Friday, July 13, 2012

Our current President knowingly ran for and and was elected to the office for which he is not eligible. And no one in a position of authority or public influence (via a national media position or fame) realizes that fact, or they do realize it but are unwilling, or not allowed to discuss it openly.

A Brief History of Natural Citizenship

The Constitution & Presidential Eligibility
  The legitimacy of the presidency of Barack Obama is predicated on the assumption that he was constitutionally eligible for the office at the time of his election.  While he fulfilled the 2nd and 3rd requirements for the office, (the requirements of age [maturity], and residency [familiarity & attachment] ) a fallacy has been unquestioningly embraced that he also fulfilled the elements of the 1st -and primary, requirement; namely that he be a “natural born Citizen”.  That fallacy is the result of an erroneous substitution of a tangential circumstance (location of birth) in place of the oldest tradition of all human societies, which is membership acquired from member parents.

This error is the result of the historical circumstances of the American British colonies, which were not founded as equal members of the King’s domain, but rather as properties which were outside of the umbrella of legal rights that had been established through centuries of “push-back” against royal despotism, beginning with the Magna Carta.  This inequitable relationship with the mother country was not made manifest until England was stuck with the large costs of waging the war against the French & Indians in America.  England was loath to bare the costs to defend others so far away while they (the colonists) escaped from paying a sizable share.  And so began a campaign to squeeze money from the colonies even while they were given no representation in Parliament nor before the King’s counselors.  This revealed that the attitude of England was that the colonies were the property of England, and its subjects were not co-equals with the rights of English freemen.
READ MORE...

1 comment:

  1. Since you know the usuring illegal Muslim is a fraud, Why address him as "president..?"

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.