MUST READ...GREAT FOLLOW-UP ON WHAT OCCURRED YESTERDAY IN JUDGE CARTER'S COURTROOM AND WHAT IS AT STAKE FOR AMERICA [IN RED]

Three COLBs vs. One Birth Certificate

The official record stands. NO official authenticated birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama has been offered by team Obama as proof that Obama is a US citizen, much less a “natural born citizen” eligible to be President of the United States under Article II—Section I of the US Constitution.

Contrary to leftist propaganda from the press, members of congress, the DOJ and some courts, the burden of proof belongs to Obama, as Article II—Section I is a well-known long-standing job requirement for the office of President, applied equally to all applicants or candidates for more than 200 years.

Just as a job applicant is required to prove his/her drug-free status by submitting to a drug test upon the request of the employer who established drug-free status as a standard requirement for employment, Obama or any other candidate for the office of President must be willing to prove compliance with the standard job requirements that have existed in the Constitution since 1787.

Further in this regard, the US Senate took specific action in a Senate Resolution to address the question of whether or not Senator John McCain was a constitutional “natural born citizen” eligible to run for president in 2008. But no such effort to vet or affirm eligibility for Barack Hussein Obama has ever been undertaken by the Senate, the House, the courts, the Electoral College or the press.

Instead, THREE different Hawaiian COLBs (Certifications of Live Birth, available to anyone including people born abroad to foreign parents) have been posted online as proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, none of them authenticated.

Clearly, as THREE difference COLBs have been offered, at least TWO of the THREE, if not all three, are forgeries. But nobody knows since none of the three have ever been authenticated.
Even if one were able to be authenticated, it would still not rise to the level of “proof of citizenship” much less “natural born citizenship” as defined by the Founders and reaffirmed by the Senate just last year.

More doubt…
Nearly $1.5 Million in legal fees to avoid the question

Although Obama has managed to focus all attention upon the missing birth certificate, without which he could not even obtain a drivers license, open a bank account or become a Scoutmaster in most states, the real issue is not when or where he was born, but to whom… As the son of a foreign national, he cannot be a “natural born citizen” of the United States.

Obama has spent almost $1.5 million racing lawyers around the country. In every instance, those lawyers have raised “technicality” defenses without even once challenging the claims or evidence against their client. In short, they have thus far succeeded in stopping any discovery from going forward, in which Obama’s files could be subpoenaed during the discovery process.

ALL birth, college, travel, passport and selective service files remain under lock and key as of today. NOBODY knows for certain who or what Barack Hussein Obama is as of this writing, despite a number of well-regurgitated false claims by leftist organizations like FactCheck, MoveOn and Snopes.

All attention is on the missing birth certificate, three forged COLBs and now, a birth certificate from Kenya and a sworn affidavit regarding the authenticity of the Kenyan certificate, as the DOJ remains committed to blocking any discovery under oath on the matter. Why?

The Kenyan Cert and Sworn Affidavit

Russian immigrant and self-made internet lawyer Orly Taitz amended an existing suit to include a certified copy of a Kenyan birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama II, from Coastal Province Hospital in Mombassa, Kenya, dated August 4, 1961, along with a sworn affidavit of authenticity under penalty of perjury.

This document is consistent with prior sworn affidavits from Obama family members who have repeatedly claimed over the months of ongoing debate, to have been present at Obama’s Kenyan birth.

A hearing on this case is scheduled for today, September 8, 2009, before Judge David Carter, who has promised that all evidence would be heard in his court in Santa Ana. More on this later…

Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury August 27, 2009

Meanwhile, Commander Fitzpatrick had to literally fight his way into a Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury meeting last week, in his effort to file criminal charges of “treason” and “fraud” against Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro.

In his brief, Commander Fitzpatrick covers a lot of ground. But the tip of his spear reads as follows…

“OBAMA-SOETORO IS MY SWORN ENEMY! - And as there were TRAITORS to Italy in Caesars day, I report to this GRAND JURY with force and authority there are senior military officers no more obedient to the CONSTITUTION than their criminal DICTATOR, OBAMA-SOETORO.”

I must state that in this era of relative morality, I respect the Commander’s ability and willingness to state his charges in such unequivocal terms. There can be no missing the Commander’s point here, and his position is based firmly in the oath he has taken along with millions of other soldiers, to protect and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

I can only pray that ALL American soldiers take that oath as seriously as Commander Fitzpatrick, and I suspect that most do.

In his efforts to deliver his briefs to the Tennessee Grand Jury, his search for justice was constantly obstructed by local officers of the court. Commander Fitzpatrick alleges that both District Attorney James H. Stutts and Grand Jury Foreman Gary Pettway stopped just short of physical abuse in their endless efforts to obstruct the Commander’s access to the court.

In fact, on September 4, 2009, Commander Fitzpatrick filed formal criminal charges of obstruction against Grand Jury Foreman Pettway and District Attorney James H. Stutts for their continuing efforts to obstruct justice in the Monroe County Grand Jury system, stating in his complaint—“My appearance before the Grand Jury panel yesterday was a puppet show. Criminally assisted by others named below, Mr. Pettway first attempted to block my appearance, and then materially interfered with my verbal testimony and blocked all efforts to enter into the record the physical evidence in my possession yesterday.”

As of this writing, no case number has been issued by Madisonville Police Department concerning Fitzpatrick’s criminal complaint against Stutts or Pettway, and it is unknown what if any action, the Monroe County Grand Jury might take on the matter.

Meanwhile, on that same day, Obama’s DOJ was busy filing yet another dismissal demand in Santa Ana, CA—using the same old “technicality” defense to stop Orly Taitz in her current case in an ongoing DOJ effort to keep discovery of Obama’s history out of Judge David Carter’s court this time.

Once again, the DOJ’s defense argument is limited to technicalities, not the merits of allegations or the growing mountain of evidence against their client.
From the DOJ dismissal request—

III. GOVERNMENT'S ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 1. This Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction Of This Action . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 A. Plaintiffs Lack Standing Herein . . . . . . . .
4 1. No Plaintiff Can Show The Required Concrete, Traceable Injury-in-Fact To Provide Standing Herein . . . . . . .
5 2. Plaintiffs Cannot Satisfy The Redressability Requirement For Standing . .
9 B. This Case Presents Non-Justiciable Political Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11 C. This Court Lacks Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over Plaintiffs’ Quo Warranto Claims . . . . .
16 D. This Court Does Not Have Subject Matter Jurisdiction Of This Action Under Either 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Or 42 U.S.C. § 1988 . . . .

No direct denial of any of the claims leveled against their client, but just a continued argument that NO American citizen has “proper standing” to question King Barack Hussein Obama and all of his Czars. It should be obvious to all readers at this point, that our system of justice is being manipulated by Ivy League lawyers to subvert the system and obstruct justice. Every case filed so far has been met with a technical defense asserting a “lack of standing” to bring the charges, no matter who brings the charges, how much evidence they have to support their charges, or in what court they bring those charges….

According to Obama’s defense team, “This motion (to dismiss) is made on the ground that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants, and on the further ground that, as to certain claims and Defendants, Plaintiffs fail to state claims upon which this Court may grant relief. Further, with respect to any and all claims or causes of action alleged herein under the Freedom of Information Act, this Court should also dismiss said claims pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), on the additional ground that venue does not properly lie as to said claims in this District.”

The demand for dismissal was signed by attorneys for Obama, I assume paid for by American taxpayers, since all serve under Obama’s Department of Justice as U.S. Attorneys… GEORGE S. CARDONA Acting United States Attorney LEON W. WEIDMAN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ROGER E. WEST Assistant United States Attorney First Assistant Chief, Civil Division DAVID A. DeJUTEAssistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants Further, the very people we expect to uphold and defend the US Constitution against a “domestic enemy within” are also charged with defending that “domestic enemy within” via the Department of Justice, all at taxpayer expense.

Judge Carter Orders Eligibility Case to Trial

As this column comes back from editing, news arrives that Judge Carter did NOT dismiss the eligibility case before his court today [September 8].

From the WND report—“In a highly anticipated hearing today before Carter, several motions were heard, including a resolution to long-standing questions about whether attorney Orly Taitz properly served notice on the defendants, which she had.

In a second ruling, Carter ordered that attorney Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation can be added to the case to represent plaintiffs Wiley Drake and Markham Robinson, who had been removed by an earlier court order. Drake, the vice presidential candidate for the American Independent Party, and Robinson, the party’s chairman, also were restored to the case.

But the judge did not immediately rule on Taitz’ motion to be granted discovery—that is the right to see the president’s still-concealed records. Nor did Carter rule immediately on a motion to dismiss the case, submitted by the U.S. government, following discussion over Taitz’ challenge to the work of a magistrate in the case.

Carter ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on the motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery. - If the case survives that challenge, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.”
If Justice is denied in Santa Ana

The term “Once a Marine, always a Marine” seems to hold true in Santa Ana California today. However, as WND reports, the DOJ request to dismiss will be heard in October. If Carter has the backbone to deny the DOJ their desperate plea to keep all Obama facts secret, then Obama’s fraudulent political future could be limited to late January 2010.

However, the DOJ carries GREAT weight and powers of persuasion. They will stop at nothing to stop this case from going forward. Based on the body count of past Obama and Clinton opponents, I’d recommend that Judge Carter hire a crack security staff immediately.

Indictment law under Rules of Criminal Procedure adopted in 1946 (but not passed into law or amending the Constitution) are being used to block access to the courts concerning Obama’s eligibility.

If for some reason the people are denied access to the courts once more in Judge Carter’s court, I return to the same conclusion I have arrived at on countless occasions over the last few years.
The Last Peaceful Solution

If the entire federal government, including the department assigned the duty of administering equal justice under the Constitution and the law, has been perverted into some insane mechanism by which the system itself is used as a tool to obstruct justice and further subvert our system of self-governance, the options for American citizens are limited at best.

In this event, the American Grand Jury effort is the last remaining peaceful alternative for redress, in which the non-binding rules of criminal procedure are set aside and the US Constitution is enforced via a constitutional grand jury process, which has already returned 16 Grand Jury indictments against Barack Hussein Obama.

This thing will not end until Barack Hussein Obama and all co-conspirators have been brought to justice. The Constitution, freedom and liberty MUST be defended at any cost. But all peaceful means must be exhausted before last resort measures become the only alternative to protect the republic.

If the people are afforded NO access to the courts, to congress, to the press, or any other peaceful means of redress, the people are left to their own devices in defense of the free constitutional republic. The people are on their own at that point and it will be every man for himself, patriots against invaders and usurpers…

Left-wing elitists have already determined that not a single American citizen has the “proper standing” and that NO US court has “proper jurisdiction” to demand a constitutional government. But Americans must resist the urge for violent revolution until all peaceful remedies have been exhausted. At that point and for this reason alone, our Founding fathers wrote the following words…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”—Declaration of Independence