Sunday, June 24, 2012

Something is seriously wrong here. Either Obama is not eligible for office on the grounds of birth or the proof to show he is is so damaging that the “stall and obfuscate” strategy is worth the risk.

 

Alan P. Halbert, commenting on the strange legal tactics of the Obama Administration trying to argue for his ballot eligibility in the state of Florida:
At the end of the day, I am struck by one incontrovertible fact; Obama chose to create phony technical grounds to dismiss this lawsuit rather than throw down his so-called long form birth certificate he released in April of 2011 and other bona-fides as absolute “proof” of his right to hold office.
Something is seriously wrong here. Either Obama is not eligible for office on the grounds of birth or the proof to show he is is so damaging that the “stall and obfuscate” strategy is worth the risk.
According to Mr. Halbert, the Judge seemed not happy with the defense.
www.economicnoise.com/2012/06/24/obamas-florida-eligibility/

1 comment:

  1. The truth is becoming obvious. It's difficult to defend the indefensible.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.