...and don't forget all those in Congress who conveniently look the other way...failing too, to uphold the Constitution!

The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…

NOT ABOUT OBAMA, BUT ABOUT THE CRIME OF TREASON WHICH THEY ARE COMMITTING

Legal Analysis by John Charlton

President Barack Hussein Obama is briefed on Afghanistan by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in the Situation Room at the White House, on Oct. 30, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).

(Dec. 12, 2009) — The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried of the dire punishment they will face, when they are one day convicted of treason against the United States of America for siding with the enemy and giving him aide and comfort.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice is quite specific that in such a case even the Joint Chiefs can be punished with death, on order of a military tribunal.

The Uniform Codes of Military Justice, on the crime of treason says under Article 906 — Espionage, section c:

A sentence of death may be adjudged by a court-martial for an offense under this section (article) only if the members unanimously find, beyond a reasonable doubt, one or more of the following aggravating factors:

(1) The accused has been convicted of another offense involving espionage or treason for which either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by statute.

(2) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of substantial damage to the national security.

(3) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of death to another person.

(4) Any other factor that may be prescribed by the President by regulations under section 836 of this title (Article 36).

Under section b, the same article specifies when the sentence of death may be imposed:

(1) No person may be sentenced by court-martial to suffer death for an offense under this section (article) unless–

(A) the members of the court-martial unanimously find at least one of the aggravating factors set out in subsection (c); and

(B) the members unanimously determine that any extenuating or mitigating circumstances are substantially outweighed by any aggravating circumstances, including the aggravating factors set out under subsection (c).

(2) Findings under this subsection may be based on–

(A) evidence introduced on the issue of guilt or innocence;

(B) evidence introduced during the sentencing proceeding; or

(C) all such evidence.

(3) The accused shall be given broad latitude to present matters in extenuation and mitigation.

Let’s examine whether the Joint Chiefs have committed a court-marshall offense worthy of death.

They have supported a man who is clearly a usurper, as if he were the President of the United States

This fact is manifest and notorious. There is one thing certain about Obama, and the Joint Chiefs know it: his father was a British subject. Fourt Supreme Court Cases declare that to be a natural born citizen, both parents must be U.S. Citizens. The Constitution clearly states in Article II, section ii, paragraph 5, that “No person except a natural born Citizen . . shall be eligible to the Office of President” The Joint Chiefs have been duly informed by many letters from military personnel, and from lawyers, such as Dr. Orly Taitz. The Joint Chiefs have the opportunity and aide of the best legal counsel.

The Joint Chiefs therefore have knowingly sided with a usurper to the Presidency, and given him obedience as if he were the President of the United States.

In doing so they have violated their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and committed treason.

A Usurper of the office of the Presidency is the greatest enemy of the Republic

Emmerich de Vattel, the renowed political philosopher, whose treatise, The Law of Nations, was the guiding legal authority of our Founding Fathers, when crafting the Constitution, described in succint and poignent words, the importance of the Constitution of any Republic, in Book I, chapter 30 of his work:

To attack the constitution of the state and to violate its laws, is a capital crime against society; and if those guilty of it are invested with authority, they add to this crime a perfidious abuse of the power with which they are instrusted. The nation ought constantly repress them with its utmost vigor and vigilance, as the importance of the case requires.

A “capital crime” is one meriting the punishment of a public execution. A “perfidious abuse” is a a treacherous misuse. Therefore de Vattel is clearly saying that the intentional, knowing violation of the Constitution is a crime worthy of death, a crime of treason. The importance of loyalty of the Joint Chiefs is the greatest of all outside the government, because without the U.S. Military, the People have no one to uphold the Constitution when that government might fail.

And it has failed. And yet the Joint Chiefs have aided and abetted that failure, but obeying a dictator, a usurper, a Marxist who is step by step transforming the United States into a second Soviet Union.

There is no greater betrayal of the Constitution than to usurp the highest office of the land, the office in which the Constitution ought to be personified and protected with the greatest personal convinction and loyalty. There is no greater crime of collaboration in such a crime that the complacency and adhesion of the Joint Chiefs to such a criminal.

The Joint Chiefs have sided with the Enemy

This is a public fact, and a notorious one. The Joint Chiefs have on numerous occasions publically stated that they fully back Barack Obama. They have fulled their otherwise normal duties, yet given allegience to a usurper, the worst enemy of the State.

The Joint Chiefs have given aide and comfort to the Enemy

The Joint Chiefs have given aide and comfort to the Enemy by publically supporting his decisions, persecuting military personnel who have objected to Obama’s unproven eligiblity status (cf. case of Major Stephen Cook), and threatened subordinates with dire consequences if they seek to challenge him (cf. case of Connie Rhodes not being allowed to attend a court hearing).

The Joint Chiefs have sent men to death, at the word of the Enemy

Great would be the public outcry if Al-Qaeda ordered the execution of U.S. Military personnel and the Joint Chiefs in league with that enemy, carried through the sentence of death against their own.

But although they have not committed this crime, they have committed a greater one: because they have sent men to their death at the word of Barack Hussein Obama, who has unlawfully entered into the power and authority of the Presidency, and who according to the Constitution has no more authority to command U.S. armed forces, that Osama bin Laden.

But being that Obam is a usurper, the Joint Chiefs have sent men to death for a mere man, and at the word of a criminal. This is even more disgraceful, since the Joint Chiefs have the duty to forego politics and ought to be men of a finer character than the Machiavellian Liar in the White House.

The Joint Chiefs have knowingly undermined national security in a grave manner

The Joint Chiefs by giving obedience to the enemy of the Republic have knowingly undermined national security in the gravest of manners; because national security requires first-and-foremost that the U.S. Constitution be upheld, and if you defend all the borders against terrorists, but allow the government to fall into the hands of a dictator, you have injured in the most grave manner the national security, even if in your puritanical vainglory, you take pride in the former and ignore your guilt in the latter.

The Joint Chiefs have trangressed every pre-requisite for court-martial and a death sentence

The Uniform Code of Military Justice, as cited above, requires one of 3 conditions to be met, to obtain a death-sentance in a court-martial (Article 906, section c):

(1) The accused has been convicted of another offense involving espionage or treason for which either a sentence of death or imprisonment for life was authorized by statute.

(2) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of substantial damage to the national security.

(3) In the commission of the offense, the accused knowingly created a grave risk of death to another person.

(4) Any other factor that may be prescribed by the President by regulations under section 836 of this title (Article 36).

The U.S. Constitution specifies that treason shall consist in siding with the enemy and giving him aide and confort. This the Joint Chiefs have undeniably done. Therefore they are guilty of treason, which according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice is punishable by death.

Second they have knowingly created a grave risk of substantial damage to the national security.

Third, in the commission of this offense they have not only created a grave risk of death, but have sent men to their deaths, to uphold the pretense of their own self-righteousness.

Therefore they more than qualify for court-martial and a death sentence, imposed by a military tribunal.

And when the American people finally rise up and overthrow the usurper and his cohorts, loyal and true members of the U.S. Military will hall them from the holes into which they have fled, and bring them before a military tribunal on charges of treason.

And for that reason, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should be worried…