Alan P. Halbert, commenting on the strange legal tactics of the Obama Administration trying to argue for his ballot eligibility in the state of Florida:
At the end of the day, I am struck by one incontrovertible fact; Obama chose to create phony technical grounds to dismiss this lawsuit rather than throw down his so-called long form birth certificate he released in April of 2011 and other bona-fides as absolute “proof” of his right to hold office.Something is seriously wrong here. Either Obama is not eligible for office on the grounds of birth or the proof to show he is is so damaging that the “stall and obfuscate” strategy is worth the risk.
According to Mr. Halbert, the Judge seemed not happy with the defense.
www.economicnoise.com/2012/06/24/obamas-florida-eligibility/







An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
The truth is becoming obvious. It's difficult to defend the indefensible.
ReplyDelete