FOIA request sent by certified mail to Alvin Onaka, state registrar of HI
Posted on | May 5, 2011 | 12 Comments
29839 SANTA MARGARITA PKWY, STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
ph. 949-683-5411
May 4, 2011
Via certified mail
Dr. Alvin T. Onaka
State Registrar and Chief of the Office of Health Status Monitoring of the Hawaii Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street.
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
REQUEST OF ACCESS TO RECORDS UNDER HAWAII UNIFORM INFORMATION PRACTICES ACT OF 1975
Dear Mr. Onaka,
For the last three years there were multiple requests made for release of Mr. Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate.
In December of 2010 a highly Decorated U.S. military officer, bronze star recipient, Lt. Col Terry Lakin, was imprisoned, after he questioned, whether President Obama is legitimate for office in light of the fact, that he does not have a valid long form birth certificate. Lakin stated, that if he as an officer is required to show his birth certificate, so should the Commander-in-Chief. When LTC, Dr. Lakin stated that he would redeploy only after he could see a valid long form birth certificate of Obama, he was court -martialed, stripped of his military pension after 17 years of service and imprisoned. At the time, Mr. Obama ignored all requests from hundreds of citizens, refused to show his long form birth certificate and LTC Lakin was sent to rot in Fort Leavenworth prison.
Recently a multibillionaire, Donald Trump, raised this issue and quickly rose in polls as a leading presidential candidate for the 2012 election. At the same time 9th Circuit court of Appeals allowed my case Keyes, Barnett et al v Obama to be presented at oral argument, which usually a sign that the court sees merit in the appeal. In this case, I, as an attorney for plaintiffs, demanded release of Mr. Obama’s long form birth certificate, among a number of other documents. In an apparent preemptive strike, just two working days before the court hearing, Mr. Obama released, what he claimed to be a true and correct copy of his birth certificate. (Exhibit 1)
Analysis of what Mr. Obama released to the public, shows that it cannot possibly be a true and correct copy of the 1961 typewritten birth certificate, that Mr. Obama claims to have. While there some 70 areas in this computer image, indicative of the fact, that it is not a true and correct copy of the original birth certificate, most visible are following areas and easily demonstrated by comparing Mr. Obama’s computer image with a birth certificate given to one, Susan Nordyke, born only a few hours after Mr. Obama, in the same hospital (Exhibit 2).
1. Original birth certificate was issued on white paper. Nordyke birth certificate is indeed on white paper, which is turning yellow due to aging process. Obama’s birth certificate is on green safety paper, which was not used at the time.
2. Nordyke birth certificate has defined borders. Obama’s birth certificate does not have borders.
3. Nordyke birth certificate contains an easily identifiable seal; Obama’s birth certificate does not have a seal.
4. Nordyke birth certificate contains certification, that the above is a true and correct copy of the record, while Obama birth certificate states “…record or ABSTRACT of the record”. (emphasis added). Since abstract of record can be absolutely anything, including old wives tales, literary, there is a need to inspect the original birth certificate in the health department.
Release of records typically involves balancing of the rights of the individual whose records are revealed against the rights of the public.
As Mr. Obama revealed his purported birth certificate with great fanfare and called all doubters “carnival barkers,”- he clearly will have no valid privacy claims in opposition to a request to see his original birth certificate in the Health Department in Hawaii.
On the other hand, there is a significant public interest. LTC Lakin is sitting in prison, denied a right to know, -whether we have a legitimate president.
Many others around the country have similar doubts. These doubts were enhanced by the following facts:
a. Mr. Obama’s selective service certificate (Exhibit 3) shows him using a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425
b. Social Security Verification Systems (Exhibit 4) show that this number was never assigned to Mr. Obama.
If Mr. Obama had a valid long form birth certificate, issued to him in 1961 in the state of Hawaii, he did not need to resort to using an invalid Connecticut Social Security number.
American citizens are entitled to know, whether an individual occupying the position of the President of the United States and Commander in Chief is committing Social Security fraud and elections fraud.
As such the Public Interest greatly outweighs any privacy concerns Mr. Obama might have.
Wherefore
1. I respectfully request access to the original 1961 birth certificate of Mr. Obama for me and my forensic document experts.
2. I request a clarification, whether a computer image presented by Mr. Obama as a true and correct copy of his birth certificate, was actually signed by you
2. If you indeed signed this document, what was used as the original? As it does not resemble the original documents from 1961, did you use a notation in archives as an abstract and the basis for creating this “document”.
Respectfully submitted,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.