Saturday, June 30, 2012
AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA...IS NOT AN AMERICAN...IN FACT HE IS UN-AMERICAN...HE IS ANTI-AMERICAN...HE IS OBVIOUSLY NOT A CHRISTIAN...HE IS AN UNABASHED RACIST...HE IS ANTI-CHRISTIAN...HE IS ANTI-LIFE...HE IS AN INDISPUTABLE FRAUD WHOSE MISSION AND INTENT IS TO DESTROY AMERICA AND SHRED THE COSNTITUTION...WAKE-UP AMERICA!
What do we know and not know about Barrack Hussein Obama,aka Barry Soetoro?
We DO NOT know precisely where he was born,although that really doesn’t matter. We DO know that he is ineligible to be President of the United States under Article II,Section 1 of our Constitution. A “natural-born” citizen is not defined per se in the Constitution,but this term was defined by the US Supreme Court in the case of Minor v,Happersett, decided in 1874. BOTH parents MUST be citizens (either native-born or naturalized) at the time of birth for the offspring to be considered ‘natural-born.’ Since BHO’s papa was a British subject (with Kenya then being a British colony) at the time of junior’s birth,Barry was (and is) not a ‘natural-born’ citizen. And just so you don’t think I’m being biased or racist or partisan,he is not alone here — Senator Marco Rubio and Governor Bobby Jindal join him in being ineligible to be President due to the status of their parents at the time of their births.
We DO know that documents that purportedly prove his citizenship — his Selective Service Registration and his Birth Certificate — are not genuine articles,and although he never established residency in the state,BHO holds a Connecticut Social Security Number (starting with 043) that was never(?) issued. He doesn’t have a SSN with Hawaii’s first 3 numbers (575-576),even though his first job,which would have required him to have a SSN,was at a Baskin-Robbins store dishing ice cream in Hawaii when he was still in High School. SSN 042-68-4425,the one being used by Obama,has been flagged by E-verify as invalid (never issued).
We DO NOT know if he was adopted by his stepfather,although we DO know he attended school in Indonesia as an Indonesian (and a Muslim) under his alias above. If he was,then his shaky US citizenship would have to have been renounced as Indonesia didn’t let non-citizens attend school (and didn’t recognize dual citizenship.)
We DO NOT know his traveling accommodations after his birth. His mother traveled to Seattle to attend UW shortly after his birth. Immigration records are mysteriously missing for the week of his birth,and passport and his visa records have been sealed. Why?
We DO NOT know if his mother actually married,or,if so,actually divorced Barrack Obama,Sr. as these records are not available. Why?
We DO NOT know under what passport(s) (or even the country/countries that issued them) he traveled in the 1980’s. It could not have been a US passport if he traveled to Pakistan as he claims because Pakistan was one of several countries that we would not grant visas for back then.
We DO NOT know under what circumstances he registered at Occidental College,Columbia University,or Harvard University. Did he register as a foreign student and take advantage of scholarships intended only for foreign-born students? We also DO NOT know of anyone who remembers him from Occidental College or Columbia University. And we also DO NOT know about his courses of study at these vaunted places of higher learning,who paid his tuition,what grades he got,what his thesis was about,or how he got any scholarships,if any. What articles did he write as editor of the Harvard Law Review? We DO NOT know!
We DO know that Obama is NOT much of an athlete,although he would have us believe he is just the opposite. He bowls “like someone from Special Olympics” (his words.) He has no idea of the mechanics of throwing a baseball;watch the comparison side-by-side video of him and George W. for proof of that. He reportedly is not very good at his self-professed favorite sport,basketball. He also is supposedly good at golf. He has played nearly as many rounds (100 as of June 21,2012) since becoming president as Tiger Woods has in the same time frame. But like his college records,his golf scores are kept out of the media,and the courses he plays are cleared of other golfers while he’s there (ostensibly for security reasons.)
We DO know that the Obamas like to go on lavish,extravagant vacations — and charge the American people for them. They probably would not be doing all this if they couldn’t let us pick up the tab. But 18 vacations in just 3 and 1/2 years is a bit much. His immediate predecessor,George W. Bush,went to the family ranch in Crawford,TX for most of his vacations and worked both to maintain the property and at his JOB while there.
We DO know that Obama is the king of fundraisers,having recently held his 160th fundraiser this election cycle. That’s more than the last 4 presidents COMBINED. But it seems that his allure is wearing off;Romney is kicking his butt in raising campaign money. The SCOTUS decision on Obamacare has helped Romney’s efforts immensely.
Fundraising,vacations,and golf — all done at the taxpayer’s expense. Sweet gig,if you can get it.
We DO know that BHO suffers from a severe case of narcissism. We have as evidence the Greek columns;the God-like reverb when he speaks;the arrogant ‘look-down-your-nose and bask in the radiance of your own glory’poses while the masses faint before you;the constant use of ‘I’,‘me’,and ‘my’;the insertion of references to himself in the official White House biographies of past presidents;I could go on and on.
We DO know he cannot accept the blame for any of his failures and will come up with someone or something other than himself to pass the buck and blame. This is another one of the narcissistic traits he possesses. Someone else is at fault — Bush,the tsunami,Bush,headwinds from Europe,Bush,the hurricane,Bush,the Republicans in Congress,etc.
We DO know that BHO sat in the pew of a racist Black Liberation theologian for 20 years and did not question the rabid anti-American rantings of his pastor. This hate-spewer married Barry and Michelle and baptized his two girls. He also has a track record of hate-filled sermons against the US and Jews that would normally ensure you wouldn’t get elected to anything higher than City Councilman,at best,if news of your association with him were understood beyond the parish.
We DO know that admitted radicals,socialists,and terrorists are his mentors and friends — Rashid Khalidi,Frank Marshal Davis,Louis Farrakhan,Bill Ayers,and Bernardine Dohrn to mention a few. Has any serious candidate or President been associated with even one person who is trying to destroy our government?
We DO know that his political career began at the home of that unrepentant domestic terrorist couple,William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were founding members of the Weather Underground,a more violent offshoot of the radical SDS (Students for a Democratic Society). The “weathermen”bombed the Pentagon,the US Capitol,and several other buildings including a NYPD precinct in which several policemen were killed.
We DO know that BHO joined the “New Party” on January 11,1996 in Chicago. The New Party is a socialist party dedicated to eradicating capitalism. He joined it prior to his first election into the Illinois state government. He attended a meeting,spoke and asked for their endorsement,signed a Candidate Contract,and JOINED the party.
We DO know that he has surrounded himself with self-identified Communists and Socialists who idolize Mao or Hugo Chavez,the socialist dictator of Venezuela. They are more comfortable citing Cuba’s Castro or Stalin than our founding fathers when they speak about government.
We DO know that he has kept only ONE significant promise since his election — by shoving Obamacare down the throats of a country that does not want it. This abhorrent law is so convoluted and massive that it is still being discovered just how deeply this nightmare will enslave and destroy the people. The SCOTUS,unfortunately,decided it is constitutional.
We DO know that he follows the plans of Saul Alinsky and the ideas of Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven,which are antithetical to a constitutional republic. Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”,dedicated to the first radical Lucifer,is how Obama has run his political strategies,and it has also influenced his Secretary of State,Hillary Rodham Clinton,who did her college thesis on Alinsky. The Cloward-Piven plan is to overload the government system with entitlements and have as many as possible enrolled in these entitlement programs to make the system collapse under its own weight.
We DO know that his energy policy is anti-business. He wants to bankrupt businesses that deal with coal,regulate to death the oil industry by making it all but impossible to drill for the vast resources we are discovering,and ensure that “energy rates will necessarily skyrocket” under his cap-and-trade plan.
We DO know that he is in favor of gay marriage and abortion on demand,even in the event of the abortion being botched and the child surviving the procedure. This is another step down the path of immorality that will lead to the end of our way of life. John Adams said “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
We DO know that his policies,both foreign and domestic,are based on fantasy,not reality. Investing in “green jobs” while trying to turn our tried-and-true energy sources into pariahs has flushed billions of taxpayer dollars down the rabbit hole,never to be seen again and causing the prices of conventional energy to “necessarily skyrocket.” His constant apology tours,bowing to other leaders,blaming the US for the world’s ills,and abandoning traditional allies and newer allies (since the end of the Cold War) in favor of our traditional enemies and newer enemies (since 9-11),has turned the world upside down.
The further we peel the layers off the onion that is Barack Obama,the more we discover what should have been divulged prior to his election in 2008. The failure by the mainstream media to properly and objectively vet our President implicates them in the biggest crime against the people in our country’s history.
We DO know that if allowed to continue as president for another term,this country will likely not be able to recover from the depths we will be dragged into. Think Great Depression times 10. Portugal,Ireland,Greece,and Spain are showing us that the course we are on is fatal. The last exit to salvation for this nation is November. If we don’t take it,we are doomed!
So what does ObamaCare accomplish? It ruined health care for the middle class and preserved and enshrined the advantages of health care for the rich, while eliminating and degrading care for the poor, increasing unemployment, and depressing economic development. What a deal.
Still a BFD, Obama Loses
By William L. Gensert
The Supreme Court
decision on the American Care Act is a loss for Barack Obama, despite
how the president and his minions in the mainstream media will attempt
to portray it. They will insist on selling this as a win for Obama.
Always classy, Obama himself has already tweeted, "Still a BFD."
When the Supreme Court declared the mandate a tax, it was in reality calling Barack Obama a liar -- not only for emphatically claiming that the mandate was not a tax when trying to convince citizens to back the legislation, but also for promising that his administration would never raise taxes on the middle class. Remember, he said that "no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
Instead, ObamaCare is the largest tax increase in the history of the nation...and it is a regressive tax. After all, the 1% of Americans he rails against religiously already have health insurance. Guess what: much of the burden of the cost of this legislation will be borne by families making less than $250,000. But don't worry: Obama cares -- perhaps only for himself and his name in the history books, but he cares.
Always classy, Obama himself has already tweeted, "Still a BFD."
When the Supreme Court declared the mandate a tax, it was in reality calling Barack Obama a liar -- not only for emphatically claiming that the mandate was not a tax when trying to convince citizens to back the legislation, but also for promising that his administration would never raise taxes on the middle class. Remember, he said that "no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase."
Instead, ObamaCare is the largest tax increase in the history of the nation...and it is a regressive tax. After all, the 1% of Americans he rails against religiously already have health insurance. Guess what: much of the burden of the cost of this legislation will be borne by families making less than $250,000. But don't worry: Obama cares -- perhaps only for himself and his name in the history books, but he cares.
KLAYMAN: “I want Lewis to address the issue of eligibility and create a record, so we can take it up before the election. I’m still confident, hopeful that will happen.”
WND EXCLUSIVE
Unexpected turn in eligibility case: 'Put it on record!'
'This judge can't get out; if he screws around, he's violating law'
by Drew ZahnEmail | Archive
Drew Zahn is a former pastor who cut his editing teeth as a member of the award-winning staff of Leadership, Christianity Today's professional journal for church leaders. He is the editor of seven books, including Movie-Based Illustrations for Preaching & Teaching, which sparked his ongoing love affair with film and his weekly WND column, "Popcorn and a (world)view."
The attorney in a publicized challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility
to be president told WND the Florida case took an unexpected turn in
court yesterday, one he says “pulled the rug out” from Obama’s lawyers
and should force a quick answer from the judge.Attorney Larry Klayman told WND he had expected an “uneventful” hearing in the ongoing case, which returned before Judge Terry Lewis yesterday, but instead found a legal tangle that he believes means Lewis will “have to make a decision, have to put it on record.”
READ MORE...
A MESSAGE FROM CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired...
Call to Action: Turn Independence Day’s Red, White and Blue to Black in Defiance of Obamacare and All Other Unconstitutional Acts By Obama
Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 30 June, 2012
By CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired
Director of Obamaballotchallenge.com
President ConstitutionActionFund.org
In light of the tyrannical, anti-freedom Obamcare Supreme Court ruling, this Independence Day make a strong statement of mourning and defiance to your friends, families, neighbors, government officials, etc.
After the strong feeling of darkness and loathing overcame me after reading about the anti-constitutional decision, I began to think of ways to protest not only this decision but the unethical Elena Kagan’s ruling on this decision when she was intimately involved with Obamacare planning. Kagan had a responsibility to recuse herself and Chief Justice Roberts had a duty to require her to do so. Furthermore, Kagan and Sotomayor were appointed by the unconstitutional usurper pResident aka Barack Obama so Obamacare should also be void for these additional reasons.
Because of this strong blackness taking over our country, we should write letters to SCOTUS and Congress and mail them in black envelopes and write “Treason” or a letter “T” in red.
Please consider doing this this Independence Day and asking everyone to join!!
A facebook friend Anita and her sister came up with some great ideas that I added to.
1. – Wear All Black for mourning.
2. – Wear a black armband.
3. – Fly your American flags upside down at your house and walking in a parade – even the ones on your car, motorcycle. This is a sign of severe distress!
If you are going to be in a parade, make floats symbolizing the tyranny of Obamacare, or carry signs with messages conveying how Obamacare strips us of freedom, equates us with subjects and not citizens endowed with unalienable rights from our Creator.
AKA Obama was born British. OBAMA IS NOT A U.S. NATURAL Born Citizen. Obama should never have been allowed in the White House. Obama’s disdain for Americans has been more than obvious. He does not have sole allegiance to this country as it was intended by our founders.
You can also give a donation to ConstitutionActionFund.org, which is raising money to prove aka Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be President. If we can expose that Obama is a criminal fraud that usurped the Office of the President, Obamacare is subject to becoming null and void because it was signed by a constitutionally unlawful President.
Note: Larry Klayman, Esq. will be attempting to run Citizen Grand Juries to indict Elena Kagan and Chief Justice Roberts for not requiring her to recuse herself.
Director of Obamaballotchallenge.com
President ConstitutionActionFund.org
In light of the tyrannical, anti-freedom Obamcare Supreme Court ruling, this Independence Day make a strong statement of mourning and defiance to your friends, families, neighbors, government officials, etc.
After the strong feeling of darkness and loathing overcame me after reading about the anti-constitutional decision, I began to think of ways to protest not only this decision but the unethical Elena Kagan’s ruling on this decision when she was intimately involved with Obamacare planning. Kagan had a responsibility to recuse herself and Chief Justice Roberts had a duty to require her to do so. Furthermore, Kagan and Sotomayor were appointed by the unconstitutional usurper pResident aka Barack Obama so Obamacare should also be void for these additional reasons.
Because of this strong blackness taking over our country, we should write letters to SCOTUS and Congress and mail them in black envelopes and write “Treason” or a letter “T” in red.
Please consider doing this this Independence Day and asking everyone to join!!
A facebook friend Anita and her sister came up with some great ideas that I added to.
1. – Wear All Black for mourning.
2. – Wear a black armband.
3. – Fly your American flags upside down at your house and walking in a parade – even the ones on your car, motorcycle. This is a sign of severe distress!
If you are going to be in a parade, make floats symbolizing the tyranny of Obamacare, or carry signs with messages conveying how Obamacare strips us of freedom, equates us with subjects and not citizens endowed with unalienable rights from our Creator.
AKA Obama was born British. OBAMA IS NOT A U.S. NATURAL Born Citizen. Obama should never have been allowed in the White House. Obama’s disdain for Americans has been more than obvious. He does not have sole allegiance to this country as it was intended by our founders.
You can also give a donation to ConstitutionActionFund.org, which is raising money to prove aka Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be President. If we can expose that Obama is a criminal fraud that usurped the Office of the President, Obamacare is subject to becoming null and void because it was signed by a constitutionally unlawful President.
Note: Larry Klayman, Esq. will be attempting to run Citizen Grand Juries to indict Elena Kagan and Chief Justice Roberts for not requiring her to recuse herself.
A MUST READ MESSAGE FROM LARRY KLAYMAN...Robert’s majority opinion and complicity with Justice Kagan, not to mention President Barack Hussein Obama himself, removes any vestige of doubt as to the state of the nation. We no longer have a republic, and We the People, just as our Founding Fathers were forced to do in 1776, must now take matters into our own legal hands!
TYRANNY IN HIGH PLACES
This July 4 a new revolution begins!
by Larry Klayman |
Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is "Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment."
Exclusive: Larry Klayman flays Justice Roberts for failing to protect We the People
The incestuous legal and political establishment has struck again. Appointed by Republican “royal blue blood” President George W. Bush in yet another stupid and incompetent act, Chief Justice John Roberts has just cast the final straw toward and thus triggered a new American Revolution. Ironically, like King George III in the years leading up to the Declaration of Independence in 1776, Roberts has ” ruled” against and deep-sixed the rights and freedoms of the people and rubber stamped the legislation that came to be known as Obamacare. Roberts, casting his lot with the other leftist justices who sit on the Supreme Court, in his majority opinion upheld the constitutionality of Obamacare Thursday. To try to justify its “constitutionality,” Roberts recast the illegal health-care mandate – where Americans are forced to buy health insurance or be financially penalized with a stiff fine – as the equivalent of a new tax. King George III would have been proud!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Obama and his enablers, like Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena
Kagan, must be held to account to We the People before our nation is
totally lost to us. To set an example and mete out justice, we will also
seek the indictment of Chief Justice Roberts and Kagan for violation of
their oaths of office."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I have said since his appointment by “W.” that Roberts was not a true conservative but instead a D.C. establishment figure. Indeed, while at his former law and lobbying firm, the Washington D.C. mega-enterprise named Hogan and Hartson, Roberts was active in supporting so-called homosexual rights. Given Obama’s recent endorsement of “gay marriage,” one can only wonder whether Roberts may have been influenced by the president’s political “gaydom.”
READ MORE...
BHO's LFBC SAYS HE'S BORN IN HUWAII...
NBC Reporter -- The Only One Allowed to Touch Obama's So-Called "Real" Birth Certificate -- PROVES IT'S A FRAUD!!...Also Note the Background Color is Different than the WH-Issued PDF Version
BHO's LFBC SAYS HE'S BORN IN HUWAII
Report of Investigation Fast & Furious: The Path to the White House
Doug Hagmann & Judi McLeod Full Story
See Full Report (PDF)
Doug Hagmann & Judi McLeod Full Story
See Full Report (PDF)
WHILE YOU'RE AT IT...THERE'S ANOTHER CRIMINAL IN THE WHITE HOUSE THAT NEEDS TO BE PICKED UP AND CARTED OFF TO JAIL...
House could arrest Holder with inherent contempt power
Despite voting to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt of Congress, there’s little House Republicans can do in the short term to compel him to turn over documents — unless it wanted to revisit a long-dormant power and arrest him.The thought is shocking, and conjures up a Hollywood-ready standoff scene between House police and the FBI agents who protect the attorney general. It’s a dramatic and unlikely possibility not least because Congress doesn’t even have a jail any longer. But in theory it could happen.
Republicans say it’s not even under consideration, with House Speaker John A. Boehner’s spokesman flatly ruling it out.
READ MORE...
Friday, June 29, 2012
The Supreme Court ruling and any ruling can be challenged within 30 days of the release of its decision. There are 26 states and their Attorneys General that were party to the Obamacare lawsuit, that can do this.
THE DECLARATION
OF
OBAMACARE AS TAXATIONDoes this provide another avenue to defeat it?
June 29, 2012 TPATH - First and foremost, TPATH and our contributors and researchers are not going to jump on the bandwagon of several so called Conservative Pundits and suggest that Justice Roberts is a hero and his ruling, activist as it was, had any long term or well planned tactical advantages for this country.
As far as TPATH is concerned there are just three possible reasons why he ruled as he did. Without going too deeply into them now, they are health, threats or disguised liberalism.
Mr. Nicholas Purpura, a TPATH contributor, along with others, have suggested that this ruling, and the way in which it was worded, that the mandate portion is a TAX, has given a green light and another avenue to put a halt to the entire bill, as being unconstitutional.
This new front is based upon Article I of the Constitution that says only the House of Representatives may propose bills that raise revenue.
For those of us who have followed this mess from the beginning, we remember that the original bill, HR3500, was authored by many of our more liberal Congressmen including the utlra progressive Frank Pallone.
However, that bill was scrapped and the one which was signed into law by the Usurper was presented and "reconciled" in the Senate. It went to Charlie ( I pay no taxes on rental income) Wrangle in the House of Representatives.
This would appear to run contrary to the Constitution in that this bill, now declared as a tax bill by the Supreme Court, originated in the Senate.
The Supreme Court ruling and any ruling can be challenged within 30 days of the release of its decision. There are 26 states and their Attorneys General that were party to the Obamacare lawsuit, that can do this.
OF
OBAMACARE AS TAXATIONDoes this provide another avenue to defeat it?
June 29, 2012 TPATH - First and foremost, TPATH and our contributors and researchers are not going to jump on the bandwagon of several so called Conservative Pundits and suggest that Justice Roberts is a hero and his ruling, activist as it was, had any long term or well planned tactical advantages for this country.
As far as TPATH is concerned there are just three possible reasons why he ruled as he did. Without going too deeply into them now, they are health, threats or disguised liberalism.
Mr. Nicholas Purpura, a TPATH contributor, along with others, have suggested that this ruling, and the way in which it was worded, that the mandate portion is a TAX, has given a green light and another avenue to put a halt to the entire bill, as being unconstitutional.
This new front is based upon Article I of the Constitution that says only the House of Representatives may propose bills that raise revenue.
For those of us who have followed this mess from the beginning, we remember that the original bill, HR3500, was authored by many of our more liberal Congressmen including the utlra progressive Frank Pallone.
However, that bill was scrapped and the one which was signed into law by the Usurper was presented and "reconciled" in the Senate. It went to Charlie ( I pay no taxes on rental income) Wrangle in the House of Representatives.
This would appear to run contrary to the Constitution in that this bill, now declared as a tax bill by the Supreme Court, originated in the Senate.
The Supreme Court ruling and any ruling can be challenged within 30 days of the release of its decision. There are 26 states and their Attorneys General that were party to the Obamacare lawsuit, that can do this.
I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank Chief Justice John Roberts for assisting the Obama regime in placing another nail in America’s coffin. Not only did he agree with the liberal communists;he gave them an out by stating that the individual mandate was a TAX rather than something that could be controlled through the commerce clause. The Obama regime had stated from the onset of this Constitution-killing legislation that the mandate was not a tax.
All this was ompounded by the fact that Justice Elana Kagen was Obama’s solicitor general (and while working in that capacity was working on a defense for the Constitutionality of Obamacare.) Ultimately,Kagen refused to recuse herself from the proceedings,and Roberts never pressed the issue.
Then we have Justice Roberts’refusal to hear anything regarding Obama’s eligability to be President,as characterized by a comment made by Justice Thomas stating that they were avoiding that issue.
Chief Justice Roberts and the majority of the Supreme Court have sold out the American people and have ultimately set fire to the US Constitution. They are nothing more than the latest group of spineless cowards to cave in to the Obama regime. Thank you again,Chief Justice Roberts;you helped America die just a little bit more today. My fellow Americans,please stay safe and always be aware of your surroundings. It’s gonna get dicey from here.
| OBAMACARE: REMEMBER HOW WE GOT HERE -- FULL HISTORY | |
| Supreme Court's Obamacare Decision Hands Gov't Unlimited Power to Force You to Spend 100% of Your Paycheck on Things You Don't Want | |
| Biggest Tax Increase in World History | |
| Standby for Unionized Doctors | |
| Standby to be Euthanized ...UK Kills 130,000 per Year |
Barack Obama has been a citizen of Kenya “by birth,” a dual citizen of the United States and Kenya. Under current policy of the U.S. government, even though he serves as President of the United States, he is obliged to obey the laws of both countries. It is precisely the reason why the Founding Fathers insisted that only “natural born” citizens should ever serve as president or vice president. Having been born with dual US-British citizenship, Barack Obama does not qualify as “natural born.”
Obama for President…of Kenya?
Paul R. Hollrah
Barack Hussein Obama will be fifty-one years, five months, and sixteen days old when he completes his four-year Frank Abagnale impersonation on January 20, 2013. That will be the day when he walks out of the White House for the last time, having played the role of President of the United States for four years, and having brought the greatest, freest, most prosperous nation on Earth to the very brink of disaster.
So what will we do with such a man...a man who promised a bedazzled electorate in 2008 that his goal was to totally transform the United States of America, a constitutional republic, into a European-style socialist state? Will he be arrested for his crimes and sentenced to spend the rest of his days behind bars? Or will the members of his party insulate him, insisting that his sham presidency was just their way of having a little fun with us...“water under the bridge”?
I suggest that Barack Obama may have his long term future already planned...assuming that he will be allowed to leave the country in 2013, a free man. As a man whose boundless narcissism has led him to “sweet-talk” his way into the presidency of the United States...the least qualified man ever to have his finger on the nuclear button...would it be too much of a stretch to imagine him returning to his beloved Kenya, the land of his fathers, to serve as president of that country?
READ MORE...
Paul R. Hollrah
Barack Hussein Obama will be fifty-one years, five months, and sixteen days old when he completes his four-year Frank Abagnale impersonation on January 20, 2013. That will be the day when he walks out of the White House for the last time, having played the role of President of the United States for four years, and having brought the greatest, freest, most prosperous nation on Earth to the very brink of disaster.
So what will we do with such a man...a man who promised a bedazzled electorate in 2008 that his goal was to totally transform the United States of America, a constitutional republic, into a European-style socialist state? Will he be arrested for his crimes and sentenced to spend the rest of his days behind bars? Or will the members of his party insulate him, insisting that his sham presidency was just their way of having a little fun with us...“water under the bridge”?
I suggest that Barack Obama may have his long term future already planned...assuming that he will be allowed to leave the country in 2013, a free man. As a man whose boundless narcissism has led him to “sweet-talk” his way into the presidency of the United States...the least qualified man ever to have his finger on the nuclear button...would it be too much of a stretch to imagine him returning to his beloved Kenya, the land of his fathers, to serve as president of that country?
READ MORE...
TODAY...Obamacare Protest OBAMACARE UPHELD BY ROBERTS COURT
Will YOU Save Freedom in 2012? Catch the Tea Party Wave!
Please forward to fellow patriots!
Friday Obamacare Protest
OBAMACARE UPHELD BY ROBERTS COURT
If we ever
needed proof that we have a statist government at all levels- Executive,
Legislative and Judicial- We got it. Obamacare was upheld, on the
pretext that it is a "tax." If there was ever a time to put down the TV
remote, ditch work, find a babysitter for the kids-- it's right now. In
fact, BRING the kids, "significant other" and still others to this
historic protest
Near VC Government Center- Telephone and Victoria 5:00-7:00 PM
Bring signs, flags (upside down) outrage, friends, relatives
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SCOTUS Exposes the ObamaCare Tax Lie
This interpretation shows the Court remonstrating Democrats, saying, "You passed a tax, by God -- now you call it a tax." More
Justice Roberts Pleads: 'Lie to Me'
Our Harvard-educated chief justice just made it the law of the land that as long as a president and House speaker and Senate leader lie long enough and in a bald-faced enough way, whatever they pass is just fine and dandy if we can eventually admit that it's a tax. More
America Fades, the World Gets Darker
Don't let this light flicker its last. There is, at present, no other. More
Holder's Contempt: Who Owns the Government?
President Obama has raised the stakes. This not just a political dust-up; not merely a healthy test of strength between two co-equal branches of government. The rule of law is being challenged More
History in the Making: The Decline of America
How do the GOP and Mitt Romney reach an electorate who does not see the potentially irreversible damage to the nation of another four years of Obama? More
This interpretation shows the Court remonstrating Democrats, saying, "You passed a tax, by God -- now you call it a tax." More
Justice Roberts Pleads: 'Lie to Me'
Our Harvard-educated chief justice just made it the law of the land that as long as a president and House speaker and Senate leader lie long enough and in a bald-faced enough way, whatever they pass is just fine and dandy if we can eventually admit that it's a tax. More
America Fades, the World Gets Darker
Don't let this light flicker its last. There is, at present, no other. More
Holder's Contempt: Who Owns the Government?
President Obama has raised the stakes. This not just a political dust-up; not merely a healthy test of strength between two co-equal branches of government. The rule of law is being challenged More
History in the Making: The Decline of America
How do the GOP and Mitt Romney reach an electorate who does not see the potentially irreversible damage to the nation of another four years of Obama? More
Thursday, June 28, 2012
Savannah Guthrie Further Proves She's Complicit: Hawaii Spelled Huwaii on Obama's Birth Certificate
NBC's Savannah Guthrie Busted Again: Hawaii Spelled Huwaii on Obama's Birth Certificate
Savannah Guthrie Further Proves She's Complicit: Hawaii Spelled Huwaii on Obama's Birth Certificate
A picture is worth a thousand words. Or in this case the usurpation of the highest office in the...
LAWLESS AG AND OBAMA PUPPET, ERIC HOLDER, HELD IN CONTEMPT BY CONGRESS...
HOLDER OBVIOUSLY TAKING THE FALL FOR THE PUPPET MASTER, I.E., THE INDONESIAN, KENYAN BORN USURPER
MUST READ...
Deja Vu: A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner about the U.S. Supreme Court Decision
It’s Deja Vu All Over Again — A Statement from CDR Charles Kerchner
(Ret) about the United States Supreme Court DecisionCommander Charles
Kerchner (Ret)
With “CINO” (Conservative in Name Only) Chief...
ALWAYS, ALWAYS LYING...
In the ABC archives.......
STEPHANOPOULOS: You were against the individual mandate…
OBAMA: Yes.
STEPHANOPOULOS: …during the campaign. Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don’t. How is that not a tax?
OBAMA: Well, hold on a second, George. Here — here’s what’s happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average — our families — in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I’ve said is that if you can’t afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn’t be punished for that. That’s just piling on. If, on the other hand, we’re giving tax credits, we’ve set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we’ve driven down the costs, we’ve done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you’ve just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that’s…
STEPHANOPOULOS: That may be, but it’s still a tax increase.
OBAMA: No. That’s not true, George. The — for us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it’s saying is, is that we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I’m not covering all the costs.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But it may be fair, it may be good public policy…
OBAMA: No, but — but, George, you — you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase. Any…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Here’s the…
OBAMA: What — what — if I — if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5 or 8 or 10 percent next year and you say well, that’s not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don’t want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I — I don’t think I’m making it up. Merriam Webster’s Dictionary: Tax — “a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.”
OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no, but…
OBAMA: …what you’re saying is…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I’m taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we’re going to have an individual mandate or not, but…
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you reject that it’s a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.
Stephanopoulos: "You Reject That It’s A Tax Increase?" Obama: "I Absolutely Reject That Notion"
Thu Jun 28 11:36
From ABC
STEPHANOPOULOS: You were against the individual mandate…
OBAMA: Yes.
STEPHANOPOULOS: …during the campaign. Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don’t. How is that not a tax?
OBAMA: Well, hold on a second, George. Here — here’s what’s happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average — our families — in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I’ve said is that if you can’t afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn’t be punished for that. That’s just piling on. If, on the other hand, we’re giving tax credits, we’ve set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we’ve driven down the costs, we’ve done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you’ve just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that’s…
STEPHANOPOULOS: That may be, but it’s still a tax increase.
OBAMA: No. That’s not true, George. The — for us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it’s saying is, is that we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America, just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase. People say to themselves, that is a fair way to make sure that if you hit my car, that I’m not covering all the costs.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But it may be fair, it may be good public policy…
OBAMA: No, but — but, George, you — you can’t just make up that language and decide that that’s called a tax increase. Any…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Here’s the…
OBAMA: What — what — if I — if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5 or 8 or 10 percent next year and you say well, that’s not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don’t want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I — I don’t think I’m making it up. Merriam Webster’s Dictionary: Tax — “a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes.”
OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam’s Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you’re stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what…
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, no, but…
OBAMA: …what you’re saying is…
STEPHANOPOULOS: I wanted to check for myself. But your critics say it is a tax increase.
OBAMA: My critics say everything is a tax increase. My critics say that I’m taking over every sector of the economy. You know that. Look, we can have a legitimate debate about whether or not we’re going to have an individual mandate or not, but…
STEPHANOPOULOS: But you reject that it’s a tax increase?
OBAMA: I absolutely reject that notion.
And so there’s your foundation for the decision: the individual mandate is constitutional based on Congress’s power to tax: Congress can “tax” those who don’t buy government approved health insurance. Don’t ask what kind of a “tax” that is! It’s not an income tax. Nor is it a duty, impost, or excise tax, the only kinds of taxes recognized under the Tax Clause of the Constitution, where Roberts purports to rest Congress’s power; and it certainly isn’t “uniform throughout the United States,” as is required for those taxes. It’s sui generis, which is a polite way of saying it’s unconstitutional – if we take the Constitution seriously.
It Now Falls to Congress
ObamaCare was a mistake from the start, a massive effort by the
federal government to take over and control one-sixth of the economy –
indeed, the part that concerns the most complex and intimate details of
life, our health. It’s the most ambitious example to date of the
political hubris progressives have displayed for over a century now, the
belief that government can solve all of our problems.
Today, the Supreme Court had an opportunity to put a brake on that
hubris. Four justices, led by Justice Kennedy, would have done so. But
Chief Justice Roberts joined the four justices who are Exhibit A of the
modern hubris, writing for the Court to uphold almost all of this
monstrous intrusion on our liberty and on the very theory of the
Constitution. And he did so on the flimsiest of rationales for deciding a
constitutional question – precedent. If precedent carried the weight
Roberts gave it today, we’d still be riding in segregated trains and
sending our children to segregated schools .
AMERICANS ARE BEING PREPARED FOR TYRANNY...MUST READ!...
Brandon Smith / Alt-Market.com
Totalitarian governments, like persistent forms of cancer, have latched onto the long history of man, falling and then reemerging from the deep recesses of our cultural biology to wreak havoc upon one unlucky generation to the next. The assumption by most is that these unfortunate empires are the product of bureaucracies gone awry; overtaken by the chaotic maddening hunger for wealth and power, and usually manipulated by the singular ambitions of a mesmerizing dictator. For those of us in the Liberty Movement who are actually educated on the less acknowledged details of history, oligarchy and globalized centralism is much less random than this, and a far more deliberate and devious process thanUnfortunately, the final truth is very complex, even for us…
One cannot place the blame of despotism entirely on the shoulders of globalists. Sadly, the crimes of elites are only possible with a certain amount of complicity from subsections of the populace. Without our penchant for apathy and fear, there can be no control. That is to say, there is no power over us but that which we give away. We pave the road to our own catastrophes.
READ MORE...
Ventura County Friday Obamacare Protest
Will YOU Save Freedom in 2012? Catch the Tea Party Wave!
Please forward to fellow patriots!
Friday Obamacare Protest
OBAMACARE UPHELD BY ROBERTS COURT
If we ever
needed proof that we have a statist government at all levels- Executive,
Legislative and Judicial- We got it. Obamacare was upheld, on the
pretext that it is a "tax." If there was ever a time to put down the TV
remote, ditch work, find a babysitter for the kids-- it's right now. In
fact, BRING the kids, "significant other" and still others to this
historic protest
Near VC Government Center- Telephone and Victoria 5:00-7:00 PM
Bring signs, flags (upside down) outrage, friends, relatives
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cantor: House will vote on repeal week of July 9
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) said Thursday that the Republican-led House will vote on repealing the health care law soon after the July 4 recess.
Cantor, who sets the floor schedule in the House, said in a statement
that the House will vote on the repeal the week of July 9 – which
Cantor said will clear the path for “patient-centered reforms that lower
costs and increase choice.”
OBAMA LIES...FREEDOM DIES...
Obama always maintained that the mandate was not a tax. Chief Justice Roberts says it is! What a joke.
Our country is in even worse shape now.
Government controlled healthcare is the cornerstone of all dictatorships. Obamacare is not about improving healthcare or making healthcare more affordable. It's all about controlling people's lives AND having access to their finances!
This a blatant attempt to destroy our Constitution!
WHY WAS THIS WOMAN ALLOWED TO VOTE?
OBAMA'S INCOMPETENT AND UNQUALIFIED APPOINTEE HAD A VESTED INTEREST AND A BIG "FAN" OF OBAMACARE...WHY DID SHE NOT RECUSE HERSELF?
AMERICA IS OFFICIALLY A DICTATORSHIP...
AMERICA SLAPDOWN!
CONSTITUTIONAL!
SUPREME
COURT DEFIES
THE LAW
AND
RULES
AGAINST THE PEOPLE AND THE CONSTITUTION!
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN ROBERTS IS A FRAUD!
OBAMACARE IS
THE CORNERSTONE OF A DICTATORSHIP!
WELCOME TO A
FULL-BLOWN TYRANNY!
AMERICA YOU HAVE BEEN HAD.
Attorney Asks Judge to Have Obama Vetted: Florida Ballot Challenge Decision Expected Soon
Attorney asks judge to have Obama vettedDecision expected soon in constitutional fight over ballot eligibilityWorld Net Daily
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Just make sure Barack Obama meets the requirements of...
Powered by Hate: Racist Content from Dreams from My Father
It is important to circulate the truth about Barack Obama and his magnum opus as widely as possible. More
It is important to circulate the truth about Barack Obama and his magnum opus as widely as possible. More
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
WE KNOW OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...IS HE EVEN AN AMERICAN CITIZEN?...
Today, it's not so much whether
or not Obama
is an Article II natural-born citizen of the United States
since America watched Obama's people try to photo-shop his Aug.
4, 1961 birth certificate from that of a stillborn baby whose Registrar's
birth certificate number was 151-61-10641—from a microfiche sequential
numbering system that tells the State of Hawaii that Obama was
theoretically the 10,641st baby born in Hawaii in 1961.
Born on Aug. 5, 1961—a day after Obama—was Susan Nordyke (the 10,637th baby) and her twin sister Gretchen (the 10,638th baby born in Hawaii that year). How does an error like that happen? It doesn't. And, it can't. Hawaiian birth certificates are sequentially filed on microfiche one after another, in order of birth—live or stillborn. Susan Nordyle, born on August 5, 1961 was the 10,637th baby born in Hawaii in 1961. Her sister, Gretchen Nordyke, was the 10,638th. Obama, purportedly born on August 4 has a birth certificate that claims he was the 10,641st baby born in Hawaii—a day before the Nordyke twins were born. It was this birth certificate (that the White House released on April 27, 2011) that Maricopia County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's forensic scientists spent six months testing and ruled that it was a computer-generated forgery. This and the fact that public now knows from California attorney Dr. Orly Taitiz's investigation and subsequent lawsuit over Obama's reportedly using not only the Social Security card issued to French immigrant Jean Paul Ludwig between 1977 and 1979 but 26 other Social Security numbers over the years, the number of Americans questioning why a natural born US citizen would need to photoshop a birth certificate and use someone else's social security card should realize that question leads to an even more natural question than: "is Barack Obama a natural born citizen?"
The more natural question? "Is Barack Obama an American citizen at all?" The growing body of evidence suggests that issue is the best to debate rather than questioning whether or not Obama is an Article II "natural born" American citizen. Pennsylvania lawyer Philip J. Berg figured that out in 2008 when he sued for Obama to produce not only his Certificate of Citizenship but also his Oath of Allegiance.
- John Christian Ryter
Born on Aug. 5, 1961—a day after Obama—was Susan Nordyke (the 10,637th baby) and her twin sister Gretchen (the 10,638th baby born in Hawaii that year). How does an error like that happen? It doesn't. And, it can't. Hawaiian birth certificates are sequentially filed on microfiche one after another, in order of birth—live or stillborn. Susan Nordyle, born on August 5, 1961 was the 10,637th baby born in Hawaii in 1961. Her sister, Gretchen Nordyke, was the 10,638th. Obama, purportedly born on August 4 has a birth certificate that claims he was the 10,641st baby born in Hawaii—a day before the Nordyke twins were born. It was this birth certificate (that the White House released on April 27, 2011) that Maricopia County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's forensic scientists spent six months testing and ruled that it was a computer-generated forgery. This and the fact that public now knows from California attorney Dr. Orly Taitiz's investigation and subsequent lawsuit over Obama's reportedly using not only the Social Security card issued to French immigrant Jean Paul Ludwig between 1977 and 1979 but 26 other Social Security numbers over the years, the number of Americans questioning why a natural born US citizen would need to photoshop a birth certificate and use someone else's social security card should realize that question leads to an even more natural question than: "is Barack Obama a natural born citizen?"
The more natural question? "Is Barack Obama an American citizen at all?" The growing body of evidence suggests that issue is the best to debate rather than questioning whether or not Obama is an Article II "natural born" American citizen. Pennsylvania lawyer Philip J. Berg figured that out in 2008 when he sued for Obama to produce not only his Certificate of Citizenship but also his Oath of Allegiance.
- John Christian Ryter
At this point, it would hardly be surprising if Oprah felt embarrassed, having endorsed Obama's presidency and praised his memoir. Ever since she did so, her career has been in a steep decline. With enough encouragement from the media, perhaps she'll even try to arrange another interview to confront Obama on these charges. That is, if she could even stand to talk to him at this point.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
LETTER TO MITT ROMNEY...
June 26, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACTS: Helen Tansey, 804.840.1449
Romney for President, Inc.
585 Commercial Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02108
RE: Vice Presidential Qualifications
Dear Mr. Romney:
Between now and the start of the August 27th Republic National Convention you and your team will be deliberating who your Vice Presidential running mate will be. Obviously, this will be an important and momentous decision for you, your running-mate, and for our country. Your selection however will receive an incredible amount of scrutiny from a growing legion of constitutionalists who believe that adherence to the Constitution, i.e., the supreme law of the land is paramount above all else. Your choice for a running mate MUST comply with requirements mandated by Article 2, Section 1 and the 12th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Nothing less will be acceptable.
You are no doubt fully aware that two of the favored choices for vice-president, bandied about by the left-leaning media and heartily endorsed by the republican political establishment, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, are in fact constitutionally ineligible to be vice-president and/or president. Simply stated they are not “natural born Citizens” as required by law. Given the controversy of your father’s presidential candidacy in the sixties as it pertained to his citizenship status, and of course the ever-growing controversy surrounding the identity of the current resident in the White House, we are confident that you are intimately knowledgeable of this issue. If not, we invite you to review the historical facts by going to http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Neither Governor Bobby Jindal, nor U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s nativity conform to the American citizenship requirement of “natural born Citizen” outlined under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Americans, a majority of which are independent conservative voters, know the definitive definition of “natural born Citizen” as being born to citizen parents on American soil. It matters not one iota what the political class pontificates on high as it relates to this most basic of citizenship definitions, a category of citizenry that has been defined for millennia.
Recently, Brett Baier of Fox News dipped his toe into this raging debate and proffered a nonsensical “natural born Citizen” definition of which Article II Super PAC invited Herb Titus, Esq., a constitutional attorney who has over thirty-years of writing, advocating and lecturing on constitutional law responded –
“Bret Baer commits a common error. He assumes that "natural born citizen" means the same thing as "citizen by birth." They are not the same. A citizen by birth is one who by constitutional or statutory provision is made or recognized as a citizen based upon where or to whom he was born. Under Mr. Baer's view, a natural born citizen, then, is a citizen of a particular nation only by positive law. If a natural born citizen is defined by statute, as Mr. Baer claims he is, then by statute Congress can take away his natural born citizenship status, subject only to the 14th Amendment's definition of citizenship by birth. And even that citizenship can be taken away by an amendment to the constitution. Indeed, according to Mr. Baer, no one could have been eligible to be elected president UNLESS Congress passed a statute designating one's citizenship by birth, or until the 14th amendment definition of citizenship by birth was ratified.”
“A natural born citizen, by contrast, is not dependent upon Congress passing a statute or the constitution being amended. A natural born citizen is a citizen of a specific nation by the law of nature of citizenship. The law of nature of national citizenship is written into the very nature of the universe of nation-states, and is universal as to place, uniform as to person, and fixed as to time. By definition the law governing natural born citizenship exists independent of any human power, legislative or otherwise. That is why "natural born citizenship" is not defined in the Constitution. Such citizenship exists whether recognized by positive law or not. Such citizenship is God-given. To qualify one must be born to a father and a mother each of whom is a citizen of a particular state in order for the person to be "natural born" citizen of that state.”(emphasis added)
Here are the facts. Governor Bobby Jindal’s parents did not apply for any form of American citizenship until after Jindal was born on June 10, 1971, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Amar Jindal, the Governor’s father, did not secure American citizenship until December 4, 1986, and his mother, Raj Jindal, did not acquire her American citizenship until September 21, 1976. Thus, Governor Bobby Jindal does not and never could meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement outlined under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
As well, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s citizenship also lacks the necessary pillars of “natural born Citizen”. Neither of the Senator’s parents applied for citizenship status until November 1975; a full four years after the Senator was born on May 28, 1971, in Miami, Florida. Therefore, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio does not and never will meet the three remarkably simple qualifications outlined under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
American citizens have endured a four-year constitutional battle with the media establishment and the political class of this nation over the meaning of “natural born Citizen” due to Barack Hussein Obama and his “dual-citizenship” status. As you know, Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., never claimed citizenship in America, but rather held citizenship as a British born subject under the 1948 British Nationality Act. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born a citizen of the United States, clearly rendering Mr. Obama a “dual citizen” not a “natural born Citizen” at birth. Nowhere in any law or Supreme Court precedent has anyone ever made the argument that “dual citizenship” equates with “natural born citizenship”. Yet for some peculiar reason, the political class seems to believe the American electorate can be fooled by their rather amateurish obfuscation on the precise definition of “natural born Citizen” by attempting to rewrite thousands of years of settled law.
Therefore, Article II Super PAC respectfully requests you honor the U.S. Constitution and remain within the confines of Article II, Section 1 when making your final selection for a Vice Presidential running mate.
We trust you understand a constitutionally “clean” ticket will not only garner you votes, but will earn the respect of the electorate.
Respectfully,
Article II Super PAC Team
Cc: Mr. Matt Rhoades, Campaign Manager
Ms. Beth Myers, Senior Advisor
Today is a sad day for America. Why? It's sad that an organization, such as Article II Super PAC, has to even write a letter to a presidential nominee detailing why vice presidential hopefuls, Jindal and Rubio's, American citizenship status doesn't come anywhere close to meeting the extremely simple definition of 'natural born Citizen'. That's why! Everyone knows this. It's not a secret, yet neither one of these two American 'citizens' have demonstrated a modicum of honor towards the law that governs this land nor the People by publicly announcing their constitutional ineligibility. Instead these two wannabes remain silent and have instead chosen to go along to get along and to hell with the very document that gave them and their parents the very freedom they were seeking to even live here. What ungrateful louses these two men are!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACTS: Helen Tansey, 804.840.1449
Romney for President, Inc.
585 Commercial Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02108
RE: Vice Presidential Qualifications
Dear Mr. Romney:
Between now and the start of the August 27th Republic National Convention you and your team will be deliberating who your Vice Presidential running mate will be. Obviously, this will be an important and momentous decision for you, your running-mate, and for our country. Your selection however will receive an incredible amount of scrutiny from a growing legion of constitutionalists who believe that adherence to the Constitution, i.e., the supreme law of the land is paramount above all else. Your choice for a running mate MUST comply with requirements mandated by Article 2, Section 1 and the 12th amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Nothing less will be acceptable.
You are no doubt fully aware that two of the favored choices for vice-president, bandied about by the left-leaning media and heartily endorsed by the republican political establishment, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, are in fact constitutionally ineligible to be vice-president and/or president. Simply stated they are not “natural born Citizens” as required by law. Given the controversy of your father’s presidential candidacy in the sixties as it pertained to his citizenship status, and of course the ever-growing controversy surrounding the identity of the current resident in the White House, we are confident that you are intimately knowledgeable of this issue. If not, we invite you to review the historical facts by going to http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
Neither Governor Bobby Jindal, nor U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s nativity conform to the American citizenship requirement of “natural born Citizen” outlined under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution. Americans, a majority of which are independent conservative voters, know the definitive definition of “natural born Citizen” as being born to citizen parents on American soil. It matters not one iota what the political class pontificates on high as it relates to this most basic of citizenship definitions, a category of citizenry that has been defined for millennia.
Recently, Brett Baier of Fox News dipped his toe into this raging debate and proffered a nonsensical “natural born Citizen” definition of which Article II Super PAC invited Herb Titus, Esq., a constitutional attorney who has over thirty-years of writing, advocating and lecturing on constitutional law responded –
“Bret Baer commits a common error. He assumes that "natural born citizen" means the same thing as "citizen by birth." They are not the same. A citizen by birth is one who by constitutional or statutory provision is made or recognized as a citizen based upon where or to whom he was born. Under Mr. Baer's view, a natural born citizen, then, is a citizen of a particular nation only by positive law. If a natural born citizen is defined by statute, as Mr. Baer claims he is, then by statute Congress can take away his natural born citizenship status, subject only to the 14th Amendment's definition of citizenship by birth. And even that citizenship can be taken away by an amendment to the constitution. Indeed, according to Mr. Baer, no one could have been eligible to be elected president UNLESS Congress passed a statute designating one's citizenship by birth, or until the 14th amendment definition of citizenship by birth was ratified.”
“A natural born citizen, by contrast, is not dependent upon Congress passing a statute or the constitution being amended. A natural born citizen is a citizen of a specific nation by the law of nature of citizenship. The law of nature of national citizenship is written into the very nature of the universe of nation-states, and is universal as to place, uniform as to person, and fixed as to time. By definition the law governing natural born citizenship exists independent of any human power, legislative or otherwise. That is why "natural born citizenship" is not defined in the Constitution. Such citizenship exists whether recognized by positive law or not. Such citizenship is God-given. To qualify one must be born to a father and a mother each of whom is a citizen of a particular state in order for the person to be "natural born" citizen of that state.”(emphasis added)
Here are the facts. Governor Bobby Jindal’s parents did not apply for any form of American citizenship until after Jindal was born on June 10, 1971, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Amar Jindal, the Governor’s father, did not secure American citizenship until December 4, 1986, and his mother, Raj Jindal, did not acquire her American citizenship until September 21, 1976. Thus, Governor Bobby Jindal does not and never could meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement outlined under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
As well, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s citizenship also lacks the necessary pillars of “natural born Citizen”. Neither of the Senator’s parents applied for citizenship status until November 1975; a full four years after the Senator was born on May 28, 1971, in Miami, Florida. Therefore, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio does not and never will meet the three remarkably simple qualifications outlined under Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
American citizens have endured a four-year constitutional battle with the media establishment and the political class of this nation over the meaning of “natural born Citizen” due to Barack Hussein Obama and his “dual-citizenship” status. As you know, Obama’s father, Barack Obama, Sr., never claimed citizenship in America, but rather held citizenship as a British born subject under the 1948 British Nationality Act. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was born a citizen of the United States, clearly rendering Mr. Obama a “dual citizen” not a “natural born Citizen” at birth. Nowhere in any law or Supreme Court precedent has anyone ever made the argument that “dual citizenship” equates with “natural born citizenship”. Yet for some peculiar reason, the political class seems to believe the American electorate can be fooled by their rather amateurish obfuscation on the precise definition of “natural born Citizen” by attempting to rewrite thousands of years of settled law.
Therefore, Article II Super PAC respectfully requests you honor the U.S. Constitution and remain within the confines of Article II, Section 1 when making your final selection for a Vice Presidential running mate.
We trust you understand a constitutionally “clean” ticket will not only garner you votes, but will earn the respect of the electorate.
Respectfully,
Article II Super PAC Team
Cc: Mr. Matt Rhoades, Campaign Manager
Ms. Beth Myers, Senior Advisor
Today is a sad day for America. Why? It's sad that an organization, such as Article II Super PAC, has to even write a letter to a presidential nominee detailing why vice presidential hopefuls, Jindal and Rubio's, American citizenship status doesn't come anywhere close to meeting the extremely simple definition of 'natural born Citizen'. That's why! Everyone knows this. It's not a secret, yet neither one of these two American 'citizens' have demonstrated a modicum of honor towards the law that governs this land nor the People by publicly announcing their constitutional ineligibility. Instead these two wannabes remain silent and have instead chosen to go along to get along and to hell with the very document that gave them and their parents the very freedom they were seeking to even live here. What ungrateful louses these two men are!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
