Thursday, July 8, 2010

Now This Is Misguided and Ill Conceived To Quote A Famous Usurper

During a time when down is up, and wrong is right, to learn another "misguided" federal judge rules against morality should not surprise us. Again to quote the usurper, lets just say this leaves me, tritely "shocked and saddened ".

I think freedom of choice falls under God's natural law of Man's right to exercise free will. While exercising that choice of free will, there exists a divine risk reward penalty clause however.

The Lord didn't look kindly on the Jews who were practicing Idolatry when they were caught red handed worshipping a golden calf the very moment Moses descended Mt Sinai with the Ten Commandments freshly carved in stone.

Lot and his wife were led from the Obama-nation which was Sodom and Gomorrah just before it was destroyed with fire and brimstone. But hey I'm just saying if that's how some of these folks gotta roll, who am I to say they can't- that call is "above my pay grade" . We as Christians can make the information available, after that it's on them.

Gay marriage does infringe on rights besides those of hetero sexuals. If same sex marriage is legalized, that opens the flood gate for threesome(or more) marriage, incestual marriages, bestiality marriage, pedophile marriage, and several other despicable combinations of matching and non-matching anatomy. The freak kink groups would be just as constitutionally infringed upon.

Marriage in judeo-christian western culture has for thousands of years been reserved for one man, one woman. I would call that a precedent. Homosexuality wasn't invented in the late 20th / early 21st century ( see Sodom and Gomorrah) but somehow after about 3500 years, now is the time the Gays think same sex marriage should happen. Nothing like procrastinating for a few millenia. I say what's the rush now, why not be really really sure, and by waiting another 3500 years we all might be better informed on this issue. Just a thought.

Steve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++



U.S. Judge Rules Federal Gay Marriage Ban Unconstitutional
July 08, 2010
Associated Press

A U.S. judge in Boston has ruled that a federal gay marriage ban is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right a state to define marriage.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro on Thursday ruled in favor of gay couples' rights in two separate challenges to the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

The state had argued the law denied benefits such as Medicaid to gay married couples in Massachusetts, where same-sex unions have been legal since 2004.

Tauro agreed, and said the act forces Massachusetts to discriminate against its own citizens.

The Justice Department argued the federal government has the right to set eligibility requirements for federal benefits -- including requiring that those benefits only go to couples in marriages between a man and a woman.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.