Friday, October 30, 2015
Why is Bill O’Reilly bringing up again? The video clip (above) comes from this very week of O’Reilly’s television program. Once again, O’Reilly claims that Barack Obama was born in the USA. (Oh, and the UN says red meat causes cancer and .)
Oddly, enough, Rush Limbaugh recently that he doesn’t believe that Joe Biden is truly out of the presidential race because in the closets of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama thatHmm.
So at the beginning of his program, O’Reilly opined that Barack Obama was born in the USA because, in his, it would be to forge the two birth announcements found, , in the two Honolulu newspapers by O’Reilly’s staff’s “investigation”.
Now, we all know that his staff did no investigating in Hawaii, and that they did find birth announcements in any newspapers. No. They found digital images of the announcements just as the Internet is the that anybody’s going to find (digital images of) the two birth certificates (long form and short form but NOT original form) that Obamareleased after he or his staff received them as certified copies from the Hawaii Dept. of Health.
We won’t rehash here why those “documents” are proof of nothing, other than to say that no court of law and no government entity would EVER accept as proof , especially when the underlying “document” has no known provenance whatsoever, nor does the image itself.
The image below is also on the Internet, just like Obama’s birth certificates and his birth announcements.
Could the digital images of the birth announcements be forged?
Has anyone produced an No. Ever submitted to anybody for authentication?
Where did these images come from? Well, they came from microfilms on file in libraries in Hawaii and California and/or the offices of the newspapers. The images were first posted on a blog and supplied by a who is , so she’s not able to provide any provenance for them.
Even if these images do exist and even if the microfilms actually date to a time prior to when Barack Obama decided to run for the presidency, the films themselves have been submitted to anybody for authentication.
In fact, people who have extensively the issue have found on the microfilm boxes, missing microfilms, and and on the films themselves, right where Obama’s announcement appears. Could somebody splice a false image into a microfilm?
In addition, procedures in some of the libraries make relatively . (Who can forget how easily Sandy Berger secreted documents on his person, sneaked them out of the building, and destroyed them?)
Therefore, contrary to O’Reilly’s allegation, the “birth announcements” could rather easily be forged.
As reported , the birth announcements, even if authentic (a fact not in evidence), are because all they do is report that a birth has occurred and was registered in Hawaii.
At the time, Hawaii’s system births to be registered at their Dept. of Health, . So, whether or not a birth certificate showed the actual place of birth, an announcement would be printed in the two newspapers, because in that announcement indicates birth location. All that list of births means is that the births were at the Hawaii Dept. of Health.
If that’s not enough, there’s no evidence that the “son” born to a “Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama” (of an address ) is the person who occupies the White House. None. Why? Because the “son” is unnamed, as is the mother.
we accept the announcements, then still all we know is that an son was born to an “Mrs.” Barack H. Obama on that date. (On that date, Barack H. Obama Sr. had wives, if you believe the official narrative. Which wife gave birth on that date?)
O’Reilly ended his rant with the amazing contention that
It’s to life whether or not the president of the USA was born in this country and/or may have always been ineligible to be president?
Consider all the harm that’s been done to this country during the potentially illegitimate Obama administration:
Consider all the lives lost in the Middle East because of Obama’s “war” policies–the lives lost in Benghazi being just four
Consider all the troops maimed or killed, all the blood and treasure expended, on his watch.
Consider the harm done by Obamacare.
Consider the loss of wealth caused by Obama’s fiscal policies.
Consider the jobs lost or created because of his economic policies and business-strangling regulations.
Consider the horrific damage inflicted upon race relations in this country because of his and racist DOJ, which prosecutes or does not prosecute, which investigates or does not investigate, based upon the race of the alleged violator. (No blind justice in Obama’s Justice Dept.)
Consider the harm done to our national security because of his weak foreign policies and his alienation of former allies.
Consider the danger to every citizen of this country that comes from open borders that allow terrorists, criminals, thugs, and drugs to flow freely into our land, not to mention illegal aliens who flood across our borders, costing the states and the country
Consider the lives lost when criminal aliens murder our citizens because they were not deported or because they came back after being deported, Kate Steinle being just one of far too many.
Consider the deathly damage done to our Constitutional Republic by Obama’s–by the way he ignores and does end runs around the law and the Constitution, when he “rules” by executive fiat.
I could go on and on, but how can O’Reilly, contend that it’s “insignificant” to anyone whether or not Obama was born here, when the answer to that question goes straight to the very legitimacy of his presidency and all that he’s done as president?
How can O’Reilly possibly state that it’s a “big lie” to challenge the that Obama was born in this country?
No evidence put forward to support that contention–that Obama was born here–has been submitted to any court of law, has been vouched for under oath, has been authenticated by anyone. Never.
There is that Obama was born in this country. Without evidence, nobody, especially an unbiased reporter/commentator, can possibly claim that it’s a “big lie” to merely where Obama was born.
The best can say is that we don’t know. We don’t know where Obama was born.
And that fact to everyone on this planet because there are few people on Earth who are not impacted (most adversely) by the Obama presidency.
Again. Why is O’Reilly bringing this issue up again? Why now?
Posted by giveusliberty1776 at 8:28 PM