To those brave men and women who have gone before and who are serving today.
Thank you to those who fought to keep this country free.
By: John LeBoutillier
For the first time since President Barack Obama’s emergence in 2004 at the Democratic Convention in Boston, the national news media, long in the tank for Obama, has begun to run him through the ringer all other presidents have experienced.
Up to now, Obama was immune to this process because the media is so invested in the rise and success of the first African-American president of the United States. Indeed, the so-called mainstream media still wants him to succeed and to win re-election in 2012; his failure — or failure to be re-elected — would be seen as a collective failure of the left.
But the bumbling, stumbling, aimless, naïve, reverse-course Obama presidency has hit the skids and even the media can no longer restrain itself.
Here are some examples:
It’s been slowly, patiently, systematically climbing to a crescendo, building upon its successes over the past one hundred years; the insidious Progressive Marxist creep of political upheaval and destruction of our American way.
Today, having arrived at the crossroads of destiny, we face the shocking results of this subterfuge; our beautiful representative republic perched on the precipice of an abyss, teetering with dangerous uncertainty.
There are many reasons, but really no excuses for our having allowed this to happen.It is a time for choosing, and we as American individuals have the most obvious and far-reaching choices to make in the history of our representative republic.
The choices in front of us are defined by what we are going to do about stopping it, and whether or not we have the moral courage and sustained political will to stop it.
The “thousand years of darkness” Ronald Reagan spoke of in his famous speech isn’t hyperbole.
There’s a tangled web stretching back to the early 1900’s involving Progressives and Marxists, but the simple unvarnished truth is that King Barry and his Czars are, quite literally, working double overtime to destroy our capitalist economic system (among other things) and thereby bring America to her knees.
I believe the elections this November are the most important elections in the history of our republic, for the obvious reason that our very existence has never been more vitally threatened from within.
What we are witnessing today is exactly what our Founding Fathers warned us about.
They knew America would unlikely be defeated by a foreign enemy, but that our form of government could be corrupted from within and destroyed covertly by those with the necessary resources and protracted vision to sustain their endeavour.
King Barry has repeatedly stated that he intends to “transform” America, but he never says why, how, or into what. Rather, we hear the usual flowery vagueness and soaring teleprompter rhetoric.
In point of fact, King Barry continually reveals, in a most unambiguous manner through his actions and policies, that his goal is a one world government, and right now he’s winning the game.
One doesn’t require a Bilderberg group or a rendezvous for secret meetings at the Bohemian Grove to see where America is headed.
It’s happening right before our eyes in real time; the facts and evidence documented, alarming, and unequivocally clear.
The International Monetary Fund now dictates to a growing number of countries comprising the European Union how and where they will spend the money they’ve borrowed to stay afloat in a sea of red ink. It is borrowed money they have no way of paying back.
Their ratio of debt to GDP is not very different from our own, yet King Barry continues to spend money we don’t have as if there will be no tomorrow.
King Barry and his George Soros-funded support groups have become so brazen and arrogant they no longer bother trying to hide their motives or methodology as they ramrod a Progressive version of “change” down throats.
Meanwhile, as this comic/tragedy unfolds, part Twilight Zone and part theatre of the absurd, our mainstream media continues to remain duplicitously silent.
As for our Congress, those august statesmen sworn to uphold our Constitution, it can be said, with few exceptions, that instead of hearing the sonorous strains of outraged indignation and a call to action, we hear the steady sound of…crickets.
Ladies and gentlemen, if America will be saved, if we believe America is worth saving, it will be up to each and every one of us to ride to the rescue. Nobody else is coming; we are the cavalry.
I can not bear the burden of knowing what is happening to this greatest of countries, and fail to do everything I can within my power to prevent the destruction of the America I so deeply love and cherish.
How much blood has been shed since the first Continental Army of George Washington was formed, in order to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”?
How many brave, dedicated, selfless, patriotic men and women have made personal sacrifices so we could enjoy a “more perfect Union, established Justice, and insured domestic Tranquility” to pursue our own individual happiness?
As Thomas Jefferson once said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
I totally agree with the venerable Mr. Jefferson, and that’s exactly what we are in the process of losing; the priceless gift of this republic from our Founders, a gift that has been squandered through apathetic indifference, self-absorption, and ignorance of history, a subject no longer taught in our dumbed-down, politically correct, feel good, equality-of outcome educational institutions.
Regarding political correctness: is there a more effective tool utilized by the Progressive Marxists to undermine and ultimately destroy America than “political correctness”?
It’s permeated every facet of our lives, every institution, like some malicious gas, yet this unbridled form of intellectual and behavioral censorship barely gets mentioned as an implement of indoctrination or stimuli of conditioned reflex.
This quote from Edmund Burke on history: “Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.”
And also this quote from Burke: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
Mr. Burke, a British philosopher and statesman (1729-1797), was an erudite fellow who understood human nature rather well.
He may not have been able to perfectly visualize the soul-rotting effect of pop culture, the compliant and sycophantic King Barry-worshiping media that secured his coronation, the studied, devious cunning of the Progressive movement as they gained control of education, re-wrote history, minimized and disparaged our Founders, and diminished the significance of the U.S. Constitution by implementing the practice of trans-national “case law” review instead of looking to our own constitutional law for relevant jurisprudence.
But Mr. Burke did understand that people were far more similar in their behavior throughout history than they were different, and that left to their own devices, those who attained power would do what ever was necessary to sustain that power at the expense of others. Mr. Burke understood perfectly well that the history of the world has been one of tyranny.
There was another thing the Progressive movement knew they must accomplish if they were to succeed in their bloodless coup, perhaps the one thing most important to achieving their revolutionary plans; they removed God from the public eye and public awareness.
Not overnight, but slowly and systematically over time God was relegated to the back bench of the public collective consciousness through political correctness, immoral excesses, T.V., media blitzes, the academic intelligencia, a narcissistic compulsion for hipness, instant gratification, drugs, pornography, and the ACLU.
We became a secular society fixated on pursuit of material baubles and trinkets to define our happiness, worshiping at the alter of conspicuous consumption as we struggled to keep up with the Jones’ and validate our spiritual insouciance.
By contrast, in the early 1900’s, while working his way through college as a part-time journalist, Napoleon Hill began a study of American exceptionalism that would become his life work.
In numerous interviews with Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and many other creative and industrial giants from that era, he began to identify certain common traits that were rudimentary to their success.
He realized that, among these, was the widely held belief that thoughts were actual “things”.
The quality time he spent with these individuals led to his theory of the “mastermind principle”, literally a synergistic tuning of sympathetic thought-induced vibrations from like-minded people, working together in a spirit of cooperation, who are equally dedicated to achieving a specific positive goal or result.
To further illustrate the credibility of his “mastermind principal” theory, he observed that the most profound example of its application in human history was that of our Founding Fathers as they worked to bring forth our republican form of government.
For these greatest of patriots, it was a spiritual quest of the highest order, and they continually invoked the power of “Almighty God” to guide them, strengthen their resolve, and help them every step of the way as they pledged their “lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor” to establish our Constitution and the United States of America.
I believe Glenn Beck, ever the trail blazer, thinker of the unthinkable, and patriot extraordinaire in his own right, is absolutely spot on with his assertion that the collective spiritual re-awakening of America and the restoration of personal honor and integrity is of paramount importance to our political success.
Everyone has room for improvement, and we all need to be at our very best on every level for the task at hand.
We have an opportunity this November, through the ballot box, to begin to right our ship of state.
It may quite possibly be the last opportunity we have in our lifetime to affect a legitimate reversal of the stunning and almost incomprehensible amount of damage inflicted by King Barry and his court of jesters.
He’s moved so far and so fast, with very little resistance, to secure our national demise, that it would be a tragic mistake to under estimate the critical imperative of establishing a conservative mandate for the 2010 November elections.
It’s crunch time, and we need a sweeping conservative victory if we are to leave an America for our children and grand children that bears any resemblance to the America that has traditionally been a beacon of light for all freedom loving people, both at home and around the world.
Rebuttal letter sent to talk show host and political commentator Steve Frank
Mr. Frank, you are slandering me and defrauding the public again and again.
The fact that my opponent lifelong Democrat Damon Dunn, running in Republican primary, defrauded the public, was not known to you before. I did not bring this issue before, since I did not have all the evidence before, and neither did you.
The letter from the Registrar of voters in Duval County, FL about Dunn calling them and asking to delete his records from the database was obtained by me last month when I went to FL to participate in the litigation against health care reform . You did not have this letter before. It was obtained by me on April 13, 2010, one day before the Health care reform hearing on April 14, 2010
Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
From Orly Taitz, Esq, (R), candidate for
Newsletter 05.29.10. .
Orly Taitz (2nd from left) with ‘supporting’ California Patriots leaders
This was a remarkable week. I traveled hundreds of miles all over the State and met over a 1,000 voters. Yesterday, 34 leaders of differentgroups, 9/12 Patriots groups and Campaign for Liberty groups conducted a conference call and were able to achieve a consensus in support of several candidacies. Mine was among them - all of those leaders supported my candidacy for CA Secretary of State. This consensus does not mean that all members of all groups will vote for me, however it means that majority of members of these groups support me.
These groups represent the strongest block of voters in the Republican primary this year. These groups put Rand Paul at the top in KY over massive support and endorsements of Trey Grayson by both state and National leadership.
While the mood in the country is decidedly anti Democrats, it is also anti-incumbents, anti-establishment, and anti-candidates who are seen as being in cahoots with and/or cherry-picked by the establishment in both parties. Judging by NJ, VA, MA, PA, KY, and UT, support from the old-boys network (from the old party establishment) is a kiss of death for the candidates in the Primaries. Tea Party Patriot groups are designated as 501(c)4, meaning that they cannot officially endorse candidates, however they can have unofficial straw polls and conference calls to discuss the candidates, and that is where consensus came from.
While the media and GOP old establishment are claiming that being a ‘queen of the birthers’ is a bad thing, in reality among rank and file Republicans, Independents and Democrats of the , not GOP PAC controlled groups, it is the biggest selling point. People are waking up and realizing that a deal was made by the establishment of both parties not to question Obama’s illegitimacy for the U.S. presidency, however it makes them angry, it gives them a feeling of betrayal, and they feel that the elite has sold them out.
Each and every event and move by Obama reminds people of the fact that they have a guy sitting in the White House who refuses to show his long form birth certificate and who sits in the White House without as much as a valid Social Security number of his own. When Obama decided to cancel laying a wreath at the Arlington cemetery, it added wood to the fire.
Additionally, it seems that my opponent (for CA Secretary of State, Damon Dunn) has 2 strikes against him. One: being seen as a candidate picked by the old corrupt establishment, the other is the fact that he is seen as a carpetbagger, someone who came to CA after living in FL & TX as a lifelong Democrat; a former football player with no voting record, no history in the voter registration card his prior voter registration as a Democrat, and who tried to have his old voting registration as a Democrat deleted. People simply don’t trust him., who did not disclose on his
On the other hand, they know that I fought tirelessly to support the Constitution, and my record and dedication speaks for itself.
So, judging by unofficial polls of the most active voter blocks, I am ahead, and with a lot of room to spare. If those Sequoia and Diebold ballot counting machines are not hopelessly rigged, I should comfortably win the primary. We will have to wait a week and see.
I am posting one of the voter guides from one of the groups (below), as well as a picture of me with(AIP in CA) candidate for CA Governor, , taken at one of the events in Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Victorville and Menifee, CA.
Thank you for all your support.
Orly Taitz, Esq.
Judge appears to be stonewalling scandal linked to White House
By Drew Zahn
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
Former Inspector General Gerald Walpin, whose dismissal by President Obama last year has been challenged by congressmen as potentially illegal political retaliation, is now stepping up the battle to get his job back, accusing the judicial system of stalling his case and, thus, doing the White House a convenient favor.
Court documents filed last week accuse U.S. District Court Judge Richard Roberts of failing to act within federally mandated time requirements and “doing nothing at all” to move the case forward.
Similarly, a joint congressional report by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., which found the administration had failed to comply with requirements of the law and “orchestrated an after-the-fact smear campaign to justify the president’s action,” has been allowed to languish.
Taking a deep drag on his cigarette while resting on the steering wheel of his truck, he looks like a parody of a middle-aged lorry driver.
But the image covers up a much more disturbing truth: At just the tender age of two, Ardi Rizal's health has been so ruined by his 40-a-day habit that he now struggles to move by himself.
The four-stone Indonesia toddler is certainly far too unfit to run around with other children - and his condition is set to rapidly deteriorate.
Truck on bad habits: Ardi Rizal sits smoking on his favourite toy at home in Musi Banyuasin, Indonesia
But, despite local officials' offer to buy the Rizal family a new car if the boy quits, his parents feel unable to stop him because he throws massive tantrums if they don't indulge him.
His mother, Diana, 26, wept: 'He's totally addicted. If he doesn't get cigarettes, he gets angry and screams and batters his head against the wall. He tells me he feels dizzy and sick.'
Ardi will smoke only one brand and his habit costs his parents £3.78 a day in Musi Banyuasin, in Indonesia's South Sumatra province.
But in spite of this, his fishmonger father Mohammed, 30, said: 'He looks pretty healthy to me. I don't see the problem.'
Ardi's youth is the extreme of a disturbing trend. Data from the Central Statistics Agency showed 25 per cent of Indonesian children aged three to 15 have tried cigarettes, with 3.2 per cent of those active smokers.
The percentage of five to nine year olds lighting up increased from 0.4 per cent in 2001 to 2.8 per cent in 2004, the agency reported.
I invite those who believe that the controversy over whether Joe Sestak was offered a bribe to get out of the Senate race with Arlen Specter was resolved with this sparse memo to imagine what their reaction may have been if they were told a Republican Administration enlisted a former Republican President to encourage a candidate to drop a divisive Republican primary challenge by offering said candidate an unpaid position–and that this was the extent of the Republican Administration’s effort to persuade the candidate to drop his primary challenge. Would they believe that this explanation–finally offered after months of speculation, unanswered questions, and statements from the candidate himself that indicated that something of greater value may have been offered to him–finally puts the controversy to rest?
I certainly want to hear from Congressman Sestak as to what he was offered in order to drop a primary challenge, and who made the offer to him, though I won’t be surprised in the least if he decides that the best thing to do–after having unwisely raised the matter in the first place on his own by speaking about the White House’s efforts to get him to drop his primary challenge to Specter–is to fall in line with what the White House is saying. In any event, an independent investigation is clearly needed. After all, does anyone really think that the White House’s persuasion efforts resulted in a single conversation between Sestak and Bill Clinton about a single job offer?
Was the reason … hush money to the government of Kenya to stifle comments like these?
Or was it simply using our taxpayer money to help his “homeland”, as Michelle Obama said of Kenya …
“This is punishable by prison. This is a felony.” – Rep. Darrell Issa
Due to the recent equivocations from the Obama White House and the apparent unwillingness by the mainstream media to investigate this matter, the majority of Americans are unaware of the seriousness of the Obama administration’s alleged actions involving Joseph Sestak.
If proven, the reported actions of the Obama administration are clear violations of three federal laws. The impact and fallout from documented violations, as well as the refusal of the Holder Justice Department to appoint a Special Counsel to investigate this matter, have the potential to eclipse the Watergate scandal of the early 1970’s – it is that serious.More...
For journalists, hate mail comes with the territory. And it can come at any moment, with critics instantly shooting off emails when someone ticks them off on a blog or on the air.
Fox News host Greta Van Susteren has surely received audience complaints before — but a recent email exchange irked her enough to take issue with it on her own blog. And in a move that Fox executives probably would have tried to discourage had they been consulted, Van Susteren also urged her blog readers to weigh in on the central point raised by her correspondent: that she is, well, rather dimly lit.
It all started when Brian of Tahlequah, Okla., told Van Susteren she had a "mind like a seive" (yes, it should be "sieve"). Brian didn't stop there: He also wanted the host to know that her "brain is empty."
"Matter of fact, it is so empty, if you put a pea in your skull it would rattle around like a BB in a boxcar," he wrote.
In her blog post, Van Susteren responded with a few questions — and several question marks. "Why does Brian watch if he thinks I am so stupid?" she wrote. "How stupid is that????"
Perhaps expecting fans to rally around her, Van Susteren polled the audience as to who's dumber: Van Susteren or the guy watching a show he doesn't like. As of this writing, after more than 12,000 votes, the results aren't in the host's favor: 67 percent of respondents say Van Susteren is dumber.
Still, she can probably take comfort in the performance that a Fox colleague, Clayton Morris, turned in on Friday's "Fox and Friends" broadcast. Reading an unrevised cue card in faithful Ron Burgundy style, Morris twice referred to himself as co-host Steve Doocy, at the beginning and end of a segment he was announcing. Perhaps the next poll on Van Susteren's blog will invite readers to pit Morris' intellectual heft against her own.
Disclaimer: This came from a pay-per-vew site so I only posted an excerpt. (David Crockett note: I decided to follow the same policy as The American Grand Jury and for the same reasons) This story is a bombshell. Read what one viewer had to say:
I can’t believe the WMR report for today. You have to read it. It is a pay-for service so I don’t feel good about cutting and pasting the whole thing, I will give you a snippet from it. Almost every paragraph in this report is a bombshell. Now Madsen is a little bombastic and I don’t take everything he reports as anything other than “hmmm, could be interesting if true”, but if he is only half correct, the report is a major event.
These are just a few of the problems with this document. There are many other problems with this document that you can read at various web sites such as:
DONATE TO COLD CASE POSSE
The MCSO Cold Case Posse (CCP) is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are awarded no tax dollars and have no paid staff. We are supported by membership dues as well as donations from corporations and individuals in the county we serve.
If you would like to make a contribution to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse, please click on the "Donate" button directly below. Your donation is greatly appreciated. Remember, in most cases, your donation to CCP is deductible. Please consult with your tax professional regarding any tax related questions.
By clicking on the below "DONATE" Link, you will be leaving the MCSO Cold Case Posse website. Within a few seconds, your browser will be redirected to a secured Paypal site at which point you can safely and securely make your donation.
Thank you very much for your donation.
You may also mail your donation to us at:
MCSO Cold-Case Posse
P.O. Box 74374
Phoenix, Arizona 85087
Adjectives mean something. A “Citizen at Birth” is not logically identically equal to a “natural born Citizen at Birth”. Barack Obama may be a ‘Citizen of the United States’ but he is not a ‘natural born Citizen of the United States’ and does not meet the constitutional standards as to who can be the President and Commander in Chief of our military: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/03/obama-maybe-citizen-of-united-states.html
The natural born Citizen clause in our Constitution is a national security clause inserted into our Constitution by John Jay and George Washington. Read why the natural born Citizen clause is still important and worth protecting.
Five Citizenship Terms Mentioned in the U.S. Constitution: http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same
Of Trees and Plants and Basic Logic and Citizenship Types: http://www.scribd.com/doc/44814496/Of-Trees-and-Plants-and-Basic-Logic-Citizen-at-Birth-NOT-Identical-to-Natural-Born-Citizen
See evidence Obama forged the birth certificate posted on White House servers 27 Apr 2011: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3166684
See evidence Obama is using a SSN 042-68-4425 not legally issued to him: http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742
See evidence of Obama’s forged and back dated draft registration here: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions/
The Obama constitutional eligibility issue is not a fringe issue! South Carolina Poll Results – A poll done by Public Policy Polling (PPP) shows that almost 2/3 of GOP voters want Obama’s constitutional eligibility and true legal identity investigated. This is not a fringe issue: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=340805
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
All those who have been following the Obama eligibility issue well know that Article II, Section 1, clause 5 provides that “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. . .” At this blog, I have already explained the importance of the “natural born Citizen” clause. See my essay entitled, Why the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause of Our Constitution Is Important and Worth Preserving, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-natural-born-citizen-clause-is.html. In order for Obama to prove that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen,” he must conclusively demonstrate that he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and father. For legal support for this definition of what an Article II “natural born Citizen” is, see, among others, my articles at this blog entitled, The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth, located at
Article II “Natural Born Citizen” Means Unity of Citizenship At Birth, located at
and ‘The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law’ as U.S. Federal Common Law Not English Common Law Define What an Article II Natural Born Citizen Is, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html.
At present, there is much controversy regarding where Obama was born. We have seen much contradictory information regarding this issue. Obama maintains he was born in Hawaii at Kapi’olani Medical Center and as his best evidence he has posted on the internet a computer-imaged Certification of Live Birth (COLB, which is a summary of his alleged long-from hospital-generated birth certificate) to prove that fact. According to the laws of Hawaii, this summary document, which does not contain information as to which hospital he was born in or what doctor delivered him, is only prima facie evidence of a birth in Hawaii. On the other hand, there exists evidence that Obama was born in Kenya. For a presentation of this evidence, see my essay on this blog entitled,
Obama Has Not Met His Burden Of Proving He Was Born In Hawaii, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-has-not-met-his-burden-of-proving.html. Additionally, just over the last few days, we have seen surface on the internet old newspaper articles that were written in African newspapers in 2004 stating that Obama was born in Kenya. http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/video-documents-discovery-of-ap-story-declaring-obama-kenyan-born/; http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/2-more-african-news-agencies-declare-obama-kenyan-born/; http://thepmnews.com/2008/11/25/two-nigerians-tipped-as-potential-%E2%80%98british-obama%E2%80%99. Because of this conflicting information, the prima facie validity of the COLB must fail. Hence, Obama should present evidence that corroborates his and the State of Hawaii’s position that he was born in Hawaii and that he is a “natural born Citizen. He has without good reason refused to provide this evidence.
It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.
Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.
The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.
But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.
Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.
We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.
All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831
October 18, 2009