
By Steve Cooper
The Conservative Monster.com
During last weeks interview with Joseph Farah on The Conservative Monster Radio Show, he made a very interesting accusation. Mr. Farah claimed that Beck's 'handlers' do not hire anyone as a analyst or consultant if they work for Worldnetdaily or if they have ever worked for Worldnetdaily in the past.
Farah claims that 'once the reporter admits' that they have worked for Worldnetdaily, they never hear back from the Beck team ever again. These tactics of isolation are left wing in origin and they come right out of the Alinsky playbook. I guess Beck does not like that Joe Farah's reporting directly contradict his fairy tales about Obama being born in Hawaii. Beck has not shown one shred of evidence to prove or back up his statements.
Farah also stated that he has done over 6 long interviews with CNN and Fox News about the Obama eligibility issue, but NONE of them were ever broadcast. Why? Well, they wanted to trip him up or make him look stupid to discredit the movement, but they could not. So, they would rather not air the interview at all, because they want to keep the American idiots clueless about this issue.
Then he (Farah) stated that Beck might not want to acknowledge Worldnetdaily, because he credits their reporting of Van Jones was what tipped Beck off to that communist hustler in the first place.
Click here for You Tube videos of the interview.......
Joseph Farah Talking about the Obama Eligibility Controversy, Media Bias & MORE






An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
This is why I take Beck, Coulter, et. al. with a grain of salt. Whatever their other strong points, if you're deliberately going to wear blinders on *this* critical issue, I'm sorry but in my book you're compromised.
ReplyDelete