Sunday, July 3, 2011

CONGRESS KNEW OBAMA WAS INELIGIBLE…SIX YEARS BEFORE HE WAS ELECTED!

Congressional records reveal a viral premeditation within the liberal ranks of our government to alter fundamental Constitutional protections in order to covertly assist an ineligible Obama candidacy in his usurpation of America’s executive power.
by Penbrook Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
Some diseases are so viral, so invasive, so insidious, so contagious…that they eventually infect what most would believe is the most sanitary part of any body. Even the once honored sovereignty of America’s highest legislative body is now coming under the attack of the disease of multi-culturalism and liberal extremism.

Congressional records show that on eight separate occasions over six years, between 2003 and 2008, legislators attempted to eliminate or change the definition of the “Natural Born” eligibility clause of Article 2 of the Constitution in order to remove restrictions and, thereby, create legal justifications supporting Obama’s unlawful candidacy for President.


We now know what members of congress knew about Obama’s ineligibility, and when they knew it.


In a recently produced documentary, Carl Gallups, a senior pastor at Hickory Hammock Baptist Church for more than two decades with a ten year professional background in law enforcement, presents documented evidence showing that members of congress submitted repetitive, coordinated proposals to alter the 'natural-born' eligibility clause.


Gallups also serves on the board of regents at the University of Mobile and hosts several weekly radio programs in the northwest Florida region.


Gallups’ documentary shows that between June 11, 2003 until Feb. 28, 2008, there were eight attempts to circumvent the Natural-born eligibility clause of the U.S. Constitution.


1. On June 11, 2003, Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Arkansas, introduced House Joint Resolution 59 (HJR 59) which attempted to Constitutionally change the understood historical definition of a ‘natural-born’ eligibility for the U.S. Presidency in order to "permit persons who are not natural born citizens of the United States, but who have been citizens of the United States for at least 35 years, to be eligible to hold the offices of president and vice president.” The resolution did not make it to a senate vote at that time.

2. Then, on Sept. 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan, introduced HJR67, which would have defined presidential eligibility the same as Snyder's proposal, only the requirement to be a citizen in Conyers’ bill was actually lowered to 20 years, not the more stringent 35 years. Conyers’ bill was also rebuffed prior to an official vote. However, the introduction of two such proposals within a mere four month period reveals that Congressional leadership was conscious of the issue of Presidential eligibility prior to Obama’s candidacy. Whether these acts were put into motion at this time specifically for the benefit of Obama, exclusively, is unclear, but highly suspicious.

3. Then, in an attempt to contend with the obvious attack against the natural born citizenship clause, on Feb. 25, 2004, Sen. Don Nickles, R-Oklahoma, introduced Senate Bill 2128 which also failed to hit the eligibility requirement target. It defined a ‘natural-born citizen’ as someone who was born in and is subject to the United States.” This was not the understanding of the framers of the Constitution. Exhibiting the same ignorance as other legislators, Nickles failed to acknowledge that the intended purpose of the natural-born eligibility clause was to ensure that the sovereignty, identity and loyalty of a presidential candidate was measured by not only a geographic birth under the protection of the U.S. Constitution but also the possession of natural natal biology afforded by birth to TWO parents who are U.S. citizens at the time of conception AND the preservation of the continuity of that citizenship status until election.

Five months later, on July 27, 2004, Barack Obama delivered his keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention which essentially and suddenly made America aware of him at a national level.

4. Then, just two months later, on Sept. 15, 2004, House Representative Dana Rohrabacher, R-California, submitted HJR 104, which audaciously attempted "to make eligible for the office of president a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States but has been a United States citizen for at least 20 years." Rohrabacher’s fallow resolution attempted to completely ignore the Constitution’s requirement that a president had to be a natural born citizen. The resolution was rejected on its face.

5. Four months later, on Jan. 4, 2005, Conyers pushed yet another unwanted attempt to change the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ in HJR 02, which was the exact same as Rohrabacher's.

6. Just one month later, on Feb. 1, 2005, Rohrabacher submitted a revised version of her previous resolution in HJR 15 which would require only 20 years of citizenship to be eligible for the office of president.

7. Two months later, on April 14, 2005, Snyder resubmitted his bill under another proposal, HJR42, requiring 35 years of U.S. citizenship to be eligible. Interestingly, it has long since been established that Barack Obama’s return to the U.S. from Indonesia took place in approximately 1970-1971. At that time, if Obama had re-naturalized as a U.S. Citizen, this resolution would have made him just eligible in 2005.
Barack Obama announced his candidacy for the U.S. presidency on February 10, 2007.
The Iowa Caucus is held on January 3, 2008.


8. Finally, in Feb. 28, 2008, after seven failures to change the natural-born eligibility requirement, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., attempted to parasite SB 2678 with the Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act, an amendment clarifying what "natural-born citizen" includes. Obama and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were sponsors of this bill. 


READ MORE...

7 comments:

  1. What Foreign Power is paying the bribe money to get this done. It has to be the Foreign owned and controlled Federal Reserve. Make no bones about it. The FEDERAL RESERVE is our biggest danger. We now have a foreign controlled banking money that controls our economy and we now have a foreign controlled semi president and entire Congress and Supreme Court is controlled by the same foreign money.

    Early in American history we had the same problem with banks. We were a new nation and the banksters moved in immediately.

    Thomas Jefferson once said:

    "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)

    watch the video THE SECRET OF OZ to see the destruction of America by the banks. They are now doing it to Europe and the world at the same time. They took over Argentina. watch video on the Collapse of Argentina.

    Get educated. Learn the truth. The enemy is the Federal Reserve and look who is popping up. A former head of the Fed Reserve Herman Cain. Watch out America. Herman Cain will be much worse than Obama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Russians, the Chinese, the Iranians, the Saudis.

      Delete
  2. Rana Rohrabacher is a HE -- Republican Congressman from Huntington Beach, CA. He was once a libertrian type of guy ... surfer, etc., but apparently has been "gotten to" by the D.C. establishment. Obviously, his disdain for our Constitution is on a par with aka Obama's

    ReplyDelete
  3. What took so long for any one to take notice? This was brought up over a year ago with the fact that Hillary Clinton was the ring leader in shoe horning Obuma into office. Congress was well aware of this as far back as 2004. These liberals that are in office have been promoting the UN and the NWO, so they have pushed for gun control, depopulation, religious shackling in order to bring forth the furtherance of the socialistic/communist agenda that has been prophetically for told of 2000 years ago.
    Actually the very beginning of religious shackling started back in July of 1962 with the removal of prayer in the schools. Back in 1978, I read a book entitled : The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which outlined the steps to be taken in order to bring about a 1 world order and everything that has been transpiring to date has followed that blue print to a T. We have no one to blame but ourselves because we allowed ourselves to become complacent to what is going on around us. Americans have put so much value in material possessions, we have left our inalienable rights fall off by the wayside for years under the guise of being good for the well being of the community.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The push to change the law was to clarify JOHN MCCAIN'S candidacy. You guys are REALLY LOONEY,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Eat Poop and Die, Please.

      Delete
  5. Personally I don't think Barack Obama was Barry Dunhams legal father...need to dig him up and do DNA testing to prove to me they are even related. If Aliases are used in conducting the business of the US Government then charges should be filed as a act of treason and hanged!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.