
ensure Obama's defeat or, perhaps, even quietly to force him out of the 2012
Presidential contest. They all have a vested interest in maintaining the balance
of power of the political status quo, which an Obama victory would permanently
alter.
An Obama win would, for example,
forever eliminate Clinton Democrats as a political factor and nullify all the
Republican economic arguments, which represent the core of the Romney
campaign.
In general, however,
politicians' concern for the well-being of country exists only in the context of
the power they wield and the health of their financial portfolios and that is
the essence of the Obama threat that they perceive.
Much can happen between now and
November to determine whether or not the non-Obama Democrat and Republican
coalition will succeed. Will Attorney General Eric Holder be forced to resign
paving the way for other investigations? Will there be selective leaks to
embarrass Obama? Will the financiers and liberal media turn against him? Will
Obama be privately blackmailed or promised a pardon?
The fate of Obama has already
been determined, not by voters, but by powerbrokers using tactics that will
unfold over the coming months.
There is one thing, however,
that is certain. Regardless of who wins in November, Obama's alleged crimes will
never be fully investigated and his personal history will never be exposed by
either Democrat or Republican politicians. Their involvement in a conspiracy of
silence is unmistakable and their protection of Obama stems solely from
political self-interest.
Barack Obama has been issued a
"get out of jail free" card by a corrupt political establishment and a dishonest
media.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a
retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of
Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Afghanistan and the Culture of Military
Leadership". He receives email at
lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
Source link:
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/15-06-2012/121397-barack_obama_prison-0/#
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
WHERE can I find out if MITT ROMNEY'S parents were U.S. CITIZENS at the TIME OF HIS BIRTH?
ReplyDeleteDid his FATHER -- who was bron in Mexico, renounce his Mexican ditizenship BEFORE Mitt was born?
There are two sides to the story. Take your pick:
DeleteCommander Kerchner did a genealogy chart for Romney and concludes that Romney was born to 2 US citizen parents, so he is an Article 2 natural born citizen.
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/08/ancestry-ahnentafel-genealogy-chart-for-mitt-romney-by-cdr-charles-kerchner-ret/
On the other hand, Edward Noonan argues: Romney’s question of citizenship covers a period from 1884 to 1907. Romney’s question begins in 1884 when 14 year old Gaskell (Mitt's grandfather) left the United States (actually they left the Territory of Utah) and migrated to Mexico. Gaskell’s father (Miles) became a Mexican Citizen and according to the Perkins v. Elg case Gaskell’s father immediately lost his citizenship as soon as he became a Mexican citizen! The question, according to Perkins v. Elg, was when and if Gaskell upon reaching his 21st birthday DID HE ELECT TO KEEP HIS AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP… if he did… then PROVE IT! But Gaskell did NOT assert his American citizenship rights on or near his 21st birthday. This would have needed to be done about 1891. However, Gaskell remained in Mexico as a Mexican citizen until 1907 when there was civil unrest in Mexico. Gaskell was then 37 years old, far past the time to regain his American citizenship and be repatriated as a US Citizen. Gaskell’s son, George Romney (Mitt's father) was born in Mexico (1907) as a full fledged Mexican citizen. There has never been given any proof of American citizenship for George Romney, or his father Gaskell Romney. And of course, this would mean that Mitt Romney has no proof of American Citizenship as well. If his father was an illegal alien then Mitt could only declare his citizenship by the right of being a “birthright” baby. Since he seemed to have been born “in the United States” he could claim birthright baby status via the 14th Amendment. But to be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, Mr. Romney would have to prove his father, George Romney, became naturalized prior to his birth. But this cannot be done because no such documentation exists.
The same is true for Mr. Soetoro. There is a school document showing Mr. Soetoro (aka BHO) to be adopted and being claimed as a citizen of Indonesia. Using Perkins v. Elg’s instructions, Mr. Soetoro would have had to reclaim his AMERICAN citizenship on or at his 21st birthday. Since Soetoro was born in 1961 then he would have had to reclaim his citizenship by 1982. No records show any attempt of Mr. Soetoro legally reclaiming his “birthright.” Of course, this is assuming that Mr. Soetoro was indeed born in Hawaii and he can in fact claim American citizenship just on the premise that he was born on American soil… but his fake birth certificate(s) seems to indicate the charges and rumors of his being born on foreign soil (Kenya) has great merit.
http://noonan4president.blogspot.com/2012/04/i-was-reviewing-one-of-art-ii-super.html
http://noonan4president.blogspot.com/2012/04/nationality-problem-posed-by-romney.html
" There are also persistent questions about the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate, Selective Service registration and his use of a Social Security number not issued to him, all serious crimes with the potential for lengthy prison sentences."
ReplyDelete"QUESTIONS???" B/C, SS and draft registration, are slam-dunk, postively, absolutely-- forgeries, frauds, bogus, phony, pretend, farce, pseudo,counterfeit, sham .....
Colonel, you have articulated a series of very credible points regarding the collusion between both parties which has gotten us to where we are today. We have an immunized POTUS who is like a rookie fighter pilot inside the cockpit of the most powerful aircraft in the world having no idea how to fly it.
ReplyDeleteHe looks and sounds good but he is untested, and uncertified, making him unqualified to fly the most powerful and sophisticated aircraft in the world. He is spinning out of control.