Non-citizen voters gave Obama the edge in 2008 and 2012 — and will in 2014 if we don’t do something about it
I read this article 2 days ago, but found it so depressing that I can bring myself to post it only today.
In an article for
The Washington Post on October 24, 2014, “
Could Non-Citizens Decide the November Election?,” political scientists Jesse Richman and David Earnest report on their stunning research finding that
non-U.S.
citizens had voted in both the 2008 and 2010 elections, and they did so
in sufficient numbers that they likely changed the outcome, that
is, the election and reelection of Barack Obama to the presidency, as
well as the election of a Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate.
Jesse
Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International
Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social
Science Research Center. David Earnest is Associate Professor of
Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University,
and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of
Arts and Letters.
Their research findings will be published in a
forthcoming article in the journal
Electoral Studies.
- Assembled a sample of 32,800 for the 2008 election, 339 of whom were non-citizens.
- Assembled a sample of 55,400 for the 2010 election, 489 of whom were non-citizens.
- Matched respondents to voter files so as to verify whether they actually voted.
Here are the political scientists’ research findings:
- Although most non-U.S. citizens do not register to vote, let alone vote, however –
- More than 14% of non-U.S. citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they had registered to vote.
- 6.4% of non-citizens voted in 2008.
- 2.2% of non-citizens voted in 2010.
- Richman and Earnest concluded that enough non-citizens had voted in 2008 and 2012 so that their votes changed the outcome of those elections.
Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens |
| 2008 | 2010 |
Self reported and/or verified | 38 (11.3%) | 13 (3.5%) |
Self reported and verified | 5 (1.5%) | N.A. |
Adjusted estimate | 21 (6.4%) | 8 (2.2%) |
In the words of Richman and Earnest:
Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen
votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to
overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other
Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen.
Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312
votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could
account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina.Obama
won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North
Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.
Richman
and Earnest also found that photo I.D., a policy advocated by
conservatives to prevent voter fraud, “appears strikingly ineffective.”
As many as three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were
asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have
subsequently voted.
The
political scientists propose that public information may be a better
method to reduce voting by non-citizens because the more educated
non-citizens were less likely to violate the law by voting. As an
example, in 2008, no non-citizens with a college degree or higher voted,
in contrast to non-citizens with less than a college degree who were
significantly more likely to have voted. This suggests that non-citizen
voting may be due to a lack of awareness about the illegality of their
voting.
Based
on the 2008 and 2012 precedents, Richman and Earnest justly ask
if control of the Senate in 2014 will be decided by illegal votes cast
by non-citizens.
If early voting in North Carolina is any indication, the answer is “Yes.”
Kenric Ward reports for
Watchdog that early voting began last Thursday, Oct. 24, in North Carolina, and already the state’s election board had found
154 ineligible non-citizen voters on its poll lists.
Those 154 illegal immigrants are on NC’s voter rolls, courtesy of the Obama administration’s
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
program. DACA designees can be up to 31 years old. When illegal
immigrants are certified under DACA, deportation proceedings are
frozen. That opens a window for those illegals to obtain driver’s
licenses in North Carolina, said James Johnson, president of North
Carolinians For Immigration Reform and Enforcement.
NC’s State Board of Elections are examining more than 9,000 additional voters’ names for their questionable legal status. But
they do not expect to finish checking before early voting had begun.
Special counsel Brian LiVecchi told Watchdog.org that “We don’t know
what we don’t know.”
“We
want to know how such a large number of non-U.S. citizens were ever
registered to vote in the first place,” said Jay DeLancy, executive
director of the Voter Integrity Project of North Carolina. “There is
clearly a system failure here and we need the Board of Elections and the
DMV to help the Legislature and the public understand where the problem
lies.”
NC State Rep. Christopher Mills (R-Hampstead)
wrote a letter to the Board of Elections citing “an extremely large
number of non-citizens” on North Carolina’s voter rolls. Mills asked
that election officials explain the “likely procedure in which these
non-citizens were allowed to register to vote … and the board’s actions
for immediate removal.”
So what do we do about this outrageous travesty?
I suggest the following:
- Contact your Congress critters and DEMAND that they look into this. Click here.
- Contact
your state’s attorney general, who is supposed to oversee elections,
and DEMAND that they inspect the voters’ registrations to spot and
eliminate non-U.S. citizens. Click here to find out the name, address, and phone no. of your attorney general.
- Publicize
by disseminating this post to your family, friends, and contacts via
e-mail and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.)!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.