Monday, October 19, 2009
A Builder vs A Demolisher
Included in my varied resume' post graduation, I've worked a ten year hitch for a fortune 500 company, about a 20 year period as a successful entrepreneur, and as a side line I built my own house. Hammer and Nails thing, not somebody doing it for me. I also can drive any truck, cross country U haul rents w/auto trailer in tow.
Plus several other things. This is not meant to be boastful, it's just the way I'm wired. If I want something, or need something done, I learn how to do it for myself. Self Sufficiency is my life's motto the more the better. There is a limit of course, I've yet to try neurosurgery (is that still illegal if you don't have one of those whatcha muhcallit medical licenses??)
Here's my point, true Americans don't need or want government interference. We DEMAND the right to succeed or fail of our own volition. In the Bible it says,"By the sweat of thy brow he shall toil" God was telling Adam, "No more free ride in the Garden of Eden for Man" but to me it also says, those who work, prosper, those who don't; don't.
To build up,it takes time and care to construct something, to demolish with a wrecking bar and sledge hammer takes next to none. You might be surprised how much can be torn down in a day with an 8 lb sledge, a lot, and it takes several days with a hammer,saw and paint brush to replace it. Been there done that.
Obama has had 9 months to work us over with his sledge hammer, we are going to need years to build back what he tears apart.
Another point here is this, Government was never intended to compete with private industry. It was, is, and never will be a good idea. Where would it end?
Obama says the Health Care Industry is too costly, therefore he wants a public option to compete. The truth is he wants a public option so he can undercut Insurance companies and eventually drive them out of business. We will then have a Government Monopoly Health system at whatever price the Obama Commies decide. (Get out of line, zoom goes your premiums, that is if you have any money left over from being taxed at whatever rate the OC's decide.)
Should he stop there, with ObamaCare?
Why not ObamaBank or Obama7-11. If you poor folks think prices are unfair at Wal Mart why not ObamaMart. ObamaLightandPower, ObamaNet, ObamaCellPhone, ObamaEverything. Drive all private business out, replaced by one big ObamaSuperMall.
The consumer sets the bar as to who stays in business or who goes. We vote with our dollars, we don't need government intervention.
Obama knows this, its not about price competition through government protection, its about usurping the country, just like he's usurping the presidency. Obama won't stop at HealthCare.
Why is it the average citizen can figure this out, but our Senators and Congressmen/women can not? What does it say about where their loyalties lie.
Steve
Plus several other things. This is not meant to be boastful, it's just the way I'm wired. If I want something, or need something done, I learn how to do it for myself. Self Sufficiency is my life's motto the more the better. There is a limit of course, I've yet to try neurosurgery (is that still illegal if you don't have one of those whatcha muhcallit medical licenses??)
Here's my point, true Americans don't need or want government interference. We DEMAND the right to succeed or fail of our own volition. In the Bible it says,"By the sweat of thy brow he shall toil" God was telling Adam, "No more free ride in the Garden of Eden for Man" but to me it also says, those who work, prosper, those who don't; don't.
To build up,it takes time and care to construct something, to demolish with a wrecking bar and sledge hammer takes next to none. You might be surprised how much can be torn down in a day with an 8 lb sledge, a lot, and it takes several days with a hammer,saw and paint brush to replace it. Been there done that.
Obama has had 9 months to work us over with his sledge hammer, we are going to need years to build back what he tears apart.
Another point here is this, Government was never intended to compete with private industry. It was, is, and never will be a good idea. Where would it end?
Obama says the Health Care Industry is too costly, therefore he wants a public option to compete. The truth is he wants a public option so he can undercut Insurance companies and eventually drive them out of business. We will then have a Government Monopoly Health system at whatever price the Obama Commies decide. (Get out of line, zoom goes your premiums, that is if you have any money left over from being taxed at whatever rate the OC's decide.)
Should he stop there, with ObamaCare?
Why not ObamaBank or Obama7-11. If you poor folks think prices are unfair at Wal Mart why not ObamaMart. ObamaLightandPower, ObamaNet, ObamaCellPhone, ObamaEverything. Drive all private business out, replaced by one big ObamaSuperMall.
The consumer sets the bar as to who stays in business or who goes. We vote with our dollars, we don't need government intervention.
Obama knows this, its not about price competition through government protection, its about usurping the country, just like he's usurping the presidency. Obama won't stop at HealthCare.
Why is it the average citizen can figure this out, but our Senators and Congressmen/women can not? What does it say about where their loyalties lie.
Steve
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
And to those who keep raising the wrong court issue re Orly Taitz, her Keyes case is NOT in the wrong court since her case is Keyes for damages in tort for fraud against Candidate (not ‘President’) Obama, and is not premised on quo warranto — and insofar as tort claim in fed ct, there is pendant jurisdiction.
ReplyDeleteOrly and Judge Carter must know this; and Team Obama must know this as well (hence the rush to weaken USA as quickly as possible before things come tumbling down on their heads).
Of course all of the above will be unnecessary if one federal judge in one federal court, that being Judge David Carter, USDC, CA, finds standing for plaintiff Alan Keyes in his tort claim in fraud against Candidate (not ‘President’) Obama. (Does not need to be quo warranto for removal of ‘President’ Obama; recovery of Dr. Keyes of even nominal damages on the proof by the preponderance of evidence of civil fraud by Obama — which should be “slam dunk” under res ipsa loquitur of Team Obama resisting all discovery — as to his eligibility would place overwhelming political pressure on the Democrats and Congress to remove him from office — thus avoiding consitutional crisis.)
ReplyDelete…which is why the finding of standing alone will immediately end Obama’s administration; the case need never get to the merits.