Roger Fallihee opensalon.com
If the 2012 campaign to send Barack Obama back to Chicago began the morning after the 2010 midterms, Tea Party superstar and Senator-elect Marco Rubio (D-FL) may be spending a lot of time next year shaking hands and kissing babies in Iowa and New Hampshire.
When asked if Rubio should seek higher office former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin said, "Not only Vice Presidential candidate, but, potentially a Presidential candidate some day."
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliana gushed, "Although this will undoubtedly sound premature to some, I believe that if Marco Rubio goes on to win the U.S. Senate seat in Florida in November, he should immediately think about running for president -- possibly in 2012."
But is the Florida-born Mr. Rubio constitutionally eligible to be elected and sworn in as either President or Vice President of the United States? [APPARENTLY NOT...IF HIS PARENT WERE CUBAN CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH...THEN NOT ELIGIBLE...SAME SITUATION FOR BOBBY JINDAL...SORRY.]
Not if you believe in one of the "prominent legal arguments" that's been put forth by the anti-Obama birther movement.
With only two exceptions, every American President, who was born after 1787, was born in the United States, to parents who were both U.S. citizens. The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama. When Chester Arthur ran for office, the public did not know about his eligibility problem. Only recently did historians learn that, when Arthur was born, his father was not a U.S. citizen.
The 2008 election was the first time in history that the United States knowingly elected a President who was born after 1787 and whose parents were not both U.S. citizens.
Barack Obama publicly admits that his father was not a U.S. citizen. [THANK YOU!] According to Minor v. Happersett, there is unresolved doubt as to whether the child of a non-citizen parent is a natural born citizen. This doubt is not based on the imaginings of some tin-foil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorists on the lunatic of society.
This doubt comes from what the Supreme Court has actually said, as well as a variety of other historical and legal sources which are presented and discussed here.
So how does this apply to Marco Rubio?
From the U.S. Department of State website: The Government of Cuba does not recognize the U.S. nationality of U.S. citizens who are Cuban-born or are the children of Cuban parents. These individuals will be treated solely as Cuban citizens and may be subject to a range of restrictions and obligations, including military service.
I don't care how great a politician is, he still needs to be a Natural Born Citizen to be President. The rules apply to everyone!!
ReplyDeleteHe would be considered natural born if his parents were naturalized at the time of his birth.If not,he may be an anchor baby
ReplyDelete