Was U.S. Attorney General secretly in town to counsel Land?
Posted on October 3rd, 2009 by David-Crockett
The Post & Email published
PRESENCE CITED AS MATERIAL FACT TO EX-PARTE DISCUSSIONS TO SWAY LAND
by John Charlton
(Oct. 3, 2009) — It boggles the mind, that for an obscure case in the Middle District of Georgia, Federal Court, involving a lead counsel who has been derided from one end of the nation to the other as a nut, crazy woman, “birther” and “Queen-bee of the birther movement”, the U.S. Attorney General himself, Eric Holder, should be seen walking into a local eatery, without a personal security detail, just to be in town for the hearing.
This allegation is made in the affidavit of Mr. Robert D. Douglas, dated Sept. 26, sworn before Mr. Lamar Rozier, notary public in the state of Georgia, Bacon County, submitted in support of Attorney Orly Taitz’s latest Motion of Recusal against Judge Clay D. Land.
His affidavit reads as follows:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, Lamar Rozier
on this 26th day of September, 2009, personally appeared Robert D. Douglas, known to me to be a credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly sown on his oath deposes and says:
On the day of he hearing for Major Stephan Cook before Federal Judge Clay D. Land, Columbus, Ga., my wife, my wife’s sister, her husband and I had entered the little coffee shop directly across from the Court House while waiting for the doors to open to the public. I was sitting in the small seating area, set aside for their customers, while facing and looking directly at the entrance to the shop. All persons entering had to pass withing 8-10 feet from where I was sitting.
I looked up and immediately recognized an individual entering and approaching the serving counter, due to his well known TV displayed distinguishing features: his trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and general olive complexion. I knew instantly it was non other than Eric Holder, the current Attorney General of the United States. I called this to the attention of those present and all agreed it appeared to be who I readily recognized. He entered unguarded, no accompanying entourage and probably thought he would not be recognized.
Red flags went up immediately in my mind and the questions remain, as yet. Why does the Attorney General of the United States need to be present in an obscure hearing well of his beaten path? Could it possible be, since Holder did not present himself in open court, he may have had a little “whisper in the ear” to a Federal Judge in order to bias his judicial vision and adhere to the President’s agenda of obstruction?
Only Judge Clay D. Land can answer those question.
Robert D. Douglas
[address redacted]
Holder’s presence is not that unbelievable, because quite contrary to the logic of their position Obama supporters have consistently shown irrational passion to defend Obama from what they claim are ridiculous charges.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
Points to consider from a number of discussions I've seen at other sites.
ReplyDeleteFirst - the timeline. Holder was out on the West coast 15 July. It's only a 5 hour (or less) flight to Columbus. Since it would likely be a government/military plane, Holder could have plenty of nap time to relax. Then, Holder was supposedly seen before the courthouse opened on 16 July. He easily could have had a personal face-to-face with Judge Land, making sure that the Judge understood that the issue in the case was a moot point, gotten to the airport for his flight back to the West coast and made it with time to spare, arriving no later than 11 am PDT, with a scheduled appearance at noon.
Second- why fly? It would be easy to make sure the flights he used would be listed as training flights so that there would be no official record of his movements. It would be like he was invisible, not expecting anyone to spot him in Columbus.
Third - why not just make a phone call? Too great a risk that any record of such a phone call might not be erased. Plus, there's nothing like personally massaging the Judge, inflating his ego and personally seeing that the message got across.
Fourth - time & expense of the flight. Didn't stop Obama from flying to Copenhagen & blowing a couple million bucks for his big flop. And don't confuse a crowded commercial passenger flight with a virtually private first class, undisturbed flight.
So, let's see if the Georgia court system decides to conduct a review of events in Judge Land's courtroom.
And then let's see how Judge Carter rules on Monday.
Here's hoping that October is a really, really bad month for Obama. An October surprise a year late.
Leon Brozyna
CW2, USA (Ret)
Yes, because it just makes so much sense to do that. I mean, why not just use the phone?
ReplyDeleteNo. He had to fly out, meet with the judge, then go to a diner (LOL), and fly back to California to do his noon appearance, then his later appearance. The guy looks good for doing all that. Superman!
You folks never cease to entertain.